Re: List headers and List Reply [Was: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice]

2015-05-28 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-05-28 17:46 -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:

Ian Note also that this list is slightly substandard in that there is
Ian no List-ID header.  There may be software out there that uses that
Ian header to determine if a message is a list message in the first
Ian place.

Patrick List-Post: mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org

Patrick Not added by my software and appears on every post I receive
Patrick from this list.

Stop showing yourself in bad light and start reading carefully.

-- 
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.



Re: List headers and List Reply [Was: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice]

2015-05-28 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org [05-28-15 17:30]:
 [...]
 Note also that this list is slightly substandard in that there is no
 List-ID header.  There may be software out there that uses that header
 to determine if a message is a list message in the first place.



List-Post: mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org

Not added by my software and appears on every post I receive from this
list.

-- 
(paka)Patrick Shanahan   Plainfield, Indiana, USA  @ptilopteri
http://en.opensuse.orgopenSUSE Community Memberfacebook/ptilopteri
http://wahoo.no-ip.orgPhoto Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
Registered Linux User #207535@ http://linuxcounter.net


Re: folder-hook for postponed messages

2015-05-28 Thread Andrzej Popielewicz
* Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:

 Dear all,
 
 I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
 run when I do R to change to the postponed folder.
 
 Note that in my .muttrc I have:
 
 set postponed=+[Gmail].Drafts
 
 but the hook does not seem to work. I tried many, including:
 
 folder-hook 'Drafts' 'set editor = vim'
 
 Is there a reason this is not matched by regex?
 
 Kind regards,
 
 Xu

For me works the following

folder-hook imap.googlemail.com set record ==Sent
folder-hook imap.googlemail.com set postponed = =Drafts

Andrzej


sync-mailbox not available in postpone map?

2015-05-28 Thread Xu Wang
The following does not work. Is there some reason or intution for why not?

bind postpone $ sync-mailbox

Kind regards,

Xu


List headers and List Reply [Was: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice]

2015-05-28 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2015-05-28 14:38 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:

Derek Come on Patrick, you are not new here...  You know full well that
Derek most mailer software does not have any list-reply function; mutt
Derek is a rare exception, and despite this being a mutt-related list,
Derek not the only mailer people use here.  If by now you still can't
Derek handle people posting both to mailing lists and to you directly
Derek at the same time, perhaps you should stop subscribing to mailing
Derek lists...

Note also that this list is slightly substandard in that there is no
List-ID header.  There may be software out there that uses that header
to determine if a message is a list message in the first place.

-- 
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.



Re: folder-hook for postponed messages

2015-05-28 Thread Xu Wang
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Andrzej Popielewicz
apopi...@amu.edu.pl wrote:
 * Xu Wang xuwang...@gmail.com [2015-05-27 22:27:00]:

 Dear all,

 I would like set a folder hook for postponed messages, which I hope is
 run when I do R to change to the postponed folder.

 Note that in my .muttrc I have:

 set postponed=+[Gmail].Drafts

 but the hook does not seem to work. I tried many, including:

 folder-hook 'Drafts' 'set editor = vim'

 Is there a reason this is not matched by regex?

 Kind regards,

 Xu

 For me works the following

 folder-hook imap.googlemail.com set record ==Sent
 folder-hook imap.googlemail.com set postponed = =Drafts

 Andrzej

Thank you for the reply Andrzej.

I am not sure I understand. What I would like is to have a special
command set for editor only when resuming postponed messages.

Kind regards,

Xu


Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice

2015-05-28 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
 * Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de [05-27-15 12:24]:
  El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 11:34:07AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan 
  escribió:
  I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be
  your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only.
 
 NOT my headers ???  group-reply replys to all posters, not the list
 only.  You need list-reply

Come on Patrick, you are not new here...  You know full well that most
mailer software does not have any list-reply function; mutt is a rare
exception, and despite this being a mutt-related list, not the only
mailer people use here.  If by now you still can't handle people
posting both to mailing lists and to you directly at the same time,
perhaps you should stop subscribing to mailing lists...

-- 
Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention.  Sorry for the inconvenience.



pgpV8U3qsLNfC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice

2015-05-28 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, May 28, 2015 a las 02:30:53PM -0500, Derek Martin escribió:

 On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:21:51PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
   [...]
  Open Libreoffice Writer or Calc;
  Open an doc or spreadsheet;
  Go to File menu;
  Choose Sent by e-mail
  
  I do not understand this. If the file is already on disk, why to
  open heavymetal libreoffice and not just the light mutt and attach
  the file, or even just use mutt on cmd line to send the file with
   -a file ...?
 
 Presumably because he's already got the file open in libreoffice, and
 doing that SHOULD work.  But... does it matter why?  The point is he
 does want to, and it should work, so there should be a reasonable
 answer to the question.

Yes. The reasonable answer (or call it suggestion) is the one above:
*start* (open) Libreoffice Writer or Calc ...

matthias
-- 
Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211
+49-176-38902045
Wenn der Mensch von den Umständen gebildet wird, so muß man die Umstände 
menschlich bilden.
Si el hombre es formado por las circunstancias entonces es necesario formar 
humanamente
las circunstancias, Karl Marx in Die heilige Familie / La sagrada familia (MEW 
2, 138)


Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice

2015-05-28 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:21:51PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
  [...]
 Open Libreoffice Writer or Calc;
 Open an doc or spreadsheet;
 Go to File menu;
 Choose Sent by e-mail
 
 I do not understand this. If the file is already on disk, why to
 open heavymetal libreoffice and not just the light mutt and attach
 the file, or even just use mutt on cmd line to send the file with
  -a file ...?

Presumably because he's already got the file open in libreoffice, and
doing that SHOULD work.  But... does it matter why?  The point is he
does want to, and it should work, so there should be a reasonable
answer to the question.

-- 
Derek D. Martinhttp://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail due to spam prevention.  Sorry for the inconvenience.



pgpJZ6a6dbSM_.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice

2015-05-28 Thread Michael Tatge
* On Wed, May 27, 2015 05:28PM -0300 Marcelo Laia (marcelol...@gmail.com) 
muttered:
 Tools - Properties - Internet - E-mail - E-mail Program:
 sensible-lomua 
 sensible-lomua %u

Try /path/to/mutt (/usr/bin/mutt) instead.

Michael
-- 
PGP-Key-ID: EEE7D043
Jabber: in...@jabber.de


Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice

2015-05-28 Thread Christian Brabandt

Am 2015-05-27 20:23, schrieb Matthias Apitz:
El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 07:57:29PM +0200, Matthias Apitz 
escribió:


El día Wednesday, May 27, 2015 a las 12:35:18PM -0400, Patrick 
Shanahan escribió:


  I just used group-reply with the MUA 'dekko' on Ubuntu phone. May be
  your header have been set wrong not directing this to the list only.

 NOT my headers ???  group-reply replys to all posters, not the list
 only.  You need list-reply

I see now in your header:

   From: Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com
   To: mutt-users@mutt.org
   Subject: Re: Sent attached doc from Libreoffice
   Message-ID: 20150527163518.gp4...@wahoo.no-ip.org
   Mail-Followup-To: mutt-users@mutt.org

 ^

I played around with your message (saved to a temp. mbox file) and if I
delete the Mail-Followup-To: line, a group-reply would go to the list
and to you;

who inserted this header and with which purpose? and, as I said, the
other mail was sent from an Ubuntu phone with the MUA Dekko; I can not
check anymre if your mail have had this line too or if Dekko was just
ignoring it.


This is done by mutt, if you have subscribed to the list, IIRC. There
are also a couple of configuration variables, that control this 
behaviour

(honor_followup_to, followup_to)

This should be explained in the manual:
http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#lists

Best,
Christian