Re: NeoMutt Opinions
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 01:02:11PM -0800, Lee K wrote: I was wondering if anyone has an opinion on the neomutt project. I've been a long time mutt user, on and off for 15 years. Neomutt seems to be popular with a certain set of users these days. The configs seem pretty much compatible. I haven't seen any features that aren't in mutt, and it's sole virtue seems to be a more colorful site page. The feature of neomutt that completely determines my choice is an elegant built-in integration with notmuch. Really worth to try. Lee -- Cheers, Oleg A. Mamontov mailto: o...@mamontov.net skype: lonerr11 cell: +7 (903) 798-1352
Re: NeoMutt Opinions
On 22Dec2021 13:02, Lee K wrote: >I was wondering if anyone has an opinion on the neomutt project. I've >been a long time mutt user, on and off for 15 years. Neomutt seems to be >popular with a certain set of users these days. The configs seem pretty much >compatible. I haven't seen any features that aren't in mutt, and it's sole >virtue seems to be a more colorful site page. I've not needed or wanted neomutt, myself. I believe it forked off during an extended period of low activity on mainline mutt. Kevin has merged a great many features that previously existed as optional patches and done a huge amount of additional work as well. I'd stay with mutt unless there's some specific feature you eally want. Cheers, Cameron Simpson
Re: NeoMutt Opinions
# neomutt (Bringing together all the Mutt code) # # Mutt is a small but very powerful text-based MIME mail client. Mutt # is highly configurable, and is well suited to the mail power user with # advanced features like key bindings, keyboard macros, mail threading, # regular expression searches and a powerful pattern matching language # for selecting groups of messages. # It seems to have many of the mutt patches for additional features. At one time I had it displaying a side panel of an index of my mailbox while the right side displayed the message of the particular line in the index that was selected. I've forgotten how to do that with neomutt, and it was no longer the default display when I just installed neomutt to try it. My muttrc file mostly works with neomutt. Some keybindings in my muttrc which did not produce errors with mutt produced errors with neomutt but neomutt worked anyway. Best wishes, David On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 4:02 PM Lee K wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has an opinion on the neomutt project. I've > been a long time mutt user, on and off for 15 years. Neomutt seems to be > popular with a certain set of users these days. The configs seem pretty > much > compatible. I haven't seen any features that aren't in mutt, and it's sole > virtue seems to be a more colorful site page. > > Lee >
NeoMutt Opinions
I was wondering if anyone has an opinion on the neomutt project. I've been a long time mutt user, on and off for 15 years. Neomutt seems to be popular with a certain set of users these days. The configs seem pretty much compatible. I haven't seen any features that aren't in mutt, and it's sole virtue seems to be a more colorful site page. Lee
Re: [Mutt] see attached html documents along with chromium
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 19:58:41 +0100, Gerard ROBIN wrote: I didn't understand why the changes to the /etc/mailcap file had no effect. According to mutt docs http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/#mailcap the default mailcap locations and their search order are given by: mutt -nF /dev/null -Q mailcap_path E.g., in my setting (Fedora) they are: mailcap_path="~/.mailcap:/usr/share/mutt/mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/etc/mailcap:/usr/etc/mailcap:/usr/local/etc/mailcap" But since I have set mailcap_path = "~/.mailcap" in ~/.muttrc, the actual mailcap search stops there for my account: mutt -Q mailcap_path mailcap_path="~/.mailcap" Best, Mihai