[Nagios-users-br] Plugins asm e alert log oracle
Boa tarde, gostaria de saber se alguém tem algum plugin para monitorar o asm e o arquivo alert do oracle Obrigado Fábio Amantes Elite Concept Informática Ltda. 11 - 3863-9404 www.elite-br.com -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki
Re: [Nagios-users] Need To migrate Nagios Setup to a New Hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 chethan@wipro.com wrote: Hi All, I m need to migrate the existing Nagios setup to a new Hardware (server)… (i.e. from one server to another server) Since I am doing such kind of migration for the first time, I need some standard documents for reference. Please share some related documents that specifices the safe procedure for doing the migration keeping all the configurations, look and feel of the existing nagios same. *Thanks Regards,* *Chethan M N,* P Save a Tree - Please consider the environment before printing this email Dear Chethan, You actually don't need a particular document for the migration. Just a few steps to be followed. ~ Keep intact the /usr/local/nagios/share , /usr/local/nagios/etc/ and /usr/local/nagios/var folders. They all need to be the same. ~ Check with all the plugins that you have installed in the older nagios server. ~ Some plugins that are installed in the older server might not be installed in the newer one, because of some version differences and dependencies. Search options for those. ~ Check if the version difference and the features implemented/deprecated in nagios effects your setup. ~ Install the nagios in the newer server and replace the above listed folders and plugins. You are good to go. Regards - -- Gaurav Ghimire System Administrator Subisu Cablenet (P.) Ltd. 148 Thirbum Sadak Baluwatar, Kathmandu Nepal http://www.subisu.net.np First and Only True Cable Internet Service Provider in Nepal (An ISO 9001:2000 Certified Company) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoDyccACgkQnfv7imVnL2u6QACdFEmGU8xOQEigxhDshmWYbWBv 090AoJjskhC9FxVtquXf2P6xiZwy5jkH =OaLE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused
Surajit, Is the service actually running on that server? Can you telnet to the NSClient++ port manually? Regards, Andy Surajit Mukherjee wrote: I am getting Connection refused status information on a Windows 2003 Server that is using NSClient++. Out of the 7 Windows server I have in Nagios 3.0.6, this is the only server giving me that error ** ** **Cheers,** **Surajit** The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by forwarding this email to mailad...@ness.com and then delete it from your system. Ness technologies is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Confusing Virtual memory utlilization on Windows
Hi All, I have started windows resource monitoring using Windows NRPE, I don't want to use snmp and NSclients also. I want to check swap utilization rather than swap free, however I have got everywhere check_swap.exe which gives free swap. I have got one exe which gives memory utilization/Virtual memory/page memory utilization, but not sure what should be consider as swap utilization ? I have downloaded this from below URL: http://www.stic-online.de/stic/download/18/check_hugemem.zip please refer above exe syntax - check_hugemem.exe -h check_hugemem - version 0.1 - csnp20070100.00/rie Developed by STIC GmbH - nagios(at)stic-online.de - www.stic-online.de see license.txt for license details. -h help -a about this plugin -w=warn warn -c=crit crit (e.g. -c=10) -t=type path (e.g. -t=physical, -t=virtual, -t=page) check_hugemem -t=virtual -warn=80 -crit=90 Can you please let me know which should consider ( -t=virtual, -t=page) as swap utilization in above exe. Mohandas Kudva K ASE Tata Consultancy Services Cell:- +91 9619144048 Mailto: mohanda...@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com Experience certainty. IT Services Business Solutions Outsourcing =-=-= Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. Thank you -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NSCA - Network server bind failure
This means exactly what the error message says: that there is already another program using port 5667. Odds are that nsca is already running on your computer; maybe it got started as a daemon on system startup. Joan Tugores wrote: Hi all, When I try to put up the daemon nsca with the command /usr/local/nagios/bin/nsca -c /usr/local/nagios/etc/nsca.cfg in /var/log/messages appears Network server bind failure (98: Address already in use) the port 5667 is configured and netstat -na show tcp 0 00.0.0.0:56670.0.0.0:* LISTEN. Please Help. Thanks. -- -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Kevin Keane Owner The NetTech Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About Office: 866-642-7116 http://www.4nettech.com This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NSCA - Network server bind failure
Nsca not running "ps -ef | grep nsca" not show process nsca. Kevin Keane escribi: This means exactly what the error message says: that there is already another program using port 5667. Odds are that nsca is already running on your computer; maybe it got started as a daemon on system startup. Joan Tugores wrote: Hi all, When I try to put up the daemon nsca with the command "/usr/local/nagios/bin/nsca -c /usr/local/nagios/etc/nsca.cfg" in "/var/log/messages" appears "Network server bind failure (98: Address already in use)" the port 5667 is configured and netstat -na show "tcp 0 00.0.0.0:56670.0.0.0:* LISTEN". Please Help. Thanks. -- -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused
Hi Kevin, The output netstat -anb looks like this. TCP0.0.0.0: 0.0.0.0:** ESTABLISHED [putty.exe] Where in left 0.0.0.0: is my windows server along with port and the right is the Linux server along with port. Is it not correct? Surajit -Original Message- From: Kevin Keane [mailto:subscript...@kkeane.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:56 PM Cc: Nagios User list Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused What connection, exactly, do you show as established with netstat -an? It can't really be the one you are talking about, because that never connected. In any case, you would want to look for LISTENING rather than ESTABLISHED in the output for netstat -an. The local address on the left should say something like 0.0.0.0: (where is the port number). If it says 127.0.0.1 then NSClient++ is not listening on the Ethernet port. If you don't see an entry that listens on the correct port, then double-check that NSClient++ is running. If you do see an entry to listen on the correct port, try running nestat -anb . This will tell you which program is actually doing the listening. If it isn't NSClient++, you found your culprit. That's not likely, though. If netstat -anb shows NSClient++ as listening correctly, you almost certainly have a firewall issue. Surajit Mukherjee wrote: Andy, I am unable to telnet to the port from the Nagios server. I checked netstat -an and the connection is established. I am able to telnet from windows server to the Linux server. Surajit -Original Message- From: Andy Shellam [mailto:andy-li...@networkmail.eu] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:03 PM To: Surajit Mukherjee Cc: Nagios User list Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused Surajit, Is the service actually running on that server? Can you telnet to the NSClient++ port manually? Regards, Andy Surajit Mukherjee wrote: I am getting Connection refused status information on a Windows 2003 Server that is using NSClient++. Out of the 7 Windows server I have in Nagios 3.0.6, this is the only server giving me that error ** ** **Cheers,** **Surajit** -- Kevin Keane Owner The NetTech Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About Office: 866-642-7116 http://www.4nettech.com This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by forwarding this email to mailad...@ness.com and then delete it from your system. Ness technologies is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios
Re: [Nagios-users] NSCA - Network server bind failure
Try netstat -ltunp | grep 5667 And respond to the group, please. Joan Tugores wrote: Nsca not running ps -ef | grep nsca not show process nsca. Kevin Keane escribió: This means exactly what the error message says: that there is already another program using port 5667. Odds are that nsca is already running on your computer; maybe it got started as a daemon on system startup. Joan Tugores wrote: Hi all, When I try to put up the daemon nsca with the command /usr/local/nagios/bin/nsca -c /usr/local/nagios/etc/nsca.cfg in /var/log/messages appears Network server bind failure (98: Address already in use) the port 5667 is configured and netstat -na show tcp 0 00.0.0.0:56670.0.0.0:* LISTEN. Please Help. Thanks. -- -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- Kevin Keane Owner The NetTech Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About Office: 866-642-7116 http://www.4nettech.com This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused
It may well be correct, but is a completely different setup! You have an SSH tunnel; that's a rather critical piece of information. You have an SSH tunnel from the Windows machine to somewhere else, instead of having an NSClient++. Maybe you meant to do a remote port forwarding and instead set up local port forwarding. Surajit Mukherjee wrote: Hi Kevin, The output netstat -anb looks like this. TCP0.0.0.0: 0.0.0.0:** ESTABLISHED [putty.exe] Where in left 0.0.0.0: is my windows server along with port and the right is the Linux server along with port. Is it not correct? Surajit -Original Message- From: Kevin Keane [mailto:subscript...@kkeane.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:56 PM Cc: Nagios User list Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused What connection, exactly, do you show as established with netstat -an? It can't really be the one you are talking about, because that never connected. In any case, you would want to look for LISTENING rather than ESTABLISHED in the output for netstat -an. The local address on the left should say something like 0.0.0.0: (where is the port number). If it says 127.0.0.1 then NSClient++ is not listening on the Ethernet port. If you don't see an entry that listens on the correct port, then double-check that NSClient++ is running. If you do see an entry to listen on the correct port, try running nestat -anb . This will tell you which program is actually doing the listening. If it isn't NSClient++, you found your culprit. That's not likely, though. If netstat -anb shows NSClient++ as listening correctly, you almost certainly have a firewall issue. Surajit Mukherjee wrote: Andy, I am unable to telnet to the port from the Nagios server. I checked netstat -an and the connection is established. I am able to telnet from windows server to the Linux server. Surajit -Original Message- From: Andy Shellam [mailto:andy-li...@networkmail.eu] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:03 PM To: Surajit Mukherjee Cc: Nagios User list Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Connection refused Surajit, Is the service actually running on that server? Can you telnet to the NSClient++ port manually? Regards, Andy Surajit Mukherjee wrote: I am getting Connection refused status information on a Windows 2003 Server that is using NSClient++. Out of the 7 Windows server I have in Nagios 3.0.6, this is the only server giving me that error ** ** **Cheers,** **Surajit** -- Kevin Keane Owner The NetTech Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About Office: 866-642-7116 http://www.4nettech.com This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients, giving funny results
Dear All, I'm trying to get my Nagios instance to behave properly! It seems to be monitoring my servers just fine, but for some reason, all my servers, which are different from each other show the same swap space, and the same free disk space to within 10 megs. Now the above tells me that there is a config error somewhere. In order to test this, I log into my monitor server, and issue the following command; ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 My understanding tells me that the following happens * The check_nrpe plugin on the nagios monitor server runs, and accesses the client at client_ip * It initiates its local check_disk plugin with the parameters of 50 and 80. * This causes the check_disk plugin on the client to run, as if typed locally in this manner check_disk -w 50 -c 80 Running check_disk 50 80 on client_ip returns data on the disk state Running ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 on Nagios monitor server returns unknown argument I cannot figure out what is causing this discrepancy - check_nrpe -H client_ip returns Nagios version so I know the communication works. Any help will be appreciated --- Kind Regards, Mr Gabriel -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Do you use IPMI with nagios?
2009/5/8 Marco Borsani m.bors...@it.net: Hi all ! I am looking for a method to control many internal server entities like: - Temperature - Disks (how can we check them when are configured in Raid 1 or Raid 5 ??? ) - Fan - Power supply - Etc. I am performing some test with IPMI (on dell servers) and related applications like ipmitool and ipmiutil (very similar), but I am not able to check everything I’d like (for example…disk health) Do you use these tools/features ? How do you control disk health? I configure the Dell OpenManage agent to send SNMP traps to the Nagios server, then use NagTrap to process them. I'm not 100% sure if this will give you everything you are asking for though. Cheers, Jim -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] The icinga on the cake ...
Hi all. First of all, let me say I'm not writing this post for Ethan's sake, but because I'm a member of the Nagios Community Advisory board and I feel this is information the community should take part of. Secondly, Ethan's under quite a bit of stress right now. If anybody wants to cheer him up, send him a postcard or a picture of a screen showing Nagios. He told me once it would be quite cool to get such postcards but he never found an opportunity to ask for it. I can't think of a better time than now ;-) The address to Nagios Enterprises is Nagios Enterprises, LLC P.O. Box 8154 Saint Paul, MN 55108 Now read on and, in the words of The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: Don't panic. Jim Avery wrote: I'm surprised nobody's mentioned this yet... http://www.icinga.org/ I only noticed it myself when I visited Nagios Exchange today. Not being a developer myself, I'm not quite sure what to say or think, It's really the input from the community that matters the most. I *am* a developer, and as a developer I applaud the effort to create a better product, but as a human being I really don't like the way it's being done. It's been discussed quite a lot on the nagios-devel mailing list. The facts so far seems to be thus: * Netways registered Nagios as a trademark in Germany last year. * The Icinga team is managed by Bernd Erk, who is also the chief programmer of Netways (to me, this makes it seem as if Netways instigated the fork). * Ethan has been absent from the community for too long, stating legal issues against Netways for trademark violation as the reason for this. * The primary reason stated for the fork is that the Icinga team feel that development isn't being done openly enough. * Some german nagios-tribute sites claim to have received email from Nagios Enterprises requesting that they add a paragraph on their page stating that they're not affiliated with Nagios Enterprises in any way, and this has caused bad blood in the community (I have no details about this, and can therefore not give any). * The icinga team has released no sources (ie, making a *worse* mistake than they feel Ethan is doing, who at least keeps his source repo publically available). * The roadmap for Icinga focuses mainly on 3rd party addons that could easily have been created *without* forking. * Some prominent developers and community members (no, I won't give names, but I'm one of them) think this is primarily an attempt from Netways to usurp the Nagios community. * The german community developers that have responded on the nagios-devel list seem honest about their desire to create a better product. * The development method of the Nagios core *will* change in some way. More on that later in this mail. Later, it appears, is now. So far, we (we being originally me and Ethan, and two emails later the community advisory board, which presently consists of Ethan, myself, Ton Voon, Alex Burger and Thomas Guyot-Sionnest) have discussed (nothing is decided) increasing the number of people with commit access to the nagios core repository. I have been asked to join this team, and I've suggested two others whom I feel can add value to the development process. I won't name any names since neither have accepted or declined yet. Me and Ton Voon argued that it would be a good idea to have all tecnical and socio-technical (ie, patch-submission alternatives) on nagios-devel instead of on a hidden list where a large part of the community have no insight into the development process. Ethan hasn't responded to this yet, but that's not so surprising as it was 2AM in Minnesota when me and Ton wrote our emails, and it's currently 5AM (I think). From what I've gathered from the discussions, it seems we agree on incorporating Icinga patches into Nagios if they hold good quality and add value to Nagios. Since many of the developers on the Icinga team are quite good programmers, this should benefit Nagios rather quickly. To make it easier to incorporate patches from the Icinga team, we have also discussed moving the core Nagios repository to git from CVS. Read- only users won't necessarily see any changes at all, as there already exists a cvs-server capable of serving git repositories. For tarball users and software distributions, it has zero impact. Anything apart from the above that's been going on is either loose speculation, bad research or misunderstanding on my behalf or relates to information I haven't seen. I may also have missed something, in which case I'm sure someone will point out my mistakes. except that I'm continuously deeply grateful to everyone who bring us Nagios itself, and the plugins and tools which make it greater than the sum of its parts. Don't be. Well, be, but reserve some gratitude for yourself for using it. Without a userbase, a project is just an academic exercise with as much real value as a bucket of sand in a desert. Oh, and send a postcard :) -- Andreas Ericsson
[Nagios-users] NSCA - Command file does not exist
Hi all, When I send a packet to ncsa server this not processed. In /var/log/messages: Command file '/usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nagios.cmd' does not exist,attempting to use alternate dump file '/usr/local/nagios/var/rw/nsca.dump' for output But nagios.cmd exists and the permissions are good. prw-rw 1 nagios nagiosgrb0 may 5 09:59 nagios.cmd Regards, Joan -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients, giving funny results
Gabriel I believe you may be confusing the two components . Nagios is the core system submitting requests and gathering the answers from the clients and network. NRPE is a client agent installed on the individual server being monitored from the nagios - and AFAIK there is no rpm for it , you can download it from the nagios site - addons http://www.nagios.org/download/addons/ Please read the documentation about the NRPE and see how to set it up to your needs . Assaf On Friday 08 May 2009 17:45:24 Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: I installed nagios from RPMs is there a way to check NRPE precompiled binary to check for support of arguments? -Original Message- From: Assaf Flatto [mailto:assaf.fla...@ssp-intl.com] Sent: 08 May 2009 10:38 To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients,giving funny results What is the configuration command of check_disk of the nrpe in the clinet machine ? Did you setup the nrpe with the support-args when you complied it ? if not , the you will not be able to pass arguments to the nrpe executor , but will have to define the exect execution of each command in the nrpe client side. Assaf On Friday 08 May 2009 17:26:57 Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: Dear All, I'm trying to get my Nagios instance to behave properly! It seems to be monitoring my servers just fine, but for some reason, all my servers, which are different from each other show the same swap space, and the same free disk space to within 10 megs. Now the above tells me that there is a config error somewhere. In order to test this, I log into my monitor server, and issue the following command; ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 My understanding tells me that the following happens * The check_nrpe plugin on the nagios monitor server runs, and accesses the client at client_ip * It initiates its local check_disk plugin with the parameters of 50 and 80. * This causes the check_disk plugin on the client to run, as if typed locally in this manner check_disk -w 50 -c 80 Running check_disk 50 80 on client_ip returns data on the disk state Running ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 on Nagios monitor server returns unknown argument I cannot figure out what is causing this discrepancy - check_nrpe -H client_ip returns Nagios version so I know the communication works. Any help will be appreciated --- Kind Regards, Mr Gabriel - -- --- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when ::: reporting any issue. Messages without supporting info will risk being ::: sent to /dev/null -- Assaf Flatto SSP Ops Team Linux System Administrator 169 Euston Road, London, NW1 2AE Along with a few colleagues I am doing The Three Peaks Challenge again this year to raise money for The Railway Children. Please sponsor me by making a donation online, simply click on the link below and give via your switch/credit card. Thank you. http://www.justgiving.com/londonnorththreepeaks IMPORTANT . this email and the information in it may be confidential, legally privileged and/or protected by law. It is intended solely for the use of the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Please also delete all copies of this email and any attachments from your system. We cannot guarantee the security or confidentiality of email communications. We do not accept any liability for losses or damages that you may suffer as a result of your receipt of this email including but not limited to computer service or system failure, access delays or interruption, data non- delivery or mis-delivery, computer viruses or other harmful components. Copyright in this email and any attachments belong to Select Service Partner UK Limited. Should you communicate with anyone at Select Service Partner UK Limited by email, you consent to us monitoring and reading any such
Re: [Nagios-users] Do you use IPMI with nagios?
You can use check_openmanage to perform active checks http://folk.uio.no/trondham/software/check_openmanage.html#performance-data http://www.monitoringexchange.org/cgi-bin/search.cgi?d=1query=openmanage -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jim Avery [mailto:j...@jimavery.me.uk] Gesendet: Freitag, 08. Mai 2009 11:33 An: Marco Borsani Cc: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [Nagios-users] Do you use IPMI with nagios? 2009/5/8 Marco Borsani m.bors...@it.net: Hi all ! I am looking for a method to control many internal server entities like: - Temperature - Disks (how can we check them when are configured in Raid 1 or Raid 5 ??? ) - Fan - Power supply - Etc. I am performing some test with IPMI (on dell servers) and related applications like ipmitool and ipmiutil (very similar), but I am not able to check everything I'd like (for example...disk health) Do you use these tools/features ? How do you control disk health? I configure the Dell OpenManage agent to send SNMP traps to the Nagios server, then use NagTrap to process them. I'm not 100% sure if this will give you everything you are asking for though. Cheers, Jim -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null OOe. Gesundheits- und Spitals-AG Techcenter, Hafenstrasse 47-51, 4020 Linz DVR 2107870, ATU 51928204, Firmenbuchgericht: Landesgericht Linz, FN 210146 p -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients, giving funny results
I get the concept, NRPE is installed on my client servers, and nagios itself is installed on ate server designated the monitor server. This server itself also has NRPE installed as it's monitored by a separate nagios install, but that's above and beyond this issue. I've been told that I cannot pass arguments to NRPE from the monitor server. For example, check_nrpe -H client_IP check_disk - is the most that I can issue on the monitor server. I guess this then means that in the *.cfg files on nagios, everywhere it says check_nrpe!check_disk - there should be no arguments after it? If this is the case, then I think I found where the guy I replaced made a mistake! -Original Message- From: Assaf Flatto [mailto:assaf.fla...@ssp-intl.com] Sent: 08 May 2009 11:00 To: Nagios User list Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients,giving funny results Gabriel I believe you may be confusing the two components . Nagios is the core system submitting requests and gathering the answers from the clients and network. NRPE is a client agent installed on the individual server being monitored from the nagios - and AFAIK there is no rpm for it , you can download it from the nagios site - addons http://www.nagios.org/download/addons/ Please read the documentation about the NRPE and see how to set it up to your needs . Assaf On Friday 08 May 2009 17:45:24 Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: I installed nagios from RPMs is there a way to check NRPE precompiled binary to check for support of arguments? -Original Message- From: Assaf Flatto [mailto:assaf.fla...@ssp-intl.com] Sent: 08 May 2009 10:38 To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients,giving funny results What is the configuration command of check_disk of the nrpe in the clinet machine ? Did you setup the nrpe with the support-args when you complied it ? if not , the you will not be able to pass arguments to the nrpe executor , but will have to define the exect execution of each command in the nrpe client side. Assaf On Friday 08 May 2009 17:26:57 Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: Dear All, I'm trying to get my Nagios instance to behave properly! It seems to be monitoring my servers just fine, but for some reason, all my servers, which are different from each other show the same swap space, and the same free disk space to within 10 megs. Now the above tells me that there is a config error somewhere. In order to test this, I log into my monitor server, and issue the following command; ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 My understanding tells me that the following happens * The check_nrpe plugin on the nagios monitor server runs, and accesses the client at client_ip * It initiates its local check_disk plugin with the parameters of 50 and 80. * This causes the check_disk plugin on the client to run, as if typed locally in this manner check_disk -w 50 -c 80 Running check_disk 50 80 on client_ip returns data on the disk state Running ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 on Nagios monitor server returns unknown argument I cannot figure out what is causing this discrepancy - check_nrpe -H client_ip returns Nagios version so I know the communication works. Any help will be appreciated --- Kind Regards, Mr Gabriel - -- --- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when ::: reporting any issue. Messages without supporting info will risk being ::: sent to /dev/null -- Assaf Flatto SSP Ops Team Linux System Administrator 169 Euston Road, London, NW1 2AE Along with a few colleagues I am doing The Three Peaks Challenge again this year to raise money for The Railway Children. Please sponsor me by making a donation online, simply click on the link below and give via your switch/credit card. Thank you. http://www.justgiving.com/londonnorththreepeaks IMPORTANT . this email and the information in it may be confidential,
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 ACK author
Sven Wiedeck wrote: Hi everybody, a few words before: - we're running a Nagios 3 installation - logins are disabled - everybody is nagiosadmin per default (only internally reachable) Now I'm searching for a possibility to force the users to enter their name when they acknowledge a problem. Currenty the author name is set to the default login per default (nagiosadmin). Some people leave this name in there and we can't see who has ack'ed. Is there any way to leave the author name empty that Nagios rejects the ack without entering a name? The simple way is to create per-user accounts with admin rights and then create contacts with the same names as the usernames you set. The difficult way is to hack the CGI's and recompile. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.erics...@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 Register now for Nordic Meet on Nagios, June 3-4 in Stockholm http://nordicmeetonnagios.op5.org/ Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war on peace. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 ACK author
2009/5/8 Sven Wiedeck sven.wied...@wunderloop.com: Hi everybody, a few words before: - we're running a Nagios 3 installation - logins are disabled - everybody is nagiosadmin per default (only internally reachable) Now I'm searching for a possibility to force the users to enter their name when they acknowledge a problem. Currenty the author name is set to the default login per default (nagiosadmin). Some people leave this name in there and we can't see who has ack'ed. Is there any way to leave the author name empty that Nagios rejects the ack without entering a name? Thanks a lot, Sven I guess you need to look in /usr/local/nagios/etc/cgi.cfg: # LOCK AUTHOR NAMES OPTION # This option determines whether users can change the author name # when submitting comments, scheduling downtime. If disabled, the # author names will be locked into their contact name, as defined in Nagios. # Values: 0 = allow editing author names # 1 = lock author names (disallow editing) lock_author_names=1 And configure Nagios so that people will login using their own username. hth, Jim -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Escalations Info
That is how I have mine set up Craig and it is working as follows: Alerts 1, 2 and 3 are emails, then 4, 5 and six are SMS and no emails are sent. However after that it reverts back to sending mails again. -Original Message- From: Marc Powell [mailto:m...@ena.com] Sent: 07 May 2009 19:13 To: nagios-user Mailinglist Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Escalations Info On May 7, 2009, at 12:52 PM, cr...@hooters-uk.com wrote: First escalation: 3 because as I understand it this will occur after 3 mails have been sent. Last Escalation: 3 because I want 3 SMS sent after my 3 mails. Is this the way to do it or have I not got the correct understanding of it I don't use escalations but my understanding is the numbering is sequential -- Notification number 1 - email 2 - email 3 - email 4 - First Escalation - sms 5 - sms 6 - Last Escalation - sms -- Marc -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Escalations Info
Thanks I guess I will have to look into acks then, I will make a fresh post about this. Thanks again all Craig --- Original Message --- From: Martyn[mailto:mar...@chetnet.co.uk] Sent: 08/05/2009 12:41:51 To : m...@ena.com; nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc : Subject : RE: Re: [Nagios-users] Escalations Info That is how I have mine set up Craig and it is working as follows: Alerts 1, 2 and 3 are emails, then 4, 5 and six are SMS and no emails are sent. However after that it reverts back to sending mails again. -Original Message- On May 7, 2009, at 12:52 PM, cr...@hooters-uk.com wrote: First escalation: 3 because as I understand it this will occur after 3 mails have been sent. Last Escalation: 3 because I want 3 SMS sent after my 3 mails. Is this the way to do it or have I not got the correct understanding of it I don't use escalations but my understanding is the numbering is sequential -- Notification number 1 - email 2 - email 3 - email 4 - First Escalation - sms 5 - sms 6 - Last Escalation - sms -- Marc -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients, giving funny results
Gabriel - IP Guys wrote:
I get the concept, NRPE is installed on my client servers, and nagios
itself is installed on ate server designated the monitor server. This
server itself also has NRPE installed as it's monitored by a separate
nagios install, but that's above and beyond this issue. I've been told
that I cannot pass arguments to NRPE from the monitor server. For
example, check_nrpe -H client_IP check_disk - is the most that I can
issue on the monitor server. I guess this then means that in the *.cfg
files on nagios, everywhere it says check_nrpe!check_disk - there should
be no arguments after it?
If this is the case, then I think I found where the guy I replaced made
a mistake!
I think you may not fully understand how NRPE works - check_nrpe just
tells a client to run a predefined check.
In your scenario, with a typical NRPE setup, there would be a check on
the Nagios server :
define command {
command_namecheck_remote_disk
command_line$USER1$/check_nrpe2 -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -c
check_disk -a $ARG1$ $ARG2$
}
And a corresponding entry in the client nrpe.cfg:
command[check_disk]= /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_disk -w $ARG1$ -c
$ARG2$
Now to actually make it check:
define service{
host_name server.example.com
service_description Disk Space Check
use generic-service
check_command check_remote_disk!50!80
}
On the Nagios host, this check is expanded to `check_nrpe2 -H
server.example.com -c check_disk -a 50 80`, which is seen by the NRPE
daemon, and exanded to `/usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_disk -w 50 -c 80`.
Even if you can't pass arguments to the client NRPE because of policy or
security reasons, you can still pass arguments on to the client-local
check scripts with a few minor changes.
On Nagios:
define command {
command_namecheck_remote_disk
command_line$USER1$/check_nrpe2 -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -c
check_disk_default
}
define service{
host_name server.example.com
service_description foo.txt file age
use generic-service
check_command check_remote_disk
}
And finally on the client nrpe.cfg:
command[check_disk_default]= /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_disk -w 50
-c 80
The only real tradeoffs to doing it this way are relating to templating
and configuration centralization, so the hit is restricted to management
overhead.
--
Sean McAfee
System Engineer
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Remote Acknowledge
Hi Group I'm trying to find a way of letting our users acknowledge their own servers faults without the need to log in to Nagios, I have seen that there are remote commands you can issue which allow this to happen, but this is where I need a little instruction on how to use them. http://www.nagios.org/developerinfo/externalcommands/commandinfo.php?command_id=39 In the Nagios book I have been reading it mention's the use of Ticket Systems and making sure that Nagios can integrate with them and when I goggled the question the one of the results I got was OTRS. I guess that means I can raise a ticket by injecting Nagios info into it, but would I be able to use ACK's from within too, if not do you know of a solution that could do this. Thanks Craig -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Monitoring switches via SNMP --
You're more likely to get a good response by emailing the entire list
than you are by emailing me directly...
A. Davis
Mike Saldivar wrote:
Hi there,
I have a new installation of Nagios, Version 3.0.6, running on Ubuntu
8.10. I followed the Quick Start guide for Ubuntu, and everything
went swimmingly, installing Nagios, the Plug-ins, Apache, et al.
Nagios started up and monitored itself, and following the quick-starts
for Linux and Windows, I've been able to get it to monitor all my hosts.
So I'm now trying to get it to monitor a Cisco ASA 5510 VPN. On the
ASA, I enabled SNMP, and pointed it to the Nagios machine for reporting.
On the Nagios box, I copied up the switch.cfg, changed the IP address
and hostname, etc, following the instructions:
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/monitoring-routers.html
Restarting, I see these errors such as this. Posting the error, then
the corresponding portion of the switch.cfg:
Inside Interface CRITICAL 05-07-2009 16:54:07 0d 2h 53m 31s
3/3 (Return code of 127 is out of bounds - plugin may be missing)
---
define service{
use generic-service ; Inherit values from
a template
host_name CCLogan-ASA5510-1
service_description Inside Interface
check_command check_snmp!-C public -o
ifOperStatus.INSIDE -r 1 -m RFC1213-MIB
}
---
I changed ifOperStatus.INSIDE from ifOperStatus.1 because an snmpwalk
on the device said that's what this port name was, but I can change it
back. But googling the error (Return code of 127 ...) seems to
indicate I'm missing net-snmp or net-snmp-util, but I'm not sure how
to install them -- can't do a rpm -qa on Ubuntu, and I don't know what
the corresponding command is with apt-get. But searching the Ubuntu
repositories, I can' find an equivalent to net-snmp-util, so I think
that's the problem. Snmpwalk works though, so I figure I have
something half-working...
The other error I see is:
---
Port 1 Bandwidth UNKNOWN 05-07-2009 17:02:24 0d 2h 38m 14s
3/3 check_mrtgtraf: Unable to open MRTG log file
---
define service{
use generic-service ; Inherit values from
a template
host_name CCLogan-ASA5510-1
service_description Port 1 Bandwidth
check_command
check_local_mrtgtraf!/var/lib/mrtg/10.5.1.2_1.log!AVG!100,100!500,500!10
}
---
I looked, and /var/lib/mrtg/ didn't exist. Googling, I saw a tip to
change it to /var/www/mrtg/, but that directory didn't exist either.
I created /var/lib/mrtg/ and chown'd it to nagios:nagios and restarted
Nagios, but still nothing. Is there a mrtg config file I need to edit?
Should I check into check_cisco.pl, or does that work better for the
huge switches than the itty-bitty 4-porters?
Thanks a heap,
-Mike
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] R: Do you use IPMI with nagios?
-- I configure the Dell OpenManage agent to send SNMP traps to the Nagios server, then use NagTrap to process them. I'm not 100% sure if this will give you everything you are asking for though. Cheers, Jim -- Ok , but IPMI is a standard while OpenManage is just for Dell Servers -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] R: Do you use IPMI with nagios?
2009/5/8 Marco Borsani m.bors...@it.net: -- I configure the Dell OpenManage agent to send SNMP traps to the Nagios server, then use NagTrap to process them. I'm not 100% sure if this will give you everything you are asking for though. Cheers, Jim -- Ok , but IPMI is a standard while OpenManage is just for Dell Servers That's true and in an ideal world I agree, but often you will find that the tool provided specifically by the manufacturer to monitor the hardware which they designed will give you more detail than the open more general-purpose one. That's not alway the case though of course, sometimes the manufacturer's tools are a pile of junk! Me, I use whatever will get the job done. I inherited some servers which already had OpenManage installed so I used it. Cheers, Jim -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. I try to add a check_http with expecting some word in a body. But: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR BUT it must be ERROR - not ok. What I do wrong? The -s=ERROR is being POSTed because you're missing an argument for -P, making Nagios interpret the rest as the required string for -P. -- Sean McAfee System Engineer Collaborative Fusion, Inc. smca...@collaborativefusion.com 412-422-3463 x 4025 5849 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15217 IMPORTANT: This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this message to an intended recipient), please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
HTTP reply 200 means that the webserver found the page you requested . if you want to get an ERROR you should either point to a non existing page , which will give you the 404 error , in the example you provide it seem you are trying to submit some string to the jsp and expecting it to return an error , but you are not submitting any string . Assaf On Friday 08 May 2009 22:44:31 Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. I try to add a check_http with expecting some word in a body. But: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR POST /some.jsp HTTP/1.0 User-Agent: check_http/v2053 (nagios-plugins 1.4.13) Connection: close Host: example.com Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: 8 -s=ERROR http://example.com:80/some.jsp is 386 characters STATUS: HTTP/1.1 200 OK HEADER Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=72439B901515114D613218FF9FD8084D; Path=/ Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 154 Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 14:07:29 GMT Connection: close CONTENT !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN html head titleSomeTitle/title /head body OKAY /body /html HTTP OK HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 386 bytes in 0.450 seconds |time=0.449973s;;;0.00 size=386B;;;0 BUT it must be ERROR - not ok. What I do wrong? -- Assaf Flatto SSP Ops Team Linux System Administrator 169 Euston Road, London, NW1 2AE Along with a few colleagues I am doing The Three Peaks Challenge again this year to raise money for The Railway Children. Please sponsor me by making a donation online, simply click on the link below and give via your switch/credit card. Thank you. http://www.justgiving.com/londonnorththreepeaks IMPORTANT . this email and the information in it may be confidential, legally privileged and/or protected by law. It is intended solely for the use of the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Please also delete all copies of this email and any attachments from your system. We cannot guarantee the security or confidentiality of email communications. We do not accept any liability for losses or damages that you may suffer as a result of your receipt of this email including but not limited to computer service or system failure, access delays or interruption, data non-delivery or mis-delivery, computer viruses or other harmful components. Copyright in this email and any attachments belong to Select Service Partner UK Limited. Should you communicate with anyone at Select Service Partner UK Limited by email, you consent to us monitoring and reading any such correspondence. Nothing in this email shall be taken or read as suggesting, proposing or relating to any agreement concerted practice or other practice that could infringe UK or EC competition legislation. Select Service Partner UK Limited is a company registered in England and Wales (company number 05687183) whose registered office is at 1 The Heights, Brooklands, Weybridge. Surrey. KT13 0NY -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
* Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org [2009-05-08 18:44]: I try to add a check_http with expecting some word in a body. But: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR In this command line, -s=ERROR will be interpreted as an argument to the -P option, see the --help output: $ check_http -h | grep -A 1 -- ' -P' -P, --post=STRING URL encoded http POST data Without the -P option (or with an appropriate argument to the -P option), things should work as expected: $ check_http -H www.nagiosplugins.org -P -s=ERROR HTTP OK HTTP/1.1 200 OK - 19113 bytes in 1.578 seconds |time=1.578360s;;;0.00 size=19113B;;;0 $ check_http -H www.nagiosplugins.org -s=ERROR HTTP CRITICAL - string not found|time=0.861949s;;;0.00 size=19048B;;;0 Holger -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 ACK author
Hi, thanks for the replies but we don't want to create user accounts for 30 people if it's not absolutely neccesary. So the auto-login is the only way so far... Sven Am 08.05.2009 um 13:11 schrieb Jim Avery: 2009/5/8 Sven Wiedeck sven.wied...@wunderloop.com: Hi everybody, a few words before: - we're running a Nagios 3 installation - logins are disabled - everybody is nagiosadmin per default (only internally reachable) Now I'm searching for a possibility to force the users to enter their name when they acknowledge a problem. Currenty the author name is set to the default login per default (nagiosadmin). Some people leave this name in there and we can't see who has ack'ed. Is there any way to leave the author name empty that Nagios rejects the ack without entering a name? Thanks a lot, Sven I guess you need to look in /usr/local/nagios/etc/cgi.cfg: # LOCK AUTHOR NAMES OPTION # This option determines whether users can change the author name # when submitting comments, scheduling downtime. If disabled, the # author names will be locked into their contact name, as defined in Nagios. # Values: 0 = allow editing author names # 1 = lock author names (disallow editing) lock_author_names=1 And configure Nagios so that people will login using their own username. hth, Jim Sven IT/Administrator wunderloop media services GmbH Holzdamm 18 20099 Hamburg T +49 (0)40 - 432 07 826 F +49 (0)40 - 432 07 799 E sven.wied...@wunderloop.com www.wunderloop.de Sitz und Handelsregister: AG Hamburg, HRB 80 530 Geschäftsführung: Torsten Ahlers, Sven Bagemihl, Frank Conrad, Dr. Christoph Bauer This e-mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the named addressee you may not use it, copy it or disclose it to any other person. If you received this message in error please notify the sender immediately. P please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email? -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
Sean McAfee wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. I try to add a check_http with expecting some word in a body. But: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR BUT it must be ERROR - not ok. What I do wrong? The -s=ERROR is being POSTed because you're missing an argument for -P, making Nagios interpret the rest as the required string for -P. I do not understand you right... I try to explain more detail. On some site works some jsp what check inner logic of site and return in body OKEY or ERROR. I what to make a check_http and IF i got in page body word ERROR - then make check critical IF in page body i got OKEY - return OK. As I understand -s= - it is what I expect in page body. Or I not understand it right? :-) -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_by_ssh error: Remote command execution failed: You don't exist, go away!
I'm not finding much current documentation on check_by_ssh -- does it work? I have set up the nagios account with /bin/sh as its shell on 2 Linux Nagios servers and several clients (RHEL/SuSE/Sol10). I installed nagios-plugins-1.4.13 on the clients, and set up public key trust for ssh. Unfortunately, Nagios remote checks via check_by_ssh fail from both servers to all clients. Here's the debug transcript trying to check_disks on jean (Solaris 10): [1241794800.756298] [128.1] [pid=20907] External Command Type: 7 [1241794800.756316] [128.1] [pid=20907] Command Entry Time: 1241794800 [1241794800.756325] [128.1] [pid=20907] Command Arguments: jean.cbio.mskcc.org;remote-disk-space;1241794797 [1241794800.756343] [016.0] [pid=20907] Scheduling a non-forced, active check of service 'remote-disk-space' on host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org' @ Fri May 8 10:59:57 2009 [1241794801.012178] [016.0] [pid=20907] Attempting to run scheduled check of service 'remote-disk-space' on host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org': check options=0, latency=4.012000 [1241794801.012227] [016.0] [pid=20907] Checking service 'remote-disk-space' on host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org'... [1241794801.012255] [2048.1] [pid=20907] BEGIN MACRO PROCESSING *** [1241794801.012265] [2048.1] [pid=20907] Processing: '$USER1$/check_by_ssh -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C '/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_disk -l -uGB'' [1241794801.012291] [2048.1] [pid=20907] Done. Final output: '/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_by_ssh -H jean.cbio.mskcc.org -C '/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_disk -l -uGB'' [1241794801.012300] [2048.1] [pid=20907] END MACRO PROCESSING * [1241794801.012367] [016.1] [pid=20907] Check result output will be written to '/usr/local/nagios/var/spool/checkresults/checkXfUAxl' (fd=7) [1241794806.141453] [016.1] [pid=20907] Handling check result for service 'remote-disk-space' on host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org'... [1241794806.141465] [016.0] [pid=20907] ** Handling check result for service 'remote-disk-space' on host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org'... [1241794806.141474] [016.1] [pid=20907] HOST: jean.cbio.mskcc.org, SERVICE: remote-disk-space, CHECK TYPE: Active, OPTIONS: 0, SCHEDULED: Yes, RESCHEDULE: Yes, EXITED OK: Yes, RETURN CODE: 3, OUTPUT: Re\nte command execution failed: You don't exist, go away! [1241794806.141496] [016.1] [pid=20907] Service is in a non-OK state! [1241794806.141506] [016.1] [pid=20907] Host is currently UP, so we'll recheck its state to make sure... [1241794806.141515] [016.1] [pid=20907] * Using last known host state: 0 [1241794806.141525] [016.1] [pid=20907] Current/Max Attempt(s): 3/3 [1241794806.141534] [016.1] [pid=20907] Service has reached max number of rechecks, so we'll handle the error... [1241794806.141543] [016.1] [pid=20907] Checking service 'remote-disk-space' on host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org' for flapping... [1241794806.141553] [016.1] [pid=20907] Service is not flapping (0.00% state change). [1241794806.141567] [016.1] [pid=20907] Checking host 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org' for flapping... [1241794806.141577] [016.1] [pid=20907] Host is not flapping (0.00% state change). [1241794806.141593] [032.0] [pid=20907] ** Service Notification Attempt ** Host: 'jean.cbio.mskcc.org', Service: 'remote-disk-space', Type: 0, Options: 0, Current State: 3, Last Notification: Fri May 8 10:02:42 2009 But I can run the plugin manually -- nag...@jean trusts nag...@maguro: nag...@maguro:~ /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_by_ssh -H jean.cbio.mskcc.org -C '/usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_disk -l -uGB' DISK OK - free space: / 4 GB (55% inode=82%); /etc/svc/volatile 9 GB (99% inode=99%); /lib/libc.so.1 4 GB (55% inode=82%); /var 2 GB (71% inode=95%); /tmp 9 GB (99% inode=99%); /var/run 9 GB (99% inode=99%); /export/home 887 GB (99% inode=99%); /jean 30542 GB (86% inode=99%);| /=3GB;;;0;7 /etc/svc/volatile=0GB;;;0;9 /lib/libc.so.1=3GB;;;0;7 /var=1GB;;;0;3 /tmp=0GB;;;0;9 /var/run=0GB;;;0;9 /export/home=0GB;;;0;897 /jean=4921GB;;;0;35464 nag...@maguro:~ /usr/local/nagios/libexec/check_by_ssh -H jean.cbio.mskcc.org -C 'id -a' uid=108(nagios) gid=108 groups=108 Any suggestions? Thanks, Chris -- Chris Pepper:http://cbio.mskcc.org/ http://www.extrapepperoni.com/ -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
Holger Weiss wrote: * Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org [2009-05-08 18:44]: I try to add a check_http with expecting some word in a body. But: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR In this command line, -s=ERROR will be interpreted as an argument to the -P option, see the --help output: Ops! I missed what I post wrong command to list. Sorry. I fix it but: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -s=OKAY GET /some.jsp HTTP/1.0 User-Agent: check_http/v2053 (nagios-plugins 1.4.13) Connection: close Host: example.com http://example.com:80/some.jsp is 386 characters STATUS: HTTP/1.1 200 OK HEADER Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1 Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=C75D8239CF3F0C0D4FEF29DCD9316EBD; Path=/ Content-Type: text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 154 Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 15:51:01 GMT Connection: close CONTENT !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN html head titleCheck/title /head body OKAY /body /html HTTP CRITICAL - string not found|time=0.447721s;;;0.00 size=386B;;;0 -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
Proskurin Kirill wrote: Sean McAfee wrote: Proskurin Kirill wrote: Hello all. I try to add a check_http with expecting some word in a body. But: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR BUT it must be ERROR - not ok. What I do wrong? The -s=ERROR is being POSTed because you're missing an argument for -P, making Nagios interpret the rest as the required string for -P. I do not understand you right... I try to explain more detail. On some site works some jsp what check inner logic of site and return in body OKEY or ERROR. I what to make a check_http and IF i got in page body word ERROR - then make check critical IF in page body i got OKEY - return OK. As I understand -s= - it is what I expect in page body. Or I not understand it right? :-) No, you're right about -s, but you command is being parsed as: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -P -s=ERROR because you're missing an argument for the -P flag. Change it to: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -s=ERROR and it will work as you expect. -- Sean McAfee System Engineer -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] NDOutils and NDO2DB daemon
Hi, i am trying to install NDOutils to stock all events in a mysql database. the event broker module ndomod-3x.o is starting correctly but i next get the message : ndomod:unable to connect data sink What can i do? Many thanks T Granier-- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hello,
When i made an snmpwalk to a ip computer there is no response.
The snmpwalk to a switch,router or printer works ok.
Does any body know the reason?
Cristian...
-Mensaje original-
De: Matias Blanco [mailto:mat...@valastro.com.ar]
Enviado el: Jueves, 07 de Mayo de 2009 17:02
Para: 'Alejandro Sánchez Meroño'; Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hello,
How can i do an snmpwalk on my switch?
Thanks,
Cristian...
-Mensaje original-
De: Alejandro Sánchez Meroño [mailto:alejandro.sanc...@ite.es]
Enviado el: Jueves, 07 de Mayo de 2009 05:44
Para: Matias Blanco; Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: RE: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hola de nuevo...
I'll answer you in English so that anybody in the list can understand
and participate in this subject.
I think that if you don't know exactly which parameter to monitor you
should browse the whole OID list that you receive when you do a snmpwalk
on your switch, and identify the ones that fit your needs, with the help
of the website I said yesterday, or any other OIDs reference.
My case: The only thing I want to detect is if there is any damaged port
in any of my switches. So what I did was to snmpwalk on a switch which I
positively knew that had its port #2 damaged, and discover which OID was
significantly different for this port. And the one I found is:
iso.3.6.1.2.1.10.7.2.1.7
(maybe you can find it as its equivalent: SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.10.7.2.1.7)
defined as: a count of frames for which the first transmission attempt
on a particular interface is delayed because the medium is busy.
The thing is that it's the only OID I found that gave a very high value
for port #2 (about 65,000 or so) and 0 for the rest of ports that work
properly.
The command I defined for this was like this:
define command {
command_name check_port
command_line $USER1$/check_snmp -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C password -O
iso.3.6.1.2.1.10.7.2.1.7.$ARG1$ -w 1 -c 10 -u retries
}
For sure there must be somebody else in the list who can give to you a
more detailed or a more formally correct answer...
Hasta la proxima,
Alejandro
==
Alejandro Sanchez Merono
Area de Informatica y Comunicaciones
Instituto de Tecnologia Electrica - http://www.ite.es
Valencia - Spain
-Mensaje original-
De: Matias Blanco [mailto:mat...@valastro.com.ar]
Enviado el: miércoles, 06 de mayo de 2009 19:27
Para: Alejandro Sánchez Meroño; Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: RE: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hola Alejandro,
Ahora otra cosa:
De que manera crees que pueda chequear los puertos de mi switch con
nagios para tener una idea más clara de lo que está sucediendo?
Porque esos paquetes entrantes con errores no se si son por causa de la
PC o de los puerto del switch...
Muchas Gracias...
Cristian
Hola Matías... :-) and hola everyone...
There exists a magical website where to identify every OID you can check
with SNMP, the link is:
http://support.ipmonitor.com/mibs_byoidtree.aspx
For your particular issue, if you type RFC1213-MIB at the Search
for: form, click the result given (RFC1213-MIB), and then View:
Oid-tree, you'll be able to locate ifInErrors(14) at the tree shown,
and clicking it you'll find its Description, which reads literally:
The number of inbound packets that contained errors preventing them
from being deliverable to a higher-layer protocol.
That's the answer to your question!!
Now some other questions appear...
Wouldn't it be nicer to know what exactly are you monitoring before you
monitor it, so you could properly interpret the results?
Is that parameter (number of inbound packets that contained errors and
blah blah blah...) significant enough to determine if a port is working
properly or not?
Hope this helps...
Best regards,
Alejandro
==
Alejandro Sanchez Merono
Area de Informatica y Comunicaciones
Instituto de Tecnologia Electrica - http://www.ite.es Valencia - Spain
-Mensaje original-
De: Matias Blanco [mailto:mat...@valastro.com.ar] Enviado el: miércoles,
06 de mayo de 2009 17:49
Para: Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hi, I am using the check_snmp nagios`s plugin. And when we check the
ports status of a 3com Baseline 2250 Plus, we recibe many ports results:
SNMP OK - 0
SNMP WARNING - *1*
SNMP WARNING - *84*
SNMP WARNING - *2*
SNMP WARNING - *2*
SNMP WARNING - *4*
The question is, what´s the meaning of the warning numbers?
Other information:
--
# 'check_snmp' command definition
define command{
command_namecheck_snmp
command_line$USER1$/check_snmp -H $HOSTADDRESS$ $ARG1$
}
Example of service
---
define service {
use service-15x3x5-switchs
host_name 3COM2250P
service_description
Re: [Nagios-users] Centreon
On May 4, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Eduardo Barreto wrote: I'm looking for a solution to monitor Nagios with some resources just like Cacti, and I found Centreon, does anyone know about it, working with Nagios? I've been running Centreon for quite a while now under Solaris 10. It was a beast to setup correctly at first but once that hurdle was taken it's been smooth riding. I am still running 1.4 and Nagios 2 but I am planning to go to Centreon 2 and Nagios 3 in the near future. - Michael PGP.sig Description: PGP signature -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_by_ssh error: Remote command execution failed: You don't exist, go away!
Chris Pepper wrote: I'm not finding much current documentation on check_by_ssh -- does it work? Nevermind! I forgot that I had found a UID conflict on some of the monitored nodes, so I changed nagios' UID on the monitoring servers. service nagios stop; chown -R nagios /usr/local/nagios; service nagios start and it's working. Sorry for the noise! Chris -- Chris Pepper:http://cbio.mskcc.org/ http://www.extrapepperoni.com/ -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
* Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org [2009-05-08 19:52]: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -s=OKAY Try -s OKAY or --string=OKAY. Holger -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
Holger Weiss пишет: * Proskurin Kirill proskurin...@fxclub.org [2009-05-08 19:52]: ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -s=OKAY Try -s OKAY or --string=OKAY. Thank you - it is works. But last strange thing - check returns OK if I expect ANY letter of OKAY word. ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -s K -- returns OK and so on. Bug? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_by_ssh problem
In order to monitor the remote linux server we are using check_by_ssh as root. I know it is not advisable to use it as root , but we are in a transition to NRPE slowly which uses nagios. Here's what i did : 1) As root copied the id_rsa.pub to the remote server's root user's .ssh directory and pasted it to the authorized_keys . 2) Then did ssh remote server ip and was able to login without password. 3) Then excecuted the check command remotely: check_by_ssh -t 30 -l root -H remote server ip -C /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_load -w10,15,20 -c15,20,25 OK - load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00|load1=0.00;10.00;15.00;0.00 load5=0.00;15.00;20.00;0.00 load15=0.00;20.00;25.00;0.00 check_by_ssh -t 30 -l root -H remote server ip -C /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_uptime UPTIME OK - System up for 6 HOUR(s) and 38 Minute(s) Looks perfectly fine!!! But from the Web interface i see this : Remote command execution failed: buffer_get_ret: trying to get more bytes 129 than in buffer 97 I am clue less . Please advice me on this . -- Anirudh Srinivasan -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients, giving funny results
On May 8, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Gabriel - IP Guys wrote: Dear All, I'm trying to get my Nagios instance to behave properly! It seems to be monitoring my servers just fine, but for some reason, all my servers, which are different from each other show the same swap space, and the same free disk space to within 10 megs. This tells me that you're most likely not monitoring those through NRPE on the remote machines. I suspect that this is the value for your nagios machine. Config examples would help clarify. ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 My understanding tells me that the following happens * The check_nrpe plugin on the nagios monitor server runs, and accesses the client at client_ip Correct. * It initiates its local check_disk plugin with the parameters of 50 and 80. Incorrect. check_nrpe does not pass arguments to the remote NRPE daemon unless -- - it was compiled with the --enable-command-args flag - dont_blame_nrpe is set in nrpe.cfg - you pass them with the -a switch to check_nrpe - See the SECURITY document for NRPE for documentation and examples. * This causes the check_disk plugin on the client to run, as if typed locally in this manner check_disk -w 50 -c 80 No, but you may specify those arguments in the command definition in nrpe.cfg instead of trying to pass them via check_nrpe. Running check_disk 50 80 on client_ip returns data on the disk state Running ./Check_nrpe -H client_ip -c check_disk 50 80 on Nagios monitor server returns unknown argument I cannot figure out what is causing this discrepancy - check_nrpe -H client_ip returns Nagios version so I know the communication works. I expect you see now that the '50 80' is being interpreted as an argument to check_nrpe itself, not check_disk, hence the 'unknown argument' error. If they're static numbers, you're probably fine just specifying them in each host's nrpe.cfg file. -- Marc -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Escalations Info
On May 8, 2009, at 6:41 AM, Martyn wrote:
That is how I have mine set up Craig and it is working as follows:
Alerts 1, 2 and 3 are emails, then 4, 5 and six are SMS and no
emails are
sent.
However after that it reverts back to sending mails again.
If that's not desired, wouldn't something like this work? --
define serviceescalation{
host_name foo
service_description bar
first_notification 7
last_notification 999
contact_groups none
}
--
Marc
--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
1. Make sure snmpd is running on the host. (classic mistake)
2. Make sure your community string and/or credentials are the same on the
host and client.
3. Make sure you're using the same snmp version on client and server (v1,
v2c, or v3)
4. Try running a tcpdump on the host while you're attempting the snmpwalk
to verify that the snmp requests are reaching the host. At the same time
verify that the host is trying to send out responses.
# tcpdump udp port 161
I'm sure there are more tests you can do but this is a start.
-f
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matias Blanco wrote:
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:02:28 -0300
From: Matias Blanco mat...@valastro.com.ar
To: 'Alejandro S?nchez Mero?o' alejandro.sanc...@ite.es,
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hello,
When i made an snmpwalk to a ip computer there is no response.
The snmpwalk to a switch,router or printer works ok.
Does any body know the reason?
Cristian...
-Mensaje original-
De: Matias Blanco [mailto:mat...@valastro.com.ar]
Enviado el: Jueves, 07 de Mayo de 2009 17:02
Para: 'Alejandro S?nchez Mero?o'; Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hello,
How can i do an snmpwalk on my switch?
Thanks,
Cristian...
-Mensaje original-
De: Alejandro S?nchez Mero?o [mailto:alejandro.sanc...@ite.es]
Enviado el: Jueves, 07 de Mayo de 2009 05:44
Para: Matias Blanco; Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: RE: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hola de nuevo...
I'll answer you in English so that anybody in the list can understand
and participate in this subject.
I think that if you don't know exactly which parameter to monitor you
should browse the whole OID list that you receive when you do a snmpwalk
on your switch, and identify the ones that fit your needs, with the help
of the website I said yesterday, or any other OIDs reference.
My case: The only thing I want to detect is if there is any damaged port
in any of my switches. So what I did was to snmpwalk on a switch which I
positively knew that had its port #2 damaged, and discover which OID was
significantly different for this port. And the one I found is:
iso.3.6.1.2.1.10.7.2.1.7
(maybe you can find it as its equivalent: SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.10.7.2.1.7)
defined as: a count of frames for which the first transmission attempt
on a particular interface is delayed because the medium is busy.
The thing is that it's the only OID I found that gave a very high value
for port #2 (about 65,000 or so) and 0 for the rest of ports that work
properly.
The command I defined for this was like this:
define command {
command_name check_port
command_line $USER1$/check_snmp -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -C password -O
iso.3.6.1.2.1.10.7.2.1.7.$ARG1$ -w 1 -c 10 -u retries
}
For sure there must be somebody else in the list who can give to you a
more detailed or a more formally correct answer...
Hasta la proxima,
Alejandro
==
Alejandro Sanchez Merono
Area de Informatica y Comunicaciones
Instituto de Tecnologia Electrica - http://www.ite.es
Valencia - Spain
-Mensaje original-
De: Matias Blanco [mailto:mat...@valastro.com.ar]
Enviado el: mi?rcoles, 06 de mayo de 2009 19:27
Para: Alejandro S?nchez Mero?o; Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: RE: [Nagios-users] check_snmp - warning numbers
Hola Alejandro,
Ahora otra cosa:
De que manera crees que pueda chequear los puertos de mi switch con
nagios para tener una idea m?s clara de lo que est? sucediendo?
Porque esos paquetes entrantes con errores no se si son por causa de la
PC o de los puerto del switch...
Muchas Gracias...
Cristian
Hola Mat?as... :-) and hola everyone...
There exists a magical website where to identify every OID you can check
with SNMP, the link is:
http://support.ipmonitor.com/mibs_byoidtree.aspx
For your particular issue, if you type RFC1213-MIB at the Search
for: form, click the result given (RFC1213-MIB), and then View:
Oid-tree, you'll be able to locate ifInErrors(14) at the tree shown,
and clicking it you'll find its Description, which reads literally:
The number of inbound packets that contained errors preventing them
from being deliverable to a higher-layer protocol.
That's the answer to your question!!
Now some other questions appear...
Wouldn't it be nicer to know what exactly are you monitoring before you
monitor it, so you could properly interpret the results?
Is that parameter (number of inbound packets that contained errors and
blah blah blah...) significant enough to determine if a port is working
properly or not?
Hope this helps...
Best regards,
Alejandro
==
Alejandro Sanchez Merono
Area de Informatica y Comunicaciones
Instituto de Tecnologia Electrica - http://www.ite.es Valencia - Spain
-Mensaje original-
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http -s
On May 8, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Proskurin Kirill wrote: But last strange thing - check returns OK if I expect ANY letter of OKAY word. ./check_http -v -H example.com -u /some.jsp -s K -- returns OK and so on. Bug? No, not a bug. You're searching for 'K' and it is present in the word 'OKAY' in the page. You're searching for simple strings, not words. Searching for the string 'OKAY' would successfully match 'thisisreallycoolOKAYthxbai'. -- Marc -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Monitor Server, and NRPE clients, giving funny results
Dear All, I'm trying to get my Nagios instance to behave properly! It seems to be monitoring my servers just fine, but for some reason, all my servers, which are different from each other show the same swap space, and the same free disk space to within 10 megs. You're running the same check repeatedly on one host. Look carefully at your commands.cfg and services.cfg definitions. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_by_ssh problem
On May 8, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Anirudh Srinivasan wrote: In order to monitor the remote linux server we are using check_by_ssh as root. I know it is not advisable to use it as root , but we are in a transition to NRPE slowly which uses nagios. Here's what i did : 1) As root copied the id_rsa.pub to the remote server's root user's .ssh directory and pasted it to the authorized_keys . nagios' id_rsa.pub? 2) Then did ssh remote server ip and was able to login without password. from the nagios user? 3) Then excecuted the check command remotely: check_by_ssh -t 30 -l root -H remote server ip -C /usr/lib/nagios/ plugins/check_load -w10,15,20 -c15,20,25 OK - load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00| load1=0.00;10.00;15.00;0.00 load5=0.00;15.00;20.00;0.00 load15=0.00;20.00;25.00;0.00 from the nagios user? Remote command execution failed: buffer_get_ret: trying to get more bytes 129 than in buffer 97 Are you using the latest version of OpenSSH? -- Marc -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] The icinga on the cake ...
Not being a developer myself, I'm not quite sure what to say or think, except that I'm continuously deeply grateful to everyone who bring us Nagios itself, and the plugins and tools which make it greater than the sum of its parts. This is, IMHO, one of the greatest problems with open source development. Too much bickering, splintering and forking dilutes the value of the product. It's unfortunate that the main nagios devs and these icinga people could not work together to simply improve the existing code base. There are a lot of great features that could be added to nagios, yet it feels like development on some of these major features has been very slw. Ethan, if you're reading this, cheer up mate. You are sitting on a virtual gold mine. Nagios is hands-down the best network monitoring system available, you should be minting money selling support contracts for it. If you aren't then hire some good salespeople to sell your support contracts and maybe a find good web developer to give the GUI an upgrade! -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] [OT] Network help?
I apologize for the off-topic post, but I figure the people here tend to be involved with networking, so perhaps someone can direct me to the right place to post a question about some networking problems I am having. Any suggestions? --- Israel Brewster Computer Support Technician II Frontier Flying Service Inc. 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7250 x293 --- -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Nagios-users] nagios and mysql and NDOutils
Hello i have installed NDOutils and i can run ndo2db-3x but i have this message in the log: ndomod: Error writing to data sink! Some output may get lost. 3996 queued items to flush. The database nagios is empty Thanks for your help Thierry -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [OT] Network help?
2009/5/8 Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com: I apologize for the off-topic post, but I figure the people here tend to be involved with networking, so perhaps someone can direct me to the right place to post a question about some networking problems I am having. Any suggestions? If it's social-networking problems, I recommend maybe facebook.com! Seriously though, it depends. If it's to do with Linux you could seek out your local LUG, but why not just say what the problem is here, you never know ... someone might find a solution to your problem AND explain how Nagios can help you to check how effective their answer to it was! -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] The icinga on the cake ...
2009/5/8 Sean Carolan scaro...@gmail.com: This is, IMHO, one of the greatest problems with open source development. Too much bickering, splintering and forking dilutes the value of the product. Yeah, because out of all of the commercial closed source development projects I've worked on, none of them have ever had bickering, splintering, forking or anything else horrible go on with them. .r' -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [OT] Network help?
On May 8, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Jim Avery wrote: 2009/5/8 Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com: I apologize for the off-topic post, but I figure the people here tend to be involved with networking, so perhaps someone can direct me to the right place to post a question about some networking problems I am having. Any suggestions? If it's social-networking problems, I recommend maybe facebook.com! Seriously though, it depends. If it's to do with Linux you could seek out your local LUG, but why not just say what the problem is here, you never know ... someone might find a solution to your problem AND explain how Nagios can help you to check how effective their answer to it was! Nope, not social, although if I don't get it fixed soon (or find another solution) it might become a social problem :-) I didn't post it here because I thought some might get annoyed with me cluttering the list with non-nagios problems, but here goes. Thanks to a recent company acquisition made by my company (Frontier Flying), we are now dealing with two separate networks (they will eventually be combined, but that's a ways off still). The company we bought (Era aviation) uses a piece of software called Sabre for their flight reservations, which contacts a central server to which their network has a direct connection. The Sabre server itself is on a third network, but there are a couple of routers that link the two (Sabre and Era) across a private network, so asside from a couple of routing and NAT statements they are effectively on the same network. In order to be able to run Sabre on our network, we established a VPN tunnel between our network and Era's. As far as I can tell, the VPN is functioning. I can ping computers on the Era network, including the Sabre server, and can access and control various computers on the Era network. For initial testing purposes we installed the sabre software (windows only) inside a parallels installation on one of our Mac laptops. This worked perfectly. So far so good. Until we tried installing the software on one of our Windows desktops. Then the problems started. The Sabre software would make the initial connection and log in the user, but when it tried to download the initial info it needs, it just timed out. Every time. Meanwhile, the laptop, which was connected through the same dumb switch, continued to work perfectly. Every time. We took the Windows machine off our network and put it on Era's (different location, obviously) and it started working. Put it back on ours, timeout. Since then we have tried installing Sabre on a number of different computers on our network. A second Mac laptop running parallels works fine, while a mac desktop with an identical install of parallels doesn't. We have managed get one Windows machine running the software on our network, while a stack of four windows machines that Era sent us which had been working on their network just fine don't work. On one hand it seems impossible that it could be an issue with the network, because you would expect that to affect all computers equally, not the hit-and miss (but mostly miss) scenario that we are facing. On the other hand, it can't be a problem with the individual computer, because the same computer with the exact same configuration (including network settings - DHCP) works fine on the Era network, but stops working when moved to ours. We thought maybe it was a DNS problem (since obviously DHCP on our network would give different DNS servers than DHCP on Era's network), so we tried putting the Era DNS servers in statically, but while it worked as far as DNS went (we still got name resolution) that didn't help with Sabre. We are going bald here tearing our hair out trying to figure out what could be causing this issue. Sabre technical support is no help - they just say it's our problem. Management is coming down on us pretty hard to get something working here, so any help anyone can provide would be GREATLY appreciated :-). Let me know if I left out any relevant details or testing we performed! --- Israel Brewster Computer Support Technician II Frontier Flying Service Inc. 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7250 x293 --- -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Re: [Nagios-users] [OT] Network help?
2009/5/8 Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com: We are going bald here tearing our hair out trying to figure out what could be causing this issue. Sabre technical support is no help - they just say it's our problem. Management is coming down on us pretty hard to get something working here, so any help anyone can provide would be GREATLY appreciated :-). Let me know if I left out any relevant details or testing we performed! You have my every sympathy. That kind of network problem can be a right pain to solve. I had a similar problem with a VPN from home to work a while ago. After lots of googling I found the home router I was using had some problem with packet reassembly (whatever that is) which was fixed by upgrading to the latest firmware. It was a bit strange because when I wasn't using the VPN to work (just using normal internet) the router seemed to work flawlessly. It was only when I was connected to the work network over SecuRemote that the problem reared its ugly head. Once I'd upgraded the firmware, it was fine ... ... then I replaced the router with a wireless one from a different manufacturer and even when I connected wired the problem was back again! Served me right for buying a cheapo one. Not sure if that will help you at all though :-( Jim -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios-users] nagios and mysql and NDOutils
ndomod (broker) can't write data on unix socket. Verify if ndo2db created a unix socket in your system. # netstat -anp |grep ndo.sock unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 14049966 25009/ndo2db-3x /var/nagios/rw/ndo.sock unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 14050152 30032/ndo2db-3x /var/nagios/rw/ndo.sock Send us your ndo2db config values. On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Thierry Granier th.gran...@free.fr wrote: Hello i have installed NDOutils and i can run ndo2db-3x but i have this message in the log: ndomod: Error writing to data sink! Some output may get lost. 3996 queued items to flush. The database nagios is empty Thanks for your help Thierry -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] [OT] Network help?
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com wrote: On May 8, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Jim Avery wrote: 2009/5/8 Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com: I apologize for the off-topic post, but I figure the people here tend to be involved with networking, so perhaps someone can direct me to the right place to post a question about some networking problems I am having. Any suggestions? If it's social-networking problems, I recommend maybe facebook.com! Seriously though, it depends. If it's to do with Linux you could seek out your local LUG, but why not just say what the problem is here, you never know ... someone might find a solution to your problem AND explain how Nagios can help you to check how effective their answer to it was! Nope, not social, although if I don't get it fixed soon (or find another solution) it might become a social problem :-) I didn't post it here because I thought some might get annoyed with me cluttering the list with non-nagios problems, but here goes. Thanks to a recent company acquisition made by my company (Frontier Flying), we are now dealing with two separate networks (they will eventually be combined, but that's a ways off still). The company we bought (Era aviation) uses a piece of software called Sabre for their flight reservations, which contacts a central server to which their network has a direct connection. The Sabre server itself is on a third network, but there are a couple of routers that link the two (Sabre and Era) across a private network, so asside from a couple of routing and NAT statements they are effectively on the same network. In order to be able to run Sabre on our network, we established a VPN tunnel between our network and Era's. As far as I can tell, the VPN is functioning. I can ping computers on the Era network, including the Sabre server, and can access and control various computers on the Era network. For initial testing purposes we installed the sabre software (windows only) inside a parallels installation on one of our Mac laptops. This worked perfectly. So far so good. Until we tried installing the software on one of our Windows desktops. Then the problems started. The Sabre software would make the initial connection and log in the user, but when it tried to download the initial info it needs, it just timed out. Every time. Meanwhile, the laptop, which was connected through the same dumb switch, continued to work perfectly. Every time. We took the Windows machine off our network and put it on Era's (different location, obviously) and it started working. Put it back on ours, timeout. Since then we have tried installing Sabre on a number of different computers on our network. A second Mac laptop running parallels works fine, while a mac desktop with an identical install of parallels doesn't. We have managed get one Windows machine running the software on our network, while a stack of four windows machines that Era sent us which had been working on their network just fine don't work. On one hand it seems impossible that it could be an issue with the network, because you would expect that to affect all computers equally, not the hit-and miss (but mostly miss) scenario that we are facing. On the other hand, it can't be a problem with the individual computer, because the same computer with the exact same configuration (including network settings - DHCP) works fine on the Era network, but stops working when moved to ours. We thought maybe it was a DNS problem (since obviously DHCP on our network would give different DNS servers than DHCP on Era's network), so we tried putting the Era DNS servers in statically, but while it worked as far as DNS went (we still got name resolution) that didn't help with Sabre. We are going bald here tearing our hair out trying to figure out what could be causing this issue. Sabre technical support is no help - they just say it's our problem. Management is coming down on us pretty hard to get something working here, so any help anyone can provide would be GREATLY appreciated :-). Let me know if I left out any relevant details or testing we performed! --- Israel Brewster Computer Support Technician II Frontier Flying Service Inc. 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7250 x293 --- Hi Israel, You do have a weird problem. It's difficult to give any hints -- it seems you should try to solve this as methodically as possible, e.g. with root cause analysis or some other troubleshooting method. At least, try to record what is working and what is not working in some kind of matrix. Maybe some trend comes out. For example, you mention that Sabre works inside a VM on Mac; how about in a VM on Windows? Maybe some network sniffing could be useful also. What TCP/UDP ports are used with the software. What kind of VPN you
Re: [Nagios-users] [OT] Network help?
Hi, sounds like classic MTU issues to me. Path MTU discovery is broken due to firewalls blocking ICMP and the VPN overhead is introduced, things break in very strange ways. Take one of the windows machines while connected to the non-working network and lower it's MTU, reload and test again: http://www.pctools.com/guides/registry/detail/280/ You can also try this theory out by varying the size of the ping packet you test with. See if your ping breaks at a certain MTU. Get some wireshark packet captures of a session too, this may point you in the right direction. -Robin On 5/8/09 6:38 PM, Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com wrote: On May 8, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Jim Avery wrote: 2009/5/8 Israel Brewster isr...@frontierflying.com: I apologize for the off-topic post, but I figure the people here tend to be involved with networking, so perhaps someone can direct me to the right place to post a question about some networking problems I am having. Any suggestions? If it's social-networking problems, I recommend maybe facebook.com! Seriously though, it depends. If it's to do with Linux you could seek out your local LUG, but why not just say what the problem is here, you never know ... someone might find a solution to your problem AND explain how Nagios can help you to check how effective their answer to it was! Nope, not social, although if I don't get it fixed soon (or find another solution) it might become a social problem :-) I didn't post it here because I thought some might get annoyed with me cluttering the list with non-nagios problems, but here goes. Thanks to a recent company acquisition made by my company (Frontier Flying), we are now dealing with two separate networks (they will eventually be combined, but that's a ways off still). The company we bought (Era aviation) uses a piece of software called Sabre for their flight reservations, which contacts a central server to which their network has a direct connection. The Sabre server itself is on a third network, but there are a couple of routers that link the two (Sabre and Era) across a private network, so asside from a couple of routing and NAT statements they are effectively on the same network. In order to be able to run Sabre on our network, we established a VPN tunnel between our network and Era's. As far as I can tell, the VPN is functioning. I can ping computers on the Era network, including the Sabre server, and can access and control various computers on the Era network. For initial testing purposes we installed the sabre software (windows only) inside a parallels installation on one of our Mac laptops. This worked perfectly. So far so good. Until we tried installing the software on one of our Windows desktops. Then the problems started. The Sabre software would make the initial connection and log in the user, but when it tried to download the initial info it needs, it just timed out. Every time. Meanwhile, the laptop, which was connected through the same dumb switch, continued to work perfectly. Every time. We took the Windows machine off our network and put it on Era's (different location, obviously) and it started working. Put it back on ours, timeout. Since then we have tried installing Sabre on a number of different computers on our network. A second Mac laptop running parallels works fine, while a mac desktop with an identical install of parallels doesn't. We have managed get one Windows machine running the software on our network, while a stack of four windows machines that Era sent us which had been working on their network just fine don't work. On one hand it seems impossible that it could be an issue with the network, because you would expect that to affect all computers equally, not the hit-and miss (but mostly miss) scenario that we are facing. On the other hand, it can't be a problem with the individual computer, because the same computer with the exact same configuration (including network settings - DHCP) works fine on the Era network, but stops working when moved to ours. We thought maybe it was a DNS problem (since obviously DHCP on our network would give different DNS servers than DHCP on Era's network), so we tried putting the Era DNS servers in statically, but while it worked as far as DNS went (we still got name resolution) that didn't help with Sabre. We are going bald here tearing our hair out trying to figure out what could be causing this issue. Sabre technical support is no help - they just say it's our problem. Management is coming down on us pretty hard to get something working here, so any help anyone can provide would be GREATLY appreciated :-). Let me know if I left out any relevant details or testing we performed! --- Israel Brewster Computer Support Technician II Frontier Flying Service Inc. 5245 Airport Industrial Rd Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 450-7250 x293 ---
Re: [Nagios-users] What does the flag failure_prediction_enabled
Sean Carolan wrote: I can't find any informations on the flag failure_prediction_enabled in service definition. What is the effect of this flag ? First result for 'nagios failure prediction' on Google: http://www.google.com/search?btnI=q=nagios+failure+prediction And it appears that first result has not been updated since 2002. Is the failure detection feature just a vestigial organ that never finished developing? As far as I can see, the failure_prediction_enabled flag does absolutely nothing right now. I can certainly imagine a reason for this. Failure prediction is *hard*. To get it right, you need to take into account 1. The current check thresholds (currently specified as arguments to Nagios plugins, so Nagios core knows nothing about them) 2. The average delta between several checks over a possibly *very* long period of time. 3. The number of times the potential problem is being taken care of before it becomes a problem, and how this affects the average delta. 4. Artificial intelligence to learn about previous problems in other areas of the network that could, potentially, lead to problems with the monitored host. /Andreas DISCLAIMER: I wrote this email very, very late on a friday evening, after having drunk several glasses of wine in very pleasant company. Such petty details as checking my facts to make sure I'm right didn't really enter my mind at the time I was writing this. It's possible I'll regret that later, but right now I'm reasonably certain the above s correct. -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] The icinga on the cake ...
Sean Carolan wrote: Not being a developer myself, I'm not quite sure what to say or think, except that I'm continuously deeply grateful to everyone who bring us Nagios itself, and the plugins and tools which make it greater than the sum of its parts. This is, IMHO, one of the greatest problems with open source development. Too much bickering, splintering and forking dilutes the value of the product. Personally, I think you're wrong. GCC (one of the most portable and portability-friendly compiler collections in the world) suffered a big fat fork in 1997, and it ended up being extremely good for the project. The X windowing system *remains* forked into at least 4 different schisms. Right now, it looks as if X.org is winning. A few years ago, everyone used XFree86. It's unfortunate that the main nagios devs and these icinga people could not work together to simply improve the existing code base. There are a lot of great features that could be added to nagios, yet it feels like development on some of these major features has been very slw. True. That's a major complaint of the forkees too. The majorest (err..) is that development hasn't been open enough though. Ethan and some other prominent community members are working on fixing that. I'm guessing info regarding that will be publicly available on monday afternoon, European time. Ethan, if you're reading this, cheer up mate. You are sitting on a virtual gold mine. Nagios is hands-down the best network monitoring system available, you should be minting money selling support contracts for it. If you aren't then hire some good salespeople to sell your support contracts and maybe a find good web developer to give the GUI an upgrade! I agree about the GUI. Rumor has it that discussions are under way to solve that too very shortly. Ethan will send something out very early next week (not he may do so or I hope he will do so; He *will* do so, or I'll go to minnesota and thump him on the head). The email he'll send out will contain, among other things, his future plans to make Nagios development move along faster. Possibly, there'll be something about GUI discussions in there as well. It's friday night here (2:32 AM), and I really don't know everything. This time, I feel confident that noone will be disappointed when I say: Just wait and see. There may be pumpkins in it. /Andreas -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 ACK author
Sven Wiedeck wrote: Hi, thanks for the replies but we don't want to create user accounts for 30 people if it's not absolutely neccesary. So the auto-login is the only way so far... No can do then. You can lock the author-field, but if everyone are authenticated as the same person, using the exact same credentials, there's no way of telling them apart automatically. You *could* add a check to see if the field isn't changed. That requires basic C programming skills and a rudimentary grasp of how HTML works when posting form data. If you still want help with that, you can probably contact op5 and get a consultancy price. I doubt it'll be of much use to the community, so it *will* come with a price-tag. /Andreas -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios 3 ACK author
If your accounts are in LDAP you can do some scripting to sync between LDAP and Nagios. Since it seems you more care about individual usernames but not strong security, you can just make the password the same for each account when you create the HTTP AUTh account on the Nagios poller. Either that or you can use the same philosophy, script to sync Nagios user accounts from LDAP queries, and then use one of the Apache LDAP authentication modules to authenticate the user so they use their real password to authenticate. - Max -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
