[Nagios-users-br] Qual plugin utilizar
Tenho um servidor linux que não é o nagios, gostaria que esse servidor fosse monitorado pelo nagios, como devo proceder? -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki
[Nagios-users-br] RES: Qual plugin utilizar
Para facilitar nossa vida, poderia dizer o que quer monitorar no servidor Linux? Diramos -Mensagem original- De: Giovann Restani [mailto:giovann.rest...@gmail.com] Enviada em: terça-feira, 9 de agosto de 2011 10:04 Para: nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net Assunto: [Nagios-users-br] Qual plugin utilizar Tenho um servidor linux que não é o nagios, gostaria que esse servidor fosse monitorado pelo nagios, como devo proceder? -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev -- Nagios-users-br@lists.sourceforge.net mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users-br Wiki: http://nagios-br.sf.net/wiki
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Core Log file
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Robert J Molerio rjm...@nyu.edu wrote: Hello, I was told the NAGIOS CORE logfile would log any changes made to host command execution ie: External commands:who turned off what and when. Upon examination of my logfile it sems that this is not the case. The log file indicates only that a particular service was enabled or disable but it does not indiacte the user id that performed the change. Can anyone point me in the right direction to make this happen? Users / Authentication are not as such managed by Nagios core. We use the Nagios cgis running through Apache, so if we want to see which user issued a command we look in the Apache log files. HTH Ritchie, -- -- http://23.me.uk/2 -- --Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana. -- Snippet of log file : [root@its019-lap-v:var]# pwd /usr/local/nagios/var [root@its019-lap-v:var]# ls -lat total 188 drwxrwxr-x 5 nagios nagios 4096 Aug 8 11:15 . -rw-rw-r-- 1 nagios nagios 51204 Aug 8 11:15 status.dat -rw-r--r-- 1 nagios nagios 4561 Aug 8 11:09 nagios.log -rw--- 1 nagios nagios 50697 Aug 8 11:09 retention.dat drwxrwxr-x 2 nagios nagios 4096 Aug 8 00:00 archives -rw-r--r-- 1 nagios nagios 41229 Aug 5 15:09 objects.cache -rw-r--r-- 1 nagios nagios 6 Aug 1 13:24 nagios.lock drwxrwsr-x 2 nagios nagcmd 4096 Aug 1 13:24 rw drwxrwxr-x 9 nagios nagios 4096 Jul 1 15:06 .. drwxrwxr-x 3 nagios nagios 4096 Jun 27 15:54 spool [root@its019-lap-v:var]# cat nagios.log [1312776000] LOG ROTATION: DAILY [1312776000] LOG VERSION: 2.0 [1312776541] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312780141] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312783741] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312787341] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312790941] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312794541] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312798141] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312801741] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312805172] EXTERNAL COMMAND: DEL_ALL_SVC_COMMENTS;TPC Server;root space [1312805341] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312808941] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312812541] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. [1312816017] EXTERNAL COMMAND: ENABLE_SVC_NOTIFICATIONS;Nagios Server;HTTP [1312816033] EXTERNAL COMMAND: ENABLE_SVC_NOTIFICATIONS;Nagios Server;SSH [1312816141] Auto-save of retention data completed successfully. -- Thank you, Bob Molerio Systems Administrator New York University ITS Computer Facilities Services/Infrastructure Level C-2 75 Third Avenue New York NY 10003-5527 email:robert.mole...@nyu.edu -- BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. Sessions, hands-on labs, demos much more. Register early save! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Nagios Core Log file
On 9 August 2011 09:25, m...@catsnest.co.uk wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Robert J Molerio rjm...@nyu.edu wrote: Can anyone point me in the right direction to make this happen? which user issued a command we look in the Apache log files. ... that you can find in /var/log/httpd/ on RedHat based distribution.. Example: tail -f /var/log/httpd/access_log Bye -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Look soku89
04y10q5o5qqq. http://ianscott.biz/wp-content/uploads/img/oafv.html 79o9xjv 4q6rlp n1nprps0, 6a8svdq kh7uwj. fpiwe quqcnwb2a 6t5e5e. -- Thanks, Max Alex Voip Developer -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Suggestions for event correlation managers?
Splunk perhaps? Mark From: Furnish, Trever G [tgfurn...@herffjones.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:30 AM To: Nagios Users List Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Suggestions for event correlation managers? Anyone? C'mon, don't be shy! :-) -- Trever From: Furnish, Trever G [tgfurn...@herffjones.com] Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 4:45 PM To: nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Boeglin, Adam R Subject: [Nagios-users] Suggestions for event correlation managers? Hello, I'm looking for suggestions for applying Nagios' style of event handling (escalations, recoveries, acknowledgements), hopefully with some improvements (aggregation), to events coming from many different (non-Nagios) sources. I know of a few Nagios-specific notification aggregators, but can anyone recommend a good (preferably inexpensive / OSS) way of expanding that to include many other tools? I know about SNARE and RiverMuse, but they're relatively expensive. We make heavy use of Nagios as well as several other tools (MSFT SCOM, HP SIM, Oracle Grid Control, AlertSite.net, etc). They're all sending alerts in various forms to a small group of admins and engineers, so many of us get alerts from all of the tools, sometimes from more than one tool regarding a single event. Nagios does a great job of flexibly managing alerts from its own events, but I don't see how I'd hook in the other tools. Several of the tools (e.g. SCOM and SIM) don't even have any concept of event correlation -- breakage and recovery are two separate events. I see tools like SNARE, RiverMuse ECM, and a few others filling this gap, at least partially, but I don't yet have experience with them and they're relatively expensive. Anyone doing this effectively with OSS tools or low-cost tools or a good home-grown approach you wouldn't mind sharing (and possibly collaborating on)? -- Trever Furnish, tgfurn...@herffjones.com Herff Jones, Inc. Solutions Architect Phone: 317.612.3519 -- BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. Sessions, hands-on labs, demos much more. Register early save! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Override service notification time
On 08/08/11 18:18, Chris Beattie wrote: You can set it on a per-host basis. If you do not define a notification timeperiod in a service's template or definition, the service will inherit its notification timeperiod from its associated host. Check out the section on implied inheritance here: http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/nagioscore/3/en/objectinheritance.html I have separate host templates for my development and production servers which have different notification timeperiods, and one set of service definitions associated with both types of hosts. Ah yes, that was the problem, I had the timeperiod set in the service template, I removed it from the template and it was inherited it from host. Thanks -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http with multiple outcomes?
Terry: on 23:37 Mon 08 Aug, Terry Carmen (te...@cnysupport.com) wrote: Quoting Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com: When some things are going well and others aren't fully up to speed (slow database), we'll get a DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG, which isn't ideal, but at least for a few occurances (n = 5) we can live with. In particular, we DON'T want a single result sounding off pagers in the middle of the night. You can specify -e OK,DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG, then let the plugin decide if it's slow or not, with the -w, -c and -t parameters. Terry Thanks. I'd considered that. It doesn't quite match what we want to test. I'm thinking we may need to have a few different tests, possibly related to one another. If there's a 4xx/5xx error, it's a hard fail. If there's no 4xx/5xx error, but we get the DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG result, it's a soft fail, turning hard on 6 repeats. That string appears in our application, it's not a nagios-determined slowness. Alternately, we might want to have a separate test for DB performance (there may well be, I'm still digging through rules and tests). If there's an OK result, there's no error. The 4xx/5xx errors are exclusive of the other two possible results. If there's no 4xx/5xx error, we've got the option of either of the other two conditions. So: is this a three-check test? How would I set precedence among them? -- Dr. Ed Morbius, Chief Scientist /| Robot Wrangler / Staff Psychologist| When you seek unlimited power Krell Power Systems Unlimited| Go to Krell! -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_http with multiple outcomes?
Quoting Dr. Ed Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com: Terry: on 23:37 Mon 08 Aug, Terry Carmen (te...@cnysupport.com) wrote: Quoting Edward Morbius dredmorb...@gmail.com: When some things are going well and others aren't fully up to speed (slow database), we'll get a DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG, which isn't ideal, but at least for a few occurances (n = 5) we can live with. In particular, we DON'T want a single result sounding off pagers in the middle of the night. You can specify -e OK,DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG, then let the plugin decide if it's slow or not, with the -w, -c and -t parameters. Terry Thanks. I'd considered that. It doesn't quite match what we want to test. I'm thinking we may need to have a few different tests, possibly related to one another. If there's a 4xx/5xx error, it's a hard fail. If there's no 4xx/5xx error, but we get the DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG result, it's a soft fail, turning hard on 6 repeats. That string appears in our application, it's not a nagios-determined slowness. Alternately, we might want to have a separate test for DB performance (there may well be, I'm still digging through rules and tests). If there's an OK result, there's no error. The 4xx/5xx errors are exclusive of the other two possible results. If there's no 4xx/5xx error, we've got the option of either of the other two conditions. So: is this a three-check test? How would I set precedence among them? You can actually completely ignore the DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG result and let the plugin decide if it ran long or not. That's part of it's design. The plugin also handles the 4xx and 5xx errors. However if you insist on using the DATABASE_TEST_RAN_LONG result to determine if the server is happy, then you'll need to modify the plugin to catch the string and interpret it as a WARNING OR CRITICAL as appropriate. Nagios won't notify on it until it happens several times in a row, depending on your specific settings. Unless I'm misunderstanding something, The only result that matters is OK because everything else is Not OK, regardless of whether it's a performance issue, an access issue or a server failure. I believe you're unnecessarily complicating the test. -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Public page
Can you use cgi.cfg:authorized_for_read_only for that? http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/3_0/configcgi.html Justin On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 06:22:20PM -0300, Diogo Melo wrote: I would like to use nagios to monitor a few sites I have. But I want to have a public page where I can show the high service availability I'm getting. Is there something ready to use that matches with what I want? A way to show a few results without give any manage control. -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_procs count going haywire on Ubuntu
After wondering why all of the processes I'm checking with check_procs were counting an extra, I discovered the bug with /bin/dash under Debian [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626913] As a workaround (because I'm not interested in changing the default shell for the entire server), I called /bin/bash when defining my commands in nrpe.cfg. Now they're going haywire in a different way. For instance: command[check_pdns_config_pub]=/bin/bash -c /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -w 1:1 -c 1:1 -a pdns_server --config-name=public But now Nagios reports: PROCS OK: 271 processes I am baffled. Every process I am checking now reports 271, which is how many total processes are running. Prior to explicitly defining the shell in the command, it was reporting correctly but adding one process to the count, so I shouldn't have broken it too badly here. Any suggestions on a better workaround? Thanks! C O N V I V A Kimberly McKinnis | Systems Engineer, Service Delivery | k...@conviva.com | Mobile: 724.612.2716 | 2 WATERS PARK DRIVE | SUITE 150 | SAN MATEO | CA | 94403 | www.conviva.com | -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_procs count going haywire on Ubuntu
After wondering why all of the processes I'm checking with check_procs were counting an extra, I discovered the bug with /bin/dash under Debian [http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626913] As a workaround (because I'm not interested in changing the default shell for the entire server), I called /bin/bash when defining my commands in nrpe.cfg. Now they're going haywire in a different way. For instance: command[check_pdns_config_pub]=/bin/bash -c /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -w 1:1 -c 1:1 -a pdns_server --config-name=public Wait...looks like your quotes are in the wrong place. Try: command[check_pdns_config_pub]=/bin/bash -c /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/check_procs -w 1:1 -c 1:1 -a pdns_server --config-name=public Everything after -c should be in double quotes. -- uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
