Re: How to resend message multiple times effectively

2007-09-25 Thread Eyolf Ă˜strem
On 25.09.2007 (01:10), Jiang Qian wrote:
 
 I'm sure we can write some kind of poor man's python script or 
 shell/sed/awk script to add or remove address from this. You can then 
 invoke this on the BCC field.

But the question was how to make them appear, one by one, in separate
mails, in the TO field. Something like:

1. Have a file with a list of addresses,
2. Have a message ready to be sent, only waiting for the TO line,
3. Have a script (sed?)  which scans the address file line by line,
   and for each line inserts it in the appropriate place in the mail,
   sends it off, and goes to the next item. 

In other words some kind of mail-merge function, right?  

-- 
We are Pentium of Borg. Division is futile. You will be approximated.
(seen in someone's .signature)


How to resend message multiple times effectively

2007-09-24 Thread Ajeet
Hi all,

I need to send the same message to multiple recipients. So what I am currently 
doing is invoking resend-message repeatedly and changing the to address. Is 
it possible to do this in one shot? As in fire multiple emails, one for each 
address containing the same body.

Thanks 
-- 
Regards,
Ajeet


pgpItvKLlKwt1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to resend message multiple times effectively

2007-09-24 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday, September 24 at 07:57 PM, quoth Ajeet:
I need to send the same message to multiple recipients. So what I am 
currently doing is invoking resend-message repeatedly and changing 
the to address. Is it possible to do this in one shot? As in fire 
multiple emails, one for each address containing the same body.

What's wrong with including them all in the To, CC, or Bcc headers?

~Kyle
- -- 
The whole art of government consists in the art of being honest.
   -- Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America, 1774
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!

iD8DBQFG+IfzBkIOoMqOI14RAvlwAJ95tAjjxl4HkYbBHahBFOxXW05o4wCeNlQx
Bs+nNCUX/cTh+b95JnSuXNo=
=ZT6L
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: How to resend message multiple times effectively

2007-09-24 Thread Ajeet

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:00:51 -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
 What's wrong with including them all in the To, CC, or Bcc headers?
 

Well the concern may seem vague to you and you may not agree. I think that in 
certain situations, it pays to make your email seem personal. If I receive an 
email in which I am not any of the addresses (when I am Bcc'ed) or when I am 
one of a large number of recipients, it feels to me like a public broadcast. I 
guess its more of etiquette issue.
-- 
Regards,
Ajeet


pgpyNCYutf2Ac.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How to resend message multiple times effectively

2007-09-24 Thread Jiang Qian
 For a few dozen recipients or less, place all the recipient addresses
 (comma-delimited) on the BCC: line, and place your own address on the
 TO: line.
 
 About a year ago, I had need to make a periodic mailing to a few
 hundred email addresses.  I tried several approaches, but I did not
 find a satisfactory open-source package.
Maybe I'm missing something obvious here, but what's wrong with having 
an alias file of this kind of content and the source it on .muttrc:

alias mailinglist1 New List \
email address 1,\
email address 2,\
.
.
.
email address n,\
my own address

I'm sure we can write some kind of poor man's python script or 
shell/sed/awk script to add or remove address from this. You can then 
invoke this on the BCC field.

Is this some sort of a performance problem?  If so, that's not the fault 
of mutt but of $sendmail you're using, since that's what's handling it.  
But I serious doubt that a few hundred email can choke, say, postfix on 
a decently powerful machine.

Let me know what I'm missing here.
Jiang
 
 It appears that most of the mass mailing software has been written
 for Window$, and must be purchased.  And some of the mass mailing
 software for Window$ is very good.
 
 If you have need to make a mass mailing on a regular basis, you may
 find that the best approach is to devote an old Window$ machine to the
 task, and shop around for a Window$ application.
 
 RLH