Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever wished you could take back something you said? Well here's some good news: Outlook allows you to recall an email message that you sent to another Outlook user! This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such feature. But wouldn't that be another nice feature for mutt? Maybe, but once a message enters an SMTP stream, it tends to get delivered permanently. :) -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson Convex Division |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Have you ever wished you could take back something you said? Well here's some good news: Outlook allows you to recall an email message that you sent to another Outlook user! This feature works only if the message you're trying to recall hasn't yet been opened by the receiver. You can choose to simply delete unread copies of the message, or you can replace unread copies of the message with a brand new message. You can also request to be notified whether the message recall was successful. Once you've selected the options you want, click OK, and Outlook attempts to recall the message you selected. Hmm, I wonder how one can abuse this? But wouldn't that be another nice feature for mutt? I believe this is only for within an intranet type network. I don't think it works for the Internet. -Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 06:54:25PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: Hmm, I wonder how one can abuse this? But wouldn't that be another nice feature for mutt? Ralf, you should lock your screen while away from the computer. I can't believe you actually typed this :) Ok, the eclipse burned my brain, but this is actually the stupidest idea M$ EVER had, and so I thought I'd share my thoughts... -- Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. PGP signature
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such feature. Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature? -- Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb The secret of flying is simple: Throw yourself at the ground and miss. PGP signature
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:26:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such feature. Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature? And now, for your amusement, i can inform you that it already does :-) How? Easy, simply send a new mail like this: | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: FOLDER INTERNAL DATA, IGNORE | Supersedes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Expires: Wed, 10 Aug 1999 14:00:43 +0100 (CEST) | | This is an folder internal cancel message, please ignore me :-) And have the recipient have the following line in his .muttrc: push D~S|~E\n (not tested :-) CU, Sec -- The UNIX Guru's View of Sex: # unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep