Re: [Nagios-users] too much memory usage on Nagios server
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Marco Borsani wrote: > Hi all > > ** ** > > I have too cluster centos , both with Nagios 3.3.1 , both with 4Gb of ram. > > > ** ** > > Nagios “A” , has 400 servers and 3300 services configured. Its memory > usage is about 88% > > Nagios “B” , has 300 servers and 1900 services configured. Its memory > usage is about 95% > > ** ** > > Where/How can I investigate to understand why this big difference (less > checks , more memory usage) ? > Is the embeeded perl enabled? (the 1.9K services can maybe call more perl than the other). Jean -- Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Disable ALL Nagios Notifications For One Hour, On One Day, Every Month
Le 18 févr. 2013 18:32, "Jon Adcock" a écrit : > > > Within Nagios, is there some way to disable ALL Nagios notifications from 6:00 AM to 7:00 AM every 3rd Saturday of every month? > > I could run a cron job that replaced the nagios.cfg file with one that has enable_notifications=0 at 6:00 AM (and restart the service), then run another cron job that replaced the nagios.cfg file with the original file at 7:00 AM (and restart the service), but I'm looking for a solution within Nagios. > > > Hi, Why not add an "exclude" entry to your notification timeperiods? Regards, Jean -- The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel - in partnership with Geeknet, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials, tech docs, whitepapers, evaluation guides, and opinion stories. Check out the most recent posts - join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Help with CPU Check Thresholds
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Scott Wilkerson wrote: > Alex, > > It would be very common for a machine with multiple CPU's to have a > higher load. On a 16 CPU machine, no processes would be waiting at all > with a load under 16. > Hi, Yes if all the load is consumed by CPUs, but it's quite rare. For example with a database the most time is spend on disks I/O, and a 16cpu server won't help here, you can be overload with a load average > 1 in this case. The "good" load average is very specific for each server/application. CPU number is a just a part of the "load" equation. Jean > > Scott Wilkerson > Technical Support Specialist > ___ > Email: swilker...@nagios.com > Web: www.nagios.com > > -- Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] IPv6 support
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Mark Elsen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > That's probably not completely true, because the config files allow you to > specify IP addresses, if so desired. If IPv6 aware, these should, at > least,be > parsed correctly ? > > Hi, In fact no. Like Andreas said, Nagios do not even understand what an IP is. It's just a string for it to be pass to plugins as a macro (still a string). It will not parse it. Jean > M. > > -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
Re: [Nagios-users] Multiple parents: *any* or *all*?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jack Bates <1j1...@nottheoilrig.com>wrote: > When you list multiple other hosts in the "parents" directive of a host, > does it mean that this host should be reachable if *any* of these > parents are up, or only if *all* of these parents are up? > > Hi, It will be unreachable if, and only if, ALL its parents are down (or unreachable). (this is a big OR rule) This is different from host dependencies when only one dependency is enough to be like "unreachable". (this is a big AND rule) Regards, Jean -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
