Desktop - Laptop mail data exchange

2001-03-26 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

Some weeks ago there was a discussion about desktop - laptop mail
data exchange. The idea was to have on both systems the same mail
data. It should be possible on both systems to get/read/move/delete
and post messages. The mail dir on both systems should be updated
automatically.

Because I couldn't follow the discussion I would like to know if a
solution was found?

Isn't this a common problem of mail data exchange? Can't we look at
other email software for solutions?


Best regards,
Daniel.



Re: Mutt under Win2k

2001-03-21 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

I would like to get mutt running on my notebook and M$ Windows.
I've looked at the www.cygwin.com homepage but could not make out that
mutt is supported by cygwin. Where do I get the source or binary of
mutt for cygwin? BTW: cygwin is new for me and not yet
installed on my notebook.

What tools do I have to install on the laptop to get mutt running?

Thank you very much for your answer.


Best regards,
Daniel.




nice URL handling

2001-03-06 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

Here are two nice ideas for URL handling:

1) Colorize URLs in the pager:

color body magenta default '(((ftp|http|https)|mailto)[.:][^ 
"]*|www.[-a-z_0-9/.?=,:]+)[^ .,;"():]'


2) start netscape on URL with mouse usage:

macro pager \eh '!netscape-remote h'

'netscape-remote' is a shell script:
-
#/bin/csh -f
netscape -noraise -remote 'OpenURL('$1',new-window)'
-

The usage is:

1. Mark URL to view with left mouse button
2. Press ESC
3. Press middle mouse button
4. Press Enter


For me this is a much better handling than using urlview.
My problem with urlview is, that it only extracts a list of
URLs, but not the text belonging to the URL.
Reading a mail including several URLs one gets lost with urlview.


Best regards,
Daniel.



Re: multipart application/pgp

2001-02-12 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

After further investigation of the problem I've written a script for
procmail or any other mail filter program. This script does one nice
thing, which I missed in "formail".
"formail" can only change lines in the header of emails. The
Content-Type being to be changed for pgp attachments is in the body of
the email.
Therefore my script scans through the body of an email. If it finds an
attachment with the sequence "^-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-" it changes
the Content-Type of the attachment to
"Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt".
The header of the email stays "multipart/".

To get procmail execute the script, the whole pgp section in my
.procmailrc is now:

 cut here 
##
## PGP
##

MAILFILTER_PGP_ATTACHMENT=${HOME}/bin/mailfilter_pgp_attachment

:0
* !^Content-Type: message/
* !^Content-Type: multipart/
* !^Content-Type: application/pgp
{
:0 fBw
* ^-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
* ^-END PGP MESSAGE-
| $FORMAIL -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt"

:0 fBw
* ^-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
* ^-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
* ^-END PGP SIGNATURE-
| $FORMAIL -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign"
}

:0
* ^Content-Type: multipart/
{
:0 fBw
* ^-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
* ^-END PGP MESSAGE-
| $MAILFILTER_PGP_ATTACHMENT -
}
 cut here 

The filter script "mailfilter_pgp_attachment" is attached to this msg.

What do you think about this solution? Ideas, comments are welcome.


Regards,
Daniel.

On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 10:28:00AM +0100, Daniel Kollar wrote:
 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 10:28:00 +0100
 From: Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mutt User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: multipart application/pgp
 Mail-Followup-To: Mutt User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi!
 
 I often get emails with several pgp encrypted attachments.
 
 The "Content-Type" in the header of the message is "multipart/", so
 mutt does not recongnize the pgp encryption.
 Procmail can change this "multipart/" content type to "application/pgp".
 Now mutt can decrypt the whole msg and show it in the pager. This works fine, as 
long as
 there are only ASCII attachments encrypted.
 But when there are e.g. tar, gz attachments or images, I run into
 problems.
 
 Nice would be, if mutt could recognize the multipart and the encryption.
 Then the normal attachment browser could be used to read or save the
 attachments separately.
 
 What do you think about this?
 
 
 Regards,
 Daniel.


eval '(exit $?0)'  eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+"$@"}'
 eval 'exec perl -S $0 $argv:q'
   if 0;

($script = $0) =~ s#.*/(.*)$#$1#;
$USAGE = "
# Usage: $script mail
#
# Task: This script converts the Content-Type of attachments to
#   application/pgp ...
#   if the attachment is pgp encrypted.
#   The output will be the stdout.
#
# Version : 1.0
# Author: Daniel.Kollar\@bigfoot.de
#
";
$user=`whoami`;
$date=`date`;

die "$USAGE" if @ARGV == 0;

$header = 1;

while () {
  $line = $_;

  if ( $header  $line =~ /^[\s\t]*$/ ) {
$header = 0;
print "$line";
next;
  }

  if ( $header == 1 ) {   # skip header
print "$line";
next;
  }

  if ( !$header  $line =~ /^--.*/ ) {
print "$line";
$aheader = 1;
@lines1 = ();
$content_type = "";
@lines = ();
while () {
  $line = $_;

  if ( $aheader  $line =~ /^Content-Type:.*/) {   # save Content-Type separately
@lines1 = @lines;
$content_type = $line;
@lines = ();
next;
  }

  if ( $aheader  $line =~ /^[\s\t]*$/ ) {   # look for header of attachment
$aheader = 0;
push(@lines, $line);
next;
  }

  if ( $aheader == 1 ) {
push(@lines, $line);
next;
  }

  if ( !$aheader  $line =~ /^-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-.*/ ) {   # attachment 
pgp encrypted
$content_type = "Old-${content_type}Content-Type: application/pgp; 
format=text; x-action=encrypt\n";
push (@lines, $line);
next;
  }

  if ( !$aheader  $line =~ /^--.*/ ) {   # next attachment begins
print join '',@lines1;
print "$content_type";
print join '',@lines;
print "$line";
$aheader = 1;
@lines1 = ();
$content_type = "";
@lines = ();
next;
  }

  push(@lines, $line);
}
print join '',@lines1;
print "$content_type";
print join '',@lines;

last;
  }

  print "$line";

}




multipart application/pgp

2001-02-07 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

I often get emails with several pgp encrypted attachments.

The "Content-Type" in the header of the message is "multipart/", so
mutt does not recongnize the pgp encryption.
Procmail can change this "multipart/" content type to "application/pgp".
Now mutt can decrypt the whole msg and show it in the pager. This works fine, as long 
as
there are only ASCII attachments encrypted.
But when there are e.g. tar, gz attachments or images, I run into
problems.

Nice would be, if mutt could recognize the multipart and the encryption.
Then the normal attachment browser could be used to read or save the
attachments separately.

What do you think about this?


Regards,
Daniel.



Re: your mail

2001-02-05 Thread Daniel Kollar

Normally, mutt encrypts an email for all persons mentioned in the
"To:" header automatically.


On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 03:56:41PM +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
 Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 15:56:41 +0100
 From: Waldemar Brodkorb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hello Mutt-User,
 
 is it possible to encrypt messages to more then one 
 person out of Mutt?
 
 I know I could use 
 gpg -d text.asc -r person1 -r person2 
 and send it as Attachment, but this is not very
 elegant.
 
 The toggle function did'nt work in the
 key-id-select window. 
 
 Any idea's?
 
 -- 
 MfG
 
 Waldemar Brodkorb
 
 Linux rulez !



Tagged msgs not considered when pager open

2001-01-25 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hello!

I'm using the pager with the setting "set pager_index_lines=10".
This means, that I can see 10 lines of the index even when the pager
is showing the contents of one email.
When I tag some msgs and still have one msg open in the pager a
command like "save msgs" works only on the open msgs but not on the
tagged msgs, although I've set "set auto_tag".

Is this a bug or a feature?


Regards,
Daniel.



pgp encrypted attachment

2001-01-08 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

I often get mails with no text inside but a pgp encrypted msg as
attachment.
Because it is defined as a multi-part message, procmail and mutt does
not recognize the pgp encryption.

Parts of the msgs look like:

--
[...]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0025_01C07715.2A6FEA50"
[...]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0025_01C07715.2A6FEA50
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use  http://www.pgp.com
http://www.pgp.com 

[...]

-END PGP MESSAGE-



--=_NextPart_000_0025_01C07715.2A6FEA50
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"
HTML
HEAD

META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.0.4417.0"
TITLEthe subject/TITLE
/HEAD
BODY
!-- Converted from text/plain format --

PFONT SIZE=3D2-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-BR
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use lt;A =
HREF=3D"http://www.pgp.com"http://www.pgp.com/Agt;BR
BR
[...]
-END PGP MESSAGE-BR
/FONT
/P

/BODY
/HTML
--=_NextPart_000_0025_01C07715.2A6FEA50--

--

Can procmail be instructed to remove the html stuff and to change the
mime type to "application/pgp" or what else is necessary ?


Thanks for ideas.

Daniel.



Re: special reply_regexp

2000-12-18 Thread Daniel Kollar

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 08:53:49PM +0100, Josh Huber wrote:
 Is this necessary?  I'm using:
 
 set reply_regexp=
 '^(\[[a-z0-9:-]+\][ \t]*)?(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[\t]*'
 
 and it's threading mailing lists of this type for me...
 
 for example:
 [ruby-talk:7097] Rubyize this method
 [ruby-talk:7099] Re: Rubyize this method
 [ruby-talk:7104] Re: Rubyize this method
 
 are all threaded properly. (well, not as good as messages with
 In-Reply-To: but better than having threads scattered all over the
 folder)
 
 perhaps the regex wasn't quite right?

But with your regexp you cannot determine the head of the thread (w/o
the Re:) like the first line of your example

   [ruby-talk:7097] Rubyize this method

You need to add a "?" after the (re...) pattern.

The regexp which finally works for me is now

set reply_regexp=
   '^(\[[a-z0-9:-]+\][ \t]*)?((re([\\[0-9\\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*)?+[ \t]*'


Cu,
Daniel.



Re: special reply_regexp

2000-12-14 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi,

thank you the regexp, but mutt still does not show threads. I'm
puzzled.

An example of the subjects, which should be recognized as a thread is
following:

Subject: [ifc-ml:2583] Re: Illegal circuit data for smincut
Subject: [ifc-ml:2584] Re: Illegal circuit data for smincut

The sorting method is "thread", and there is of course
"strict_threads" unset.

Somehow the regexp still does not work.

Any idea?


On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:27:40PM -0500, Laurent Pelecq wrote:
 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:27:40 -0500
 From: Laurent Pelecq [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mutt User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: special reply_regexp
 Mail-Followup-To: Laurent Pelecq [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   Mutt User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 08:37:41AM +0100, Daniel Kollar wrote:
  Hi,
  
  in one of my folder containing msgs from a mailing list I would like
  to sort the msgs as threads.
  
  With the default reply_regexp this does not work, because the mailing
  list always puts a string "[ifc-ml:] " at the beginning of the subject
  line of each msg.  is an increasing number and is always different.
  
  If mutt would check for the text after this string and possible Re:'s,
  then the threading display might work.
  
  Is this possible? If so, how should the reply_regexp look like?
 
 You can try "^(\[[][]*\][ \t]+)?(re([\[0-9\]+])*|aw):[ \t]*"
 
 \[[][]*\] should match: [ anything_except_brackets ]
 
 Or more specific: "^(\[[a-z0-9:-]*\][ \t]+)?(re ... "
 If you are sure that you can have only a-z0-9:- between the brackets.
 
 I've just tested that to tag messages and it worked.
 
 -- 
 Laurent Pelecq [EMAIL PROTECTED]



special reply_regexp

2000-12-12 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi,

in one of my folder containing msgs from a mailing list I would like
to sort the msgs as threads.

With the default reply_regexp this does not work, because the mailing
list always puts a string "[ifc-ml:] " at the beginning of the subject
line of each msg.  is an increasing number and is always different.

If mutt would check for the text after this string and possible Re:'s,
then the threading display might work.

Is this possible? If so, how should the reply_regexp look like?

Thank you very much!


Daniel.



MIME text/plain attachment too big

2000-11-28 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi!

When opening a received mail containing a text/plain MIME attachment
mutt always displays the contents of this attachment inside the pager.
This can cause a problem when the size of the attachment is several
MBytes big.

How do I prevent mutt from showing the contents of text/plain
attachment inside the pager when a specific size limit is achieved?


Thx for answer.

Regards,
Daniel.



Re: Is it possible to have a Trashbox?

2000-11-15 Thread Daniel Kollar

   macro index d "save-message=trashenter"
   macro pager d "save-message=trashenter"
 
 This will always save the message to the folder "=trash" whenever you
 "delete" it, and mark it for deletion from the current folder.  You have
 to clean up =trash yourself when you want it, possibly from the command
 line manually, or from a crontab entry for periodic execution.

here is a solution for delete-thread:

macro index \CD "\et;save-message=trashenter"
macro pager \CD "\et;save-message=trashenter"


Regards,
Daniel.



vim looking like mutt pager

2000-11-14 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hello!

I'm using vim as message editor with color syntax highlighting.
The standard settings look similar to the mutt pager standard color
settings, but there are some things to adjust.
For example to change color of special header lines and to highlight URLs.

How do I do this? I don't want to overwrite existing standard settings
but to extend them.
Can anyone give me an example for this? I looked at Sven Guckes
example .vimrcs, but there was not what I'm looking for.

Thank you very much.

Regards,
Daniel.



length of attachment name too short

2000-11-02 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hello!

When composing a new mail and adding attachments, mutt cuts the name
of the attached files after a specific length of characters.
When I attach a file with a long path I'm not able to read the file
name in the attachment list.
Mutt seems to bring the lines to 80 columns. My xterm is much wider
than 80 columns.
How can I prevent mutt from cutting off the attachment names ?


Daniel.



Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-23 Thread Daniel Kollar

On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:14:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
 
 Did you try to change the content-type of these octet-streams to
 application/pgp?  With the more recent mutt versions, you can
 comfortably do this from within mutt.

Really? I'm using mutt 1.2i .
What version do I need to do this and where do I find information on
this?

Regards,
Daniel.



FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hello mutt-developers,

here is a feature request for future versions of mutt:

Mutt looks for the PGPPASS environment variable. If this is set, then
no passphrase is needed to be send to pgp program, because pgp looks
for the PGPPASS variable by itself.
Mutt will also not ask the user for the passphrase.

This should be easy to implement.

The user would then have the option to set the passphrase via a
wrapper-script permanently.
For example:
 muttwrap ---
#!/usr/bin/sh
set $passparam=$*
if ( ps -U $LOGNAME | grep mutt | grep -v muttwrap  /dev/null ) then
  echo "WARNING: You are already running Mutt."
  echo " Starting Mutt in readonly mode."
  echo
  echo "Please enter passphrase: "
  stty -echo
  read pgppassphrase
  PGPPASS=$pgppassphrase; export PGPPASS
  stty echo
  $PATHTOMUTT/mutt -R $*
else
  echo "Please enter passphrase: "
  stty -echo
  read pgppassphrase
  PGPPASS=$pgppassphrase; export PGPPASS
  stty echo
  $PATHTOMUTT/mutt $passparam
fi
--

Thank you very much!

Regards,
Daniel.



Re: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable

2000-10-20 Thread Daniel Kollar

 Don't do that.
 
 Storing the pgp pass phrase in an environment variable may have been
 a valid option on MS-DOS computers.  It isn't on Unix machines,
 since the environment is not guaranteed to be confidential.

I'm working on unix.

In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about this.
There you can read that using this feature is safe when you use in in
a environment where no one else has access to it.

I'm doing that. The environment is only active as long as mutt is
open. No one from outside can access it.
The wrapper script asks me for entering the passphrase and starts mutt
immedeately after this. So, it is safe.
The only thing a would agree is that someone can change the wrapper
script to send the passphrase via email to outside...


 Also, what's the point in using a shell script like the one below?
 
 - There is no reason to avoid running two mutts on the same mailbox.
   Mutt _does_ know how to graciously deal with concurrent access to
   mail folders.
 
 - There is no point in asking for the pass phrase in a shell script,
   and then storing it in $PGPPASS.  Mutt will ask for the pass
   phrase the first time it's needed, and remember it for the coming
   $pgp_timeout seconds.  The default is 300 seconds; you can easily
   change that from your .muttrc.

Maybe you have read my previous email regarding the mutt_octet-filter
which can decrypt pgp encrypted octet-streams.
The PGPPASS environment variable is the easiest way to remember the
passphrase.

But now I have to enter the passphrase two times. One for my
octet-filter and one for mutt.
What solution to you see?


Daniel.



Using mutt and pgp without asking for passphrase ?

2000-10-19 Thread Daniel Kollar

I'm setting the passphrase via the PGPPASS environment variable before starting
mutt.
Wenn I open a pgp encrypted message mutt still asks me for the
passphrase. This is not necessary, because pgp looks automatically for
the PGPPASS environment variable.

So, how do I disable this function in mutt?


Daniel.



Mutt and PGP passphrase

2000-10-17 Thread Daniel Kollar

Mutt can remember the pgp passphrase once it is entered by the user.
How does mutt passes the phrase over to pgp when en-/decrypting a message?
Is there an algorithm that checks for the pgp passphrase input message
and sends it as stdin ?

Daniel.



pgp encrypted text in octet-stream attachment

2000-10-10 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi,

do you remember that I asked for a recursive MIME attachment recognition in mutt?
The problem was, that I often receive MIME attachment as octet-stream which are PGP 
encrypted HTML pages.
What I need is an octet-filter, which recognizes the pgp encryption, starts the 
decryption, recognizes the .html extension and opens a netscape window.

I managed this with the mutt_octet-filter script.
The following entries have been added by myself:

 mutt_octet-filter script 
[...]

ShowPGP()
{
encfilename="$1"
decfilename=${encfilename%.pgp}
cat "$1" | pgp +language=mutt +verbose=0 +force -f -o ${decfilename} 2 /dev/null
mutt_octet-filter ${decfilename}
rm -f ${decfilename} 2 /dev/null
}

ShowHTML()
{
echo "Using netscape to read html..."
mutt_bgrun mutt_netscape "$1" 2 /dev/null
}

[...]

case "$1" in
*.pgp ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowPGP"$1";;
*.PGP ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowPGP"$1";;
*.htm ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
*.html )ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
*.HTM ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
*.HTML )ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
[...]
 end of mutt_octet-filter script 

This is some sort of recursive octet-filter and it works fine.

But there is some thing, that is not nice:
The PGP decryption tool needs to ask for the passphrase. I haven't managed it to 
display the question for the passphrase in mutt.
The only solution was to suppress all pgp std output. But then I have to enter the 
passphrase "blindly".
Is there a way to use the passphrase mutt remembers?


Cu,
Daniel.




pgp encrypted text in octet-stream attachment

2000-10-10 Thread Daniel . Kollar

Hi,

do you remember that I asked for a recursive MIME attachment recognition in mutt?
The problem was, that I often receive MIME attachment as octet-stream which are PGP 
encrypted HTML pages.
What I need is an octet-filter, which recognizes the pgp encryption, starts the 
decryption, recognizes the .html extension and opens a netscape window.

I managed this with the mutt_octet-filter script.
The following entries have been added by myself:

 mutt_octet-filter script 
[...]

ShowPGP()
{
encfilename="$1"
decfilename=${encfilename%.pgp}
cat "$1" | pgp +language=mutt +verbose=0 +force -f -o ${decfilename} 2 /dev/null
mutt_octet-filter ${decfilename}
rm -f ${decfilename} 2 /dev/null
}

ShowHTML()
{
echo "Using netscape to read html..."
mutt_bgrun mutt_netscape "$1" 2 /dev/null
}

[...]

case "$1" in
*.pgp ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowPGP"$1";;
*.PGP ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowPGP"$1";;
*.htm ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
*.html )ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
*.HTM ) ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
*.HTML )ShowFileType "$1"; ShowHTML   "$1";;
[...]
 end of mutt_octet-filter script 

This is some sort of recursive octet-filter and it works fine.

But there is some thing, that is not nice:
The PGP decryption tool needs to ask for the passphrase. I haven't managed it to 
display the question for the passphrase in mutt.
The only solution was to suppress all pgp std output. But then I have to enter the 
passphrase "blindly".
Is there a way to use the passphrase mutt remembers?


Cu,
Daniel.




pgp encryption problem

2000-09-14 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi you all,

I'd like to use a not certified public key for encryption.
On command line with 'pgp -e filename' this works fine.

But out of mutt I get an 'Encryption error':

--- cut here -
Pretty Good Privacy(tm) Version 6.5.1 Int.
(c) 1999 Network Associates Inc.

Export of this software may be restricted by the U.S. government.

WARNING:  Because this public key is not certified with a trusted
signature, it is not known with high confidence that this public key
actually belongs to: "Fxxx Oxxx Txxx [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Encryption error

For a usage summary, type:  pgp -h
For more detailed help, consult the PGP User's Guide.
--- cut here -
(I just x'ed out the name and email address)


Regards,
Daniel.



Re: pgp encryption problem

2000-09-14 Thread Daniel Kollar

I solved the problem by myself.

In batchmode, pgp refuses to use an uncertified key and aborts with this Encryption 
Error.
I just needed to remove the "+batchmode" entry in the pgp encrypt command for mutt.

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:22:02PM +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 14:22:02 +0200
 From: Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: pgp encryption problem
 Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Hi you all,
 
 I'd like to use a not certified public key for encryption.
 On command line with 'pgp -e filename' this works fine.
 
 But out of mutt I get an 'Encryption error':
 
 --- cut here -
 Pretty Good Privacy(tm) Version 6.5.1 Int.
 (c) 1999 Network Associates Inc.
 
 Export of this software may be restricted by the U.S. government.
 
 WARNING:  Because this public key is not certified with a trusted
 signature, it is not known with high confidence that this public key
 actually belongs to: "Fxxx Oxxx Txxx [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
 Encryption error
 
 For a usage summary, type:  pgp -h
 For more detailed help, consult the PGP User's Guide.
 --- cut here -
 (I just x'ed out the name and email address)
 
 
 Regards,
 Daniel.



application/octet-stream

2000-08-30 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I'm not happy with the way mutt manages received mail attachments.

One problem is: I often receive html-pages pgp encrypted as octet-stream.
Questions:
1) How can I implement in the octet.filter.script the pgp decryption?
2) After decrypting I don't want to see the HTML code in the pager, but with Netscape. 
Can mutt do the attachment recognition recursively?
3) Can procmail modify the incoming messages in that way, that it replaces the 
"application/octet-stream" to a mime type determined in a similar way as the 
octet.filter.script does it?
   Then, mutt would handle the attachment concerning to its mailcap entry.

Regards,
Daniel.



lbdb with ldap query ?

2000-08-29 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

does a module ldap_query exists for the little brother database?


Regards,
Daniel.



fcc-hook update after To: change

2000-08-24 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I encountered a missing feature (or a bug?).

When creating a new mail and exiting the editor, mutt fills in the correct Fcc: folder 
according to the fcc-hook entry.
When the To: entry is changed after this, the Fcc: should be updated.

Can this be implemented?

Cu,
Daniel.
-- 

+ DANIEL KOLLAR   Fujitsu Microelectronics Europe GmbH +
+ Application EngineerASIC/RF Technology   +
+ fon +49(0)6103-690-212  Am Siebenstein 6-10  +
+ fax +49(0)6103-690-122  D-63303 Dreieich-Buchschlag  +
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]+





fcc-hook update after To: change

2000-08-24 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I encountered a missing feature (or a bug?).

When creating a new mail and exiting the editor, mutt fills in the correct Fcc: folder 
according to the fcc-hook entry.
When the To: entry is changed after this, the Fcc: should be updated.

Can this be implemented?

Cu,
Daniel.
-- 

+ DANIEL KOLLAR   Fujitsu Microelectronics Europe GmbH +
+ Application EngineerASIC/RF Technology   +
+ fon +49(0)6103-690-212  Am Siebenstein 6-10  +
+ fax +49(0)6103-690-122  D-63303 Dreieich-Buchschlag  +
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]+




pgp encrypting problems

2000-08-17 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I've got problems with the pgp encryption.

I'm using pgp2 and did everything described in the PGP-Notes.
PGP decoding works slow, but great.

When replying to a pgp encoded mail I get asked for a keyID.
What do I need to enter there? Regardless of what I've tried, I get the keyID query 
again and again.
Isn't what I'm entering there the '%r', which is passed to the command:
  pgp_encrypt_only_command="pgp +encrypttoself +language=mutt +verbose=0 +batchmode 
-aeft %r  %f"

I've tried this outside mutt in an xterm and it worked.
Inside mutt I still keep in the loop of the keyID query. What's wrong?

Thx for help,
Daniel.



no external programs can be used

2000-08-16 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I'm a mutt newbie and I have a basic problem:

It seems that no external program can be startet out of mutt.

I.e.:
1) The external editor is set to "vim".
   When I try to compose a message, I get the following error in mutt: "Aborted 
unmodified message." instead that vim opens up.
2) The "mutt_ldap_query.pl" for the query_command gives no results. When typing 'Q' in 
the mutt message index, I only get a beep after entering the search phrase. Trying 
'mutt_ldap_query.pl search phrase' in an xterm gives the expected results and seems 
to work.

Thank you for help.

Cu,
Daniel.



Re: no external programs can be used

2000-08-16 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I solved the problem by myself.
I used the csh as a shell for --with-exec-shell command with configure script.
ksh instead works fine.

Daniel Kollar wrote:
 
 Hi there,
 
 I'm a mutt newbie and I have a basic problem:
 
 It seems that no external program can be startet out of mutt.
 
 I.e.:
 1) The external editor is set to "vim".
When I try to compose a message, I get the following error in mutt: "Aborted 
unmodified message." instead that vim opens up.
 2) The "mutt_ldap_query.pl" for the query_command gives no results. When typing 'Q' 
in the mutt message index, I only get a beep after entering the search phrase. Trying 
'mutt_ldap_query.pl search phrase' in an xterm gives the expected results and seems 
to work.
 
 Thank you for help.
 
 Cu,
 Daniel.

-- 
=======
Daniel Kollar  FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS EUROPE GmbH
Application Engineer   ASIC/RF Technology

Phone : +49(0)6103-690-212 Am Siebenstein 6-10
Fax   : +49(0)6103-690-122 D-63303 Dreieich-Buchschlag
===



Folder overview ?

2000-08-16 Thread Daniel Kollar

Hi there,

I'm missing an incoming folders overview.
Procmail is spooling the incoming mail to different folders.
How do I detect, which folders content new mail without entering each?

Cu.
Daniel