Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-05-25 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-19 22:21 +0100]:
 So the question is how to proceed. The following options are
 available:

   1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
   2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
   3) Do 1 + 2

 Opinions?

3)

-- 
dave [ please don't CC me ]


Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Rocco Rutte

Hi,

as pointed out on #mutt, the quoting behaviour of the new format=flowed  
(f=f for short) handler as added to the source after 1.5.14 is different 
than before: When replying to f=f messages, empty lines are left empty 
whereby an empty line is a line without further content after the 
quoting characters.


So the question is how to proceed. The following options are available:

  1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
  2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
  3) Do 1 + 2

Opinions?

  bye, Rocco
--
:wq!
--


Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday, March 19 at 09:19 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte:
 So the question is how to proceed. The following options are 
 available:

   1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
   2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
   3) Do 1 + 2

 Opinions?

3

~Kyle
- -- 
Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you 
are, you aren't.
  -- Margaret Thatcher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Thank you for using encryption!

iD8DBQFF/wBIBkIOoMqOI14RAicRAKC3tj7YxkLao63p2Z9Fz8Mzuc7IFQCgtcRZ
5nMhBzfhAXt0XRcJBYKJvFQ=
=t8bu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Angel Olivera

On Mon, Mar 19 2007 21:19, Rocco Rutte wrote:

 1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
 2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
 3) Do 1 + 2


Replying to non-f=f messages currently adds quote markers to empty 
lines, whereas replying to f=f messages does not. This can be seen as an 
inconsistency.


3, since the current default behavior is, IMHO, unpredictable.

Not only 2, because I happen to find this a very useful feature for 
inline replies. (No more empty lines removal done by the editor)


--
redondos


pgpsdBabegbEU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 the mental interface of
Rocco Rutte told:

 Hi,

 as pointed out on #mutt, the quoting behaviour of the new format=flowed  
 (f=f for short) handler as added to the source after 1.5.14 is different 
 than before: When replying to f=f messages, empty lines are left empty 
 whereby an empty line is a line without further content after the quoting 
 characters.

 So the question is how to proceed. The following options are available:

   1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
   2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
   3) Do 1 + 2

 Opinions?

3)

Elimar


-- 
  Never make anything simple and efficient when a way 
  can be found to make it complex and wonderful ;-)


Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-03-19, Angel Olivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 19 2007 21:19, Rocco Rutte wrote:
   1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
   2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
   3) Do 1 + 2
 
 Replying to non-f=f messages currently adds quote markers to empty 
 lines, whereas replying to f=f messages does not. This can be seen as an 
 inconsistency.
 
 3, since the current default behavior is, IMHO, unpredictable.
 
 Not only 2, because I happen to find this a very useful feature for 
 inline replies. (No more empty lines removal done by the editor)

I would use only 2, but 3 seems like a good idea.  If 3, would 
$quote_empty apply to non-f=f messages as well?

Regards,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Mobile Broadband Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA


Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Rocco Rutte

Hi,

* Gary Johnson [07-03-19 15:35:39 -0700] wrote:

On 2007-03-19, Angel Olivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Mon, Mar 19 2007 21:19, Rocco Rutte wrote:
  1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
  2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
  3) Do 1 + 2


[...]

Not only 2, because I happen to find this a very useful feature for 
inline replies. (No more empty lines removal done by the editor)


I would use only 2, but 3 seems like a good idea.  If 3, would 
$quote_empty apply to non-f=f messages as well?


Yes.

  bye, Rocco
--
:wq!


Re: Poll: Quoting behaviour

2007-03-19 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2007-03-19, Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 * Gary Johnson [07-03-19 15:35:39 -0700] wrote:
  On 2007-03-19, Angel Olivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, Mar 19 2007 21:19, Rocco Rutte wrote:
1) Introduce $quote_empty that makes this behaviour configurable
2) Restore the original behaviour for the f=f handler
3) Do 1 + 2
 
 [...]
 
  Not only 2, because I happen to find this a very useful feature for 
  inline replies. (No more empty lines removal done by the editor)
 
  I would use only 2, but 3 seems like a good idea.  If 3, would 
  $quote_empty apply to non-f=f messages as well?
 
 Yes.

Thanks.

It also occurred to me that I'm not clear on just what original
behavior means.  I had assumed that original behavior meant per
my patch-1.5.5.1.gj.stuff_all_quoted.3 patch or the equivalent.  I
definitely don't like the unpatched behavior of 1.5.12.  I haven't
tried the latest 1.5.14 f=f handler.

Regards,
Gary

-- 
Gary Johnson   | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | Mobile Broadband Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA