Just FYI ... this is pretty good as far as I can see.

----- Forwarded message from USM Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

From: USM Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:31:19 +0530
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LIH] mutt and gpg
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:19:31AM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
> 
> is there any way in mutt to gpg-sign only certain messages?
> for example, when i post to the  LIH or any list,  i  don't 
> want to sign them 'coz they only cause confusions  but when 
> i'm doing other jobs i want the mails to be signed.
> 
> --__--__--
---end quoted text---

Couldn't resist the temptation to do some advertising. Use
rotator ! It is capable of attaching LOSTS, any other sig,
No sig, or PGP/GPG sigs, for each mail individually chosen.
Works perfectly with mutt, and pine !! Nothing  else gives
you that wide a choice :-) 

http://geocities.com/usmbish/rotator-0.5.tar.gz

The "official" method ofcourse is send-hook switch in your
.muttrc. However how many addresses can  you  really block
with send-hooks ? PGP/GPG is NOT needed for  99% of mails.
It is possible to get responses from people saying  "Could
not decipher the gibberish at the end of the mail/ att" !

HTH

Bish


--
:
####[ Linux One Stanza Tip (LOST) ]###########################

Sub : Untar a bunch of tarballs (with wildcard)      LOST #211

Unlike gzip, tar does not accept wildcards.'tar -xzf *.tar.gz'
will not work. However, this will untar a bunch of tarballs in 
a  particular directory with a  prompt for  very  tarball  met 
before untarring: 'ls *.tar.gz | xargs -p -l tar -xzvf'.

####<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>####################################
:

_______________________________________________
linux-india-help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help

----- End forwarded message -----

Reply via email to