Re: Urgent need for bandwidth in Chiswick/London

2006-11-03 Thread Michael . Dillon

 Does anyone know of any MAN (or anything else for that matter) options
 at this location?

Yes, somebody does know but they are unlikely to 
be on this list. In general, for any commercial
building in any city, there is a building manager
who takes care of utilities, air conditioning, heating
systems, etc. This person or persons will be aware of
any and all telecommunications circuits into the building
and which companies send technicians to monkey around 
with the comms closet. That should be your first port
of call.

If that person is too hard to get answers from, next
best is to talk to neighbouring commercial buildings
because MANs are built in rings so chances are that 
one of the companies connected to neighbouring buildings
will also be in yours.

Third port of call is to contact the sales departments
of all the companies offering MAN services in your city.
Since they have a chance to win some business, they will
be happy to research their internal records to find out
whether or not they have infrastructure in your building.

Fourth port of call is your other technical contacts
in the city/country in question.

And maybe in the fifth position, or lower, is a general
mailing list like NANOG. 

My question is, did you actually go through all the above
BEFORE posting to NANOG?

--Michael Dillon



BGP Update Report

2006-11-03 Thread cidr-report

BGP Update Report
Interval: 20-Oct-06 -to- 02-Nov-06 (14 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS4637

TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS13156   18671  1.7% 296.4 -- AS13156 Cabovisao,SA
 2 - AS14117   10967  1.0%  45.7 -- Telefonica del Sur S.A.
 3 - AS17557   10721  1.0%  29.1 -- PKTELECOM-AS-AP Pakistan Telecom
 4 - AS432310566  1.0%  10.2 -- TWTC - Time Warner Telecom, Inc.
 5 - AS337839313  0.8%  84.7 -- EEPAD
 6 - AS7303 8864  0.8%  41.0 -- Telecom Argentina S.A.
 7 - AS9121 8759  0.8%  85.0 -- TTNET TTnet Autonomous System
 8 - AS4621 8200  0.8%  60.7 -- UNSPECIFIED UNINET-TH
 9 - AS346957026  0.6% 127.7 -- E4A-AS E4A Primary AS
10 - AS2854 7018  0.6% 200.5 -- ROSPRINT-AS Equant Russia AS
11 - AS114926893  0.6%  18.0 -- CABLEONE - CABLE ONE
12 - AS6471 6700  0.6%  30.0 -- ENTEL CHILE S.A.
13 - AS7011 6461  0.6%   9.1 -- FRONTIER-AND-CITIZENS - 
Frontier Communications, Inc.
14 - AS287516416  0.6%  34.9 -- CAUCASUS-NET-AS Caucasus 
Network Tbilisi, Georgia
15 - AS124976186  0.6% 123.7 -- SANET-GE SANET NETWORK (AS)
16 - AS3602 6161  0.6%  11.6 -- AS3602-RTI - Rogers Telecom Inc.
17 - AS308906144  0.6%  29.7 -- EVOLVA Evolva Telecom
18 - AS702  5944  0.5%  19.7 -- AS702 MCI EMEA - Commercial IP 
service provider in Europe
19 - AS6629 5523  0.5%  83.7 -- NOAA-AS - NOAA
20 - AS146995402  0.5% 600.2 -- BTCBCI - Bloomingdale 
Communications Inc


TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS3043 3104  0.3%3104.0 -- AMPHIB-AS - Amphibian Media 
Corporation
 2 - AS315943073  0.3%3073.0 -- FORTESS-AS Fortess LLC Network
 3 - AS392501436  0.1%1436.0 -- COLOPROVIDER-AS Colo Provider
 4 - AS264602206  0.2%1103.0 -- CERTEGY-INC - CERTEGY INC.
 5 - AS34378 907  0.1% 907.0 -- RUG-AS Razguliay-UKRROS Group
 6 - AS1258  650  0.1% 650.0 -- XKL-NET-AS - XKL Systems 
Corporation
 7 - AS18173 640  0.1% 640.0 -- AKU-AS-PK Aga Khan University
 8 - AS5310 1807  0.2% 602.3 -- DODNIC - DoD Network 
Information Center
 9 - AS146995402  0.5% 600.2 -- BTCBCI - Bloomingdale 
Communications Inc
10 - AS329371180  0.1% 590.0 -- 
CAC-FOR-THE-DEAF-AND-HARD-OF-HEARING - Communication Access Center for the Deaf 
and Hard of Hearing, Inc.
11 - AS305173999  0.4% 571.3 -- GREAT-LAKES-COMNET - Great 
Lakes Comnet, Inc.
12 - AS11904 555  0.1% 555.0 -- ALLENTEL - Allendale Telephone 
Company
13 - AS331881103  0.1% 551.5 -- SCS-NETWORK-1 - Sono Corporate 
Suites
14 - AS347231032  0.1% 516.0 -- RNT-AS SC Real Network and 
Telecomunications SRL
15 - AS30095 468  0.0% 468.0 -- NYCMEC - MediaEdge-CIA
16 - AS32225 413  0.0% 413.0 -- MCGRAW-BCM - McGraw 
Communications
17 - AS305972040  0.2% 408.0 -- AMBEST-ASN - A.M. Best Company
18 - AS14548 394  0.0% 394.0 -- LISTEN-SF-1 - Listen.com
19 - AS41212 389  0.0% 389.0 -- CARCADE Carcade Network Tupolev 
Plaza
20 - AS12953 381  0.0% 381.0 -- REUTERS-AS REUTERS


TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
 1 - 209.140.24.0/243104  0.2%   AS3043  -- AMPHIB-AS - Amphibian Media 
Corporation
 2 - 194.242.124.0/22   3073  0.2%   AS31594 -- FORTESS-AS Fortess LLC Network
 3 - 203.199.128.0/19   2444  0.2%   AS4755  -- VSNL-AS Videsh Sanchar Nigam 
Ltd. Autonomous System
 4 - 194.42.208.0/201754  0.1%   AS705   -- ALTERNET-AS - UUNET 
Technologies, Inc.
 5 - 205.109.192.0/24   1440  0.1%   AS747   -- TAEGU-AS - DoD Network 
Information Center
 6 - 83.98.220.0/23 1436  0.1%   AS39250 -- COLOPROVIDER-AS Colo Provider
 7 - 217.129.168.0/21   1353  0.1%   AS13156 -- AS13156 Cabovisao,SA
 8 - 143.81.0.0/21  1191  0.1%   AS6034  -- DDN-ASNBLK - DoD Network 
Information Center
 9 - 205.105.128.0/20   1148  0.1%   AS5839  -- DDN-ASNBLK - DoD Network 
Information Center
10 - 216.189.252.0/24   1103  0.1%   AS26460 -- CERTEGY-INC - CERTEGY INC.
11 - 216.189.253.0/24   1103  0.1%   AS26460 -- CERTEGY-INC - CERTEGY INC.
12 - 217.129.192.0/21   1028  0.1%   AS13156 -- AS13156 Cabovisao,SA
13 - 86.106.200.0/221016  0.1%   AS34723 -- RNT-AS SC Real Network and 
Telecomunications SRL
14 - 143.81.159.0/24 962  0.1%   AS6034  -- DDN-ASNBLK - DoD Network 
Information Center
15 - 217.129.128.0/20961  0.1%   AS13156 -- AS13156 Cabovisao,SA
16 - 217.129.200.0/21939  0.1%   AS13156 -- AS13156 Cabovisao,SA
17 - 

The Cidr Report

2006-11-03 Thread cidr-report

This report has been generated at Fri Nov  3 21:45:34 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
27-10-06199053  129640
28-10-06199145  129412
28-10-06198919  129487
30-10-06198976  129548
31-10-06199093  129634
01-11-06199107  129807
02-11-06199250  129804
03-11-06199409  129827


AS Summary
 23452  Number of ASes in routing system
  9862  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  1490  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS7018 : ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT WorldNet Services
  91370240  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS721  : DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network Information Center


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 03Nov06 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 199338   1298496948934.9%   All ASes

AS4755  1014   65  94993.6%   VSNL-AS Videsh Sanchar Nigam
   Ltd. Autonomous System
AS4134  1197  279  91876.7%   CHINANET-BACKBONE
   No.31,Jin-rong Street
AS18566  972  130  84286.6%   COVAD - Covad Communications
   Co.
AS9498   864  128  73685.2%   BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET
   LTD.
AS4323  1026  294  73271.3%   TWTC - Time Warner Telecom,
   Inc.
AS22773  715   52  66392.7%   CCINET-2 - Cox Communications
   Inc.
AS19262  733  179  55475.6%   VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon
   Internet Services Inc.
AS721861  311  55063.9%   DISA-ASNBLK - DoD Network
   Information Center
AS7018  1490  968  52235.0%   ATT-INTERNET4 - ATT WorldNet
   Services
AS6197  1020  506  51450.4%   BATI-ATL - BellSouth Network
   Solutions, Inc
AS17488  547   46  50191.6%   HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over
   Cable Internet
AS19916  565   68  49788.0%   ASTRUM-0001 - OLM LLC
AS11492  772  278  49464.0%   CABLEONE - CABLE ONE
AS855537   88  44983.6%   CANET-ASN-4 - Aliant Telecom
AS18101  473   26  44794.5%   RIL-IDC Reliance Infocom Ltd
   Internet Data Centre,
AS17676  500   64  43687.2%   JPNIC-JP-ASN-BLOCK Japan
   Network Information Center
AS3602   525  104  42180.2%   AS3602-RTI - Rogers Telecom
   Inc.
AS4766   703  311  39255.8%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS812423   34  38992.0%   ROGERS-CABLE - Rogers Cable
   Inc.
AS9583   955  575  38039.8%   SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
AS4812   431   60  37186.1%   CHINANET-SH-AP China Telecom
   (Group)
AS2386  1109  741  36833.2%   INS-AS - ATT Data
   Communications Services
AS8151   759  409  35046.1%   Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS6467   400   70  33082.5%   ESPIRECOMM - Xspedius
   Communications Co.
AS16852  373   55  31885.3%   FOCAL-CHICAGO - Focal Data
   Communications of Illinois
AS15270  477  191  28660.0%   AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec.net -a
   division of
   PaeTecCommunications, Inc.
AS16814  330   52  27884.2%   NSS S.A.
AS14654  298   30  26889.9%   WAYPORT - Wayport
AS17849  429  162  26762.2%   GINAMHANVIT-AS-KR hanvit ginam
   broadcasting comm.
AS33588  391  125  26668.0%   BRESNAN-AS - Bresnan
   Communications, LLC.


Weekly Routing Table Report

2006-11-03 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 04 Nov, 2006

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  202451
Prefixes after maximum aggregation:  110029
Unique aggregates announced to Internet:  98259
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 23539
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   20493
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:9862
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:3046
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 79
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   3.6
Max AS path length visible:  29
Max AS path prepend of ASN (36728)   27
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 2
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:   4
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:1
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:  9
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   1625968400
Equivalent to 96 /8s, 234 /16s and 79 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   43.9
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   60.7
Percentage of available address space allocated:   72.3
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  102103

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:44918
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   18279
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:   42504
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:18572
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:2739
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:761
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:417
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:3.6
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 16
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  265522528
Equivalent to 15 /8s, 211 /16s and 141 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 83.0

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911
APNIC Address Blocks   58/7, 60/7, 121/8, 122/7, 124/7, 126/8, 202/7
   210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:101032
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:59784
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:74283
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 28181
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:11101
ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:4218
ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1041
Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.3
Max ARIN Region AS path length visible:  29
Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet:   308402080
Equivalent to 18 /8s, 97 /16s and 215 /24s
Percentage of available ARIN address space announced:  68.1

ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106
(pre-ERX allocations)  2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153
   3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466
   7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407
   18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591,
   26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791
   35840-36863, 39936-40959
ARIN Address Blocks24/8, 63/8, 64/5, 72/6, 76/8, 96/6, 199/8, 204/6,
   208/7 and 216/8

RIPE Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 41038
Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation:27152
Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks:37976
Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 25439
RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 8710
RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:4592
RIPE Region transit ASes present in 

Need AOL Postmaster Contact, Please

2006-11-03 Thread Weier, Paul


Having problems getting subscription-based news emails to registered AOL
customers - unable to rectify in 5 days with regular AOL Postmaster channel.

Any assitance greatly appreciated.

Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: adviCe on network security report

2006-11-03 Thread Sean Donelan


On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Robert Boyle wrote:
someone who can help. I wish abuse was used as intended instead of my every 
idiot programmer and script writer for their own helpful stuff we never 
asked for nor does it help us at all nor does it help the users.


Unfortunately that is a problem with every public reporting channel.  Most
9-1-1 (or your national equivalent) centers report a majority of their 
calls are non-emergencies.  In many cities the police will not respond
to automatic dialers calling 9-1-1 because of the extremely high false 
reporting rate, or put them at a very low, low response priority.  Most

of the complaints the FCC gets about television and radio programming are
from people who have never seen or heard the program they are complaining
about.

ISP abuse desks, US congressional offices, etc have all implemented things
which make contacting them by e-mail harder due to the automatic-idiot
problems.  There are effective ways to contact your congressional office 
or ISP abuse desk, and ineffective ways.  When they give suggestions about

the best way to contact them, its a good idea to listen to what they
recommend if you want to be effective.

If you just want to complain about ISPs not responding, or the police not
finding your stolen car, or 9-1-1 operators refusing calls from your 
automatic alarm system; you are welcome to continue complaining.  It 
probably won't be that effective, but if it makes you feel better go 
ahead.


On the other hand, if you are interested in accomplishing something then
there are different actions you can take.


Yahoo Postmaster contact, please

2006-11-03 Thread Matt Clauson

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings, NANOGers.  I've got a mail cluster that's been spooling about
5 messages for the past week or so (with very little drain and
traffic passing), and my mail admin reports that attempted contacts to
the Yahoo Postmaster are not getting answered.  Can someone over there
drop me a line off-list, please?

- --mec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPT 2.7.2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFS6w9vDNtj3aXDYkRAu8hAJkBl7fcSpXG1p0nU9QsWHReHfQsKwCdFj20
LrLTe2HcgNremAEoYIp983Y=
=+e8X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: Yahoo Postmaster contact, please

2006-11-03 Thread chuck goolsbee



Greetings, NANOGers.  I've got a mail cluster that's been spooling about
5 messages for the past week or so (with very little drain and
traffic passing), and my mail admin reports that attempted contacts to
the Yahoo Postmaster are not getting answered.  Can someone over there
drop me a line off-list, please?


Welcome to a very NON-exclusive club Matt.

You are not alone*. It seems as if every other mail server on the 
planet is having the same issue.


As for an actual human being at Yahoo getting back in touch with you, 
I suspect I'll be refereeing a Flyers** vs Chiefs*** Ice Hockey game 
in hell before that happens. However, if an actual human being 
affiliated with Yahoo does get back to you prior to the Zamboni being 
delivered to the netherworld, please pass them over my way when your 
done with them.


--chuck


* http://www.forest.net/support/archives/2006/10/000792.php#000792
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Flyers#Broad_Street_Bullies
*** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slap_Shot_%28film%29




Re: Yahoo Postmaster contact, please

2006-11-03 Thread Jim Popovitch

On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 13:42 -0800, chuck goolsbee wrote:
 Greetings, NANOGers.  I've got a mail cluster that's been spooling about
 5 messages for the past week or so (with very little drain and
 traffic passing), and my mail admin reports that attempted contacts to
 the Yahoo Postmaster are not getting answered.  Can someone over there
 drop me a line off-list, please?
 
 Welcome to a very NON-exclusive club Matt.
 
 You are not alone*. It seems as if every other mail server on the 
 planet is having the same issue.

My queues aren't as large as most reading this, I haven't seen one email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] delayed all day.  They come in
singularly, get expanded by mailinglist software, and go out in bulk.
Also, my emails (from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) haven't seen any significant
delays to/from other mailinglists this week.

-Jim P.



Re: CWDM equipment (current favorites) (fwd)

2006-11-03 Thread Deepak Jain




As there's no specification for 2.5 gigabit ethernet (that I'm aware
of), and SONET gear with pluggable optics is likely out of your
league, I'm afraid that's a decision you'll have to make.  :-)

There are plenty affordable[1] options available 1U for switches with
10GE uplink ports.  I've had good luck with the Extreme Summit x450.
If you're a bit more daring, Allied Telesyn recently announced a
switch with a similar port density, though lacking in the useful
bunch of SFPs rather than 10/100/1000 ports configuration.

More and more, I'm finding it difficult to justify deploying n x GE
port-channels across dark fiber, when 10GE is a lot easier to scale
and troubleshoot...



Since we are clarifying...

Yes, 10G is a nice option when you can use reasonably priced optics 
(80km). CWDM (nx2.5 or nx1G) works happily up to 30+db of loss and 
reduces complexity if you can avoid all the associated pieces of DWDM 
you may need to address conditions in the long reach end of the range.


Deepak




Is the sky failling?

2006-11-03 Thread Roy


An article from CNN on IPV6 and how the US will be hurt because its 
falling behind


http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/03/technology/fastforward_ipv6_networking.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2006110317


RE: Yahoo Postmaster contact, please

2006-11-03 Thread Frank Bulk

I have one customer that's been having trouble (not specific to him, all of
our ISP subs send out via well-known gateways) and the message started off
with 451 Message temporarily deferred - 4.16.50 and the most recent one
was Remote host said: 451 Message temporarily deferred - [190].  When I
had this problem about 2 weeks ago I could manually initiate a connection to
any of Yahoo's MX records and get the first error message.  After I filled
out the Yahoo! Mail Feedback form on their website
(http://add.yahoo.com/fast/help/us/mail/cgi_defer/) I get this response four
days later:

===
Thank you for contacting Yahoo! Customer Care.

There appears to have been an incident involving capacity issues within 
our delivery infrastructure. The error message 451 Message temporarily 
deferred - 4.16.50 indicates that our MTAs are currently experiencing 
heavy, unusual traffic. You may retry sending at a later time when you 
see this message.

However please note that emails from the mail server(s) you are using 
may also have recently become deprioritized due to potential issues with
its mailings. 

These deprioritizations were temporary but may be re-triggered if the 
sending IP profile continues to be poor. Typically, deprioritizations 
are triggered by bad individual sender or MAIL FROM profiles. 
===

Googling for some of these error codes yields this Yahoo discussion
(http://tinyurl.com/y3nm6p) of a week ago that talks about greylisting and
site upgrades, so hopefully this goes away sooner rather than later.

Regards,

Frank

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
chuck goolsbee
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 3:42 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Yahoo Postmaster contact, please


Greetings, NANOGers.  I've got a mail cluster that's been spooling about
5 messages for the past week or so (with very little drain and
traffic passing), and my mail admin reports that attempted contacts to
the Yahoo Postmaster are not getting answered.  Can someone over there
drop me a line off-list, please?

Welcome to a very NON-exclusive club Matt.

You are not alone*. It seems as if every other mail server on the 
planet is having the same issue.

As for an actual human being at Yahoo getting back in touch with you, 
I suspect I'll be refereeing a Flyers** vs Chiefs*** Ice Hockey game 
in hell before that happens. However, if an actual human being 
affiliated with Yahoo does get back to you prior to the Zamboni being 
delivered to the netherworld, please pass them over my way when your 
done with them.

--chuck


* http://www.forest.net/support/archives/2006/10/000792.php#000792
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Flyers#Broad_Street_Bullies
*** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slap_Shot_%28film%29





Re: Yahoo Postmaster contact, please

2006-11-03 Thread Matthew Petach


On 11/3/06, Matt Clauson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings, NANOGers.  I've got a mail cluster that's been spooling about
5 messages for the past week or so (with very little drain and
traffic passing), and my mail admin reports that attempted contacts to
the Yahoo Postmaster are not getting answered.  Can someone over there
drop me a line off-list, please?

- --mec


Amusingly enough, gmail tossed this in my spam folder, so I didn't see it
until people started replying to it.  I have no idea if that's indicative of
anything with respect to Yahoo or not, but it might indicate a possible
reason for mail deferral from some sites.

If you're having network connectivity issues reaching Yahoo, NANOG would
seem like a reasonable place to raise questions--but this isn't really a list
for mail admins to hang out on.  It looks like network connectivity between
dotorg.org and Yahoo is good, so I'm not sure if there's anything people on
this list could help you with--but if you do have network connectivity issues
in the future, there's definitely people here who can address those concerns.

Matt


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPT 2.7.2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFS6w9vDNtj3aXDYkRAu8hAJkBl7fcSpXG1p0nU9QsWHReHfQsKwCdFj20
LrLTe2HcgNremAEoYIp983Y=
=+e8X
-END PGP SIGNATURE-