Re: Any way to color a line _following_ the line with 'pattern'?
On 2010-05-27, Mun wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use 'color body' to highlight a line which matches > 'pattern' AND also highlight the successive line. However, I couldn't > find any way to extend 'pattern' across multiple lines. > > Is such a thing possible in mutt? I don't think you can do this with mutt's built-in coloring facility, but I have done this using 'display_filter' and a Perl script to add ANSI color escape sequences around text that matched some pattern. 'allow_ansi' needs to be set in your muttrc as well for this to work. HTH, Gary
Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:12:24PM -0300, Monte Stevens wrote: > So, instead of > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > you'd have > fcc-hook "~C @depesz\.com" +depesz/ > . > > I'm not sure what you want to match so I went with the ~C which would > evaluate as true if the message is to or cc @depesz\.com . But fcc hook is applied to *To:* field, not From:! ?! Best regards, depesz -- Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/ jid/gtalk: dep...@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:56:59PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Situation: > server martin.depesz.com > shell account depesz. > > i create test.rc with following content: > my_hdr From: depesz > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > start mutt with: > mutt -n -F test.rc > > ignore messages about missing directories, write mail to myself, and on > finish screen, i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ > > Now. > > I change the my_hdr line to: > my_hdr From: Marcin Pietrzak > > and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! > > Why is that? Perhaps it has something to do with the default_hook, which defaults to: "~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)" This would make your simple regular expression (@depesz.com) evaluate to "~f @depesz.com !~P | (~P ~C @depesz.com)" . Filling in the ~characters yields something like: from @depesz.com and not from alternates or (from alternates and (to or cc @depesz.com)) . Solving for the first case (from: depesz ): 1 and 1 or (0 and ?) = 1 . Solving for the second case (from: Marcin Pietrzak ): 0 and 1 or (0 and ?), = 0 . Hopefully someone will jump in and point out any errors I've made in translating or evaluating the patterns. Barring any errors, I'd say the best way out is to craft a pattern from your simple regular expression. So, instead of fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ you'd have fcc-hook "~C @depesz\.com" +depesz/ . I'm not sure what you want to match so I went with the ~C which would evaluate as true if the message is to or cc @depesz\.com . -- Monte
Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:44:25PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > * On Thu, May 27, 2010 12:56PM +0200 hubert depesz lubaczewski > (dep...@depesz.com) muttered: > > i create test.rc with following content: > > my_hdr From: depesz > > Well you shouldn't use my_hdr unless forced too > Just set $from instead > > > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > > > start mutt with: > > mutt -n -F test.rc > > > > i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ > > > > Now. > > > > I change the my_hdr line to: > > my_hdr From: Marcin Pietrzak > > > > and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! > > Somethink along the lines of > > default_hook="~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)" > > So you'd better spell out the fcc-hook pattern > eg fcc-hook '~t @depesz.com' +depesz I did make it working, but I just don't understand why it doesn't work with this my_hdr. basically I switched to $from and other $..., but it's irrelevant at the moment - i want to understand why some values in my_hdr make it break. Best regards, depesz -- Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/ jid/gtalk: dep...@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
* On Thu, May 27, 2010 12:56PM +0200 hubert depesz lubaczewski (dep...@depesz.com) muttered: > i create test.rc with following content: > my_hdr From: depesz Well you shouldn't use my_hdr unless forced too Just set $from instead > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > start mutt with: > mutt -n -F test.rc > > i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ > > Now. > > I change the my_hdr line to: > my_hdr From: Marcin Pietrzak > > and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! Somethink along the lines of default_hook="~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)" So you'd better spell out the fcc-hook pattern eg fcc-hook '~t @depesz.com' +depesz HTH, Michael -- COBOL is for morons. -- E. W. Dijkstra PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC1A44DD Jabber: init...@amessage.de
Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:55:59PM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > On 27.05.10,12:56, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > > Situation: > > server martin.depesz.com > > shell account depesz. > > > > i create test.rc with following content: > > my_hdr From: depesz > > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > > > start mutt with: > > mutt -n -F test.rc > > > > ignore messages about missing directories, write mail to myself, and on > > finish screen, i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ > > > > Now. > > > > I change the my_hdr line to: > > my_hdr From: Marcin Pietrzak > > > > and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! > > > > Why is that? > > > > Have you tried to restart mutt after you have applied the new fcc-hook? sure. besides - this fcc is in the test.rc file. Best regards, depesz -- Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/ jid/gtalk: dep...@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
Any way to color a line _following_ the line with 'pattern'?
Hi, I would like to use 'color body' to highlight a line which matches 'pattern' AND also highlight the successive line. However, I couldn't find any way to extend 'pattern' across multiple lines. Is such a thing possible in mutt? Regards, -- Mun
Re: Reply to email simulating a bounced email in mutt?
On 2010-05-27, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Russell Urquhart [05-27-10 09:00]: >> >> I was just wondering. In the Apple email tool, there was a bounce command >> that would reply to a given email(s) and make them look like they had >> bounced, to the original sender. >> >> Is there a similar command or way to do that in mutt? > > Yes, explained in TFM :^) No, explained in TFM. > it is assigned to the "b" key unless you have changed it. As explained in TFM, mutt's bounce command just sends the current message to the specified address without any changes. It doesn't "bounce" the current message as specifed by the OP. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Are you the at self-frying president? gmail.com
Re: Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
On 27.05.10,12:56, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: > Situation: > server martin.depesz.com > shell account depesz. > > i create test.rc with following content: > my_hdr From: depesz > fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ > > start mutt with: > mutt -n -F test.rc > > ignore messages about missing directories, write mail to myself, and on > finish screen, i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ > > Now. > > I change the my_hdr line to: > my_hdr From: Marcin Pietrzak > > and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! > > Why is that? > Have you tried to restart mutt after you have applied the new fcc-hook? Jostein
Re: Reply to email simulating a bounced email in mutt?
* Russell Urquhart [05-27-10 09:00]: > > I was just wondering. In the Apple email tool, there was a bounce command > that would reply to a given email(s) and make them look like they had > bounced, to the original sender. > > Is there a similar command or way to do that in mutt? Yes, explained in TFM :^) it is assigned to the "b" key unless you have changed it. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org
Reply to email simulating a bounced email in mutt?
Hi, I was just wondering. In the Apple email tool, there was a bounce command that would reply to a given email(s) and make them look like they had bounced, to the original sender. Is there a similar command or way to do that in mutt? Thanks, Russ
Losing my mind? fcc-hook doesn't work for one *from* ?
Situation: server martin.depesz.com shell account depesz. i create test.rc with following content: my_hdr From: depesz fcc-hook @depesz.com +depesz/ start mutt with: mutt -n -F test.rc ignore messages about missing directories, write mail to myself, and on finish screen, i see that fcc has been correctly set to depesz/ Now. I change the my_hdr line to: my_hdr From: Marcin Pietrzak and now fcc_hook is no longer applied ?! Why is that? Best regards, depesz -- Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/ jid/gtalk: dep...@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
