Re: How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?
* Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02/03/06 10:37]: I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a feature? mutt gets aware of new mail in mailboxes with the mailboxes command, see chapter 3.11 in the manual. HTH, Thomas -- Thomas Hümmler * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.huemmler.de
How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?
Hi, Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared to empty and removed by mutt. I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a feature? best regards, charlie
Re: How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared to empty and removed by mutt. I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a feature? I don't know about that, but you can fix the problem of mutt removing empty mailboxes by set save_empty Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |
Re: How to get mutt bark for new created mbox?
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 03:25:04PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: Hi, Now I have a mail system with 7 mboxes. Some of them are usually cleared to empty and removed by mutt. I found that if procmail feeds new mail into such mboxes and creates them, mutt will not get aware of the new mails. Is it a feature? best regards, charlie I don't know the answer to your actual question, but have you looked into the $save_empty variable? Perhaps a workaround could be to not have mutt remove the mailboxes in the first place... -- John Buttery (Web page temporarily unavailable) msg25074/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
