[Nagios-users] TEST to Nagios
TEST TEST TEST -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com Phone: (808) 934-4102 Cell: (808) 937-5026 -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] check_procs and negating regex in --ereg-argument-array
All,
Is it possible to negate the regular expression used in
--ereg-argument-array with check_procs?
We want to ignore one of the processes running on a machine but when we
try to use negative lookahead the regex is not processed correctly
because it reads ! as a bash internal command:
./check_procs -w 25 -c 35 -m CPU -v --ereg-argument-array=^((?!john).)*$
./check_procs -w 25 -c 35 -m CPU -v --ereg-argument-array=^((?john
--show passwd.ldap).)*$
bash: syntax error near unexpected token `('
And the Nagios web output shows: NRPE: Unable to read output
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Best Regards,
Camron
--
Camron W. Fox
Hilo Office
High Performance Computing Group
Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc.
E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] check_procs and negating regex in --ereg-argument-array
On 12/05/21 11:29 AM, Alex Griffin wrote: To get around the issue of bash interpreting your regex characters as something else, simply wrap the regex in single quotes: ./check_procs -w 25 -c 35 -m CPU -v --ereg-argument-array='^((?!john).)*$' Alex Griffin Alex, I already tried that and this was the error: /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_procs -w 25 -c 35 -m CPU -v --ereg-argument-array='^((?!john).)*$' PROCS UNKNOWN: Could not compile regular expression - Invalid preceding regular expression with the message on the web output being: PROCS UNKNOWN: Could not compile regular expression - Invalid preceding regular expression Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] TEST to Nagios Users List
Alle, This is just a test. I haven't received any mail from the list in almost a month. Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
[Nagios-users] Exclusions to check_procs plugin?
Alle, I've searched and found this question has been asked before, but there don't seem to have been any responses. Is it possible to exclude a process with the check_procs plugin. I have John the Ripper running on one of my machines which consistently uses 100% of one of the four CPUs: Cpu0 : 0.3%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 93.0%id, 6.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu1 : 0.7%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.0%id, 1.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st Cpu2 : 0.3%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Cpu3 :*100.0%us*, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 3912852k total, 3761780k used, 151072k free, 180016k buffers Swap: 8388600k total, 112k used, 8388488k free, 2994944k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 11066 root 25 0 12376 7012 644 R 100.1 0.2 70505:06 john I'd like to ignore this if possible. Best Regards, Camron -- Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] NRPE vs. check_by_ssh
Charlie Reddington wrote: +1 on the control master. We have about 1000 checks over 300 hosts and using control master made the box much more stable and quite frankly usable. Saved a lot of plug in time outs as well. Think about 1000 checks every 5 or 10 minutes. That's 1000 encrypted tunnels that are going up and down. That's a lot of overhead for a quick check, let along if your server is checking say 5 or 10 things back to back. http://www.torchbox.com/blog/ssh_tips_2.html Charlie Charlie, Sounded interesting so I gave this a try on our test environment, with the following config: Host * ControlMaster auto ControlPath ~/.ssh/master...@%h:%p Initially, all looked well, but then we started to see these: Remote command execution failed: Control socket connect(/var/log/nagios/.ssh/master-r...@192.168.100.100:22): Connection refused So you see this as well in your environment? Best Regards, Camron Camron W. Fox Hilo Office High Performance Computing Group Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc. E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com -- ___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
