Re: Mutt under Win2k
Just run the Cygwin setup (the link is on the Cygwin page). You'll get the binary. You need to select source if you want the source. You'll end up with mutt (and a bunch of other useful stuff). Todd * Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010321 07:35]: Hi! I would like to get mutt running on my notebook and M$ Windows. I've looked at the www.cygwin.com homepage but could not make out that mutt is supported by cygwin. Where do I get the source or binary of mutt for cygwin? BTW: cygwin is new for me and not yet installed on my notebook. What tools do I have to install on the laptop to get mutt running? Thank you very much for your answer. Best regards, Daniel.
MIME Parts Not Forwarded?
I'm running mutt-1.3.7 on Solaris. When I forward a message it doesn't forward any of the MIME parts except the first text part. It seems to operate this way whether I forward MIME-encoded or not. Is this just the way it works or am I missing something? Thank you, Todd Goodman
Re: MIME Parts Not Forwarded?
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 11:12]: This is controlled by a number of variables listed under 2.5. Forwarding and Bouncing Mail in the mutt manual. Personally, I only use set mime_forward=ask-no I'm still not "getting it". I have mime_forward set as you do to ask-no. I didn't have mime_forward_rest set so it should have defaulted to "yes" (I tried setting it explicitly to "yes" and had the same results). Perhaps I'm not asking the right way (or it's so obvious that it wouldn't/shouldn't work the way I want that my question isn't clear). I expect mime_forward to control whether the original message is attached as a MIME attachment (if yes) or included in the first text part (that is edited by the editor). I then would have thought that mime_forward_rest would control whether other attachments in the original message would be included as attachments in the forwarded message. If I want to forward a message with attachments it seems that I need to save the attachments, forward the text part and then reattach the files before sending. Is this really the only way to do this? Thank you, Todd
Re: MIME Parts Not Forwarded?
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 11:59]: If you answer "Forward MIME encapsulated? ([n]/y):", which is controlled by mime_forward, with yes, the complete message will be attached as one message/rfc822 attachment. Is that what you want? Have you tried whether mime_forward_decode makes a difference? What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the orginal message attached just as they were in the original.
Re: MIME Parts Not Forwarded?
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:03]: On 2000.08.16, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Todd Goodman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the orginal message attached just as they were in the original. Use resend-message. This sounds intriguing, however I can't find that function documented anywhere in the mutt manual. You don't mean bounce-message, right? Todd
Re: MIME Parts Not Forwarded?
* Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000816 14:16]: Todd Goodman writes: What I'm ultimately looking for is to edit the first text part (as when I answer no to mime_forward) but to still have all other parts of the orginal message attached just as they were in the original. I *think* the only way to do this is is to go to the attachment menu (v - view attachments), tag all attachments, and then ;-f (forward all tagged parts) MIME encapsulated, although the original text part will be an attachment, too, and cannot be edited. OK. Thanks very much. Todd
Re: M$ dog
* John Saylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000717 21:50]: Has anyone done anything about porting mutt to the windows world? Someone has reportedly ported mutt and sendmail to Cygwin (see http://sourceware.cygnus.com/cygwin). Check out http://www.fiction.net/blong/programs/mutt/ for the mutt patch. I don't use either yet, but that's because I grab all my mail from UNIX machines at work.
