CC: folder-hook with same From:
When I'm answering to a mail sent to a work mailing list I want to change my From to the mailing list address and also CC to the mailing list address so that replier doesn't have to honor reply-to and he will never reply to me directly but always to the list. And also other people at work reading the list will see my reply. Now I already excluded reply-to, because not everyone honors it, also Bcc doesn't seem good alternative since people at work seem to have difficulties with their procmail rules to filter them to correct folders (something I cannot change). Problem is, mutt doesn't allow writing Cc to same address as From, maybe a sanity check, I don't know. I think this used to work long time ago in mutt (~2 years). Anyone know if it would be still possible by some evil kludge. This is what I'm looking for: folder-hook list 'my_hdr From: My Name list@address folder-hook list 'my_hdr Cc: List list@address Thanks, -- ++ytti
Re: Quoting the signature in replies (yes, I want)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:32:29AM -0400,
Rob Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 48 lines which said:
But you're breaking it for the 90% or whatever of messages that have proper
formatting.
Right but it is easier than education people :-{
You can also try explaining to your correspondents why they shouldn't use
^-- \n except at the start of a signature.
And that they should not use Outlook either :-) Thanks to the
technical tips.
Re: how to view -hook list -- show-hook-list
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: to write these to a file so he can monitor them. a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat? Sven of-course not but an added functionality. -- Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vi-style keybindings for mutt
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: Oh, I have a feeling it's more difficult than I want it to be, but I would like the change (I hit esc just about every time I go to edit a string in mutt). welcome to the club! ;-) Ooh, can I join too? Not for mutt, but when I have to use some Windows mailers, I am hitting ESC all over the place in the editors. Sometimes with less than expected results. :( -Ken, vim as an editor, emacs on the command line
Re: CC: folder-hook with same From:
Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: Problem is, mutt doesn't allow writing Cc to same address as From, maybe a sanity check, I don't know. Hm, I can't reproduce that here. Mutt 1.4i This is what I'm looking for: folder-hook list 'my_hdr From: My Name list@address folder-hook list 'my_hdr Cc: List list@address This works here, too. Sure you don't have send-hooks which set From: in any way? HTH, Michael -- I did this 'cause Linux gives me a woody. It doesn't generate revenue. (Dave '-ddt-` Taylor, announcing DOOM for Linux) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: CC: folder-hook with same From:
Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: This is what I'm looking for: folder-hook list 'my_hdr From: My Name list@address folder-hook list 'my_hdr Cc: List list@address ^ ^ Btw. the missing ' is a copy/paste error I presume. Michael -- We come to bury DOS, not to praise it. (Paul Vojta, [EMAIL PROTECTED], paraphrasing a quote of Shakespeare) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: hook-list menu
* On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: to write these to a file so he can monitor them. a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat? * Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 12:34]: of-course not but an added functionality. the distinction between bloat and feature are usually subjective to one's preferences. i doubt that many users will use such a menu. besides - what shall this menu offer? of course, this adds another menu with default bindings and commands. i suppose there you would use it to list the rules, show sublists by pattern, add and remove entries, and rearrange the order of them, and then maybe write out the current list to some file. how much will such a menu add in size? now, if it can be dis/enabled at compile time and if it adds less than, say, 20K, - fine! then again, should there be a menu foer each kind of hook? what about mixed hook commands? Vikram - can you answer these questions for me? Sven
Re: hook-list menu
On 020816, at 18:23:02, Sven Guckes wrote * On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: to write these to a file so he can monitor them. a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat? * Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 12:34]: of-course not but an added functionality. the distinction between bloat and feature are usually subjective to one's preferences. i doubt that many users will use such a menu. besides - what shall this menu offer? About three years ago, Byrial Jensen had a patch provided hook menus. It listed hooks, and allowed one to tag and delete hooks (if I recall correctly). -- David Ellement
how to view -hook list was not: hook-list menu but: how to view -hook list -- show-hook-list
Hi Sven, * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16. Aug. 2002]: * Vikram Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 12:34]: Vikram - can you answer these questions for me? I can -- i was the original poster. of-course not but an added functionality. [...] i suppose there you would use it to list the rules, show sublists by pattern, add and remove entries, and rearrange the order of them, and then maybe write out the current list to some file. [...] then again, should there be a menu foer each kind of hook? what about mixed hook commands? You are the one who mentioned menus with editing functionality. I would be perfectly satisfied if i could see a dump of hooks, so i can debug my configuration. That's all. I don't even think such a menu would be very useful: Hooks are for automated mail handling, so there is notwendig much sense in setting, moving, editing them ... exept ... if you could save the hook-lists and load them on startup. Ciao, Gregor -- The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. -- William Gibson
spamassassin
I recently installed Spamassassin and have been successfully using it with Mutt and Procmail. So far it's doing a great job of catching spam, but the ocassional one does get through. When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d. But everytime I do this, I get the following message at the bottom of Mutt: mailcap entry for type audio/x-wav not found followed by Press Any Key to Return (which I would expect). Any idea why I might be getting the mailcap entry message? Improperly config'd mailcap? Maybe, but why would it be looking for audio/x-wav files? Thanks in advance for any tips. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30313/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: spam filter
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-07-29 19:08 -0400: Alas! Andre Berger spake thus: By the way, what would an exmaple procmail rule to add a sender to the spamassassin blacklist look like? Probably something along the lines of this (but I'm a little rusty; the flags are probably wrong): :0 Wh: * some spam heuristic, like all caps subject lines |grep ^From: |some sed to extract info from the header killfile :0 a: spamfolder This didn't work as expected, :0 c: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes | grep ^From: | grep @ | grep -v lists.debian | grep -v uzscd5 | grep -v |berger.150 | grep -v andre.berger | grep -v -e ^$ | sed -e 's/ *(.*)//; s/.*//; |s/.*[:] *//' $HOME/.procmail/blacklist :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes spamblock does, at least for me... -Andre msg30314/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: spam filter
* Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-07-29 19:08 -0400: Alas! Andre Berger spake thus: By the way, what would an exmaple procmail rule to add a sender to the spamassassin blacklist look like? Read `perldoc Mail::SpamAssasUser:Conf`. There are blacklist entries you can put in your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file that do this much more elegantly and easily. An excerpt: blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Used to specify addresses which send mail that is often tagged (incorrectly) as non-spam, but which the user doesn't want. Same format as whitelist_from. Note that is per-user, which I think is what you want. hth, mike Probably something along the lines of this (but I'm a little rusty; the flags are probably wrong): :0 Wh: * some spam heuristic, like all caps subject lines |grep ^From: |some sed to extract info from the header killfile :0 a: spamfolder This didn't work as expected, :0 c: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes | grep ^From: | grep @ | grep -v lists.debian | grep -v uzscd5 | grep -v berger.150 | grep -v andre.berger | grep -v -e ^$ | sed -e 's/ *(.*)//; s/.*//; s/.*[:] *//' $HOME/.procmail/blacklist :0: * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes spamblock does, at least for me... msg30315/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: spamassassin - mailcap - audio/x-wav
* Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-16 19:02]: I recently installed Spamassassin and have been successfully using it with Mutt and Procmail. So far it's doing a great job of catching spam, but the ocassional one does get through. When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in the index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d. -dRemove SpamAssassin reports from a mail message and print why do you do this? what is the intention? do you want to *change* the message? or simply view it without the report? i suppose S is a macro? how is it defined, exactly? But everytime I do this, I get the following message at the bottom of Mutt: mailcap entry for type audio/x-wav not found followed by Press Any Key to Return (which I would expect). Any idea why I might be getting the mailcap entry message? Improperly config'd mailcap? Maybe, but why would it be looking for audio/x-wav files? come on - why should we try to guess your setup? post your macro and your mailcap entries! Sven
