Re: multiple mutts
the/eXtreme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 11 Oct 2000: I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing mutt sessions before launching another session; or is there a better way? How about a shell script that looks (vaguely) like this: #!/bin/sh LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock if [ -f $LOCKFILE ]; then echo "Another Mutt session is already running ($LOCKFILE exists)" exit 1 else touch $LOCKFILE mutt $* rm $LOCKFILE fi ... That's untested, I just typed it in, but hopefully it will work. At the very least, with minor tweaking. Hope this helps, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / Meep!
Re: multiple mutts
the/eXtreme proclaimed on mutt-users that: I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing mutt sessions before launching another session; or is there a better way? That is the best way ;) -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI Come quickly, I am tasting stars! -- Dom Perignon, upon discovering champagne.
Re: multiple mutts
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:49:40AM -0500, the/eXtreme wrote: Hey, sometimes I shell out of a mutt window, forget where I am (easy, when you're me), and start another mutt session. Days can go by before I catch the duplicated sessions. I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing mutt sessions before launching another session; or is there a better way? Assuming for the sake of this example a bash shell: You could create a .muttbashrc file which, after sourcing your regular rc file, says PS1="mutt-shell: " and then in mutt (or your .muttrc) :set shell="/bin/bash -rcfile /home/username/.muttbashrc" But if you open more subshells, you're on your own. :) -- - Bruce
Re: multiple mutts
-: LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock Does a lock file exist for IMAP-configured mutt? When I have a mutt session up, I can't find a lock file anywhere. Do I need to be concerned with the `dotlock_program' configuration variable? My configuration and build of mutt-1.2.5 didn't create a `mutt_dotlock' binary. TIA
Re: multiple mutts
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:30:07PM -0500 or thereabouts, the/eXtreme wrote: -: LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock Does a lock file exist for IMAP-configured mutt? When I have a mutt session up, I can't find a lock file anywhere. Do I need to be concerned with the `dotlock_program' configuration variable? My configuration and build of mutt-1.2.5 didn't create a `mutt_dotlock' binary. TIA You'll notice the previous post includes the line touch $LOCKFILE This will create such a lockfile when you run the script. mutt does not create a lockfile by default. -- Conor Daly Met Eireann, Glasnevin Hill, Dublin 9, Ireland Ph +353 1 8064217 Fax +353 1 8064275
Re: multiple mutts
-: You'll notice the previous post includes the line -: -: touch $LOCKFILE Yes, silly of me. It also helps if the luser starts the *first* mutt session using the script. Duh.
Re: multiple mutts
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 03:33:06PM -0500 or thereabouts, the/eXtreme wrote: -: You'll notice the previous post includes the line -: -: touch $LOCKFILE Yes, silly of me. It also helps if the luser starts the *first* mutt session using the script. Duh. Time of day, Time of day... -- Conor Daly Met Eireann, Glasnevin Hill, Dublin 9, Ireland Ph +353 1 8064217 Fax +353 1 8064275
Re: multiple mutts
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:19:24PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote: the/eXtreme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 11 Oct 2000: I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing mutt sessions before launching another session; or is there a better way? How about a shell script that looks (vaguely) like this: #!/bin/sh LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock if [ -f $LOCKFILE ]; then echo "Another Mutt session is already running ($LOCKFILE exists)" exit 1 else touch $LOCKFILE mutt $* rm $LOCKFILE fi ... That's untested, I just typed it in, but hopefully it will work. At the very least, with minor tweaking. This is the ps solution that I use all the time. I and Rob Reid developed this some time ago. I call the mutt exectuable realmutt, this script muttwrap and alias 'mutt' to 'muttwrap -y'. I know you can open several mutts and write in all of them, but I prefer to open the 2nd in readonly to remind me that I really did not want to do it in most cases and if I did it could be in readonly mode. #!/usr/bin/sh if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt /dev/null then echo Warning: You are already running Mutt. echo Starting mutt in readonly mode. sleep 2 # Or however many seconds you need to read the # message before mutt starts. /usr/local/bin/realmutt -R $* else echo Starting Mutt OK sleep 2 /usr/local/bin/realmutt $* fi Cheers, Brian. Hope this helps, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / Meep! -- Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] School of Biological, Environmental and Chemical Sciences, SITE, Northern Territory University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. Phone 08-89466702. Fax 08-89466847 http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/school/compchem.html
Re: multiple mutts
if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt /dev/null Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example $ ps ax | grep lemming 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process. -- [ Bruce J.A. Nourish (email and finger) [EMAIL PROTECTED]] [ GPG key ID BE062236 (75C2 6784 B600 F7F4 E35E A039 F62C 5AC7 BE06 2236) ] [ Fax (775) 665-5938 Phone (480) 763-6970 Pgr (602) 201-3376, ICQ 38344897 ] [ Web http://www.kode187.net - Postal: PO Box 51611, Phoenix AZ 85076-1611 ]
Re: multiple mutts
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote: if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt /dev/null Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example $ ps ax | grep lemming 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process. It works OK on AIX 3.2.5 ps. If you add the -f flag it finds the grep line, but it does'nt without it. OK, so maybe my script does'nt work on all systems, but it is worth playing with to see if some set of ps flags works as required. Cheers, Brian. -- [ Bruce J.A. Nourish (email and finger) [EMAIL PROTECTED]] [ GPG key ID BE062236 (75C2 6784 B600 F7F4 E35E A039 F62C 5AC7 BE06 2236) ] [ Fax (775) 665-5938 Phone (480) 763-6970 Pgr (602) 201-3376, ICQ 38344897 ] [ Web http://www.kode187.net - Postal: PO Box 51611, Phoenix AZ 85076-1611 ] -- Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] School of Biological, Environmental and Chemical Sciences, SITE, Northern Territory University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. Phone 08-89466702. Fax 08-89466847 http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/school/compchem.html
Re: multiple mutts
At 09:23 +0930 12 Oct 2000, Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote: if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt /dev/null Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example $ ps ax | grep lemming 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process. It works OK on AIX 3.2.5 ps. If you add the -f flag it finds the grep line, but it does'nt without it. OK, so maybe my script does'nt work on all systems, but it is worth playing with to see if some set of ps flags works as required. Or you could just make a minor modification to the grep pattern: ps -U $LOGNAME | grep 'r[e]almutt' /dev/null That way grep won't be able to match itself. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ Besides, including std_ice_cubes.h is a fatal error on machines that don't have it yet. Bad language design, there... :-)--Larry Wall
Re: multiple mutts
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 07:17:35PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: At 09:23 +0930 12 Oct 2000, Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote: if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt /dev/null Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example $ ps ax | grep lemming 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process. It works OK on AIX 3.2.5 ps. If you add the -f flag it finds the grep line, but it does'nt without it. OK, so maybe my script does'nt work on all systems, but it is worth playing with to see if some set of ps flags works as required. Or you could just make a minor modification to the grep pattern: ps -U $LOGNAME | grep 'r[e]almutt' /dev/null That way grep won't be able to match itself. Clever! It works well. Brian. -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ Besides, including std_ice_cubes.h is a fatal error on machines that don't have it yet. Bad language design, there... :-)--Larry Wall -- Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] School of Biological, Environmental and Chemical Sciences, SITE, Northern Territory University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. Phone 08-89466702. Fax 08-89466847 http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/school/compchem.html
Re: multiple mutts
Jamie Novak wrote: On 10/11, Aaron Schrab rearranged the electrons to read: Or you could just make a minor modification to the grep pattern: ps -U $LOGNAME | grep 'r[e]almutt' /dev/null That way grep won't be able to match itself. You could also just do a: ps -U $LOGONAME | grep mutt | grep -v grep /dev/null "grep -v" tells grep to ignore whatever pattern you specify there. I haven't tested this on many versions of grep, but I know it works under AIX, HP-UX and FreeBSD. YMMV. - Jamie but that would be a waste of a process. raf
Re: multiple mutts
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 09:23:29AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example $ ps ax | grep lemming 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process. It works OK on AIX 3.2.5 ps. If you add the -f flag it finds the grep line, but it does'nt without it. OK, so maybe my script does'nt work on all systems, but it is worth playing with to see if some set of ps flags works as required. I've been working a lot with ps in Tru64 UNIX and reading the Unix98 (Single Unix Spec V2) standards, and this is undefined behaviour. Basically, ps takes a snapshot of the processes running at an instant in time. Depending on how it does this, and how the system manages processes, the ps command itself may or may not show. Some Unices will even show it sometimes and not others. -- Bob Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] - "The sooner you start to code, the longer the program will take." -- Roy Carlson, University of Wisconsin
