Re: [Nagios-users-br] Nagios atrás de Firewall
On 7/8/08, Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oi Diego De uma olhada em Distributed Monitoring na página 211 do manual do Nagios. Acho que isso pode ser uma solução. html tem paginação? Inté Oscar - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki
Re: [Nagios-users-br] Nagios atrás de Firewall
Ai ai ai... Depois os mineiros é que são capiais da roça... html tem paginação? Lógico que não. Mas é por isso que tem a versão PDF do manual. Versão 3.x: http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/nagios-3.pdf Inté Oscar - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki
Re: [Nagios-users] New user with nagios 3.0.3 hanging.
Hello agian,
I'm experiencing right now the same problem. And I'm trying to doing some
forensic.
It's working in a 2 CPU system and main daemon is taking one of them.
With truss I just get many many lines like this
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
/2: poll(0xFEF79F88, 1, 500)= 1
And the only pool entry in code is in utill.c, function
void * command_file_worker_thread(void *arg){
And the output (1) match this
#define EPERM 1 /* Not super-user */
But although with this error it should write to nagios.log, nothing is
written.
I have also checked the external command file
# ls -l /usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd
prw-rw 1 nagios nagcmd 47675 Jul 14 09:08
/usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd
And I've seen than this code is the same than in 3.0.1.
Any idea?
Trying to stop nagios (/etc/init.d/nagios stop) I can't. I just get
Warning - nagios did not exit in a timely manner
And 3 nagios processes are still running. So I had to kill -9 them
Thanks a lot
Jose Luis
2008/7/11 Jose Luis Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
My name is Jose Luis and I'm wrinting from Spain.
I have recently installed Nagios in a Solaris 9 box.
While I was in version 3.0.1, 1 month or so, everything has been working
smoothly, but now, with version 3.0.3 Nagios has hanged twice (once a week
more or less).
Nagios daemon is running but neither checks are performed nor external
commands processed. So I have to restart it.
Anyone else have experienced this behaviour?
Any suggestions? We are thinking of setting up a cron check to detect this
situation (no entries in nagios.log), but perhaps we are experiencing some
kind of bug that should be solved in new releases.
Thank you very much indded
Jose Luis
-
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check-ping
Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Philipp: Thanks for your help. When we ran ping as nagios it bombed. Permissions on ping needed to be set SUID root so that an ICMP socket could be opened. We had changed that for security reasons. We'll make nagios sudo root for ping. That should solve the problem. Changing /bin/ping to not be suid root for security reasons and then changing Nagios to be suid root to fix a problem this causes seems more than just a little backwards to me. Do chmod 4711 /bin/ping instead. ping is a simple program of ~4000 LoC. It has been thouroughly audited for security holes. Nagios is, in comparison, a complex elephantine monster of 80.000 LoC. Add any and all plugins it might run as well and you'll be well on your way to 250k LoC or more. Nobody has bothered auditing it very much from a security standpoint because it's not supposed to run with root permissions. -- Andreas Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check-ping
Hi, Changing /bin/ping to not be suid root for security reasons and then changing Nagios to be suid root to fix a problem this causes seems more than just a little backwards to me. Do chmod 4711 /bin/ping instead. ping is a simple program of ~4000 LoC. It has been thouroughly audited for security holes. Nagios is, in comparison, a complex elephantine monster of 80.000 LoC. Add any and all plugins it might run as well and you'll be well on your way to 250k LoC or more. Nobody has bothered auditing it very much from a security standpoint because it's not supposed to run with root permissions. For checks which require root privileges we use sudo. That way it is easy to configure the usage to a single user: the nagios user. Just put something like nagios ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/aptitude # added by nagios-plugins-debs in your /etc/sudoers file and that is it. The check of course has to call the binary with sudo prepended, e.g. 'sudo aptitude ...'. Christopher -- == Dipl.-Ing. Christopher Odenbach Zentrum fuer Informations- und Medientechnologien Universitaet Paderborn Raum N5.122 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +49 5251 60 5315 == signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] hosts
I found this in the documentation: check_interval: NOTE: Do NOT enable regularly scheduled checks of a host unless you absolutely need to! Host checks are already performed on-demand when necessary, so there are few times when regularly scheduled checks would be needed. Regularly scheduled host checks can negatively impact performance - see the performance tuning tips for more information. This directive is used to define the number of time units between regularly scheduled checks of the host. Unless you've changed the interval_length directive from the default value of 60, this number will mean minutes. More information on this value can be found in the check scheduling documentation. If I do NOT have a check_interval, how often are hosts checked? - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Help - I am unable to get the NSClient++ to restart services
I am having a little trouble installing the NRPE 2.8 plug in Ubuntu. I
am able to extract the source code tarball and than I am having issues
after that. Per the instructions I am trying to compile the NRPE add-on
by running
./configure
make all
After I type ./configure I get a message at the end of the compile job
saying configuration error: Cannot find ssl libraries. Than if I try
to go further by installing the plugins by typing make all or the
individual make install-pluggin I get an error saying ** No rule to make
target 'all'. Stop.
From: Paulo Ribas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 2:04 PM
To: Jonathan Williams
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Help - I am unable to get the NSClient++ to
restart services
Ok, If you need, contact me.
[]'s
--
- Jonathan Williams wrote:
I found the NRPE add-on (not plug-in) so I will download and install
that. I'll let you know if I run into anything. You have been more
than helpful.
Thanks,
Jon
From: Paulo Ribas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 1:49 PM
To: Jonathan Williams
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Help - I am unable to get the NSClient++
to restart services
check_nrpe is part of the package nrpe, if you use ubuntu, I believe
that only an apt-get install nrpe solve your problem.
[]'s
--
- Jonathan Williams wrote:
OK.. I do not have check_nrpe so apparently I need to download that
plug-in on by Ubuntu box.
From: Paulo Ribas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 1:42 PM
To: Jonathan Williams
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Help - I am unable to get the NSClient++
to restart services
The commando must be:
define command{
command_name restart-Spooler
command_line PATH/check_nrpe -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -p 5666 -n -c
service_control -a Spooler start
}
ex:
define command{
command_name restart-Spooler
command_line /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_nrpe -H
$HOSTADDRESS$ -p 5666 -n -c service_control -a Spooler start
}
risk being sent to /dev/null
-
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] hosts
On Jul 14, 2008, at 9:41 AM, James wrote: If I do NOT have a check_interval, how often are hosts checked? When necessary. The check scheduling documentation isn't complete yet for 3.x but the first section of the following page is still valid -- http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/networkreachability.html -- Marc - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] OpenVMS memory monitoring by SNMP
Good morning: Has anyone had any success monitoring memory usage for OpenVMS 8.3 ALPHA? I have tried the HOST-RESOURCES-MIB as well as the CPQHOST-MIB as provided by System Management Homepage for OpenVMS as well as Insight Management Agents for OpenVMS. The results I get from these sources are inconsistent with each other and inaccurate when compared to show mem on the system itself. Please see snmpwalk output below for more detail. Please note: CPQHOST-MIB memory is documented as being measured in megabytes. Jake Paulus Systems Engineer/Administrator Source Interlink Companies HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrMemorySize.0 = INTEGER: 3107612 KBytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.1 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.2 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageVirtualMemory HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.3 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.4 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.5 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageType.6 = OID: HOST-RESOURCES-TYPES::hrStorageRam HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.1 = INTEGER: 8192 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.2 = INTEGER: 8192 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.3 = INTEGER: 1 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.4 = INTEGER: 1 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.5 = INTEGER: 8192 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationUnits.6 = INTEGER: 32 Bytes HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.1 = INTEGER: 25 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.2 = INTEGER: 4232 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.3 = INTEGER: 10084352 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.4 = INTEGER: 7536640 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.5 = INTEGER: 306691 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageSize.6 = INTEGER: 1379 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.1 = INTEGER: 0 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.2 = INTEGER: 0 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.3 = INTEGER: 5348416 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.4 = INTEGER: 4166576 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.5 = INTEGER: 14492 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageUsed.6 = INTEGER: 1379 10084352 7536640 306691*8192=2512412672 1379*32=44128 total=2530077792 bytes 5348416 4166576 14492*8192=118718464 1379*32=44128 used=128277584 bytes Physical128277584/2530077792 bytes Virtual 0/2082668544 bytes CPQHOST-MIB::cpqHoPhysicalMemorySize.0 = INTEGER: 3072 CPQHOST-MIB::cpqHoPhysicalMemoryFree.0 = INTEGER: 1160 CPQHOST-MIB::cpqHoPagingMemorySize.0 = INTEGER: 929 CPQHOST-MIB::cpqHoPagingMemoryFree.0 = INTEGER: -989 - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] hosts
On Mon, July 14, 2008 10:58 am, Marc Powell wrote: On Jul 14, 2008, at 9:41 AM, James wrote: If I do NOT have a check_interval, how often are hosts checked? When necessary. The check scheduling documentation isn't complete yet for 3.x but the first section of the following page is still valid -- http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/networkreachability.html What if there is one service (ping). Isn't it the same as having a check_interval on a host with no services? -- Marc - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] (no subject)
If flapping is enabled but flapping notification is disabled and the host really goes down then is it possible there is no down notification? I am trying to figure out why there was no notification of a host being down. It does notify if I give it a bogus IP and it is unreachable. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Question about Flapping notification
Yes - if a host is flapping, you won't be notified of each up/down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 11:10 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] (no subject) If flapping is enabled but flapping notification is disabled and the host really goes down then is it possible there is no down notification? I am trying to figure out why there was no notification of a host being down. It does notify if I give it a bogus IP and it is unreachable. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] hosts
What if there is one service (ping). Isn't it the same as having a check_interval on a host with no services? Depending on which version of Nagios you are running. Nagios 2.x host checks are run in series while Nagios 3.x most host checks are run in Parallel ( much faster as Nagios doesn't have to wait for the slow ping check to continue with everything else). So in Nagios 3.x it is similar to having it only check the host. But the logic of Nagios host and service checks are different. You should have a service check for ping and a host check with ping. And to your earlier question: You should check out Marc Powells post to the list earlier this year for some added insight to host checks keeping in mind that host checks are now performed faster in Nagios 3.x. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.nagios.user/52470 If you set the check_interval to be 0 disables regular checks or checks that are performed on a time interval. Nagios will then check the host if a service of the host is in a non-OK state. The documentation for the Nagios 3.x Service Check Scheduling has yet to be completed but you still might get some insight from the 2.x docs if you keep in mind the change in how host checks are executed http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/checkscheduling.html - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] flapping
If flapping is enabled but flapping notification is disabled and the host really goes down then is it possible there is no down notification? I am trying to figure out why there was no notification of a host being down. It does notify if I give it a bogus IP and it is unreachable. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Question about Flapping notification
On Mon, July 14, 2008 11:13 am, Paulus, Jake wrote: Yes - if a host is flapping, you won't be notified of each up/down. The history graph shows Indeterminate around that time, could that be the host was down after flapping? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 11:10 AM To: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Nagios-users] (no subject) If flapping is enabled but flapping notification is disabled and the host really goes down then is it possible there is no down notification? I am trying to figure out why there was no notification of a host being down. It does notify if I give it a bogus IP and it is unreachable. - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Log time stamps
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 07:58:39PM -0400, Janet Post wrote: If you would like to see the log files with a human-readable timestamp: perl -pe 's/(\d+)/localtime($1)/e' logfile Janet Nice trick. I was surmising there might be some way to do that, but a perl one-liner didn't occur to me. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Josef Stalin) - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check-ping
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:54:03PM +0200, Andreas Ericsson wrote: Jeff Koch wrote: Thanks for your help. When we ran ping as nagios it bombed. Permissions on ping needed to be set SUID root so that an ICMP socket could be opened. We had changed that for security reasons. We'll make nagios sudo root for ping. That should solve the problem. Changing /bin/ping to not be suid root for security reasons and then changing Nagios to be suid root to fix a problem this causes seems more than just a little backwards to me. I've left Jeff's quote in so you can see, Andreas, that you misread him. He didn't say SUID root. He said sudo -- he plans to set the nagios Linux user up so it can sudo to run ping as root. Seems sensible to me. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Josef Stalin) - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios v3 WAP
I recently upgraded from Nagios2 to version3, and it¹s running beautifully. All except for the WAP interface. I¹ve searched the web, and the archives and haven¹t found anything that might help. When my users go to the wap interface (which worked GREAT under v2) and try to acknowledge a problem (either a host or a service), they get: Error: You're not authorized to commit that command! I¹ve made sure that they all have access to: Authorization Requirements: If you are authorized for system information you can view Nagios process information. If you are authorized for all hosts you can view status data for all hosts and services. If you are authorized for all services you can view status data for all services. And they are authenticating. If you are an authenticated contact you can view status data for all hosts and services for which you are a contact. Any ideas and help would be appreicated. Thanks! Robert - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] NagiosWiki.org announcement
Hi List, after the last week`s announcement of NagiosForge.org another new Nagios related site went online just a few minutes ago. We`ve created a new platform called NagiosWiki.org, the intention behind the NagiosWiki is to integrate nicely into NagiosExchange and NagiosForge. It is now possible to link from NagiosExchange via WikiWords into the NagiosWiki. This integration makes it possible to create better documentation wit h images, HTML tables etc. for your community developed NAGIOS plugins based on the fancy MediaWiki syntax. Another aim of NagiosWiki.org is to host best practice and addon documentation which you would like to share with the NAGIOS community. Your already registered usernames on NagiosExchange are fully synced to NagiosWiki, so you can just logon with your registered NagiosExchange credentia ls. We would be happy to have you as an author on http://www.NagiosWiki.org Best regards, Michael Streb -- Michael Streb Managing Consultant NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 47a | D-90429 Nürnberg Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77 GF: Julian Hein | AG Nürnberg HRB18461 http://www.netways.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** NETWAYS Nagios Konferenz 2008 - http://www.nagioskonferenz.de ** - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios v3 WAP
Are we playing stump the dummy? What is WAP? Harry M. Hart Systems integrator (757) 203-7422 DSN 668-7422 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Small Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:35 PM To: Nagios Users Mailinglist Subject: [Nagios-users] Nagios v3 WAP I recently upgraded from Nagios2 to version3, and it's running beautifully. All except for the WAP interface. I've searched the web, and the archives and haven't found anything that might help. When my users go to the wap interface (which worked GREAT under v2) and try to acknowledge a problem (either a host or a service), they get: Error: You're not authorized to commit that command! I've made sure that they all have access to: Authorization Requirements: If you are authorized for system information you can view Nagios process information. If you are authorized for all hosts you can view status data for all hosts and services. If you are authorized for all services you can view status data for all services. And they are authenticating. If you are an authenticated contact you can view status data for all hosts and services for which you are a contact. Any ideas and help would be appreicated. Thanks! Robert - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios v3 WAP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hart, Harry M. CTR USJFCOM SUPPORT.SUPPORT JTC-I wrote: | Are we playing stump the dummy? What is WAP? Google found plenty of hits but this one seems to tell it best: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Application_Protocol Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIe4rGBvzDRVjxmYERArujAJ49pteG+oY6cxNf3Z4HdwOlIJFXTgCfTEL3 uuAyBrQEhZ+zd4aWQyXqdhg= =4etV -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios v3 WAP
Thanks, I thought it was something Nagios specific. Harry M. Hart Systems integrator (757) 203-7422 DSN 668-7422 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hugo van der Kooij Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 1:20 PM To: Nagios Users Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios v3 WAP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hart, Harry M. CTR USJFCOM SUPPORT.SUPPORT JTC-I wrote: | Are we playing stump the dummy? What is WAP? Google found plenty of hits but this one seems to tell it best: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Application_Protocol Hugo. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/ PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIe4rGBvzDRVjxmYERArujAJ49pteG+oY6cxNf3Z4HdwOlIJFXTgCfTEL3 uuAyBrQEhZ+zd4aWQyXqdhg= =4etV -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] unable to connect to data sink
What version of nagios are you running? If you're running nagios 3.x you'll need ndo2db-3x Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi I get [1215630364] ndomod: Still unable to connect to data sink. 1019216 items lost, 5000 queued items to flush. in nagios.log file I can see the ndo2db has been started. nagios 14086 19676 0 11:24 ?00:00:02 /usr/nagios/bin/ndo2db-2x -c /etc/nagios/ndo2db.cfg nagios 15964 19676 0 11:25 ?00:00:02 /usr/nagios/bin/ndo2db-2x -c /etc/nagios/ndo2db.cfg nagios 19676 1 0 07:44 ?00:00:00 /usr/nagios/bin/ndo2db-2x -c /etc/nagios/ndo2db.cfg nagios 23622 19676 0 08:38 ?00:00:10 /usr/nagios/bin/ndo2db-2x -c /etc/nagios/ndo2db.cfg My NDO2DB DAEMON CONFIG FILE is mentioned here - http://www.pastebin.org/50006 My NDOMOD CONFIG FILE is mentioned here - http://www.pastebin.org/50007 Any clue as what is going wrong Thanks and Regards Kaushal - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_freshness detecting staled services in alphabetical order
Hey, Have any of you have seen anything like this before? Nagios 2.9, ndoutils 1.4b4. Nagios began to detect staled services in alphabethical order, in batches of almost 400 hosts at a time. check_service_freshness=1 service_freshness_check_interval=900 check_host_freshness=0 host_freshness_check_interval=900 cheers from Brazil... Marcel - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios can die and still update the CGI date?
So, see, I thought the Last Updated date on the CGI status screens came from Nagios itself, not from the CGI. Turns out my Nagios console had failed to restart the process on a boot, and I didn't realize it until a full disk prompted a fire drill an hour ago. Does the CGI not at least scream somehow if there's nothing running behind it? Should I already know this answer? And, what about Naomi? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274 Those who cast the vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything. -- (Josef Stalin) - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios can die and still update the CGI date?
Please start a new e-mail for a new question. This e-mail will forevermore be associated with the 'check_freshness...' post that you started with. On Jul 14, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: Does the CGI not at least scream somehow if there's nothing running behind it? If nagios dies in such a way that the status_file still exists, no. You might consider running check_nagios (from the plugins distrib) from cron. Should I already know this answer? It's been discussed in the past, I'm sure. And, what about Naomi? She threatened a restraining order the last time I called. I just stalk her now... -- Marc - Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Cannot use some Macros in notification.
Hi there. I'm trying to get nagios to send sms notofications via my kannel sms gateway. I'm using this command as notify-by-pager: /usr/bin/curl -s http://10.64.48.154:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms\?username=username\password=password\to=$CONTACTPAGER$text=$NOTIFICATIONTYPE$:+$HOSTALIAS$/$SERVICEDESC$+is+$SERVICESTATE$; But the two macros $CONTACTPAGER$ and $NOTIFICATIONTYPE$ do not get replaced with anything. Initially i thought it had something to do with the = sign so i tried to escape it with \= but thats not it. I then tried the following: echo $CONTACTPAGER$ $NOTIFICATIONTYPE$ $HOSTALIAS$ $SERVICEDESC$ $SERVICESTATE$ /home/kasper/test.txt as my command. And the result is the same, the two macros are empty. I know i have put in a pager number on my contact account. Anyone knows what to do? - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
