Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
On 07/24/02 22:11 +0200, Michael Tatge wrote: > To summarize: Mutt will delete any X-Mailer header. Confirmed. Thanks.
Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
* Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 20:45]: > > I assume that if you do no specifically "unignore" X-* lines > > then they will be weeded out. > > > > let's test this: > > > > $ mutt -f mutt.testmail > > :unignore x- > > > > > > bingo - X-Test: line *included*! :-) > > That does not work with x-mailer sven. > Why didn't you test the header in question? because it should be self-evident that mutt will not send with an identification other than the one it adds itself. that's why. you can complain to the developers for not documenting their code enough on this point, of course. Sven [off to see a sneak preview]
Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
> I assume that if you do no specifically "unignore" X-* lines > then they will be weeded out. > > let's test this: > > $ mutt -f mutt.testmail > :unignore x- > > > bingo - X-Test: line *included*! :-) That does not work with x-mailer sven. Why didn't you test the header in question? Michael -- "Whip me. Beat me. Make me maintain AIX." (By Stephan Zielinski) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 20:03]: > On 07/24/02 21:12 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > resending takes the message as is. > > no hooks or whatever get applied. > > feature. period. > Not to be difficult, but to quote the on-line manual: > > 'With resend-message.. Note that the amount of headers included > here depends on the value of the ``$weed'' variable.' > > What does the last sentence mean? a valid question! thanks for pointing it out - i did not see this. > As the original message had an X-Mailer header included, I took > the manual to mean that it would be picked up in the new message. I assume that if you do no specifically "unignore" X-* lines then they will be weeded out. let's test this: $ mutt -f mutt.testmail :unignore x- bingo - X-Test: line *included*! :-) Sven === mutt.testmail >From mutt-testers Wed Jul 24 23:22:21 2002 From: Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mutt Users' List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <20020724200253.GB1775@Verdi> X-Test: does resend-message weed headers or not?
Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
John P Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > 'With resend-message, mutt takes the current message as a template for > a new message. This function is best described as "recall from > arbitrary folders". It can conveniently be used to forward MIME > messages while preserving the original mail structure. Note that the > amount of headers included here depends on the value of the ``$weed'' > variable.' > > What does the last sentence mean? As the original message had an > X-Mailer header included, I took the manual to mean that it would be > picked up in the new message. I seem to recall a previous discussion on this topic. Please grep the archives for further details. To summarize: Mutt will delete any X-Mailer header. HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
On 07/24/02 21:12 +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > resending takes the message as is. > no hooks or whatever get applied. > feature. period. Not to be difficult, but to quote the on-line manual: 'With resend-message, mutt takes the current message as a template for a new message. This function is best described as "recall from arbitrary folders". It can conveniently be used to forward MIME messages while preserving the original mail structure. Note that the amount of headers included here depends on the value of the ``$weed'' variable.' What does the last sentence mean? As the original message had an X-Mailer header included, I took the manual to mean that it would be picked up in the new message. John
Re: X-Mailer Header Not Being Picked Up With Resend Command
* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-24 14:54]: > When I resend a message, using esc e, I find that my > X-Mailer header is not picked up from the original message. > The manual indicates that weeding is used when resending. .. > What obvious thing am I missing? resending takes the message as is. no hooks or whatever get applied. feature. period. Sven
