Re: abook is ugly. What else is there?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:54:00PM +, MindFuq wrote: What do you non-abook users use? I don't care if it's textual or graphical. Check out lbdb (Little Brother Data Base) -- google for 'lbdb'. It has a bunch of modules (including something called 'm_palm', and lots of others) that can import address and print them out in a mutt-readable manner (so the internal query utility can read them). But I'll leave that investigation to you. /db
[OT] Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:58:06PM -0400, Keith R. John Warno wrote: gqap in conjunction with 'comments' works well. But I'm curious: how do folks handle reformatting text with multiple levels of quoting? For me, it just works. I think vim recognized the message I'm editing as an email (part of it's auto file type recognition, I imagine) so it also recognizes the typical quote characters... 'gqap' operates correctly on multi-level quotes in this mail mode. If you wonder how it all works: :help syntax :help formatting in vim should answer all your questions. /db
Re: The browser
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:13:48PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: Another frustrating thing that happens is that the new-mail indicator doesn't work on that box even if it actually contains new massages. :-( When I come out of a folder (to the browser screen), the folder I am *in* is not marked with an N. I belive that this is becuase this folder is still open by the running mutt. Is this what you are referring to? /db
Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:03:26PM -0400, Mike Leone wrote: Exchange, by default, makes it's Global Address Books available via LDAP, so anything that reads LDAP can read it off of Exchange that way. Not so for personal address books. Thanks for the tip... Good info. /db
Re: The browser
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press enter? Sometimes... like when new mail comes in the mailbox I was just in, I sometimes get taken back to said mailbox. It happens so infrequently that I have never worried about looking into it. /db
[OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: In particular, it is my understanding that there is some way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the server. Maybe it's LDAP? If so than you may be in luck. Perhaps it has something to do with the query functions? Do I need an external program to help? Absolutely you will. Thus, the rest of this mail is a bit Off-Topic for this list. Is there a HOWTO somewhere (Google did not find anything useful for mutt exchange howto)? Mutt would have nothing to do with this... So your search probably wouldn't be that useful... Furthermore, I don't know of a way (outside of maybe Ximian's Exchange Connector program) to interface with Exchange address books from non-M$ platforms. If you have an LDAP server at your office, you might want to try a google search for mutt LDAP. This seems to be a more logical choice (And returned a couple interesting hits when I ran it). But there is nothing in mutt (other than it's ability to read data from external programs), that can interface with an Exchange server. /db
vi-style keybindings for mutt
All, I figure this question has been asked before, but I can't find it anywhere. Is there any way to switch the key-bindings while line-editing (like at the 'To:' prompt or at any other prompt that *mutt* brings up) to simple vi-style key bindings (I'm thinking of a patch here)? Much like you expect after typing 'set -o vi' at a Posix-sh prompt. Thanks... /db
Re: vi-style keybindings for mutt
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:57:52PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: * David Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-15 06:30]: Is there any way to switch the key-bindings while line-editing (like at the 'To:' prompt or at any other prompt that *mutt* brings up) to simple vi-style key bindings (I'm thinking of a patch here)? no. That's unfortunate. send the patch! Well, I doubt it, but we will see. i hope you are aware that there is a lot to be changed to achieve vi modes there? Oh, I have a feeling it's more difficult than I want it to be, but I would like the change (I hit esc just about every time I go to edit a string in mutt). Since I hardly ever use the arrow keys anywhere else, it'd be nice if mutt could be taken off the short list. /db
