Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?
Hi, On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:09:40:PM -0500 Andre Berger wrote: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: well, does this BCC header get posted, too? if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug* Indirectly: To: undisclosed recipients ; is generated, but no mail is sent. Who does insert it? This is just a thought but in Mutt and in Vsevolod's nntp patch one may specify programs for delivery of mail/news. A short wrapper (maybe Perl) for both could strip of the 'Newsgroups'-header and deliver to sendmail and strip of the 'To:', 'Cc:' and 'Bcc:'-header to deliver to inews. Rocco msg26047/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet - nntp patch vs BCC?
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-22 20:31 -0500: * Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 15:51]: Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail? that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header. well, does this BCC header get posted, too? if not then I don't a problem.. *shrug* Sven Indirectly: To: undisclosed recipients ; is generated, but no mail is sent. -Andre msg25975/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-18 10:17 -0500: * Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-17 21:50:28 -0500]: I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my mail in one place, my compi at home. Where I use fcc-hooks BTW. Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail? Nicolas Nicolas, that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header. -Andre msg25676/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-18 10:50:49 -0500]: that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header. Uh, sorry, I didn't follow the thread closely, it seems I missed the real problem. Nicolas
Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet
* Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-17 02:05]: What I'm trying to accomplish is more or less the same Jerome (the original poster) wants. We use mutt with nntp-patch and want to set headers according to the fact if we are mailing or posting. i got that. however, you did not describe what the goal of *your* setup should be. What I want is to test if there is a To-header or not - if there is one, I'm mailing, if there is none, I'm posting. hmm.. ok. i think. (i do not know what else the NNTP patches offer.) If I'm mailing, add a Bcc header (I'm Bccing all mail to myself to keep track of it). If not, do not add this header because this results in an ugly To: undiclosed recipients ; line in my postings. If you just want mutt to keep a copy of all your messages depending on Email or Usenet then why not set FCC instead? Why *send* a copy? I've tried an otherwise empty .muttrc file and send-hook . unmy_hdr * send-hook '~t ..*''my_hdr Bcc: mail' send-hook !'~t ..*''my_hdr Bcc: news' fcc-hook'~t .' +MAIL fcc-hook '! ~t .' +NEWS Isn't this easier? Testing the settings: 1. (mail) no bcc 2. (mail) bcc: mail 3. (news) bcc: mail 4. (news) bcc: news So it seems to work, but the send-hook is one message late. huh? Sven -- Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/setup.html
Re: different hooks for Email/Usenet
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-17 18:26 -0500: * Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-17 02:05]: [...] If you just want mutt to keep a copy of all your messages depending on Email or Usenet then why not set FCC instead? Why *send* a copy? [...] fcc-hook'~t .' +MAIL fcc-hook '! ~t .' +NEWS Isn't this easier? I'm working on different computers at work and want to save my mail on none of them. Bcc is a convenient mail to keep track of all my mail in one place, my compi at home. Where I use fcc-hooks BTW. Testing the settings: 1. (mail) no bcc 2. (mail) bcc: mail 3. (news) bcc: mail 4. (news) bcc: news So it seems to work, but the send-hook is one message late. huh? [sigh] this means I'm trying to send 4 messages for test purposes (mail, then mail, then news, then news). Send-hooks trying to set Bcc headers do not effect the current but the next message! -Andre msg25651/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
