Just FYI ... this is pretty good as far as I can see. ----- Forwarded message from USM Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: USM Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:31:19 +0530 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LIH] mutt and gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:19:31AM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote: > > is there any way in mutt to gpg-sign only certain messages? > for example, when i post to the LIH or any list, i don't > want to sign them 'coz they only cause confusions but when > i'm doing other jobs i want the mails to be signed. > > --__--__-- ---end quoted text--- Couldn't resist the temptation to do some advertising. Use rotator ! It is capable of attaching LOSTS, any other sig, No sig, or PGP/GPG sigs, for each mail individually chosen. Works perfectly with mutt, and pine !! Nothing else gives you that wide a choice :-) http://geocities.com/usmbish/rotator-0.5.tar.gz The "official" method ofcourse is send-hook switch in your .muttrc. However how many addresses can you really block with send-hooks ? PGP/GPG is NOT needed for 99% of mails. It is possible to get responses from people saying "Could not decipher the gibberish at the end of the mail/ att" ! HTH Bish -- : ####[ Linux One Stanza Tip (LOST) ]########################### Sub : Untar a bunch of tarballs (with wildcard) LOST #211 Unlike gzip, tar does not accept wildcards.'tar -xzf *.tar.gz' will not work. However, this will untar a bunch of tarballs in a particular directory with a prompt for very tarball met before untarring: 'ls *.tar.gz | xargs -p -l tar -xzvf'. ####<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>#################################### : _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help ----- End forwarded message -----