folder-hook for postponed messages
Dear all, I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is run when I do "R" to change to the postponed folder. Note that in my .muttrc I have: set postponed="+[Gmail].Drafts" but the hook does not seem to work. I tried many, including: folder-hook 'Drafts' 'set editor = "vim"' Is there a reason this is not matched by regex? Kind regards, Xu
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:28:08PM -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote: > Take it easy, good guys!!! > > sensible-lomua %u > Maybe you can put a wrapper script with the following content: #!/bin/sh mutt -a $@ Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El miércoles, 27 de mayo de 2015 22:59:01 (CEST), Patrick Shanahan escribió: * Understood. I see further discussion is w/o merit. You are not responsible for *your* actions, everyone else is. Major problem with the world as it is today! wrong conclusion; you can not send posts to the world and demand that replies are only going to where you would like to have them; and if you would have asked this more politely, maybe I would have taken your whish into account; matthias -- Sent from my Ubuntu phone http://www.unixarea.de/
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 16:51]: > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 04:36:24PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > escribió: > > > * Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 16:29]: > > [...] > > > PS: I used group-reply again :-) > > > > You did? But not from your phone which fsck'd it originally. What is > > your point? > > My point is: if the sender to a list wants only receive mails from the > list and not to his account too, IMHO the sender (or the list) should > take care on this and not blame the person just using group-reply; Understood. I see further discussion is w/o merit. You are not responsible for *your* actions, everyone else is. Major problem with the world as it is today! -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 04:36:24PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan escribió: > * Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 16:29]: > [...] > > PS: I used group-reply again :-) > > You did? But not from your phone which fsck'd it originally. What is > your point? My point is: if the sender to a list wants only receive mails from the list and not to his account too, IMHO the sender (or the list) should take care on this and not blame the person just using group-reply; matthias -- Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 +49-176-38902045 "Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände menschlich bilden." "Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar humanamente las circunstancias", Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 2, 138)
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
Take it easy, good guys!!! I 110% use mutt to send message and message + attach. But, a few time, I open the big heavy Libreoffice to compose some things only to send to someone. So, why I need to save it in my hard disk end, in a next step, send it by cmd with mutt? In my Libreoffice Tools, I have a tab properties setted to: Tools -> Properties -> Internet -> E-mail -> E-mail Program: sensible-lomua I setted it to: sensible-lomua %u but it not solve. In my Debian system, I only could select what program I use to send e-mails. Isn't possible to parse arguments, like %u. Finally, I think that my problem is more related to Libreoffice forum or Debian Libreoffice maintainers. Thank you very much! -- Marcelo
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 16:29]: [...] > PS: I used group-reply again :-) You did? But not from your phone which fsck'd it originally. What is your point? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 03:21:35PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan escribió: > * Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 14:03]: > > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > > escribió: > [...] > > > > Yes, and this what he wants, I do not understand. > > > > > > You don't understand that he *wants* to post from within lo? I don't > > > understand what you don't understand ??? > > > > Yes I do not understand why > > > > 1) someone (the OP) wants to send something which is already on disk > > within libreoffice when he/she could just fire up mutt with the file > > His *choice* which he *is* allowed just the same as you would choose not > to. Why would you not allow him to work as he sees fit? > > > 2) and even more: I do not understand how someone (you) could send him > > to GO TO TO START libreoffice to send the file when the OP could do > > this with mutt. > > He made a choice and I support his choosing and advised what was probably > necessary to accomplish that. It is not my duty to deny him his choice, > nor is it yours. > > *Understand*! I do not deny anything, I only said that such a hint is a bit ununderstandable, i.e. a bit to much effort for sending a file. Ofc you and the OP are free to do what you understand and feel a good choice for your needs. matthias PS: I used group-reply again :-) -- Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 +49-176-38902045 "Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände menschlich bilden." "Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar humanamente las circunstancias", Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 2, 138)
"group-rpley", was: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 15:07]: > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 07:57:29PM +0200, Matthias Apitz > escribió: > > > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > > escribió: > > > > > > I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be > > > > your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only. > > > > > > NOT my headers ??? "group-reply" replys to all posters, not the list > > > only. You need "list-reply" > > > > I see now in your header: > > > >From: Patrick Shanahan > >To: mutt-users@mutt.org > >Subject: Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice > >Message-ID: <20150527163518.gp4...@wahoo.no-ip.org> > >Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org > ^ > > I played around with your message (saved to a temp. mbox file) and if I > delete the Mail-Followup-To: line, a group-reply would go to the list > and to you; > > who inserted this header and with which purpose? Probably the mutt-list mailer. I can but do not, mudging headers is *wrong*. > and, as I said, the other mail was sent from an Ubuntu phone with the > MUA Dekko; I can not check anymre if your mail have had this line too or > if Dekko was just ignoring it. Which probably did not respect the "Mail-Foll..." header. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 14:03]: > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > escribió: [...] > > > Yes, and this what he wants, I do not understand. > > > > You don't understand that he *wants* to post from within lo? I don't > > understand what you don't understand ??? > > Yes I do not understand why > > 1) someone (the OP) wants to send something which is already on disk > within libreoffice when he/she could just fire up mutt with the file His *choice* which he *is* allowed just the same as you would choose not to. Why would you not allow him to work as he sees fit? > 2) and even more: I do not understand how someone (you) could send him > to GO TO TO START libreoffice to send the file when the OP could do > this with mutt. He made a choice and I support his choosing and advised what was probably necessary to accomplish that. It is not my duty to deny him his choice, nor is it yours. *Understand*! -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 07:57:29PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > escribió: > > > > I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be > > > your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only. > > > > NOT my headers ??? "group-reply" replys to all posters, not the list > > only. You need "list-reply" > > I see now in your header: > >From: Patrick Shanahan >To: mutt-users@mutt.org >Subject: Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice >Message-ID: <20150527163518.gp4...@wahoo.no-ip.org> >Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org ^ I played around with your message (saved to a temp. mbox file) and if I delete the Mail-Followup-To: line, a group-reply would go to the list and to you; who inserted this header and with which purpose? and, as I said, the other mail was sent from an Ubuntu phone with the MUA Dekko; I can not check anymre if your mail have had this line too or if Dekko was just ignoring it. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 +49-176-38902045 "Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände menschlich bilden." "Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar humanamente las circunstancias", Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 2, 138)
Re: Exact semantics of ignore?
On 2015-05-27 09:24 -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: Ian> The reason I ask is I had "x-" as one of the patterns, precisely as Ian> the documentation suggests (in an offhand example). But Mario's Ian> posts from today have an X-URL header and it was not weeded. It is Ian> when I add "x-url" to the ignore. What gives? Gary> Patterns are case-insensitive as long as they contain only Gary> lower-case letters. If you include an upper-case letter in a Gary> pattern, or include a range (e.g., [a-z]) that because of your Gary> locale includes an upper-case letter, the pattern becomes Gary> case-sensitive. That could be why "x-url" in the pattern is not Gary> matching "X-URL" in the header, but that's just a guess. I don't see how either exception applies in this particular situation. -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
Re: Exact semantics of ignore?
Ian Zimmerman wrote: > The part of the documentation about the "ignore" command talks about > "patterns". As far as I can see it never precisely says what kind of > patterns these are - regexps, shell globs, fixed substrings, or what. It's a case-independent prefix match against the header. "*" is recognized special-case to mean everything. The function used is mutt_matches_ignore() inside muttlib.c. You can see the invocation at mutt_copy_hdr() inside copy.c: if (!((flags & CH_FROM) && (flags & CH_FORCE_FROM) && this_is_from) && (flags & CH_WEED) && mutt_matches_ignore (buf, Ignore) && !mutt_matches_ignore (buf, UnIgnore)) continue; > The reason I ask is I had "x-" as one of the patterns, precisely as the > documentation suggests (in an offhand example). But Mario's posts from > today have an X-URL header and it was not weeded. It is when I add > "x-url" to the ignore. What gives? Maybe it also matched something in an unignore? My quick testing shows "x-" is working for me. Try emptying out your ignore list: "unignore *" and then do an "ignore x-". -Kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan escribió: > > I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be > > your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only. > > NOT my headers ??? "group-reply" replys to all posters, not the list > only. You need "list-reply" I see now in your header: From: Patrick Shanahan To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice Message-ID: <20150527163518.gp4...@wahoo.no-ip.org> Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org and when I do in mutt 'g' for group-reply, the mail goes only to the list; why is this now even with group-reply? > > > And: If you read his requirement, he wants to post from within lo (see > > > first quoted line above). > > > > Yes, and this what he wants, I do not understand. > > You don't understand that he *wants* to post from within lo? I don't > understand what you don't understand ??? Yes I do not understand why 1) someone (the OP) wants to send something which is already on disk within libreoffice when he/she could just fire up mutt with the file 2) and even more: I do not understand how someone (you) could send him to GO TO TO START libreoffice to send the file when the OP could do this with mutt. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 +49-176-38902045 "Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände menschlich bilden." "Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar humanamente las circunstancias", Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 2, 138)
Re: Exact semantics of ignore?
On 2015-05-27, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > The part of the documentation about the "ignore" command talks about > "patterns". As far as I can see it never precisely says what kind of > patterns these are - regexps, shell globs, fixed substrings, or what. Look in the mutt manual for Chapter 4, Advanced Usage, and Section 2, Patterns: Searching, Limiting and Tagging. > The reason I ask is I had "x-" as one of the patterns, precisely as the > documentation suggests (in an offhand example). But Mario's posts from > today have an X-URL header and it was not weeded. It is when I add > "x-url" to the ignore. What gives? Patterns are case-insensitive as long as they contain only lower-case letters. If you include an upper-case letter in a pattern, or include a range (e.g., [a-z]) that because of your locale includes an upper-case letter, the pattern becomes case-sensitive. That could be why "x-url" in the pattern is not matching "X-URL" in the header, but that's just a guess. Regards, Gary
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 12:24]: > El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 11:34:07AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan > escribió: > > > > I do not understand this. If the file is already on disk, why to open > > > heavymetal libreoffice and not just the light mutt and attach the > > > file, or even just use mutt on cmd line to send the file with -a > > > file ...? > > > > > > matthias > > > > matthias, I read the list or would not have seen msg to post reply. I > > will see your post on the list. Pls do not direct reply or cc w/o express > > request. > > I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be > your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only. NOT my headers ??? "group-reply" replys to all posters, not the list only. You need "list-reply" > > And: If you read his requirement, he wants to post from within lo (see > > first quoted line above). > > Yes, and this what he wants, I do not understand. You don't understand that he *wants* to post from within lo? I don't understand what you don't understand ??? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 11:34:07AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan escribió: > > I do not understand this. If the file is already on disk, why to open > > heavymetal libreoffice and not just the light mutt and attach the > > file, or even just use mutt on cmd line to send the file with -a > > file ...? > > > > matthias > > matthias, I read the list or would not have seen msg to post reply. I > will see your post on the list. Pls do not direct reply or cc w/o express > request. I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only. > And: If you read his requirement, he wants to post from within lo (see > first quoted line above). Yes, and this what he wants, I do not understand. -- Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 +49-176-38902045 "Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände menschlich bilden." "Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar humanamente las circunstancias", Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 2, 138)
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
El miércoles, 27 de mayo de 2015 16:40:33 (CEST), Patrick Shanahan escribió: * Marcelo Laia [05-27-15 10:05]: [...] Open Libreoffice Writer or Calc; Open an doc or spreadsheet; Go to File menu; Choose Sent by e-mail I do not understand this. If the file is already on disk, why to open heavymetal libreoffice and not just the light mutt and attach the file, or even just use mutt on cmd line to send the file with -a file ...? matthias -- Sent from my Ubuntu phone http://www.unixarea.de/
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Matthias Apitz [05-27-15 11:23]: > El miércoles, 27 de mayo de 2015 16:40:33 (CEST), Patrick Shanahan > escribió: > >* Marcelo Laia [05-27-15 10:05]: > > [...] > >>Open Libreoffice Writer or Calc; > >>Open an doc or spreadsheet; > >>Go to File menu; > >>Choose Sent by e-mail > >> > > I do not understand this. If the file is already on disk, why to open > heavymetal libreoffice and not just the light mutt and attach the > file, or even just use mutt on cmd line to send the file with -a > file ...? > > matthias matthias, I read the list or would not have seen msg to post reply. I will see your post on the list. Pls do not direct reply or cc w/o express request. And: If you read his requirement, he wants to post from within lo (see first quoted line above). -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Exact semantics of ignore?
The part of the documentation about the "ignore" command talks about "patterns". As far as I can see it never precisely says what kind of patterns these are - regexps, shell globs, fixed substrings, or what. The reason I ask is I had "x-" as one of the patterns, precisely as the documentation suggests (in an offhand example). But Mario's posts from today have an X-URL header and it was not weeded. It is when I add "x-url" to the ignore. What gives? -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
* Marcelo Laia [05-27-15 10:05]: [...] > Open Libreoffice Writer or Calc; > Open an doc or spreadsheet; > Go to File menu; > Choose Sent by e-mail > > In my debian system, when I choose Sent by e-mail, it open Mutt in a > new terminal, I could enter To address and Subject and Message Body. > However, when I sent the message, nothing is attached. Prblm probably in libreoffice configuration, parameters sent to mutt. Maybe should include %u for include, or whatever lo specifies. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net
Re: Fwd: dot postpone folder don't work
* On Wed, May 27, 2015 06:55AM -0300 Marcelo Laia (marcelol...@gmail.com) muttered: > The problem still remaining. Please, have you some tips to solve? > > If I wrote a message, save it, and press q, that message will be sent > to folder: > MEMEME > Sent 1 > Drafts 0 > However, when I try to send that postponed message, mutt don't ask me > if I want to send the message postponed!!! It's not a postponed message when it's not in the folder $postponed points to. :) > set postponed = "+MEMEME/INBOX.Drafts" There are a few veriables you didn't tell us about... $ postpone (is this set to no maybe?) Type: quadoption Default: ask-yes Controls whether or not messages are saved in the $postponed mailbox when you select not to send immediately. $ recall Type: quadoption Default: ask-yes Controls whether or not Mutt recalls postponed messages when composing a new message. Setting this variable to is not generally useful, and thus not recommended. Also see the recall-message (default R) function. HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key-ID: EEE7D043 Jabber: in...@jabber.de
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
On 27/05/15 at 06:29am, Xu Wang wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Marcelo Laia wrote: > > When I choose to sent a doc form Libreoffice, the message was sent but > > without attached doc. How I could configure mutt+libreoffice to sent > > directly from libreoffice attached docs? Thank you. > > Can you give explicit > steps to reproduce your problem? Hello Xu Wang, How to reproduce? Open Libreoffice Writer or Calc; Open an doc or spreadsheet; Go to File menu; Choose Sent by e-mail In my debian system, when I choose Sent by e-mail, it open Mutt in a new terminal, I could enter To address and Subject and Message Body. However, when I sent the message, nothing is attached. I sent message to my alternative account in yahoo. Thank you very much! -- Marcelo
Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Marcelo Laia wrote: > When I choose to sent a doc form Libreoffice, the message was sent but > without attached doc. How I could configure mutt+libreoffice to sent > directly from libreoffice attached docs? Thank you. Hello Marcelo, Can you please be more clear about your problem? Can you give explicit steps to reproduce your problem? Are you sending your document to a mailing list? If so, sometimes mailing lists do not like certain files. Can you test sending it to e.g. a different personal account? When you say "sent directly from libreoffice" you mean to say that from within the libreoffice application you wish to send an email? Kind regards, Xu
Fwd: dot postpone folder don't work
Hi, Some days ago I have asked about a problem (please, see attached message). The problem still remaining. Please, have you some tips to solve? Thank you! -- Marcelo --- Begin Message --- Hi, I have this: set from = "m...@gmail.com" set sendmail = "/home/me/bin/scripts/mymsmpt.ufvjm" set mbox = "+MEMEME/INBOX" set record = "+MEMEME/INBOX.Sent" set postponed = "+MEMEME/INBOX.Drafts" set signature = "~/.mutt/sig.mememe" If I wrote a message, save it, and press q, that message will be sent to folder: MEMEME Sent 1 Drafts 0 However, when I try to send that postponed message, mutt don't ask me if I want to send the message postponed!!! There some mistakes in my configuration files? Thank you very much! -- Marcelo --- End Message ---
Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
When I choose to sent a doc form Libreoffice, the message was sent but without attached doc. How I could configure mutt+libreoffice to sent directly from libreoffice attached docs? Thank you. -- Marcelo
