Re: Certain (mailing list) emails NOT being threaded ... trying to

2010-01-09 Thread Rado S
=- Wilkinson, Alex wrote on Fri  8.Jan'10 at 12:38:55 +0800 -=

 However, threading never ever has seemed to work. I am finally
 wanting to investigate why and if possible how to fix it.
 {...}
 Here is my folder-hook to implement threading:
 {...}
 Can anyone suggest why the aforementioned Sysinternals Forums
 Topic Reply Notification emails would not be threaded or methods
 to try investigate why.

Try to make it work without hooks first, they make things
complicated to track down.
If it works then, then you've conflicting hooks.
Verify sort _is_ actually set to threads, add it to your
status_format or see DebugConfig on wiki.
Otherwise strict_threads=no should do it, if the Subject: string
actually is identical: sometimes a whitespace (or changed
line-wrapping) can spoil it, invisible to the eye, but machines see
everything.

-- 
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least to show your attitude.
You're responsible for ALL you do: you get what you give.


Certain (mailing list) emails NOT being threaded ... trying to work out why ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-01-07 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
Hi all,

I am subscribed to email alerts from:

   From: Sysinternals Forums fo...@forum.sysinternals.com

However, threading never ever has seemed to work. I am finally
wanting to investigate why and if possible how to fix it.

Here is an example of a series of emails that should have been threaded:

 03 N Jan 08 Sysinternals Fo (2.6K) Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply 
Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and usbport.sys hardware interrupts
-   0  141 N Jan 07 Sysinternals Fo (4.0K) Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply 
Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and usbport.sys hardware interrupts
 0  165 N Jan 07 Sysinternals Fo (4.4K) Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply 
Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and usbport.sys hardware interrupts
 0  166 N Jan 07 Sysinternals Fo (4.4K) Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply 
Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and usbport.sys hardware interrupts
 0  184 N Jan 07 Sysinternals Fo (4.7K) Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply 
Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and usbport.sys hardware interrupts
 0  188 N Jan 07 Sysinternals Fo (6.6K) Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply 
Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and usbport.sys hardware interrupts

Here is my folder-hook to implement threading:

   folder-hook . \
set sort=reverse-threads ;\
 set sort_aux=last-date-received ;\
 set duplicate_threads=yes ;\
 push 'delete-pattern~=enter' ;\
 push 'collapse-all' ;\
 set index_format='%3N %4C %S %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4c) %?M?%M 
?%s' ;\
 set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass'

Can anyone suggest why the aforementioned Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply
Notification emails would not be threaded or methods to try investigate why.

Thanks

   -Alex


IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence 
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 
1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact 
the sender and delete the email.



Re: Certain (mailing list) emails NOT being threaded ... trying to

2010-01-07 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On Friday, January  8 at 12:38 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
However, threading never ever has seemed to work. I am finally
wanting to investigate why and if possible how to fix it.

Do you have strict threading enabled? If so, try turning it off (unset 
strict_threads). It's possible that that mailing list is stripping out 
the usual email headers that establish threads (such as In-Reply-To 
and References).

~Kyle
- -- 
In all affairs it's a healthy thing now and then to hang a question 
mark on the things you have long taken for granted.
-- Bertrand Russell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!
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=ZTWB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Certain (mailing list) emails NOT being threaded ... trying to

2010-01-07 Thread Wilkinson, Alex

0n Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:48:37PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: 

On Friday, January  8 at 12:38 PM, quoth Wilkinson, Alex:
However, threading never ever has seemed to work. I am finally
wanting to investigate why and if possible how to fix it.

Do you have strict threading enabled? If so, try turning it off (unset 
strict_threads). It's possible that that mailing list is stripping out 
the usual email headers that establish threads (such as In-Reply-To 
and References).

I added unset strict_threads to my folder-hook e.g.

   folder-hook . \
set sort=reverse-threads ;\
 set sort_aux=last-date-received ;\
 set duplicate_threads=yes ;\
 unset strict_threads ;\
 push 'delete-pattern~=enter' ;\
 push 'collapse-all' ;\
 set index_format='%3N %4C %S %{%b %d} %-15.15F (%4c) %?M?%M 
?%s' ;\
 set display_filter='t-prot -acelmtS -Mmutt --spass'

However still no threading :(

I looked at the headers and you are correct - there is no In-Reply-To header.
However there are these two:

   thread-index: AcqPygfdiA/1vWBTRGqs/6xP5Fmwtw==
   Thread-Topic: Sysinternals Forums Topic Reply Notification : dxgkrnl.sys and 
usbport.sys hardware interrupts

Is there any way in mutt to add a custom rule for threading ? e.g Thread msg's
based on the Thread-Topic: header ?

  -Alex

IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence 
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 
1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact 
the sender and delete the email.