[Nagios-users] Problem with Router status in notification.
Hello list
I am using nagios 3.0.I am having problem in getting notification for any
port down in my router.I am using snmp to collect data.
define service{
usegeneric-service; Inherit values from a template
host_namehongkong-gw1
service_descriptionPort 10 descr adminstatus operstatus
check_commandcheck_snmp! -C public -o
ifDescr.14,ifAdminStatus.14,ifOperStatus.14
this gives me output
SNMP OK - Serial0/0 up(1) up(1) FTIL1566 Connection to Londonpop-gw1
Ser0/3
now when the port goes down , i recieve messege saying SMNP data not
recieved from host , problem unknown.but i want that it should give me
messege that the port is down.
is there anything i need to change in the above check_snmp command?
appreciate your help !!
regards
Michael
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with Router status in notification.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Mukherji wrote:
| Hello list
|
| I am using nagios 3.0.I am having problem in getting notification for
| any port down in my router.I am using snmp to collect data.
|
| define service{
| usegeneric-service; Inherit values from a template
| host_namehongkong-gw1
| service_descriptionPort 10 descr adminstatus operstatus
| check_commandcheck_snmp! -C public -o
| ifDescr.14,ifAdminStatus.14,ifOperStatus.14
|
| this gives me output
|
| SNMP OK - Serial0/0 up(1) up(1) FTIL1566 Connection to Londonpop-gw1
| Ser0/3
|
| now when the port goes down , i recieve messege saying SMNP data not
| recieved from host , problem unknown.but i want that it should give me
| messege that the port is down.
|
| is there anything i need to change in the above check_snmp command?
No. You need to get another router. Cisco in their infinite wisdom will
give odd results on some interfaces if they are down. I have seen cases
where the interface is there if it's up but when it's down the interface
is gone as far as SNMP is concerned.
I suggest you open a supprt ticket with Cisco on this odd behaviour.
It's their problem and they need to fix it.
Hugo.
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIMofYBvzDRVjxmYERAu8sAJwKf81ROkyCpkcMsakPbXvjMCF5ygCbBkaG
cZ6DMrhKEhkQOx2lsTJbX7M=
=XGIN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] OT: Procmail filter to add Reply-To: to mailinglist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A bit off-topic but this list is the only one I have a hard time sending replies back to. So I was thinking of adding a Reply-To: header on my side by adding some code to my procmail filters. Anyone happen to have a working set they would like to share? I allready organize all mailinglists to end up in their respective folders like: :0 * ^X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maildir/.NAGIOS-USERS/ Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMom+BvzDRVjxmYERAnCzAJ9fw2lDrCLNqhc9aMT3d6N+BStRAQCeI7MN XhwoImtfb0uN7OEW+gyPJ88= =RU6x -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with Router status in notification.
Hi
thanks for your input.But the port was actually down.Bt i want notification
saying that port is down rather than snmp unable to collect data
So is any extra parameter such as -s /-r is required in my check_snmp
command.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Hugo van der Kooij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Mukherji wrote:
| Hello list
|
| I am using nagios 3.0.I am having problem in getting notification for
| any port down in my router.I am using snmp to collect data.
|
| define service{
| usegeneric-service; Inherit values from a template
| host_namehongkong-gw1
| service_descriptionPort 10 descr adminstatus operstatus
| check_commandcheck_snmp! -C public -o
| ifDescr.14,ifAdminStatus.14,ifOperStatus.14
|
| this gives me output
|
| SNMP OK - Serial0/0 up(1) up(1) FTIL1566 Connection to Londonpop-gw1
| Ser0/3
|
| now when the port goes down , i recieve messege saying SMNP data not
| recieved from host , problem unknown.but i want that it should give me
| messege that the port is down.
|
| is there anything i need to change in the above check_snmp command?
No. You need to get another router. Cisco in their infinite wisdom will
give odd results on some interfaces if they are down. I have seen cases
where the interface is there if it's up but when it's down the interface
is gone as far as SNMP is concerned.
I suggest you open a supprt ticket with Cisco on this odd behaviour.
It's their problem and they need to fix it.
Hugo.
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIMofYBvzDRVjxmYERAu8sAJwKf81ROkyCpkcMsakPbXvjMCF5ygCbBkaG
cZ6DMrhKEhkQOx2lsTJbX7M=
=XGIN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service
Hi Izz, Izz Abdullah schrieb: I have enabled performance data for my monitored Windows 2k3 server. I am receiving performance data, not extremely clear, but receiving, for the defaulted services. What I want is to see performance data on running processes as well (e.g. the Explorer.exe process has nothing in the performance data field). Can someone please assist? What kind of performance data would you expect from explorer.exe? With some services, it just doesn't make much sense to have performance analyzed, in my opinion. Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NRPE
On Tuesday May 20 2008 10:38:24 am Villanueva, Pete wrote: Hello All, I have a problem regarding the nrpe when I try this command ./check_nrpe -H 10.65.32.98 -c check_disk ...error occurred CHECK_NRPE: Received 0 bytes. Are we allowed to connect to the host? First, try to answer the question, are you allowed to connect to the host? How have you configured the nrpd on the clientside? If you are allowed to connect there by xinitd configuration, is a firewall active? greetings, Christian How do I fix this? Pete Sherwin S. Villanueva Information Technology Department Lear Automotive Services (Netherlands) B.V Philippine Branch MEPZ 1, Lapu-Lapu City 6015 Philippines Phone: (32) 349-9300 loc 4140 Fax : (32) 3400-411 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of #ANG CHIN TECK# Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:05 PM To: nagios-users Subject: [Nagios-users] high check latency,slow update of config on web interface Hi all, I am currently monitoring 50 hosts with no services, only pinging them. perf info for these 50 hosts: check interval: 10 mins check duration: avg 4 s (5 pings) but my check latency fluctuates alot (10s , 140s , 250s) I am also monitoring 2 other hosts with 10 services. perf info for these 10 services: check interval: 1 min check duration: avg 3s check latency fluctuates (2s, 5s, 48s) Why does the latency fluctuates so much? Another problem is that after i update my config file, verify and restart nagios, it takes 15 mins for the web interface to register the change. Under view config, the change was not registered too. Are the 2 problems linked? Thanks. ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer. -- Christian Schneemann - SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D - 90409 Nürnberg Phone: +49 (0)911 - 740 53 0 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] NRPE
Hello All, I have a problem regarding the nrpe when I try this command ./check_nrpe -H 10.65.32.98 -c check_disk ...error occurred CHECK_NRPE: Received 0 bytes. Are we allowed to connect to the host? How do I fix this? Pete Sherwin S. Villanueva Information Technology Department Lear Automotive Services (Netherlands) B.V Philippine Branch MEPZ 1, Lapu-Lapu City 6015 Philippines Phone: (32) 349-9300 loc 4140 Fax : (32) 3400-411 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of #ANG CHIN TECK# Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:05 PM To: nagios-users Subject: [Nagios-users] high check latency,slow update of config on web interface Hi all, I am currently monitoring 50 hosts with no services, only pinging them. perf info for these 50 hosts: check interval: 10 mins check duration: avg 4 s (5 pings) but my check latency fluctuates alot (10s , 140s , 250s) I am also monitoring 2 other hosts with 10 services. perf info for these 10 services: check interval: 1 min check duration: avg 3s check latency fluctuates (2s, 5s, 48s) Why does the latency fluctuates so much? Another problem is that after i update my config file, verify and restart nagios, it takes 15 mins for the web interface to register the change. Under view config, the change was not registered too. Are the 2 problems linked? Thanks. ** ** LEGAL DISCLAIMER ** ** This E-mail message and any attachments may contain legally privileged, confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this E-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this E-mail message from your computer.- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service
Not necessarily explorer.exe. I am looking more at some java instances, (java.exe, etc.). I want to know CPU load as well as Memory usage of a process. Thanks, Izz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:49:48 +0200 To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service Hi Izz, Izz Abdullah schrieb: I have enabled performance data for my monitored Windows 2k3 server. I am receiving performance data, not extremely clear, but receiving, for the defaulted services. What I want is to see performance data on running processes as well (e.g. the Explorer.exe process has nothing in the performance data field). Can someone please assist? What kind of performance data would you expect from explorer.exe? With some services, it just doesn't make much sense to have performance analyzed, in my opinion. Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_nrpe issues
I have a remote Linux host (ubuntu), and the monitoring server is Redhat Linux Enterprise 4. I have disabled SSL for check_nrpe and when testing the connection to the remote host with the /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_nrpe -H 192.168.0.1 command, I receive the following error: CHECK_NRPE: Received 0 bytes from daemon. Check the remote server logs for error messages. There are no firewalls in-between the monitoring server and the remote host, and the remote host can check itself and get the NRPE version number. Help is greatly appreciated as I am banging my head on this one :) -Izz - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_nrpe issues
Izz Abdullah schrieb: I have a remote Linux host (ubuntu), and the monitoring server is Redhat Linux Enterprise 4. I have disabled SSL for check_nrpe and when testing the connection to the remote host with the /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_nrpe -H 192.168.0.1 command, I receive the following error: CHECK_NRPE: Received 0 bytes from daemon. Check the remote server logs for error messages. Hm, what helped me recently figuring out a 0 bytes-issue, was activating the debug in nrpe.cfg on the remote host and looking in the syslog. There I immediately found the error. (Missing utils.pm in perl-path). Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Increasing latency - over the top - a cry for help
Hello, oh thou sweet fountain of problem-solving knowledge :-) Here at the University of Oslo we are running Natios to monitor roughly 10k services out of which ~9500 are active. We also monitor ~700 hosts. We are running nagios 3.0.1 on a Dell 2850 with 4 Gb of RAM. And 4 kernels. We upgraded from 2.9 roughly a month ago. We have the following problem, and are turning here for help after fumbling in darkness for some time: The latency of both host checks and service checks increase over time. After a stop/start of nagios, we see the following pattern: 1) The service latency starts of at ~2.8 seconds, which we are happy with. It increases with about 1 ms per minute, a rough estimate. 2) The nagios process starts off at about 17m resident, shown in top. 3) The system part of cpu usage starts off at ~30% However. 4) The system part of cpu usage increases over a period of approx. six hours, till it reaches a threshold of some kind at ~290%. At the same time, the system load increases till four or five. 5) At this point, the latency of both host and service checks will start increasing much faster, until another stop/start of nagios. The service latency will reach 160 seconds (!) after ~9 hours. 6) At The question is what causes this. We started using mrtg for graphing some time after we noticed a problem, so we are not quite sure when this started. Our setup is actually quite simple. o no flap-detection o no environment macros o no dependencies We have tried the following, with no real effect: use_large_installation_tweaks=1 (with various sub-tweaks) playing with the max_concurrent_checks checkresults on a tmpfs filesystem So. We are very grateful for any ideas. I have gathered some useful data on http://folk.uio.no/staalej/nagios/ -- Ståle Johansen, soon in despair. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] nagiosql - hosts issue
this is a nagiosql question really but i wonder if any users here have encountered this before. using nagiosql i can generate and write configs both into the db and onto the filesystem. Nagios can read them and startup etc. The problem is that for some reason when configs are deleted from the db the host.cfg file for that host still remains on the filesystem, which is odd as if nagiosql is supposed to delete them it should do as it has rights to write and so in effect delete. Does anyone have any clues? thanks - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Increasing latency - over the top - a cry for help
On May 20, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Ståle Askerød Johansen wrote: Hello, oh thou sweet fountain of problem-solving knowledge :-) Here at the University of Oslo we are running Natios to monitor roughly 10k services out of which ~9500 are active. We also monitor ~700 hosts. We are running nagios 3.0.1 on a Dell 2850 with 4 Gb of RAM. And 4 kernels. We upgraded from 2.9 roughly a month ago. We have the following problem, and are turning here for help after fumbling in darkness for some time: The latency of both host checks and service checks increase over time. After a stop/start of nagios, we see the following pattern: 1) The service latency starts of at ~2.8 seconds, which we are happy with. It increases with about 1 ms per minute, a rough estimate. 2) The nagios process starts off at about 17m resident, shown in top. 3) The system part of cpu usage starts off at ~30% I seem to recall this being related to using the embedded perl interpreter. Did you compile nagios with ePN? Try without it if you did. -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] HOST - check is not working
Hi All , I have a strange situation where my nagios is not recovering after some server goes to UNREACHABLE state unless I force a recheck . That is the state before the Re-schedule the next check of this host Host Status: UNREACHABLE Status Information:CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 seconds Performance Data: Current Attempt:1/4 State Type:HARD Last Check Type:ACTIVE Last Check Time:05-20-2008 10:05:32 Status Data Age: 0d 0h 1m 20s Next Scheduled Active Check: N/A Latency:0.000 seconds Check Duration:10.034 seconds Last State Change:05-17-2008 01:03:56 Current State Duration: 3d 9h 2m 56s So after the Re-check : Host Status: UP Status Information:PING OK - Packet loss = 0%, RTA = 58.26 ms Performance Data: Current Attempt:0/4 State Type:HARD Last Check Type:ACTIVE Last Check Time:05-20-2008 10:08:24 Status Data Age: 0d 0h 0m 13s Next Scheduled Active Check: N/A Latency:5.545 seconds Check Duration:0.077 seconds Last State Change:05-20-2008 10:08:24 Current State Duration: 0d 0h 0m 13s Any clue ? - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Help with large scale planning
Hello List, Been a while since I have been able to post on a regular basis due to being given the opportunity to seek other employment! I have landed, gracefully, in a position where I have been tasked with designing a large scale Nagios installation. The requirements are all client requirements and pretty necessary. I need a little advice on where to start. I will describe the environment and then lay out my idea on how I see the design coming together. The environment is an HPCC environment and the requirements are based on that aspect almost exclusively. Initially the monitoring will be for clustering only and then expanding out to other servers outside of the HPCC environment. 1. No client installed on compute nodes (there is an HA head node where a client or a full install could be done). 2. No active checks directly to compute nodes 3. Ganglia is available for node data That is the majority of the requirements. Ganglia makes things a bit easier but I am not sure how much easier. It looks like GroundWork could handle this but I don't see the large scale features available in the open source version. The environment is as follows 1. 80 clusters 2. Each cluster has 70-72 compute nodes The client wants a single point of monitoring for this environment. I am looking at the following for a setup: Using the ganglia plugin from Nagios Exchange to gather and parse the data, on the HA head node, and having this report back to a main Nagios server (HA) for the single point of monitoring. What I don't know is how Nagios 3.x will scale with ~5000-6000 hosts coming into a single point of monitoring. What cannot happen is the checks causing any degradation in the HPCC environment. Ganglia is already in place and accounted for in performance so querying the ganglia process is allowed but they would prefer to pull this data from gmetad and not gmond. Also, from the Nagios management side, I would like to see if there is a way to automatically add hosts if a new host pops up in the ganglia data. This is not a deal breaker but will make life so much easier in the long run. I have likely not given enough information somewhere but I think there is enough here to get a discussion started. It's good to be back! Regards, Mark L. Potter eXcellence in IS Solutions, Inc. (X-ISS) Office: 713-862-9200 x219 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.x-iss.com http://www.x-iss.com/ Making IT Work for You HPC Enterprise IT Solutions * HPC Application Acceleration * Cluster Design, Deploy, Manage, Train * Linux/Windows Integration * Remote Management, Backup, Anti-Spam/Virus * Network Assessments, Design * Security Audits, Design * Datacenter Design, Relocation * Messaging and Collaboration NOTICE: This message may contain privileged or otherwise confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete the message and any attachments without using, copying or disclosing the contents. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] HOST - check is not working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Saulo Silva wrote: | I have a strange situation where my nagios is not recovering after some | server goes to UNREACHABLE state unless I force a recheck . What service have you assigned to this host? How did you define this host? Did you read the section about host checks? Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMt6TBvzDRVjxmYERAs8iAJkBAlgbOh7Nt5XFxAOip+H6NihoIACfc5QG zaC5IUC32ARg/h/ximdwjBY= =RBP6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] HOST - check is not working
Here some host example
define host{
host_namehostname
contact_groups 1
alias hostname.fulname
address x.xx.xxx.xxx
parents route1
use generic-host-active
}
define host{
host_nameroute1
contact_groups 1
address x.xx.xxx.xxx
use generic-host-active
}
define host{
name generic-host-active
register 0
notification_options d,u,r
check_commandcheck-host-alive
event_handler_enabled1
flap_detection_enabled 1
notification_interval120
notification_period full_week
notifications_enabled1
max_check_attempts 4
}
define command{
command_name check-host-alive
command_line /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_ping
-H $HOSTADDRESS$ -w 3000.0,80% -c 5000.0,100% -p 1
}
So that is it . That is a few services associated to the server if necessary
I can include that here .
Thanks for help
Saulo Silva
2008/5/20 Hugo van der Kooij [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saulo Silva wrote:
| I have a strange situation where my nagios is not recovering after some
| server goes to UNREACHABLE state unless I force a recheck .
What service have you assigned to this host? How did you define this host?
Did you read the section about host checks?
Hugo.
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/PGP/GPG? Use:
http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIMt6TBvzDRVjxmYERAs8iAJkBAlgbOh7Nt5XFxAOip+H6NihoIACfc5QG
zaC5IUC32ARg/h/ximdwjBY=
=RBP6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with Router status in notification.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:16:23PM +0530, Michael Mukherji wrote:
thanks for your input.But the port was actually down.Bt i want notification
saying that port is down rather than snmp unable to collect data
So is any extra parameter such as -s /-r is required in my check_snmp
command.
No.
As he noted, the problem is that the Cisco doesn't behave properly. If
the port is down, the Cisco should *say that it is down*, rather than
simply ceasing to respond properly.
But that's what it does, and that's what you're seeing.
Marc, I gather provided a workaround, but that will likely obscure
those circumstances when the entire router drops dead. Well, at least,
the historical logs will say the wrong thing.
No way to do better.
I concur: contact TAC; open a ticket.
Cheers,
-- jra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Mukherji wrote:
| Hello list
|
| I am using nagios 3.0.I am having problem in getting notification for
| any port down in my router.I am using snmp to collect data.
|
| define service{
| usegeneric-service; Inherit values from a template
| host_namehongkong-gw1
| service_descriptionPort 10 descr adminstatus operstatus
| check_commandcheck_snmp! -C public -o
| ifDescr.14,ifAdminStatus.14,ifOperStatus.14
|
| this gives me output
|
| SNMP OK - Serial0/0 up(1) up(1) FTIL1566 Connection to Londonpop-gw1
| Ser0/3
|
| now when the port goes down , i recieve messege saying SMNP data not
| recieved from host , problem unknown.but i want that it should give me
| messege that the port is down.
|
| is there anything i need to change in the above check_snmp command?
No. You need to get another router. Cisco in their infinite wisdom will
give odd results on some interfaces if they are down. I have seen cases
where the interface is there if it's up but when it's down the interface
is gone as far as SNMP is concerned.
I suggest you open a supprt ticket with Cisco on this odd behaviour.
It's their problem and they need to fix it.
Hugo.
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [3]http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: [4]http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Bored? Click on [5]http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIMofYBvzDRVjxmYERAu8sAJwKf81ROkyCpkcMsakPbXvjMCF5ygCbBkaG
cZ6DMrhKEhkQOx2lsTJbX7M=
=XGIN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
[6]http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[8]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when
reporting any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
References
1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3. http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/PGP/GPG
4. http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
5. http://spamornot.org/
6. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
7. mailto:Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
8. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Joseph Stalin)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all
Re: [Nagios-users] OT: Procmail filter to add Reply-To: to mailinglist
On May 20, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, A bit off-topic but this list is the only one I have a hard time sending replies back to. So I was thinking of adding a Reply-To: header on my side by adding some code to my procmail filters. Anyone happen to have a working set they would like to share? The first hit on Google for 'procmail add reply-to header' seems to be what you're looking for. -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Problem with Router status in notification.
On May 20, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:16:23PM +0530, Michael Mukherji wrote: thanks for your input.But the port was actually down.Bt i want notification saying that port is down rather than snmp unable to collect data So is any extra parameter such as -s /-r is required in my check_snmp command. No. As he noted, the problem is that the Cisco doesn't behave properly. If the port is down, the Cisco should *say that it is down*, rather than simply ceasing to respond properly. But that's what it does, and that's what you're seeing. That's not how I interpreted his issue at all and I'm a bit dubious about it. The problem interface was a Serial interface, possibly the only upstream connection. check_snmp will behave this way if the router is unreachable. I've never personally experienced this 'disappearing' interface problem or non-responsiveness with any kind of physical connection (Serial, (Fast)Ethernet, etc), only virtuals such as ISDN Virtual interfaces, which are expected and even those have never caused SNMP to be non-responsive. I do perform somewhat extensive checking of interfaces via SNMP (several thousand). Michael: Can you clarify? I'm interested in knowing if this is something I need to be concerned about. What IOS version are you running? -- Marc - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] OT: Procmail filter to add Reply-To: to mailinglist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc Powell wrote: | On May 20, 2008, at 3:20 AM, Hugo van der Kooij wrote: | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | Hi, | | A bit off-topic but this list is the only one I have a hard time | sending | replies back to. | | So I was thinking of adding a Reply-To: header on my side by adding | some | code to my procmail filters. Anyone happen to have a working set they | would like to share? | | The first hit on Google for 'procmail add reply-to header' seems to be | what you're looking for. The first few hits have delivered me codes that resulted in lost messages. So it is a bit more complex then that. Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIMyXYBvzDRVjxmYERAiG8AJ9LWdYxYlFZJMnsxAEa8IYStaIyQACghV4D KxGwA7yBvW9c+57K9iqe1JE= =QiDu -END PGP SIGNATURE- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios 3 visual map
I posted this question about a month and a half ago, but didn't get any replies. I'm hoping that now that Nagios 3 has been out a bit longer, there might be more options. My company has been using nagios 2.x for some time, with the add-on Nexsm for displaying a visual overview of the network at-a-glance. It was also useful for showing visitors (and management) what our network was like cleanly and easily. Since Nagios 3 was released, and we migrated over to it (for a number of reasons), nexsum no longer works. The author says he'd like to add nagios 3 support, but he doesn't have the time at the moment and may not anytime soon. So I am looking for another option. Any suggestions? I did look at nagvis a while back, but at least at that time it would have required me to go through a very time-consuming process of placing each host and each link on the layout manually, and then adjusting the coordinates of each host and link in a configuration file to make it look good. This process would have been prohibitively time-consuming. I need something that can automatically place the hosts and links on the map, and simply allow me to drag the hosts around to position them. Thanks for any suggestions anyone might have to offer! --- Israel Brewster Computer Support Technician Frontier Flying Service Inc. 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7250 x293 --- - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 visual map
Hi, Israel Brewster schrieb: I did look at nagvis a while back, but at least at that time it would have required me to go through a very time-consuming process of placing each host and each link on the layout manually, and then adjusting the coordinates of each host and link in a configuration file to make it look good. This process would have been prohibitively time-consuming. I need something that can automatically place the hosts and links on the map, and simply allow me to drag the hosts around to position them. Thanks for any suggestions anyone might have to offer! well... give NagVis a second chance - it now has a Automap feature. http://www.nagvis.org/_media/nagvis-1.3-automap_undirected-1.png Regards, Hendrik smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Basic Distributed setup question - Central server passive service only reads PENDING
I have followed the documentation on the centralized/distributed model. I believe I have everything setup properly: My central server has active checks disabled, it has the same services and host configuration data as the distributed server. I have NSCA functioning, and I can see that the central server is receiving NSCA data from the distributed server by looking at the syslog output: May 20 16:14:18 dnag5 nsca[32101]: Connection from 172.27.20.202 port 58500 May 20 16:14:18 dnag5 nsca[32101]: Handling the connection... May 20 16:14:19 dnag5 nsca[32101]: End of connection... However the passive service check's status on the central server reads as: PENDING. Any ideas on what could be causing this? Thanks, -Ray - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Monitoring for Stale AIX Processes with Nagios ?
Hello, We have AIX 5.3 running on our production servers and the way things are setup we need to make sure there are no STALE processes on the box, by STALE I mean any idle process that has been running for more than 5 hours. Sure we can monitor this with topas -P and have a terminal session open at all times but this is not ideal. Does anyone know of a script or a way to accomplish this? Even if we would need to write a script/cron job to get the job done? Any help is appreciated and thank you. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service
You should be able to get this data through the Process performance counter object with the instance set to the process name (as long as you can map the process name to an actual counter instance) or you should be able to get this data through a WMI querry Or you can write a script or program and get the data through NC_NEt or a NRPE plugin TOny (author of NC_Net) On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Izz Abdullah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not necessarily explorer.exe. I am looking more at some java instances, (java.exe, etc.). I want to know CPU load as well as Memory usage of a process. Thanks, Izz -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:49:48 +0200 To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Performance data for service Hi Izz, Izz Abdullah schrieb: I have enabled performance data for my monitored Windows 2k3 server. I am receiving performance data, not extremely clear, but receiving, for the defaulted services. What I want is to see performance data on running processes as well (e.g. the Explorer.exe process has nothing in the performance data field). Can someone please assist? What kind of performance data would you expect from explorer.exe? With some services, it just doesn't make much sense to have performance analyzed, in my opinion. Greetz, Marcus - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] nagios-plugins fail to compile solaris 10 x86/x64
list, im getting the following when attempting to compile nagios-plugins on a solaris 10 x86 (x4500) box. # begin background system info -bash-3.00$ uname -a SunOS loraine 5.10 Generic_127128-11 i86pc i386 i86pc -bash-3.00$ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --with-gnu-as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath) -bash-3.00$ which ar /usr/local/bin/ar -bash-3.00$ which make /usr/local/bin/make -bash-3.00$ make -v GNU Make 3.81 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This program built for i386-pc-solaris2.10 # end background system # begin make errors (output truncated) if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/ssl/include -g -O2 -MT vasnprintf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/vasnprintf.Tpo -c -o vasnprintf.o vasnprintf.c; \ then mv -f .deps/vasnprintf.Tpo .deps/vasnprintf.Po; else rm -f .deps/vasnprintf.Tpo; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/ssl/include -g -O2 -MT vasprintf.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/vasprintf.Tpo -c -o vasprintf.o vasprintf.c; \ then mv -f .deps/vasprintf.Tpo .deps/vasprintf.Po; else rm -f .deps/vasprintf.Tpo; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../intl -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/ssl/include -g -O2 -MT xmalloc.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/xmalloc.Tpo -c -o xmalloc.o xmalloc.c; \ then mv -f .deps/xmalloc.Tpo .deps/xmalloc.Po; else rm -f .deps/xmalloc.Tpo; exit 1; fi rm -f libgnu.a ar cru libgnu.a full-read.o full-write.o strnlen1.o xalloc-die.o xstrndup.o asnprintf.o asprintf.o basename.o c-strtod.o cloexec.o creat-safer.o dirname.o dup-safer.o error.o exitfail.o fd-safer.o fsusage.o getopt.o getopt1.o mbchar.o mountlist.o open-safer.o pipe-safer.o printf-args.o printf-parse.o regex.o safe-read.o safe-write.o strcasecmp.o stripslash.o strndup.o strnlen.o vasnprintf.o vasprintf.o xmalloc.o /bin/bash: /usr/local/bin/ar: Invalid argument make[3]: *** [libgnu.a] Error 126 make[3]: Leaving directory `/export/home/toor/nagios-plugins-1.4.11/gl' make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/home/toor/nagios-plugins-1.4.11/gl' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/home/toor/nagios-plugins-1.4.11' any ideas? regards, _Terry - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Query regarding negate wrapper
Hi, I have been trying to test and implement the negate wrapper in our Nagios environment. It has worked successfully with all (except one) of the plugins. 'negate' is not working as expected when I try to use with check_http (with -u URL argument especially). When I actually run the negate wrapper with check_http plugin against a web server (enabled with SSL), it doesn't negate the state returned (only when the web server is down). When the web server is down (connect to socket times out) and check_http plugin actually returns STATE_CRITICAL with time out error. But when negate wrapper is used, surprisingly it doesn't negate the output, but instead returns STATE_CRITICAL. I have included the commands and the output of the commands as below: prod-unix-mon04:/usr/lib/nagios/plugins# /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_http -S -p 443 -u '/EdgeAuth/login.jsp' -H server_name CRITICAL - Socket timeout after 10 seconds prod-unix-mon04:/usr/lib/nagios/plugins# echo $? 2 prod-unix-mon04:/usr/lib/nagios/plugins# /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/negate /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_http -S -p 443 -u '/EdgeAuth/login.jsp' -H server_name CRITICAL - Plugin timed out after 10 seconds prod-unix-mon04:/usr/lib/nagios/plugins# echo $? 2 Our Nagios environment details are as follows: Nagios Version : 3.0 Nagios Plugins Version : 1.4.11 Appreciate any quick help / suggestions to get around this problem. Thanks in advance. Thanks Regards, Satish Kumar P - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring for Stale AIX Processes with Nagios ?
You could write a simple cron job and use NCSA to push the results to Nagios. I suggest send_ncsa.pl so you don't have to compile any software. On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:09:36PM -0700, Mirza Dedic wrote: Hello, We have AIX 5.3 running on our production servers and the way things are setup we need to make sure there are no STALE processes on the box, by STALE I mean any idle process that has been running for more than 5 hours. Sure we can monitor this with topas -P and have a terminal session open at all times but this is not ideal. Does anyone know of a script or a way to accomplish this? Even if we would need to write a script/cron job to get the job done? Any help is appreciated and thank you. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Russell Adams[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ Fingerprint:1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3 - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Basic Distributed setup question - Central server passive service only reads PENDING
I have followed the documentation on the centralized/distributed model. I believe I have everything setup properly: My central server has active checks disabled, it has the same services and host configuration data as the distributed server. I have NSCA functioning, and I can see that the central server is receiving NSCA data from the distributed server by looking at the syslog output: May 20 16:14:18 dnag5 nsca[32101]: Connection from 172.27.20.202 port 58500 May 20 16:14:18 dnag5 nsca[32101]: Handling the connection... May 20 16:14:19 dnag5 nsca[32101]: End of connection... However the passive service check's status on the central server reads as: PENDING. Any ideas on what could be causing this? Thanks, -Ray - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
