Re: [OT] procmail rule
* Benjamin Michotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Apr 18. 2002 21:56]: hello, sorry for the off-topic but I would like to add a rules to my procmailrc to create archive by month; ie mutt-users.april.2002 Any Idea ? man 8 cron man 5 crontab man crontab -- Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort? -- A. P. J.
Re: List-Reply
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Apr 16. 2002 15:12]: Alternately, just do the To:, and ignore the Cc:, because people shouldn't be Cc:ing lists. But that may just be me. But they do. A LOT. -- Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort? -- A. P. J.
Re: Compiling problems with newer autoconf on vvv.nntp patch
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 14. 2002 15:30]: Now using the latest autoconf-2.53 I get the error message: $ ./configure [...] $ make cd . autoconf configure.in:296: error: do not use LIBOBJS directly, use AC_LIBOBJ (see section `AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS' make: *** [configure] Error 1 $ The output of ./configuire seems as normal. Any ideas? Is it a bug or did I something wrong? --- mutt-1.3.28/configure.in.old2002-03-13 13:49:46.0 +0100 +++ mutt-1.3.28/configure.in2002-04-03 13:09:53.0 +0200 @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS(snprintf, , [mutt_cv_snprintf=yes]) AC_CHECK_FUNCS(vsnprintf, , [mutt_cv_snprintf=yes]) if test $mutt_cv_snprintf = yes; then -LIBOBJS=$LIBOBJS snprintf.o + AC_LIBOBJ([snprintf]) fi dnl SCO uses chsize() instead of ftruncate() @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ if test $mutt_cv_regex = yes; then AC_DEFINE(USE_GNU_REGEX,1,[ Define if you want to use the included regex.c. ]) -LIBOBJS=$LIBOBJS regex.o + AC_LIBOBJ([regex]) fi This patch fixes it. -- Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort? -- A. P. J.
Re: orange editor
* Todd Kokoszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Mar 11. 2002 13:16]: Hi, I happily use vi as my editor with mutt. However, when I started using commands like d/. or c/; and the +like (changing or deleting a line until a specific character), my vi display under mutt changed. Each +character that I chose became highlighted in orange. Today I chose I think the d/. and now my entire vi +display, except for the background is in orange. Vi outside of mutt is fine -- that's why I'm writing +here. What'a the editor line in your .muttrc? -- Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort? -- A. P. J.
Re: SPAM-filter with mutt
* Jobst Landgrebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Feb 18. 2002 14:59]: Dear List, I'm looking for a SPAMfilter that I could combine with mutt. Does anyone have a good suggestion which filter is easy to setup together with mutt and how this must be done? Is there a filter one can call from the .muttrc-file? One alternative to look at would be: http://www.spamassassin.org -- Mads Martin Jørgensen, http://mmj.dk Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort? -- A. P. J.
