Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
On 30/06 16:47, Jon LaBadie wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote: On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: Hi, is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know people who use only PGP and others only S/Mime. So: is this possible in mutt? If yes, how - any how-tos you can recommend? Thanks, Niels Hi! I use send-hooks for this for examples send-hook someonewhoperfersinlinecry...@mail.com set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt While I have S/Mime as standard in my default crypto settings. For configuration ease, so as not to have lots of send-hooks, could you do something like: set my_PersonsWhoUsePGP = \ pers...@email1.com,\ pers...@email2.com,\ ... pers...@emailn.com send-hook $my_PersonsWhoUsePGP set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt Thanks a lot. Your suggestions look really good :) Niels
Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
On 01Jul2015 20:12, Ian Zimmerman i...@buug.org wrote: On 2015-07-02 12:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: I keep a little maildb which assigns group names to addresses, and autogenerate mutt aliases formed like the above from it. Why the maildb? Because my mail filing also uses these groups in its rules. Excuse my ignorance, but what is a maildb? Just a Berkeley DB file or similar with emails and groups? Or? Ah, sorry, it is a thing of my own. But any external-to-mutt db might do if it lets you tag or group addresses. Mine is a particular flavour of CSV, with an associated tool and some handy edit tools. My mailfiler knows how to consult it, so I get to use these groups in mail filing and also in mutt config. Cheers, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au It looked good-natured, she thought; Still it had very long claws and a great many teeth, so she felt it ought to be treated with respect.
Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
On 2015-07-02 12:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote: I keep a little maildb which assigns group names to addresses, and autogenerate mutt aliases formed like the above from it. Why the maildb? Because my mail filing also uses these groups in its rules. Excuse my ignorance, but what is a maildb? Just a Berkeley DB file or similar with emails and groups? Or? -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
On 30Jun2015 16:47, Jon LaBadie mut...@jgcomp.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote: On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know people who use only PGP and others only S/Mime. So: is this possible in mutt? If yes, how - any how-tos you can recommend? I use send-hooks for this for examples send-hook someonewhoperfersinlinecry...@mail.com set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt While I have S/Mime as standard in my default crypto settings. For configuration ease, so as not to have lots of send-hooks, could you do something like: set my_PersonsWhoUsePGP = \ pers...@email1.com,\ pers...@email2.com,\ ... pers...@emailn.com send-hook $my_PersonsWhoUsePGP set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt A cleaner solution might be to reframe the above like this: alias -group pgpers pgpers pers...@email1.com, pers...@email2.com, ... send-hook '%C pgpers' 'set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt' I suggest this for two reasons. First, address groups seem a much cleaner system for talking about groups of addresses and second, I use them aggressively! I keep a little maildb which assigns group names to addresses, and autogenerate mutt aliases formed like the above from it. Why the maildb? Because my mail filing also uses these groups in its rules. As a real world example, I use this in my muttrc for HTML: message-hook . 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/plain text/html' # Apple Mail embeds attachments in the HTML part instead of outside the multipart/mixed message-hook '~h X-Mailer: Apple Mail ~X 1-' 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/html multipart/mixed text/plain' message-hook '%f htmlers | ~f @no-re...@cc.yahoo-inc.com | ~f @outlook.com | ~f live.com | ~f @facebookmail.com' 'unalternative_order *; alternative_order text/html text/plain' That final message-hook selects HTML in preference for messages from people in my htmlers mutt group. Cheers, Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au When Microsoft Office is your only hammer, pretty much everything begins to look like a nail. Or a thumb. - Rob Pegoraro
Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: Hi, is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know people who use only PGP and others only S/Mime. So: is this possible in mutt? If yes, how - any how-tos you can recommend? Thanks, Niels Hi! I use send-hooks for this for examples send-hook someonewhoperfersinlinecry...@mail.com set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt While I have S/Mime as standard in my default crypto settings. /jonas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote: On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: Hi, is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know people who use only PGP and others only S/Mime. So: is this possible in mutt? If yes, how - any how-tos you can recommend? Thanks, Niels Hi! I use send-hooks for this for examples send-hook someonewhoperfersinlinecry...@mail.com set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt While I have S/Mime as standard in my default crypto settings. For configuration ease, so as not to have lots of send-hooks, could you do something like: set my_PersonsWhoUsePGP = \ pers...@email1.com,\ pers...@email2.com,\ ... pers...@emailn.com send-hook $my_PersonsWhoUsePGP set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt I don't have that need, but I'm curious for other similar purposes. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)
mutt with GPG and S/Mime
Hi, is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know people who use only PGP and others only S/Mime. So: is this possible in mutt? If yes, how - any how-tos you can recommend? Thanks, Niels
Re: mutt with GPG and S/Mime
* Jon LaBadie mut...@jgcomp.com [2015-06-30 16:53]: On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:11:53PM +0200, jonas hedman wrote: On 15-06-30 22:00:27, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: Hi, is it possible to use with one account PGP and S/Mime? I found a how-to for using S/Mime or using mutt with one account with PGP and one account S/Mime. But I want to use my main account with both and would like to choose on a per user basis whether I encrypt via PGP or S/Mime. I know people who use only PGP and others only S/Mime. So: is this possible in mutt? If yes, how - any how-tos you can recommend? Thanks, Niels Hi! I use send-hooks for this for examples send-hook someonewhoperfersinlinecry...@mail.com set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt While I have S/Mime as standard in my default crypto settings. For configuration ease, so as not to have lots of send-hooks, could you do something like: set my_PersonsWhoUsePGP = \ pers...@email1.com,\ pers...@email2.com,\ ... pers...@emailn.com send-hook $my_PersonsWhoUsePGP set pgp_autoinline; set pgp_autoencrypt I don't have that need, but I'm curious for other similar purposes. Thank you, this is a great contribution! I am also curious if the above solution would be able to distinguish between mails that are sent to the pers...@email1.com (who uses PGP) only and exclusively, and between mails that get sent to others in CC: as well. best, P
