Re: GPG, sign encrypt
Prahlad, et al -- ...and then Prahlad Vaidyanathan said... % Hi, Hello! % % On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 René [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether: % * Markus Boelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [30-11-2001 11:22]: % ... % | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? % ... % This because the vast majority of my recipients probably thinks pgp is % some sort of automobile ;) % % *grin* % % Yes, I think most of us have, at one time or another, received a mail % saying 'What was the attachment you sent me ?'. So, it may not be a good % idea to sign _all_ mails. Then, again, you could take the opportunity to give your thirty-second (or two-paragraph) spiel on what gpg is and why it's a Good Thing (tm). :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg20912/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GPG, sign encrypt
Markus -- ...and then Markus Boelter said... % Hi! % % I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But: % Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? Yep. % % Can I use the hooks vor this? I don't wont to press p after writing That's exactly what you want. % an message an than choose nothing - I should sign or not sign % automatically mails :) Here's what I have: send-hook . set pgp_autosign send-hook . unset pgp_autoencrypt pgp_create_traditional pgp_outlook_compat ... # spamcop forwards send-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'unset pgp_autosign ; set editor=/bin/true ; my_hdr Fcc: /dev/null ; my_hdr from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ... # diary entries send-hook diary set nopgp_autosign signature=$HOME/.mutt/sig.daddy ... # Dad (anyone with LookOut!) cannot handle PGP attachments as text # let's keep things simple for Grandpa Mom Laura # plus sven the whiner :-) # and christine's ISP-based(?) email # and dumb mail-list software, even send-hook (skip|zerepb|jgood9|topgunch|psmath|lauratg|guckes|gerstmeier|tlinux-users@) unset pgp_autosign ... send-hook jimh@ unset pgp_autosign ### until we get Eudora straight send-hook (kielsky) set pgp_autoencrypt pgp_create_traditional pgp_outlook_compat As you can see, I usually have signing on (in MIME mode) and encryption off, but I change that for certain folks.. % % Markus HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg20913/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
GPG, sign encrypt
msg.pgp Description: PGP message
Re: GPG, sign encrypt
* Markus Boelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [30-11-2001 11:22]: | I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But: | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? I do it the other way around: by default, I don't sign any message. And then define persons to which mails _do_ have to be signed. This because the vast majority of my recipients probably thinks pgp is some sort of automobile ;) | Can I use the hooks vor this? I don't wont to press p after writing | an message an than choose nothing - I should sign or not sign | automatically mails :) I use the following: send-hook . set pgp_autosign=no send-hook ~C mutt\.org set pgp_autosign=yes You should be able to adapt this to your situation. Bye, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequilla. -Mitch Ratcliffe msg20831/pgp4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GPG, sign encrypt
Moin, * Markus Boelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 11:20]: I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. Questionable at best, but completly useless unless you get your keys on the server. But: Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? Yes, by setting a send-hook that modifies $pgp_autosign. You need a list of persons though. Thorsten -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
Re: GPG, sign encrypt
Hi, On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 René [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether: * Markus Boelter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [30-11-2001 11:22]: | I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But: | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed? I do it the other way around: by default, I don't sign any message. And then define persons to which mails _do_ have to be signed. This because the vast majority of my recipients probably thinks pgp is some sort of automobile ;) *grin* Yes, I think most of us have, at one time or another, received a mail saying 'What was the attachment you sent me ?'. So, it may not be a good idea to sign _all_ mails. | Can I use the hooks vor this? I don't wont to press p after writing | an message an than choose nothing - I should sign or not sign | automatically mails :) My settings : muttrc send-hook . set pgp_autosign=no # Default send-hook ~l set pgp_autosign=yes send-hook ilugc set pgp_autosign=no # listar@aero mangles it /muttrc pv. -- Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]What, me worry ? http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/Don't Panic ! -- msg20851/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GPG, sign encrypt
Hi, * Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-30 13:08]: send-hook ~l set pgp_autosign=yes Could you give me the motivation for this? Off-list, if you like, because I'm sure this comes up twice a year. Thorsten -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin
