Re: [Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime?
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wil Schultz Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:11 PM To: nagios-users Subject: [Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime? IIRC, there used to be a Cancel Downtime link, am I blind or did this go away? How do you cancel scheduled downtime? Click the 'Downtime link in the left-side menu. It should be pretty self-explanatory from there. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime?
IIRC, there used to be a Cancel Downtime link, am I blind or did this go away? How do you cancel scheduled downtime? - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime?
Click Downtime and then the Trash can icon to the right of the service/host you want to cancel. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wil Schultz Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:11 PM To: nagios-users Subject: [Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime? IIRC, there used to be a Cancel Downtime link, am I blind or did this go away? How do you cancel scheduled downtime? - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime?
Blind I am :-) Thank you! On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Anthony Mendoza wrote: Click Downtime and then the Trash can icon to the right of the service/host you want to cancel. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wil Schultz Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:11 PM To: nagios-users Subject: [Nagios-users] Cancel Downtime? IIRC, there used to be a Cancel Downtime link, am I blind or did this go away? How do you cancel scheduled downtime? - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios end-user interfaces
On 07/06/07, Michael W. Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I need to offer Nagios information to end users without granting them access to the CGIs. Ideally, I don't want users to even know that the CGIs exist. The users need a bank of green/red lights and a network map. Have a look at Nagvis: http://www.nagvis.org/doku.php hth, Jim - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] R: R: NSClient++ or NRPE
I have Nagios 1.4 on Linux server. 374 hosts (Linux/Unix,Windows and network equipment) 877 services More than 40 windows systems have NSClient++ installed Regards Marco _ Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Antonio Pereira Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 17.36 A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE The way I have set up is Nagios 2.7 on Linux and installed NSClient++ on windows servers. I am monitoring the windows servers using NSClient++. Is this the best option? I want to make sure before I go any further in configuration. I am presently monitoring 2 windows servers. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Borsani Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:30 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE On unix/linux system you can use only NRPE. On Microsoft system you can use NSClient++ (that contains both features of old NSClient and NRPE). Regards Marco _ Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Antonio Pereira Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 17.07 A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE Hello, I am trying to figure out which one is better to use and I am having a difficult time to determine which is better. So I figured I would ask all of you. Which one is better NRPE or NSClient++? Thanks _ Avis Le present message n'est destine qu'a la personne ou a l'entite a qui il est adresse et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privilegiee et confidentielle. Si le lecteur du present message n'est pas le destinataire prevu ou encore la personne chargee de remettre ce message au destinataire prevu, veuillez nous aviser immediatement. Toute diffusion, distribution ou reproduction des renseignements contenus dans ce message ou des documents qui lui sont joints est strictement interdite. Notice This message is intended only for the use of individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this message or the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly prohibited. _ Avis Le présent message n'est destiné qu'à la personne ou à l'entité à qui il est adressé et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privilégiée et confidentielle. Si le lecteur du présent message n'est pas le destinataire prévu ou encore la personne chargée de remettre ce message au destinataire prévu, veuillez nous aviser immédiatement. Toute diffusion, distribution ou reproduction des renseignements contenus dans ce message ou des documents qui lui sont joints est strictement interdite. Notice This message is intended only for the use of individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Any disclosure, distribution or copying of this message or the information contained herein or attached hereto is strictly prohibited. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE
Hi there, We currently have nsclient++ installed across 200+ w2k3 servers. We get about 4 crashes a day. The service has been set to auto-restart so it is not a _huge_ problem. Nevertheless we are looking at moving away from nsclient++ possible to nrpe_nt or even a completely different monitoring platform :( Although it appears that practically everybody else has a great deal of success with nsclient++ we can not at the moment endorse it. Hopefully the issue will turn out to be a configuration error on our part. Regards, Matthew. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE
This discussion intrigues me... We've been using NRPE_NT with our Windows boxes (probably around 200 that we're monitoring) because I think I had the impression that this was the more commonly used of the two (NRPE/nsclient++). We primarily use it to call the wincheck_counter.exe file to probe Windows' PDH counters. However, from seeing the responses so far I'd say it appears that the majority of folks are using nsclient++ instead. I had considered nsclient++ at one time because it doesn't appear that nrpe_nt is actively developed anymore, yet nsclient++ has a lot of activity. When I tried it out, I did have some difficulty getting it working properly and eventually gave up on it. Then again, I maybe just didn't give it enough time and didn't understand how it worked well enough. It seemed to me that you mostly were able to probe things that it gave you the opportunity to probe. With NRPE_NT and wincheck_counter.exe (which doesn't seem to me to be run by all that many people either...) we could probe anything that was returnable by the PDH lib. I also had the impression that nsclient++ carried a bigger footprint than NRPE_NT did. One problem we've seen with NRPE_NT and wincheck_counter.exe is that it seems rather unreliable on Win2k machines -- at least for the things we commonly check like cpu, memory and disk space. A number of times it will just time out. Another list member indicated that they'd had crashes with Win2k3 -- we've never seen that. Given that nsclient++ seems much more widely used and is still actively developed, I'm considering giving it another shot. This issue of figuring out what's widely used has come up for me before with Nagios. When I was trying to figure out whether to use nagiosgraph or nagiosgrapher, for example. Just because something's in the Nagios Exchange, doesn't mean it's any good, actively supported, or perhaps even worth using. I wish I could send out a poll :-) Mark From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Borsani Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:24 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] R: R: NSClient++ or NRPE I have Nagios 1.4 on Linux server. 374 hosts (Linux/Unix,Windows and network equipment) 877 services More than 40 windows systems have NSClient++ installed Regards Marco Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Antonio Pereira Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 17.36 A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE The way I have set up is Nagios 2.7 on Linux and installed NSClient++ on windows servers. I am monitoring the windows servers using NSClient++. Is this the best option? I want to make sure before I go any further in configuration. I am presently monitoring 2 windows servers. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Borsani Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:30 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE On unix/linux system you can use only NRPE. On Microsoft system you can use NSClient++ (that contains both features of old NSClient and NRPE). Regards Marco Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Antonio Pereira Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 17.07 A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Oggetto: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE Hello, I am trying to figure out which one is better to use and I am having a difficult time to determine which is better. So I figured I would ask all of you. Which one is better NRPE or NSClient++? Thanks Avis Le present message n'est destine qu'a la personne ou a l'entite a qui il est adresse et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privilegiee et confidentielle. Si le lecteur du present message n'est pas le destinataire prevu ou encore la personne chargee de remettre ce message au destinataire prevu, veuillez nous aviser immediatement. Toute diffusion, distribution ou reproduction des renseignements contenus dans ce message ou des documents qui lui sont joints est strictement interdite. Notice This message is intended only for the use of individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios monitoring limits: hosts and services
I'm starting to get complaints from our Operations group that the Nagios web GUI is getting slow. This is on a version 1.x Nagios server. The server is monitoring 678 hosts and 3481 services organized in 29 host groups. Most checks are done on 5 minutes intervals. I've gone over all of the documented tweaks to improve performance. The hardware seems adequate and isn't starved for CPU; loads seem reasonable; although the Check Latency under the Performance Info screen continually creeps up - currently at Max. 23 seconds. Time to load the Status Overview screen: 8,5,6,6 seconds Time to load the Status Summary screen: 42,35 I guess my first question is what do your uses expect in terms of performance? Am I missing the boat on something real basic here? How many hosts/services do you manage per Nagios host? Those times seem long for that number of hosts. In most cases (including a system I'm looking at now with around 2100 hosts and 11,000 services being monitored) the bottleneck's bandwidth more than the server on the big pages like the service detail, but I haven't used a Nagios 1.x system for quite some time. Have you tried keeping your status data in RAM? I've seen some pretty decent performance gains from doing that in other cases. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] notification inheritance issue
I have 30 or so hosts defined using 2 layers of inheritance. The parent
template is:
# Generic host definition template - This is NOT a real host, just a
template!
define host{
namegeneric-host; The name of this
host template
notifications_enabled 1 ; Host notifications are
enabled
event_handler_enabled 1 ; Host event handler is
enabled
flap_detection_enabled 1 ; Flap detection is enabled
failure_prediction_enabled 1 ; Failure prediction is
enabled
process_perf_data 1 ; Process performance data
retain_status_information 1 ; Retain status information
acro ss program restarts
retain_nonstatus_information1 ; Retain non-status
information across program restarts
check_command check-host-alive
max_check_attempts 10
notification_interval 0
notification_period 24x7
notification_optionsd,u,r
contact_groups admins
register0 ; DONT REGISTER THIS
DEFINITION - ITS NOT A REAL HOST, JUST A TEMPLATE!
--
Then I defined a more specific template:
#Parent Class that all objects will inherit from
define host {
host_name 58ants
check_command check-host-alive
notification_optionsd,u,r
notification_period never
max_check_attempts 8
hostgroups Customers58
name58ant
use generic-host
register0
}
---
by my calculations, I should not be receiving any notifications for hosts
using this template. But I am and I don't know why. I'm using nagios2 on
a debian etch system by the way.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios monitoring limits: hosts and services
I'm starting to get complaints from our Operations group that the Nagios web GUI is getting slow. This is on a version 1.x Nagios server. The server is monitoring 678 hosts and 3481 services organized in 29 host groups. Most checks are done on 5 minutes intervals. I've gone over all of the documented tweaks to improve performance. The hardware seems adequate and isn't starved for CPU; loads seem reasonable; although the Check Latency under the Performance Info screen continually creeps up - currently at Max. 23 seconds. Time to load the Status Overview screen: 8,5,6,6 seconds Time to load the Status Summary screen: 42,35 I guess my first question is what do your uses expect in terms of performance? Am I missing the boat on something real basic here? How many hosts/services do you manage per Nagios host? Thanks in advance - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios Host Dependencie
Hello
I configure two host on my nagios config.
HOST A
HOST B
define hostdependency{
host_name Host A
dependent_host_name Host B
notification_failure_criteria d,u
}
I Need that when HOST B is mark down, Nagios sent notification:
Warning HOST A Dependend of HOST B, but HOST B is Down.
Is Posible?
Thant
_
Consigue aquí las mejores y mas recientes ofertas de trabajo EE.UU.
http://latino.msn.com/empleos
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE
I have continued on the NSClient++ path. I have recently added windows counters
such as thread count and paging on the windows machines. It seems to work well
for now. I will continue to keep expanding and see what it does.
Thanks for all the input.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frost, Mark {PBG}
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:40 AM
To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE
This discussion intrigues me...
We've been using NRPE_NT with our Windows boxes (probably around 200 that we're
monitoring) because I think I had the impression that this was the more
commonly used of the two (NRPE/nsclient++). We primarily use it to call the
wincheck_counter.exe file to probe Windows' PDH counters. However, from seeing
the responses so far I'd say it appears that the majority of folks are using
nsclient++ instead.
I had considered nsclient++ at one time because it doesn't appear that nrpe_nt
is actively developed anymore, yet nsclient++ has a lot of activity. When I
tried it out, I did have some difficulty getting it working properly and
eventually gave up on it. Then again, I maybe just didn't give it enough time
and didn't understand how it worked well enough. It seemed to me that you
mostly were able to probe things that it gave you the opportunity to probe.
With NRPE_NT and wincheck_counter.exe (which doesn't seem to me to be run by
all that many people either...) we could probe anything that was returnable by
the PDH lib.
I also had the impression that nsclient++ carried a bigger footprint than
NRPE_NT did.
One problem we've seen with NRPE_NT and wincheck_counter.exe is that it seems
rather unreliable on Win2k machines -- at least for the things we commonly
check like cpu, memory and disk space. A number of times it will just time out.
Another list member indicated that they'd had crashes with Win2k3 -- we've
never seen that.
Given that nsclient++ seems much more widely used and is still actively
developed, I'm considering giving it another shot.
This issue of figuring out what's widely used has come up for me before with
Nagios. When I was trying to figure out whether to use nagiosgraph or
nagiosgrapher, for example. Just because something's in the Nagios Exchange,
doesn't mean it's any good, actively supported, or perhaps even worth using. I
wish I could send out a poll :-)
Mark
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco
Borsani
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 4:24 AM
To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] R: R: NSClient++ or NRPE
I have Nagios 1.4 on Linux server.
374 hosts (Linux/Unix,Windows and network equipment)
877 services
More than 40 windows systems have NSClient++ installed
Regards
Marco
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Antonio
Pereira
Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 17.36
A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Oggetto: Re: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE
The way I have set up is Nagios 2.7 on Linux and installed NSClient++
on windows servers. I am monitoring the windows servers using NSClient++.
Is this the best option? I want to make sure before I go any further in
configuration. I am presently monitoring 2 windows servers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco
Borsani
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:30 AM
To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nagios-users] R: NSClient++ or NRPE
On unix/linux system you can use only NRPE.
On Microsoft system you can use NSClient++ (that contains both features
of old NSClient and NRPE).
Regards
Marco
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Antonio
Pereira
Inviato: giovedì 7 giugno 2007 17.07
A: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Oggetto: [Nagios-users] NSClient++ or NRPE
Hello,
I am trying to figure out which one is better to use and I am having a
difficult time to determine which is better. So I figured I would ask all of
you.
Which one is better NRPE or NSClient++?
Thanks
Avis Le present message n'est destine qu'a la personne ou a l'entite a
qui il est adresse et peut contenir des renseignements de nature privilegiee et
confidentielle. Si le lecteur du present message n'est pas le destinataire
[Nagios-users] service check intervals ignored
My service check intervals seem to be ignored and Nagios is checking every service once a day at 0:00. I've never seen this problem with older Nagios. The scheduling queue has almost every check running at 0:00 the next day, instead of spreading checks out. Help!? $ ../bin/nagios -v nagios.cfg Nagios 2.9 Copyright (c) 1999-2007 Ethan Galstad (http://www.nagios.org) Last Modified: 04-10-2007 License: GPL Reading configuration data... Running pre-flight check on configuration data... Checking services... Checked 502 services. Checking hosts... Checked 61 hosts. Checking host groups... Checked 8 host groups. Checking service groups... Checked 0 service groups. Checking contacts... Checked 21 contacts. Checking contact groups... Checked 32 contact groups. Checking service escalations... Checked 0 service escalations. Checking service dependencies... Checked 0 service dependencies. Checking host escalations... Checked 0 host escalations. Checking host dependencies... Checked 0 host dependencies. Checking commands... Checked 36 commands. Checking time periods... Checked 9 time periods. Checking extended host info definitions... Checked 0 extended host info definitions. Checking extended service info definitions... Checked 0 extended service info definitions. Checking for circular paths between hosts... Checking for circular host and service dependencies... Checking global event handlers... Checking obsessive compulsive processor commands... Checking misc settings... Total Warnings: 0 Total Errors: 0 Things look okay - No serious problems were detected during the pre-flight check $ ../bin/nagios -s -d nagios.cfg Projected scheduling information for host and service checks is listed below. This information assumes that you are going to start running Nagios with your current config files. HOST SCHEDULING INFORMATION --- Total hosts: 61 Total scheduled hosts: 0 Host inter-check delay method: SMART Average host check interval: 0.00 sec Host inter-check delay: 0.00 sec Max host check spread: 30 min First scheduled check: N/A Last scheduled check:N/A SERVICE SCHEDULING INFORMATION --- Total services: 502 Total scheduled services: 502 Service inter-check delay method: SMART Average service check interval: 3600.00 sec Inter-check delay: 7.17 sec Interleave factor method: SMART Average services per host: 8.23 Service interleave factor: 9 Max service check spread: 720 min First scheduled check: Fri Jun 8 16:37:04 2007 Last scheduled check: Sat Jun 9 00:00:00 2007 CHECK PROCESSING INFORMATION Service check reaper interval: 10 sec Max concurrent service checks: Unlimited PERFORMANCE SUGGESTIONS --- I have no suggestions - things look okay. --- The mailing list archive is found here: http://www.nagiosexchange.org/nagios-users.34.0.html - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] An odd question
There is the negate plugin. bash-3.1# ./negate --help negate (nagios-plugins 1.4.3) 1.24 Copyright (c) 2002-2004 Nagios Plugin Development Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Negates the status of a plugin (returns OK for CRITICAL, and vice- versa). Usage: negate [-t timeout] definition of wrapped plugin Options: -h, --help Print detailed help screen -V, --version Print version information -t, --timeout=INTEGER Seconds before connection times out (default: 9) [keep timeout than the plugin timeout to retain CRITICAL status] negate /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_ping -H host Run check_ping and invert result. Must use full path to plugin negate /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_procs -a 'vi negate.c' Use single quotes if you need to retain spaces This plugin is a wrapper to take the output of another plugin and invert it. If the wrapped plugin returns STATE_OK, the wrapper will return STATE_CRITICAL. If the wrapped plugin returns STATE_CRITICAL, the wrapper will return STATE_OK. Otherwise, the output state of the wrapped plugin is unchanged. Send email to nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net if you have questions regarding use of this software. To submit patches or suggest improvements, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Steven Schwartz wrote: I’m working in Nagios 2.x, so this may be possible in 3, and I just can’t find it in 2. Is there a way to specify more frequent checks on a service in a non-OK state? Essentially, we have a service where catching the moment it goes down is not critical, but once it *does*, we’d like to know as closely as possible when it comes back up. (It’s a long story) (i.e. have a different check interval for Hard OK and Hard Critical states.) S. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential Information belonging to Gracenote, Inc. may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message (and all attachments) to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message (and all attached documents) and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] An odd question
I'm working in Nagios 2.x, so this may be possible in 3, and I just can't find it in 2. Is there a way to specify more frequent checks on a service in a non-OK state? Essentially, we have a service where catching the moment it goes down is not critical, but once it *does*, we'd like to know as closely as possible when it comes back up. (It's a long story) (i.e. have a different check interval for Hard OK and Hard Critical states.) S. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential Information belonging to Gracenote, Inc. may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message (and all attachments) to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message (and all attached documents) and are asked to notify the sender by reply email. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Host Dependencie
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007, Fernando A Ben wrote:
Hello
I configure two host on my nagios config.
HOST A
HOST B
define hostdependency{
host_name Host A
dependent_host_name Host B
notification_failure_criteria d,u
}
I Need that when HOST B is mark down, Nagios sent notification:
Warning HOST A Dependend of HOST B, but HOST B is Down.
Is Posible?
I'm not 100% surte I'm understanding what you want, but if I am, there
are easier ways to handle it (and, in any case, you have your
dependencies backwards).
If you make host B a parent of Host B, and enable Unreachable
notifications, you'll receive a Host Unreachable notification for host
A if Host B goes down.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] An odd question
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2007 19:20:54 schrieb Wil Schultz:
There is the negate plugin.
.
On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Steven Schwartz wrote:
Is there a way to specify more frequent checks on a service in a
non-OK state? Essentially, we have a service where catching the
moment it goes down is not critical, but once it *does*, we’d like
to know as closely as possible when it comes back up. (It’s a long
story)
If i understood this right, you're not looking for the negate plugin, you're
looking for something like:
define service {
use critical-service
namerecheck-for-ok
register0
max_check_attempts 99 # I whish this could be value for
neverending retries
retry_check_interval1
}
Regards,
Elias P.
--
A really nice number:
09:F9:11:02:9D:74:E3:5B:D8:41:56:C5:63:56:88:C0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios monitoring limits: hosts and services
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nagios-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:38 AM To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios monitoring limits: hosts and services I'm starting to get complaints from our Operations group that the Nagios web GUI is getting slow. This is on a version 1.x Nagios server. The server is monitoring 678 hosts and 3481 services organized in 29 host groups. Most checks are done on 5 minutes intervals. I've gone over all of the documented tweaks to improve performance. The hardware seems adequate and isn't starved for CPU; loads seem reasonable; although the Check Latency under the Performance Info screen continually creeps up - currently at Max. 23 seconds. Time to load the Status Overview screen: 8,5,6,6 seconds Time to load the Status Summary screen: 42,35 I guess my first question is what do your uses expect in terms of performance? This is not unusual for a 1.x installation with large numbers of hosts/services. I had hostgroup overview pages that were taking up to 5 minutes to generate and I needed to cron them. There were significant optimizations done in 2.x to correct the way the CGI's internally traversed host and service entries resulting in the same pages generating in about 6 _seconds_. You should upgrade. 1.x is getting very old now. -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] cfg file considerations for Nagios?
I am making some Nagios 2.x config files that will be installed at probably 100 locations for various administrators to monitor some specific appliances on their network. Is there anything that I need to take into consideration before creating these cfg files if I am to make this completely compatible with, say, GUI tools like Fruity or NagiosQL? Some of the end users who might use these config files might be wanting to use programs that make more tweaks configures easy, and I want to make sure that my cfg files will be properly work with whatever s/he installs. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Can Nagios/Lynx/wget/curl/links do NTLM authentication?
I want to use Nagios to monitor a site (running on Windows/IIS) that uses NTLM for authentication. Is there a plugin/script/library/etc that can help? Reason I'm cc'ing the lynx/wget/curl/links lists: if lynx/wget/curl/links can do NTLM, I can easily write a nagios wrapper. -- We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying to understand and assimilate technology. We feel that resistance to new ideas and technology is unwise and ultimately futile. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
