Re: need advice on reply-to problem

2000-04-18 Thread Mikko Hänninen

Hello,

Replying to an old email but I don't think there was an answer provided
(one that addressed the question, anyway).


Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 07 Apr 2000:
 here is the mail i wish to reply to :

[relevant headers included here]
 Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: "Darren Wyn Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 using the above email ("mutt -f email") :
 when i type 'r', the reply is directed towards
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 when i type 'g', the reply is _only_ directed
 towards [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm guessing here -- without knowing full details about your setup --
that this happens because Mutt sees that the email's From address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which presumably you've got in your $alternates.
So Mutt looks at the email, notices that the From address matches
your $alternates, therefore determines that the message is FROM YOU.
Mutt has a special case for replying to emails which are sent by you,
replies to such emails are directed to the *recipient*, not the sender.
The Reply-To header indicates where replies to the sender should be
sent, so in this case Mutt ignores that header.

(Although it might be argued that the Reply-To address should only be
ignored if it matches $alternates too...  I'm not sure.)

This feature is very useful actually, you can go to your sent folder for
example and use the reply function to send a further email to the
original recipients of a message that you've sent earlier.

 however, when i CHANGE - for the sake of argument -
 the 'From:' header (anything but [EMAIL PROTECTED]),
 it seems to work as per normal.

Right, when you change the From header then Mutt doesn't think that the
message is from you anymore, and does a normal reply.

 so what is happening ? is there something in .muttrc
 causing the above ?

Yes probably, the $alternates setting and whatever settings you have for
creating the From address. :-)


Hopefully this explains the issue,
Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy  scifi, the Corrs /
Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.



Re: need advice on reply-to problem

2000-04-07 Thread Charles Cazabon

Darren Wyn Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [ Mutt 1.0i (1999-10-22 ]
 
 i'm having difficulty understanding how to
 reply to an e-mail from a list, which contains
 a set reply-to.

Basically the problem is that Reply-To: is being munged for mailing list
purposes.  This is in general a bad idea and causes these types of problems.

Any decent mail client, like Mutt, has Reply, Group reply, and List reply
functions.  Munging the Reply-To: overrides these functions.  Even this
list does it for whatever reason, which is why you won't get a copy of
this message in your personal mailbox, despite the fact that I chose
group-reply.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
---