Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-19 Thread David T-G

Ailbhe --

...and then Ailbhe Leamy said...
% On (17/11/01 22:44), David T-G wrote:
% 
%  I work in support and part of what floats my boat is helping other
%  people.
% 
% You sick, sick bunny.

Yep!  And I take that as a compliment, too ;-)


% 
% Ailbhe
% 
% -- 
% Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg20566/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-18 Thread Ailbhe Leamy

On (17/11/01 22:44), David T-G wrote:

 I work in support and part of what floats my boat is helping other
 people.

You sick, sick bunny.

Ailbhe

-- 
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/



Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-18 Thread Andrew Eichmann

On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 07:57:04AM -0500, Bela Bartok wrote:
 

some comments snipped


 I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i 
 disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want 
 to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for handling 
 emails.
 thanks again.
 

To flush out the mail queues and send things on their way, try:

sendmail -q

before you disconnect.  Works for me.  Any reason not to do it this
way, folks?


Regards,
Andy Eichmann


 
 




[Fwd: help]

2001-11-17 Thread Bela Bartok



---BeginMessage---



Hi, your letter, beside joke at me, did no solve my problem, you are the 
tipical person that joke at other's confusion and dont help!, you are 
the typical person that full mailing lists or wise, deep comments 
and reflections but dont help!!!. You are the typical open source 
anti-support guy.!

Hey - I think you didn't read the email exect enough. 

Look, there are many people, that learn something for a basic, user 
perspective and join mailing lists and enjoy repling to newbie questions 
in a wise, deep and a bit rude way, because they know it all. I 
dont  agree with that because they are people that offend, discourage 
and ridicule new user that, for sure, in the future, will develop and 
give support to future new users.
ok, I know we should respect other's style and i think i must apoligize 
to mutt-users mailing list.

I the mail from
the open source anti-support guy was written down that you shouldn't use
an email-client to deliver emails. You should use an MTA to deliver them.

So - If you really want an email-client also working as MTA (the program
to deliver your mails) you can't use mutt.

If you want use mutt, you should/must use a MTA like sendmail, postfix, exim,
... Whatever you want! It's your choice to use the best/fastest/simplest mta
or whatever YOU want.

ok, now How windoze programs (eudora, outlook, etc) send email if they 
dont have a running sendmail daemon?
I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i 
disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want 
to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for handling 
emails.
thanks again.




---End Message---


Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-17 Thread Sean LeBlanc

On 11-17 07:57, Bela Bartok wrote:
snip
 ok, now How windoze programs (eudora, outlook, etc) send email if they 
 dont have a running sendmail daemon?
 I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i 
 disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want 
 to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for handling 
 emails.

Hey, Bela, I feel your pain...at least a little bit, anyway. I've just
started using Mutt less than a week ago, and people here sure have helped
out a lot! I've gotten quite a few things ironed out, and switched to mutt
as my main mailer. 

I didn't want to set up sendmail, either, just to send out emails. I found this
sweet little utility:
http://www.muquit.com/muquit/software/smtp_pl/smtp_pl.html
REALLY easy to use, and believe me, I set this up when I was in a stupid and
lazy kind of mood. :) I definitely did not want to tackle sendmail, that seems
like a really big hammer for only one user. YMMV.


-- 
-
Sean LeBlanc, [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-17 Thread Petr Baudis

 I didn't want to set up sendmail, either, just to send out emails. I found
 this sweet little utility:
 http://www.muquit.com/muquit/software/smtp_pl/smtp_pl.html REALLY easy to
 use, and believe me, I set this up when I was in a stupid and lazy kind of
 mood. :) I definitely did not want to tackle sendmail, that seems like a
 really big hammer for only one user. YMMV.

What about putting some tips for those programs into mutt's manual? It looks
that this feature is frequently wanted by users, and if we don't want to
implement it, we should at least help users a little more to install something
simple which will do the job.

-- 

Petr Pasky Baudis

UN*X programmer, UN*X administrator, hobbies = IPv6, IRC
Real Users hate Real Programmers.
Public PGP key, geekcode and stuff: http://pasky.ji.cz/~pasky/



Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-17 Thread Bela Bartok



snip

ok, now How windoze programs (eudora, outlook, etc) send email if they 
dont have a running sendmail daemon?
I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i 
disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want 
to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for handling 
emails.


Hey, Bela, I feel your pain...at least a little bit, anyway. I've just
started using Mutt less than a week ago, and people here sure have helped
out a lot! I've gotten quite a few things ironed out, and switched to mutt
as my main mailer. 

I didn't want to set up sendmail, either, just to send out emails. I found this
sweet little utility:
http://www.muquit.com/muquit/software/smtp_pl/smtp_pl.html

hey LeBlanc, you are right, did you install it on freebsd? it needs some 
perl modules, i found one in ports collection (mail::sendmail) but i did 
no find mail::internet. ok, i will keep looking, this topic is not about 
mutt, so, let's cut it.
thank you, mutt is a example of friendly and powerfull open source comunity.





Re: [Fwd: help]

2001-11-17 Thread David T-G

Bela --

...and then Bela Bartok said...
% 
% Hi, your letter, beside joke at me, did no solve my problem, you are the 
...
% Hey - I think you didn't read the email exect enough. 
% 
% Look, there are many people, that learn something for a basic, user 
...
% and ridicule new user that, for sure, in the future, will develop and 
% give support to future new users.
% ok, I know we should respect other's style and i think i must apoligize 
% to mutt-users mailing list.

I work in support and part of what floats my boat is helping other
people.  If you truly found my answer flippant, I apologize.  I tried to
explain what the protocols do and don't do and even suggested methods
that might work for you while allowing you to continue to use mutt.


% 
% ... Whatever you want! It's your choice to use the best/fastest/simplest 
% mta
% or whatever YOU want.
% 
% ok, now How windoze programs (eudora, outlook, etc) send email if they 
% dont have a running sendmail daemon?

They talk, as I said in my previous email, directly over a TCP/IP
connection to port 25 on a remote server specified in your setup.
That is referred to in many circles as bloatware, where one loads many
functions onto one program at the expense of configurability.  mutt does
not try to talk over a TCP/IP connection (or anything else that you may
have in your network) but instead hands it off to a mail transport agent;
you can have any MTA you wish.


% I just dont want to use sendmail, if i am sending a big email, and i 
% disconnect, it will stay in sendmail queue, and i dont want that. I want 

How, if I may possibly ask without offending, would Eudora handle the
same problem of disconnecting while sending?  At some point you're going
to have to make a connection off of your machine and send the bytes over
the wire; what's the difference if it's a TCP/IP connection from within
your mail program or a TCP/IP connection from a real mail transport
agent?


% to the simpler, bert solution for desktop freebsd machine for handling 
% emails.

Best is clearly an opinion whose definition may differ.  Most mutt
users would say that letting a mail transport agent, even a very simple
one meant purely for sending outgoing messages to another server, do the
work is the best instead of having to incorporate additional networking
code into a tight, small, fast mail user agent.


% thanks again.

Hope this helps, once again.


:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg20551/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature