Re: Is pgp_strict_enc working
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:50:09PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 20:28:12 CEST] wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote: I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me or mutt? (Of course! Mutt can't be wrong, I know! :-) Why would someone want this? QP is chosen to ensure that the body of a messages is not touched and can be safely transported and delivered. Signing unencoded mail may cause some MTA on the path to do encoding so that you can't verify anything. Because my emails read users of MUA, that dont understand that =50=65 messages. In which character set do you send non-signed mail? Maybe your $send_charset overides it? I have set send_charset=us-ascii:iso-8859-2:utf8 in my muttrc file. How can send_charset overide pgp_strict_enc? Anyway. Is the pgp_strict_enc setting working? Not for me. I just noticed that it does not always work for me. Thanks. Patrik msg27214/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Is pgp_strict_enc working
Hi! I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me or mutt? (Of course! Mutt can't be wrong, I know! :-) Thank Patrik. msg27182/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Is pgp_strict_enc working
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote: Hi, * Patrik Modesto [04/15/02 13:46:31 CEST] wrote: I'm having problems with pgp_strict_enc. I want mutt to not encode message to quoted-printable before pgp sign, so I set pgp_strict_enc to no in my .muttrc, but mutt still encode it before sign. What's wrong? Me or mutt? (Of course! Mutt can't be wrong, I know! :-) Why would someone want this? QP is chosen to ensure that the body of a messages is not touched and can be safely transported and delivered. Signing unencoded mail may cause some MTA on the path to do encoding so that you can't verify anything. Because my emails read users of MUA, that dont understand that =50=65 messages. Anyway. Is the pgp_strict_enc setting working? Not for me. Patrik msg27198/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Why is http address attachet to header?
Hi! I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing. I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this correct? Patrik
Why is http address attachet to header?
Hi! I use Mutt 1.3.27i (2002-01-22) from Debian testing. I create new message, then to the first empty line under header i write http://www.something.com and send this mail. This address is send as a part of email's header and body of this mail is empty. Why? Is this correct? Patrik msg26343/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Strange attachement
Hi, I often get mail with attachement like this: begin 666 Studie.doc MT,\1X*QN$`/@`#`/[_0! M/P``$ ``00$```#^`#X```#_ M snip ` end It is sent from MSOE and it looks like that, only when the user forwards interesting messages to someone else. When sending new composed mail, attachement looks right and is recogniced by mutt. I think, this is not a valid form of attachement. What can be wrong? Thanks. Patrik
Re: Strange attachement
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:27:45PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Patrik Modesto wrote: Hi, I often get mail with attachement like this: begin 666 Studie.doc MT,\1X*QN$`/@`#`/[_0! M/P``$ ``00$```#^`#X```#_ M snip ` end It is sent from MSOE and it looks like that, only when the user forwards interesting messages to someone else. When sending new composed mail, attachement looks right and is recogniced by mutt. I think, this is not a valid form of attachement. What can be wrong? pipe it into uudecode - '|uudecode' should do the trick. I wouldn't be able to tell you when OE decides to encode an attachment in MIME and when in UU, but either way is decodable. It works. Thanks. But one question. Why mutt doesn't recognise it as a regular attachement? Patrik HTH :) -- Dan Boger Linux MVP brainbench.com
Re: Strange attachement
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed: Hi, I often get mail with attachement like this: begin 666 Studie.doc MT,\1X*QN$`/@`#`/[_0! M/P``$ ``00$```#^`#X```#_ M snip ` end It is sent from MSOE and it looks like that, only when the user forwards interesting messages to someone else. When sending new composed mail, attachement looks right and is recogniced by mutt. I think, this is not a valid form of attachement. What can be wrong? Looks like a M$ Word attachment. You have to edit the mailcap file and tell it how to handle these attachments. You might want to take a look But this attachment doesn't have any application/... signature. It is completely inline. What line should I add in mailcap? at third party apps for Mutt (look in the archives, or maybe someone can repost the URI? I don't remember it offhand). At the mutt page, you can take a look at mutt pages by mutt users. There are lots of very cool things you can do to have almost any kind of attachment handled and viewable automatically - if you want. Mutt will do most anything you need or want it to do, but the front end work can be a long process. Get using it, and find out how to solve each problem when it gets to the point where it's worth the while to search mutt.org and the list, etc. I don't think I can ever use another MUA, but I still haven't gotten all the rough edges smoothed out completely. BTW, if you want to view Word Docs inline, there are useful links directly from Mutt regarding configuration. The 3rd party app you want is wv, I think. Used to be wordview, but it changed a while back. No. I don't want to view MS word document inline. It could by nice to show this file in attachments submenu, for easy saving. Patrik HTH Lou -- Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Steinbach's Guideline for Systems Programming: Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle.
Re: Strange attachement
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:43:41PM -0800, David Ellement wrote: On 011126, at 23:02:16, Patrik Modesto wrote On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: On 11/26/01 10:21 PM, Patrik Modesto sat at the `puter and typed: I often get mail with attachement like this: begin 666 Studie.doc MT,\1X*QN$`/@`#`/[_0! snip ` end It is sent from MSOE ... What can be wrong? Looks like a M$ Word attachment. You have to edit the mailcap file and tell it how to handle these attachments. You might want to take a look But this attachment doesn't have any application/... signature. It is completely inline. What line should I add in mailcap? Do the message headers indicate that it is a multi-part message? If so, there should be a Content-Type header for the attachment. You'll need a mailcap entry to tell it how you want that type decoded. If the headers don't indicate a multi-part message, the attachment hasn't been sent as an attachment and mutt won't recognize it as such. There is no Content-Type header. There is: few times Received: from From, To, Subject, Date fields X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Return-Path: -removed/private- X-Orcpt: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: RO Content-Length: 48003 Lines: 781 then few empty lines and then the encoded file above. I can get to the PC that sends this attachments so I will check it's MSOE setup. Thanks. Patrik
Re: browser
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:58:39AM +, John Kearney wrote: * John Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09 10:40]: how can i change the way browser lists my mail folders from ls -l style(or whatever one it is) to just a simple ls or ls -a i hate replying to my own emails ok i just found this set folder_format=%f but i still want to know can i make it print more than one on the same line ? I saw a patch on some Czech (*.cz) web-server, but I can't find it now. Sorry. :( Patrik TIA again ? TIA
Auto CC the From: when reply in mailing list
Hello, I'm looking for a special version of List-reply function, that automaticaly CC the sender. So new mail header would look like this: From: me To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: someone who wrote the mail to the list How to do it? Mody
