Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?
0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or nullmailer or something similar) instead of have mutt do it? That way you *can* background email sending. Is msmtp completely independent of a local MTA ? i.e. I would no longer need to use my local sendmail for smart-relay anymore ? -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
Re: HOW to set the UMASK?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:26:55AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Saturday, May 10 at 01:13 AM, quoth Michelle Konzack: Hello, My system is setup to use a UMASK=002 on my Maildir (procmail do the right thing) but if I read the messages with mut, they are after reading 0600 and can not more read fro another account. How can this solved? Well, mutt attempts to preserve the umask of any mailbox that it reads. The only reason I can think of that it would get that wrong is if the stat() call on the mailbox failed. Try running mutt in debug mode and see if you get a line that says stat failed on x (where x is the name of the mailbox you're reading). I have a related problem, when I create files from mutt they are 600, I would lke them to be 644. My umask is 022. Is there anything I can do to have my new files 644? best regards keld
Re: sendmail_wait for smtp ?
* Wilkinson, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-18-2008]: 0n Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: Yes and no. Mutt is not multithreaded, so you can't have it handle the SMTP connection in the background, so, NO. But if you really want it backgrounded, why not use a simple SMTP sender (like msmtp or nullmailer or something similar) instead of have mutt do it? That way you *can* background email sending. Is msmtp completely independent of a local MTA ? i.e. I would no longer need to use my local sendmail for smart-relay anymore ? Correct. -- Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HOW to set the UMASK?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday, May 17 at 10:42 PM, quoth Keld Jørn Simonsen: I have a related problem, when I create files from mutt they are 600, I would lke them to be 644. My umask is 022. Is there anything I can do to have my new files 644? Modify main.c. Mutt *ALWAYS* calls umask(077) before doing anything, so you'd need to either remove that call from the main.c or you'd need to modify it to suit your needs. ~Kyle - -- Mathematicians stand on each other's shoulders while computer scientists stand on each other's toes. -- R. W. Hamming -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkgwY6IACgkQBkIOoMqOI16Q1gCg7rETSCaOWsm/Hd8SND7zsCbN ERAAoOssQDL/ffqRJG1A8gn6e/lH0ydv =yvBh -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: HOW to set the UMASK?
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Saturday, May 17 at 10:42 PM, quoth Keld Jørn Simonsen: I have a related problem, when I create files from mutt they are 600, I would lke them to be 644. My umask is 022. Is there anything I can do to have my new files 644? Modify main.c. Mutt *ALWAYS* calls umask(077) before doing anything, so you'd need to either remove that call from the main.c or you'd need to modify it to suit your needs. I see. Would it be possible to add some command to .muttrc to override this? eg a umask command? That would be easier for me and others needing this functionality than recompiling the sources every time mutt is used on a new system. Or maybe a set no_mutt_umask=yes to just keep the umask of the environment. Best regards keld
[FEATURE REQUEST] ~/.muttrc, ~/.mutt/muttrc and other directories
Hello, Since I am developer and my mailinglist/bts subscriptions explode I like to separate the stuff. Unfortunately I have already over 200 config files in my ~/.mutt/ directory. I know I can use mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_std mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_bts mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_ml but this keep all the config files in the same directory which is by default ~/.mutt/. Now I have tried to use mutt -F ~/.mutt_bts/ but this does not work. So I like to see the feature, that if mutt is called with a DIRECTORY as parameter for -F then the default ~/.mutt/ is not more used. This would simplify things, because currently if I use mutt -F ~/.mutt_bts/muttrc I have to specify ALL files I source with the FULL PATH which mess up things since some files are only copies from other configs and I have to edit this files all the time I want to change something... Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ # Debian GNU/Linux Consultant # Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/935194750, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) signature.pgp Description: Digital signature
Re: HOW to set the UMASK?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, May 18 at 07:34 PM, quoth Keld Jørn Simonsen: On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Saturday, May 17 at 10:42 PM, quoth Keld Jørn Simonsen: I have a related problem, when I create files from mutt they are 600, I would lke them to be 644. My umask is 022. Is there anything I can do to have my new files 644? Modify main.c. Mutt *ALWAYS* calls umask(077) before doing anything, so you'd need to either remove that call from the main.c or you'd need to modify it to suit your needs. I see. Would it be possible to add some command to .muttrc to override this? eg a umask command? That would be easier for me and others needing this functionality than recompiling the sources every time mutt is used on a new system. Or maybe a set no_mutt_umask=yes to just keep the umask of the environment. Well, unfortunately, there is currently no such setting in standard mutt. The Debian folks have put together a patch to provide that functionality, and you can apply that to your mutt. Here's the relevant Debian bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426317 Here's a similar patch: http://bereshit.synflood.at/svn/mutt-patches/trunk/patches/ak.umask.diff If it's important to you, you should probably submit a bug at http://bugs.mutt.org ~Kyle - -- It is a tragic mix-up when the United States spends $500,000 for every enemy soldier killed, and only $53 annually on the victims of poverty. -- Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkgweYQACgkQBkIOoMqOI17xGQCfQ/CiSYGlSDoli826xYetdbuP Sj8AoNlavFqYsxi7l2pIYdAN2CqUfBOy =Umld -END PGP SIGNATURE-
how to display a status-message from macros?
dear users I use macros to switch between different mail-account (sending). Now, I change with macros F2, F3, etc... the 'set from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]enter' this works great, but, I want to show the adress. If in .muttrc is this push show-version then it display at the start the version-string. Is it also possible to show something like my address from macros? Now, I use this, but the sleep isn't very nice... macro index F2 enter-commandset from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'enter!echo use [EMAIL PROTECTED];sleep 1enter is there a way to display a status-message? Thanks for all your ideas. Greetings, Raphael
Is file_charset replace by attach_charset?
I am reading http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Charset now. I noticed that there is an option file_charset exists in to deal with attached text file charst problem. But when I try it in my mutt-1.5.16, I couldn't find that option. After doing some digging on the relevant web site, e.g. http://wiki.mutt.org/?PatchList, I guessed that the option file_charset maybe be replaced by attach_charset. Am I right? -- Shaochun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to display a status-message from macros?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, May 18 at 08:42 PM, quoth Raphael Brunner: Now, I use this, but the sleep isn't very nice... macro index F2 enter-commandset from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'enter!echo use [EMAIL PROTECTED];sleep 1enter is there a way to display a status-message? How about just changing the status bar? set status_format=[EMAIL PROTECTED]: %f. ~Kyle - -- Freedom is the right to be wrong, not the right to do wrong. -- John G. Riefenbaker -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkgw/W0ACgkQBkIOoMqOI14R+ACffkf9y6TEvISEXJto9gxSInUt ToYAoOoq8qijspb/7EKwY8IZcLexnkth =VAFF -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Is file_charset replace by attach_charset?
* Shaochun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05-19-2008]: I am reading http://wiki.mutt.org/?MuttFaq/Charset now. I noticed that there is an option file_charset exists in to deal with attached text file charst problem. But when I try it in my mutt-1.5.16, I couldn't find that option. After doing some digging on the relevant web site, e.g. http://wiki.mutt.org/?PatchList, I guessed that the option file_charset maybe be replaced by attach_charset. Am I right? I believe so. Search for 'charset' in: http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.txt -- Sahil Tandon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is file_charset replace by attach_charset?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, May 19 at 11:37 AM, quoth Shaochun Wang: After doing some digging on the relevant web site, e.g. http://wiki.mutt.org/?PatchList, I guessed that the option file_charset maybe be replaced by attach_charset. Am I right? Yup. file_charset was never actually official mutt; it was from a common patch. ~Kyle - -- If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you. -- Don Marquis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Comment: Thank you for using encryption! iEYEARECAAYFAkgw/jcACgkQBkIOoMqOI15Q1QCg/G5okN289SVUclS4fV7UnIu9 rVQAoLN+r+VRCYsWFuR8oTjmdWbNzPTd =VOJc -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: how to display a status-message from macros?
On 18 May 2008 23:09 -0500, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kyle Wheeler): macro index F2 enter-commandset from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'enter!echo use [EMAIL PROTECTED];sleep 1enter is there a way to display a status-message? set status_format=[EMAIL PROTECTED]: %f. That, or putting a enter-commandset ?fromenter right at the end of the macro? -- Michael Kjörling .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. http://michael.kjorling.se * . No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings . * * ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x 758F8749 BDE9ADA6 * * ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments * signature.asc Description: Digital signature
