RE: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread webmaster
Hi Garot,

This sounds an interesting idea.

Are you looking to store all known commands and their options or are you
looking for a 'formula' for calling any unix command ?

The reason for my question is that, at the end of the day, a unix command is
just a program that is run in the operating system. Each program comes with
its own options and acceptable inputs. I don't know if there is a rule or
convention for structuring these commands.

Are you then looking to build a system that 'knows' all commands and 'how
to' call them ?

Thanks,
Justin

-Original Message-
From: Garot Conklin [mailto:garotconk...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 03:39
To: Martin Gainty; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning

The initial goal is to provide a working framework from which to call all
UNIX shell command combinations as the underlying storage mechanism for a
machine learning algorithm.  I would like to build a completely self aware
instantiation that will maintain itself on all levels... I postulate that
the first place to start would be in determining a method for maintaining
all possible remediation combinations including the unknown to eventually be
learned from and populate new knowledge into the database.  Thank you for
the reply,

Garot


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



ANN: Database Workbench 4.3.1, the multi-DBMS IDE now available!

2012-08-20 Thread Martijn Tonies

ANN: Database Workbench 4.3.1, the multi-DBMS IDE now available!

Ladies, gentlemen,

Upscene Productions is proud to announce the next version
of the popular Windows-based multi-DBMS development tool:

 Database Workbench 4.3.1 Pro 

This release fixes a few issues with MySQL support.


For more information, see http://www.upscene.com/go/?go=newsid=20120820

The FREE Lite Editions will follow later.

Changes include:
- NEW: Stored Procedure  Trigger debugger for MySQL
- NEW: incremental data search in SQL, Table  View Editor
- FIXED: Oracle Debugger fixes
- FIXED: NexusDB error when testing Stored Functions
- FIXED: MySQL module not properly displaying stored procedures/functions 
without mysql.procs access

and much more...


Database Workbench supports:
- Borland InterBase ( 6.x - XE )
- Firebird ( 1.x, 2.x )
- MS SQL Server/MSDE ( 7, 2000, 2005, 2008 )
- MySQL 4.x, 5.x
- Oracle Database ( 8i, 9i, 10g, 11g )
- Sybase SQL Anywhere ( 9, 10, 11 and 12 )
- NexusDB ( 3.0 and up )






Thank you for your support,

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - the database developer tool for professionals
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Re: update doesn't

2012-08-20 Thread Mogens Melander

On Sun, August 19, 2012 18:19, william drescher wrote:
 On 8/17/2012 12:13 PM, Rik Wasmus wrote:
 I get 1 row affected, but the status does not change when I look
 at the row.

 If I set it to 'X' it does change.

 To make it even more wacky, if I (using phpMyAdmin) change it to
 'H' it will change and the row is shown change, but when I go to
 examine the row (using the pencil icon=Edit) it changes back to 'W'.

 Either there is something really strange or my mysql is possessed.

 I am using Server version: 5.1.63-0ubuntu0.10.04.

 Anyone have any thoughts about this or suggestions on how to
 debug it?

 1) One thing that _could_ do this is a trigger. Does SHOW TRIGGERS; show
 any
 that could be doing this?

 2) However, in 99.999% of cases, it is just a logic error in the
 application
 (be it your application or PHPMyAdmin), not anything in MySQL. Can you
 connect
 with the command line client, run the UPDATE statement, en then check
 what the
 SELECT shows? If it shows a correct result... the problem ain't in MySQL
 itself.

 mysql select status from tasks;
 ++
 | status |
 ++
 | W  |
 ++
 1 row in set (0.00 sec)

 mysql update tasks set status= 'H';
 Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
 Rows matched: 1 Changed 1 Warnings: 0

 mysql select status from tasks;
 ++
 | status |
 ++
 | W  |
 ++
 1 row in set (0.00 sec)

 whoops

 bill


Maybe a SHOW CREATE TABLE `tasks`\g could shed some light.

-- 
Mogens Melander
+66 8701 33224

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Re: update doesn't

2012-08-20 Thread william drescher

On 8/20/2012 10:09 AM, Mogens Melander wrote:


On Sun, August 19, 2012 18:19, william drescher wrote:

On 8/17/2012 12:13 PM, Rik Wasmus wrote:

I get 1 row affected, but the status does not change when I look
at the row.

If I set it to 'X' it does change.

To make it even more wacky, if I (using phpMyAdmin) change it to
'H' it will change and the row is shown change, but when I go to
examine the row (using the pencil icon=Edit) it changes back to 'W'.

Either there is something really strange or my mysql is possessed.

I am using Server version: 5.1.63-0ubuntu0.10.04.

Anyone have any thoughts about this or suggestions on how to
debug it?


1) One thing that _could_ do this is a trigger. Does SHOW TRIGGERS; show
any
that could be doing this?

2) However, in 99.999% of cases, it is just a logic error in the
application
(be it your application or PHPMyAdmin), not anything in MySQL. Can you
connect
with the command line client, run the UPDATE statement, en then check
what the
SELECT shows? If it shows a correct result... the problem ain't in MySQL
itself.


mysql select status from tasks;
++
| status |
++
| W  |
++
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql update tasks set status= 'H';
Query OK, 1 row affected (0.00 sec)
Rows matched: 1 Changed 1 Warnings: 0

mysql select status from tasks;
++
| status |
++
| W  |
++
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

whoops

bill



Maybe a SHOW CREATE TABLE `tasks`\g could shed some light.

I can't figure out how to get puTTY to log the session so I can't 
cut and paste the output, but here is a phpMySQL export of the 
table with the extra stuff typed in from the create table


task_id mediumint(9) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT
status char(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT ''
priority char(1) NOT NULL
due_date_time datetimeNOT NULL
hold_date_time datetime NOT NULL
review_date_time datetime  Default NULL
requestor varchar(10) NOT NULL
performer varchar(10) NOT NULL
repeat_frequency char(1) NOT NULL
repeat_time char(2) NOT NULL
repeat_from char(1) NOT NULL
task_title varchar(60) NOT NULL
description text Yes NULL
history text Yes NULL
function_to_run varchar(80) DEFAULT NULL
last_access datetime NOT NULL
completed datetime NOT NULL
notify tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL

PRIMARY kEY('TASK_ID')
UNIQUE KEY 'performer' ('performer', 'status', priority', 
due_date_time', 'task_id')
UNIQUE KEY 'requestor' ('requestor', prirority','due_date_time', 
'task_id')

ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=312 DEFAULT CHARSET=ascii

As a workaround I changed status to task_status and now it 
works just fine.



bill


--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Re: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread Garot Conklin
My initial thought was to propagate the db with everything and allow the 
algorithm to then begin to determin trends/patterns and begin either an 
indexing methodology, additional table/db creation process or both to further 
optimize the calls being made and build in some internal levels of redundancy.  
I am actually approaching this with some degree of biological conception in the 
multipathing within our own brains however until I have something up and 
running under some substantial load however I may not get a complete picture.  

Thanks,

Garot

RE: Hi, how did u do de-emphasis of sql statements?

2012-08-20 Thread Rick James
Let me change your example slightly...
select * from table where name’A’
versus
select * from table where name’Z’

Now, let's assume you have an INDEX starting with `name` and names are 
distributed in the typical way.

The will be perhaps 1% of the names satisfying 'Z', but 95% satisfying 'A'.  
The index would be very useful for Z, but a waste for A.

Hence, it is a feature that MySQL does not cache execution plans.

You will also find that MySQL's query analyzer is very fast (compared to the 
competition).  Hence, there is much less need for a cache than 'they' have.

 -Original Message-
 From: Johan De Meersman [mailto:vegiv...@tuxera.be]
 Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 5:49 AM
 To: MID.night
 Cc: 673575760; mysql
 Subject: Re: Hi, how did u do de-emphasis of sql statements?
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
  From: MID.night 693893...@qq.com
 
  Like select * from table where name’A’ is just
 
  The same as select * from table where name’B’.
 
 The execution plan for both statements is indeed likely (but not
 guaranteed!) to be the same. As far as I'm aware, though, MySQL does
 not bother about that, though, as there is no execution plan cache.
 
 The query result cache does not equate the statements - it works based
 off the EXACT query text, INCLUDING spaces and capitalization.
 
 When analyzing various logs, the Maatkit/Aspersa/Percona toolset does
 transform SQL statements into their canonical form, though; so if
 you're looking for ways to do that you can have a look at how it's done
 there.
 
 
 --
 Linux Bier Wanderung 2012, now also available in Belgium!
 August, 12 to 19, Diksmuide, Belgium - http://lbw2012.tuxera.be
 
 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



RE: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread Martin Gainty


From: garotconk...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning
To: webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com

My initial thought was to propagate the db with everything and allow the 
algorithm to then begin to determin trends/patterns
MGwhich trends or patterns will you be modelling?

and begin either an indexing methodology
MGwhich indexes are you considering: Unique index, primary index or foreign 
index?

additional table/db creation process or both to further optimize the calls 
being made
MGoptimize based on execution time or diskspace allocated, EliminatingFTS or 
some other criteria?
MGhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/optimization.html

 and build in some internal levels of redundancy.
MGwhat about replication
MGhttp://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/replication.html

 I am actually approaching this with some degree of biological conception in 
the multipathing within our own brains however until I have something up and 
running under some substantial load however I may not get a complete picture.  

Thanks,

Garot


Interesting
Martin





From:

webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk;  
  


To:

'Garot Conklin' garotconk...@yahoo.com; 'Martin 
Gainty' mgai...@hotmail.com;  mysql@lists.mysql.com;
 


Subject:

RE: Machine Learning


Sent:

Mon, Aug 20, 2012 7:13:25 AM








Hi Garot,

This sounds an interesting idea.

Are you looking to store all known commands and their options or are you
looking for a 'formula' for calling any unix command ?

The reason for my question is that, at the end of the day, a unix command is
just a program that is run in the operating system. Each program comes with
its own options and acceptable inputs. I don't know if there is a rule or
convention for structuring these commands.

Are you then looking to build a system that 'knows' all commands and 'how
to' call them ?

Thanks,
Justin

-Original Message-
From: Garot Conklin [mailto:garotconk...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 03:39
To: Martin Gainty; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning

The initial goal is to provide a working framework from which to call all
UNIX shell command combinations as the underlying storage mechanism for a
machine learning algorithm.  I would like to build a completely self aware
instantiation that will maintain itself on all levels... I postulate that
the first place to start would be in determining a method for maintaining
all possible remediation combinations including the unknown to eventually be
learned from and populate new knowledge into the database.  Thank you for
the reply,

Garot







  

Re: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread Garot Conklin
MGwhich trends or patterns will you be modelling?  ALL (interesting answer if 
you allow yourself to consider that there really are no restrictions aside from 
those we would impose here)

MGwhich indexes are you considering: Unique index, primary index or foreign 
index?Primary for speed however unique may be more useful to keep the unwanted 
redundancy to a minimum.


MGoptimize based on execution time or diskspace allocated, EliminatingFTS or 
some other criteria? As diskspace is somewhat less concerning these days, I 
would like to focus on execution time.


MGwhat about replication -Yes, however I wanted an internal form of redundancy 
as well as distributed.



garotconk...@yahoo.com



 From: Martin Gainty mgai...@hotmail.com
To: garotconk...@yahoo.com; webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mysql@lists.mysql.com 
mysql@lists.mysql.com 
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: Machine Learning
 


From: garotconk...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning
To: webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com

My initial thought was to propagate the db with everything and allow the 
algorithm to then begin to determin trends/patterns
MGwhich trends or patterns will you be modelling?

and begin either an indexing methodology
MGwhich indexes are you considering: Unique index, primary index or foreign 
index?

additional table/db creation process or both to further optimize the calls 
being made
MGoptimize based on execution time or diskspace allocated, EliminatingFTS or 
some other criteria?
MGhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/optimization.html

and build in some internal levels of redundancy.
MGwhat about replication
MGhttp://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/replication.html

I am actually approaching this with some degree of biological conception in the 
multipathing within our own brains however until I have something up and 
running under some substantial load however I may not get a complete picture.  

Thanks,

Garot            
                
                    
Interesting
Martin

                    
                        
                            
                            
                                From:
                            
                            webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk;      
                      

                            
                                To:
                            
                            'Garot Conklin' garotconk...@yahoo.com; 'Martin 
Gainty' mgai...@hotmail.com;  mysql@lists.mysql.com;                        
                                                                            

                            
                                Subject:
                            
                            RE: Machine Learning                            

                            
                                Sent:
                            
                            Mon, Aug 20, 2012 7:13:25 AM                        
    

                            
                            

                            
                                
                                    
                                        Hi Garot,

This sounds an interesting idea.

Are you looking to store all known commands and their options or are you
looking for a 'formula' for calling any unix command ?

The reason for my question is that, at the end of the day, a unix command is
just a program that is run in the operating system. Each program comes with
its own options and acceptable inputs. I don't know if there is a rule or
convention for structuring these commands.

Are you then looking to build a system that 'knows' all commands and 'how
to' call them ?

Thanks,
Justin

-Original Message-
From: Garot Conklin [mailto:garotconk...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 03:39
To: Martin Gainty; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning

The initial goal is to provide a working framework from which to call all
UNIX shell command combinations as the underlying storage mechanism for a
machine learning algorithm.  I would like to build a completely self aware
instantiation that will maintain itself on all levels... I postulate that
the first place to start would be in determining a method for maintaining
all possible remediation combinations including the unknown to eventually be
learned from and populate new knowledge into the database.  Thank you for
the reply,

Garot

RE: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread webmaster
Hi Garot,

 

You'll have to elaborate some more ... I understand you may want to protect
the idea as well, so if you can narrow it down to some technical specifics
then it'll help.

 

What is the objective of this system, for instance ?

 

Thanks,

Justin

 

From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 19:23
To: garotconk...@yahoo.com; webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Machine Learning

 

 

From: garotconk...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning
To: webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com


My initial thought was to propagate the db with everything and allow the
algorithm to then begin to determin trends/patterns
MGwhich trends or patterns will you be modelling?

and begin either an indexing methodology
MGwhich indexes are you considering: Unique index, primary index or foreign
index?

additional table/db creation process or both to further optimize the calls
being made
MGoptimize based on execution time or diskspace allocated, EliminatingFTS
or some other criteria?
MGhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/optimization.html

 and build in some internal levels of redundancy.
MGwhat about replication
MGhttp://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/replication.html

I am actually approaching this with some degree of biological conception in
the multipathing within our own brains however until I have something up and
running under some substantial load however I may not get a complete
picture. 

Thanks,

Garot


Interesting
Martin

  _  

From: webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk; 
To: 'Garot Conklin' garotconk...@yahoo.com; 'Martin Gainty'
mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com; 
Subject: RE: Machine Learning 
Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 7:13:25 AM 


Hi Garot,

This sounds an interesting idea.

Are you looking to store all known commands and their options or are you
looking for a 'formula' for calling any unix command ?

The reason for my question is that, at the end of the day, a unix command is
just a program that is run in the operating system. Each program comes with
its own options and acceptable inputs. I don't know if there is a rule or
convention for structuring these commands.

Are you then looking to build a system that 'knows' all commands and 'how
to' call them ?

Thanks,
Justin

-Original Message-
From: Garot Conklin [mailto:garotconk...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 03:39
To: Martin Gainty; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning

The initial goal is to provide a working framework from which to call all
UNIX shell command combinations as the underlying storage mechanism for a
machine learning algorithm.  I would like to build a completely self aware
instantiation that will maintain itself on all levels... I postulate that
the first place to start would be in determining a method for maintaining
all possible remediation combinations including the unknown to eventually be
learned from and populate new knowledge into the database.  Thank you for
the reply,

Garot

 



Re: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread Garot Conklin
Ya the idea is not anything new, but must be apparently quit difficult or not a 
priority as I have yet to find it already implemented anywhere... Far be it 
from me to not make some attempt here anyway...

I am creating a fully automated framework from which a distributed 
infrastructure can be maintained.  I have been writing automation scripts/code 
for some time now and the logical progression is to embark on a full concept of 
systems health auto remediation.  I have numerous monitoring solutions under 
my control however none that properly (in my opinion) implements any real 
learning algorithms from which to draw even a minimalists view of automation.  
I like mySQL therefor began thinking about creating the aspects (lobes) of the 
brain as a relational database(s).  So this is only one facet of what I am 
trying to do, however leveraging a full command set of shell 
utilities/commands/programs seemed to be a good starting point before I get 
into the hard stuff ! 


-Garot

 
garotconk...@yahoo.com



 From: webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk
To: 'Martin Gainty' mgai...@hotmail.com; garotconk...@yahoo.com; 
mysql@lists.mysql.com 
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: Machine Learning
 
Hi Garot,



You'll have to elaborate some more ... I understand you may want to protect
the idea as well, so if you can narrow it down to some technical specifics
then it'll help.



What is the objective of this system, for instance ?



Thanks,

Justin



From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 19:23
To: garotconk...@yahoo.com; webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Machine Learning





From: garotconk...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning
To: webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com


My initial thought was to propagate the db with everything and allow the
algorithm to then begin to determin trends/patterns
MGwhich trends or patterns will you be modelling?

and begin either an indexing methodology
MGwhich indexes are you considering: Unique index, primary index or foreign
index?

additional table/db creation process or both to further optimize the calls
being made
MGoptimize based on execution time or diskspace allocated, EliminatingFTS
or some other criteria?
MGhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/optimization.html

and build in some internal levels of redundancy.
MGwhat about replication
MGhttp://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/replication.html

I am actually approaching this with some degree of biological conception in
the multipathing within our own brains however until I have something up and
running under some substantial load however I may not get a complete
picture. 

Thanks,

Garot


Interesting
Martin

  _  

From: webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk; 
To: 'Garot Conklin' garotconk...@yahoo.com; 'Martin Gainty'
mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com; 
Subject: RE: Machine Learning 
Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 7:13:25 AM 


Hi Garot,

This sounds an interesting idea.

Are you looking to store all known commands and their options or are you
looking for a 'formula' for calling any unix command ?

The reason for my question is that, at the end of the day, a unix command is
just a program that is run in the operating system. Each program comes with
its own options and acceptable inputs. I don't know if there is a rule or
convention for structuring these commands.

Are you then looking to build a system that 'knows' all commands and 'how
to' call them ?

Thanks,
Justin

-Original Message-
From: Garot Conklin [mailto:garotconk...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 03:39
To: Martin Gainty; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning

The initial goal is to provide a working framework from which to call all
UNIX shell command combinations as the underlying storage mechanism for a
machine learning algorithm.  I would like to build a completely self aware
instantiation that will maintain itself on all levels... I postulate that
the first place to start would be in determining a method for maintaining
all possible remediation combinations including the unknown to eventually be
learned from and populate new knowledge into the database.  Thank you for
the reply,

Garot

RE: Machine Learning

2012-08-20 Thread Martin Gainty

When I hear 'AI' I always imagine theres a HAL 9001 behind the scenes that is 
running the show constantly admonishing its creator to take another stress 
pill

Sounds like a fun project

Keep us apprised,
Martin Gainty 
__ 
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité

Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger 
sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte Weiterleitung 
oder Fertigung einer Kopie ist unzulaessig. Diese Nachricht dient lediglich dem 
Austausch von Informationen und entfaltet keine rechtliche Bindungswirkung. 
Aufgrund der leichten Manipulierbarkeit von E-Mails koennen wir keine Haftung 
fuer den Inhalt uebernehmen.
Ce message est confidentiel et peut être privilégié. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire prévu, nous te demandons avec bonté que pour satisfaire informez 
l'expéditeur. N'importe quelle diffusion non autorisée ou la copie de ceci est 
interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe 
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement 
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité 
pour le contenu fourni.


Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:50:04 -0700
From: garotconk...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning
To: webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com

Ya the idea is not anything new, but must be apparently quit difficult or not a 
priority as I have yet to find it already implemented anywhere... Far be it 
from me to not make some attempt here anyway...
I am creating a fully automated framework from which a distributed 
infrastructure can be maintained.  I have been writing automation scripts/code 
for some time now and the logical progression is to embark on a full concept of 
systems health auto remediation.  I have numerous monitoring solutions under 
my control however none that properly
 (in my opinion) implements any real learning algorithms from which to draw 
even a minimalists view of automation.  I like mySQL therefor began thinking 
about creating the aspects (lobes) of the brain as a relational database(s).  
So this is only one facet of what I am trying to do, however leveraging a full 
command set of shell utilities/commands/programs seemed to be a good starting 
point before I get into the hard stuff ! 

-Garot
 garotconk...@yahoo.com
From: webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk
 To: 'Martin Gainty' mgai...@hotmail.com; garotconk...@yahoo.com; 
mysql@lists.mysql.com 
 Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:55 PM
 Subject: RE: Machine Learning
   

Hi Garot,

 

You'll have to elaborate some more ... I understand you may want to protect
the idea as well, so if you can narrow it down to some technical specifics
then it'll help.

 

What is the objective of this system, for instance ?

 

Thanks,

Justin

 

From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: 20 August 2012 19:23
To: garotconk...@yahoo.com; webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: RE: Machine Learning

 

 

From: garotconk...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Machine Learning
To: webmas...@lisol.co.uk; mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com


My initial thought was to propagate the db with everything and allow the
algorithm to then begin to determin trends/patterns
MGwhich trends or patterns will you be modelling?

and begin either an indexing methodology
MGwhich indexes are you considering: Unique index, primary index or foreign
index?

additional table/db creation process or both to further optimize the calls
being made
MGoptimize based on execution time or diskspace allocated, EliminatingFTS
or some other criteria?
MGhttps://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/optimization.html

 and build in some internal levels of redundancy.
MGwhat about replication
MGhttp://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/replication.html

I am actually approaching this with some degree of biological conception in
the multipathing within our own brains however until I have something up and
running under some substantial load however I may not get a complete
picture. 

Thanks,

Garot


Interesting
Martin

  _  

From: webmas...@lisol.co.uk webmas...@lisol.co.uk; 
To: 'Garot
 Conklin' garotconk...@yahoo.com; 'Martin Gainty'
mgai...@hotmail.com; mysql@lists.mysql.com; 
Subject: RE: Machine Learning 
Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 7:13:25 AM 


Hi Garot,

This sounds an interesting idea.

Are you looking to store all known commands and their options or are you
looking for a 'formula' for calling any unix command ?

The reason for my question is that, at the end of the day, a unix command is
just a program that is run in the operating system. Each program comes with
its own options and acceptable inputs. I don't know if there is a rule or
convention for structuring these commands.

Are you then looking to build a
 system that 'knows' all commands and 'how
to' call them ?

Thanks,
Justin


RE: Best design for a table using variant data

2012-08-20 Thread Rick James
Even if you get past those issues, you will get to other nasty problems...  
Ugly JOINs, terrible performance, huge disk footprint, etc.

Split the attributes into two groups:
* The ones you _really_ need to search on.
* The rest.
Build columns for the first group; use the appropriate datatypes.
Throw the rest into a JSON string, put that into another column.  (I like to 
compress the JSON and put it into a MEDIUMBLOB.)

For searching,...
Use SQL (WHERE ...) to filter on any attributes in the first group.
Then use your programming language (PHP, etc) to finish the filtering, after 
fetching (and uncompressing) the JSON.

 -Original Message-
 From: Gaston Gloesener [mailto:gaston.gloese...@web.de]
 Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 10:58 PM
 To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: RE: Best design for a table using variant data
 
  You don't specify how many different types (including min/max values)
  you
 expect to be using. If you expect to end up with a few hundred, then
 you should perhaps consider using an ENUM or SET column directly in the
 data table.
 
 I do not quite understand where the use of enums/sets could be help
 here.
 
 Regarding the number of basic types there are only expected to be a few
 similar to a programming language: At the beginning there will be 4
 types (integer, 64-bit integer, floating point (probably double) and
 strings with their associated constraints. Each single attribute (i.e.
 table row) would only use one of these types.
 
 Possibly my explanations where not clear enough, so let me take a
 virtual example which would match my needs: A database which represents
 a second hand shop. This shop would contain a number of things of
 different types.
 Let's take cars and clothes as example. Those two would have a
 number off attributes which depend on the type. I.e. the car would have
 Brand (String), Model (String), manufacturing year (Inetger, max
 2012), horsepower (integer), ... while some of these are meaningless
 for the clothes which will have size, ...
 
 These attributes are not known at development type and are to be
 defined by the users of the database and may be extended over time. As
 said above this is a virtual example which does not match the actual
 much more complex database use.
 
 / Gaston
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Carsten Pedersen [mailto:cars...@bitbybit.dk]
 Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 15:33
 To: Gaston Gloesener
 Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
 Subject: Re: Best design for a table using variant data
 
 You don't specify how many different types (including min/max values)
 you expect to be using. If you expect to end up with a few hundred,
 then you should perhaps consider using an ENUM or SET column directly
 in the data table.
 
 / Carsten
 
 On 10.08.2012 10:51, Gaston Gloesener wrote:
  Hello,
 
 
 
  I am currently facing a design where a table (virtually) needs to
  store attributes of a topic (related table). The attributes can be
  user defined, i.e. not known at development type and depend on other
  factors. Each attributes value can be one of different types (int,
  int64, double, string) and may have constraints like min, max or
  length
 (string).
 
 
 
  Thus the data type would be modeled as variant in some programming
  languages, but this is not an option in SQL (beside the MS SQLserver
  sql_variant extension).
 
 
 
  So, how to simulate this in SQL.
 
 
 
  Basically there would be one table describing the attributes type
  (Type identifier, min/max,.) and one table for the values itself.
 
 
 
  The design I am currently thinking of would be to make exactly these
  two tables, with the attributes having a Dataype column and iMin,iMax
  for integer, i64Min, i64Max, fMin,fMax for double , sMinLen, sMaxLen
  for strings. The same applies to the value table which will have
  iValue, i64Value, fValue, string columns to hold the actual data.
 
 
 
  Now the columns will be filled according to the data type, columns
 not
  matching the type will be NULL.
 
 
 
  This means that each row in the table will have virtual space for any
  data type which violates database normalization. However it seems to
  me to be the best deal for performance and data space as NULL takes
  virtually no room
  (4/8 bytes in total for a number of fields in some circumstances) and
  requires no complex queries.
 
 
 
  One could also imagine to have the constraints moved to a separate
  table and interpreted according to the data type. Also a table for
  each type could be imagined but this will make the queries very
  complicated working against performance.
 
 
 
  Note: The model has to work for huge databases
 
 
 
  Anybody has a better alternative ?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 
 
 
 
 --
 MySQL General Mailing List
 For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
 To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql


--
MySQL 

RE: MySQL LDAP Authentication Plugin - Full example with source code

2012-08-20 Thread Rick James
Does that depend on mysql running as root in order to see /etc/shadow (or 
whatever)?

If so, that is too big a security hole to do.

 -Original Message-
 From: Ignacio Ocampo [mailto:naf...@gmail.com]
 Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:54 PM
 To: mysql
 Subject: MySQL LDAP Authentication Plugin - Full example with source
 code
 
 I have published in my blog, an full example (with source code) of a
 LDAP Authentication plugin for MySQL.
 
 http://nafiux.com/blog/2012/08/11/mysql-ldap-authentication-plugin/
 
 --
 Ignacio Ocampo

--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/mysql



Re: MySQL LDAP Authentication Plugin - Full example with source code

2012-08-20 Thread Ignacio Ocampo
Hi Rick,

The plugin does not need to access to /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow.

It uses an LDAP Server to authenticate the user through
ldap_simple_bind_s function.

Best regards.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Rick James rja...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:

 Does that depend on mysql running as root in order to see /etc/shadow
 (or whatever)?

 If so, that is too big a security hole to do.

  -Original Message-
  From: Ignacio Ocampo [mailto:naf...@gmail.com]
  Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:54 PM
  To: mysql
  Subject: MySQL LDAP Authentication Plugin - Full example with source
  code
 
  I have published in my blog, an full example (with source code) of a
  LDAP Authentication plugin for MySQL.
 
  http://nafiux.com/blog/2012/08/11/mysql-ldap-authentication-plugin/
 
  --
  Ignacio Ocampo




-- 
Ignacio Ocampo Millán