Re: ';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
* Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-29 08:24:21 -0500]: I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the 'index' menu for use. I find no indication of this in the manual or 'man muttrc', other than the description of 'auto_tag' which indicates the 'index menu' mode is necessary. Is there a way to make this function usable in pager mode, or do I have a local problem? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org Wouldn't something like: bind pager ; tag-prefix ...do the trick? (Note I said something _like_, I'm not sure if that's a drop-in. :p) -- John Buttery The easiest way to protest free speech is to pretend that you are being forced to listen to it. (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg30586/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: ';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-31 19:57]: Wouldn't something like: bind pager ; tag-prefix do the trick? no. this command is *not* available in the pager menu, so you cannot bind it at all. use the help command to verify this. it's easy. hint hint ;-) Sven
Re: ';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
Michael Tatge wrote: Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the 'index' menu for use. Yeah, so what? Comeon is that such a hard thing to do? Perhaps not, but it is annoying -- since a lot of people use 'pager_index_lines', it does seem like it would be nice if mutt would at least allow you to bind certain functions (limit / tag-prefix, etc) in the pager, even if they're not bound by default. -- Will Yardley input: william @ hq . newdream . net .
';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the 'index' menu for use. I find no indication of this in the manual or 'man muttrc', other than the description of 'auto_tag' which indicates the 'index menu' mode is necessary. Is there a way to make this function usable in pager mode, or do I have a local problem? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://counter.li.org
Re: ';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the 'index' menu for use. Yeah, so what? Comeon is that such a hard thing to do? Michael -- Are [Linux users] lemmings collectively jumping off of the cliff of reliable, well-engineered commercial software? (By Matt Welsh) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: ';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
Michael Tatge wrote: Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the 'index' menu for use. Yeah, so what? Comeon is that such a hard thing to do? Perhaps not, but it is annoying -- since a lot of people use 'pager_index_lines', it does seem like it would be nice if mutt would at least allow you to bind certain functions (limit / tag-prefix, etc) in the pager, even if they're not bound by default. -- Will Yardley input: william @ hq . newdream . net .
Re: ';' tag-prefix function dead in pager mode
* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-29 22:17]: Michael Tatge wrote: Patrick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: I am unable while in pager mode to use the tag-prefix (;) operator to perform operations on tag-selected e-mails. Requires changing to the 'index' menu for use. Yeah, so what? Comeon is that such a hard thing to do? Perhaps not, but it is annoying -- since a lot of people use 'pager_index_lines', it does seem like it would be nice if mutt would at least allow you to bind certain functions (limit / tag-prefix, etc) in the pager, even if they're not bound by default. different menus - different contexts. macros can help. nuff said. Sven
