Re: [MLO] Re: Why is MLO Cloud Sync paid?

[Mario Gourgel]

I agree with you James,

Everyone must choose the desired and sustainable business model that suites
their own business.

It was a suggestion, a desire, call it whatever you want.

But we can charge in different ways so that appealing more customers/users.

I think the review is a good way...not the unique, but the one I appreciate.

There are, for sure, others.

For example, prices according to packages : business package, small groups
package (2 users, 3 users, others); still be payied but with different
prices...I don't know.

It depends on MLO business purposes.

Regarding Zainan, can you please tell which feature would you like to pay
to vote for upcoming features?

I would say that I appreciate MLO app, and I expect it to be enhanced more
and more...

I am waiting for the task custom properties and calculated fields.


A Qua, 30/11/2016, 13:56, Zainan Victor Zhou  escreveu:

> +1 on charging for Cloud Service. I am also wishing to be able to pay to
> vote for upcoming features
>
>
> Zainan Victor Zhou, 周载南
> 650-336-5691
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, James D  wrote:
>
> From the perspective of an enthusiastic user of other "dead" PIM programs
> of the past, most notably Ecco Pro, a great outliner-based PIM program...
> When I put my life and information and plans and schemes and goals into a
> program like MLO, the last thing I want is for the company producing that
> software to go belly-up.
> MLO cloud fees are a small price to pay for being able to count on having
> the features of this awesome program available year after year.
>
> For example, Google sells advertising.  That's their business model.  They
> can afford to "give away" things that help their business model, or give
> them a competitive advantage that leads people to the part of the business
> where they make money. At last check MLO was not in the business of selling
> ads, just the business of providing great personal productivity software on
> PC, Mac, and mobile platforms.  How else can MLO stay in business and pay
> their developers if they can't make money somewhere?  I guarantee you don't
> want to be a loyal user of a dead program from a company that no longer
> exists.  MLO's cloud fees are reasonable enough.  Servers and bandwidth and
> people and systems to monitor them and keep them up aren't free, so MLO has
> an expense to cover in providing the service.  MLO even provides us a way
> to sync over WiFi and other options so we are not "forced" to use the cloud
> service.  However, being able to use cloud sync is such a big productivity
> booster, to me it's worth paying a few bucks every year or two.
>
> It's a small price to pay to ensure the ongoing viabiity of a program
> whose primary agenda is to help US be more productive, without us being
> funneled and forced into other agendas like happens with Google, Microsoft,
> Apple, Amazon, etc.  Don't get me wrong, I love and use products from all
> those companies.
>
> P.S. I'm hoping before long their might even be a "skill" developed for
> Amazon Echo so that "Alexa, add a task to my to-do list, buy my girlfriend
> a Seattle Sounders jersey for Christmas", and have that task added to my
> *MLO* to-do list, instead of the lame Amazon Echo one.  Oh yes, and "Alexa,
> add a task to buy tickets to MLS Cup at 7 pm pacific time tomorrow".
>
>
> On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 3:51:30 PM UTC-8, MG wrote:
>
> Andrey,
>
> I guess I was misunderstood.
>
> I did not meant that MLO would have to be free at all but, only the cloud
> sync service.
>
> I do not agree of free app or whatever product, and regarding MLO would
> not be too, since it is a good app.
>
> But regarding the cloud sync service, what is the main reason to keep it
> under charge?
>
> I think MLO Team would have to reconsider this issue, since those who
> bought the app or the windows version would have this cloud sync for free,
> in my opinion.
>
> Because this subscriptions works like a limitation for the app in everyday
> usage.
>
>
> MG
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>
>
> To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/ca241099-015e-4b22-b531-47544a479cec%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> 

Re: [MLO] Digest for mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com - 5 updates in 4 topics

[Mario Gourgel]

Dear Sirs,

I would like to know why events cannot be edited to turn them into tasks?

And why tasks have not a timeline, since events have?

Tasks like events, have duration and need a timeline in my opinion.

A Seg, 4/01/2016, 22:52,   escreveu:

> mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com
> 
>  Google
> Groups
> 
> 
> Topic digest
> View all topics
> 
>
>- All of a sudden a whole bunch of flags disappeared
><#msg-f:1522473978592306113_group_thread_0> - 1 Update
>- Reminder: filtering a view in the Android app affects the widget, too
><#msg-f:1522473978592306113_group_thread_1> - 2 Updates
>- Unwanted Duplicate Tasks, linked togther
><#msg-f:1522473978592306113_group_thread_2> - 1 Update
>- Copy tool does not work while editing the caption of a task on the
>task list. <#msg-f:1522473978592306113_group_thread_3> - 1 Update
>
> All of a sudden a whole bunch of flags disappeared
> 
> FischerPhoto : Jan 04 11:35AM -0800
>
> Hi
> I'm not worried about the flags. I can put them back on. But I'm not
> concerned about trusting that what I put on MLO will stay there. I have no
> clue what could have happened.
> In the meantime I upgraded to android pro version. around the same time
> that this happened. But this happened last week too , but I did something
> (no idea what, maybe just a different view) and they were there again.
> Maybe they are still there and I'm not in the right view.
> Any ideas??
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jon
> Back to top <#msg-f:1522473978592306113_digest_top>
> Reminder: filtering a view in the Android app affects the widget, too
> 
> "Charles Blaquière" : Jan 03 01:40PM -0800
>
> Android users: you may be puzzled if you forget that if you apply a filter
> to a view (e.g. "Active Actions") in the app, that same filter will affect
> that view in the widget.
>
> This happened to me as I was playing with the new MLO2 for Android. I had
> recreated the widget and set it to display the *Active Actions* view. A
> few
> days later, I was puzzled to find the widget displaying "No items in view"
> instead. (There were tons of active actions in my MLO profile.) I
> discovered that earlier in the week, in the app, I had filtered *Active
> Actions* using a string that didn't exist in my profile. That filter had
> also affected the *Active actions* view displayed in the widget. Once I
> removed the filter in the app, both the app and the widget resumed
> displaying all *Active actions*.
>
> So keep that in mind: the widget displays the app's *current *result set
> from the selected view.
> Lisa Stroyan : Jan 04 07:32AM -0700
>
> Good to know! I wouldn't have expected that otherwise.
> On Jan 4, 2016 1:22 AM, "Charles Blaquière" 
> wrote:
>
> Back to top <#msg-f:1522473978592306113_digest_top>
> Unwanted Duplicate Tasks, linked togther
> 
> Lisa Stroyan : Jan 04 07:30AM -0700
>
> If you double click to see the task in outline view on Windows does it go
> to the same task in the tree? If you look at properties, task details, are
> they the same creation date? If so, it's likely they are the same task and
> the view is set up to show that task twice. For example a task with
> multiple contexts will show up multiple times in tasks by context, it's not
> a duplicate, it just meets the criteria for the filter in both cases.
> Back to top <#msg-f:1522473978592306113_digest_top>
> Copy tool does not work while editing the caption of a task on the task
> list.
> 
> Lisa Stroyan : Jan 04 07:25AM -0700
>
> Strange, it still works fine for me so must be platform dependant.I'm on a
> nexus 5.
> Back to top <#msg-f:1522473978592306113_digest_top>
> You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this
> group. You can change your settings on the group membership page
> 
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an
> email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" 

[MLO] Colaborative and shared Tasks and Folders

[Mario Gourgel]

I would like to know if it is possible to implement the colaborative and shared 
tasks and folders, so that we can work with a team and share different types of 
filés?
This improvement would be usefull

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
MyLifeOrganized group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/905f54fa-62f4-41c3-9d2e-cf380939be52%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.