Re: character limit

2001-01-28 Thread Tabor J. Wells 

On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:09:58PM -0500,
Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is thought to have said:

> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:13:12PM -0500, Timberwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>wrote:
> > Daniel:
> > 
> > Where is the standard for line wrapping limits set? Is that in an 
> > RFC? If so, can you point me to the RFC that lays out the proper 
> > form for outbound message character wrapping.
> 
> I don't know if it's in an RFC.  But it's long-standing netiquette to do
> it.

RFC 1855 (the Netiquette RFC) Section 2.1.1, contains the following:

- Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line
  with a carriage return.

Tabor
-- 
--------
Tabor J. Wells[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator 
Art Technology Group  http://www.atg.com

Re: mutt & courier-imap

2000-12-14 Thread Tabor J. Wells 

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:21:34PM -0500,
Michael MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is thought to have said:

> Can anyone point me in a good direction for solving this problem?  I'm
> frustrated because I can't seem to figure out if the problem is with
> configuration or if it's implementation problems of the client and/or 
> server.
> 
> I'm using mutt 1.2.5i (debian potato package recompiled with ssl
> support) against courier-imap 0.31.
> 
> TIA for any advice.

I've found that using the mutt development version 1.3.12i works much
better for IMAP support. Besides fixing the problem with notifications it
deals with other things better as well (like expunging messages from an
IMAP folder not requiring a re-download of all of the headers in the
mailbox).

However while it is still beta software and has core dumped on me a few
times, I think the IMAP support in 1.3.12i is much more solid than in
1.2.5i

HTH

Tabor

-- 
------------
Tabor J. Wells[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator 
Art Technology Group  http://www.atg.com

Re: folder-hooks with IMAP mailboxes?

2000-11-27 Thread Tabor J. Wells 

On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 08:01:29PM +,
Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is thought to have said:

> Ah, got it!
> 
> use
> 
> folder-hook INBOX.mutt-users set sort=thread
> 
> instead so long as the folder appears in your .muttrc.

Doesn't work for me with 1.3.11i.

>From my .muttrc:

mailboxes ! {server}INBOX.mutt-users

folder-hook INBOX.mutt-users set sort=thread

and it still defaults to date-received

Tabor

-- 
--------
Tabor J. Wells[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator 
Art Technology Group  http://www.atg.com

folder-hooks with IMAP mailboxes?

2000-11-26 Thread Tabor J. Wells 

Up until yesterday I had folder-hook statements that look like:

folder-hook =mutt-users set sort=thread

Yesterday I moved everything from local mailboxes to IMAP mailboxes at my
site and I've been unable to figure out how to get this behavior when I
enter the mailbox.

I would have expected that:

folder-hook {hostname}INBOX.mutt-users set sort=thread

would work, but that apparantly is not the case. Any suggestions on what I'm
missing?

Thanks,

Tabor

-- 
--------
Tabor J. Wells[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator 
Art Technology Group  http://www.atg.com