Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-12-05 Thread Michael . Dillon

 Thanks very much for this link (and the summary). I see an interesting 
 (if not surprising) trend in Advertised AS Count. Up until 2001 it was 
 accelerating... and after 2001 its stayed linear. However, unadvertised 
 AS count which was basically stagnant has increased markedly before 
then.

Those are not unadvertised ASNs. Those are only ASNs
which have been issued but are undetectable by his monitoring
tools. That doesn't mean that they are not advertised, just
that his tool cannot detect them. Given the fact that the
Internet is now thoroughly global with rich interconnectivity
in most regions of the globe, it is hardly surprising that lots
of ASNs do not get advertised globally.

The trend you see is likely cause by rich local interconnectivity
becoming the norm rather than a few circuits from the capital 
city to some big U.S. city.

--Michael Dillon



Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-12-04 Thread Deepak Jain




14 October 2010

http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asns/



Thanks very much for this link (and the summary). I see an interesting 
(if not surprising) trend in Advertised AS Count. Up until 2001 it was 
accelerating... and after 2001 its stayed linear. However, unadvertised 
AS count which was basically stagnant has increased markedly before then.


If this is an observation others have already made... um, consider me 
out of the loop. :)


Deepak




Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-12-03 Thread Geoff Huston


At 01:06 PM 30/11/2006, Deepak Jain wrote:

Does anyone have a current projection of when AS# (16 bit) exhaust will occur?



14 October 2010

http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asns/

regards,

Geoff



Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-11-30 Thread Todd Vierling


On 11/29/06, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for 128 bit
AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing about how
silly 32 bit AS#s seem.


I hope to be long dead before we exhaust 4 billion ASNs.  If I'm
still alive then, someone probably transferred my brain into a
positronic neural network, and Earth is long since uninhabitable by
organic life.  But I wouldn't doubt if some threads like this are
still running on HSNOG (Hyperspace Network Off-topic Gripes).

Hm.  I think I need to get some lunch before the office cafeteria closes.

--
-- Todd Vierling [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-11-29 Thread Marshall Eubanks


Seems relevant.

Begin forwarded message:


From: IESG Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 29, 2006 10:32:38 AM EST
To: IETF Announcement list ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

 Original Message 
Subject: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:56:13 -0500
From: IESG Secretary
To: IANA
CC: IESG

Dear IANA,

The IESG has approved the expansion of the size of the AS Number
registry described in draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes-12.txt before the  
approval

of the document. Please expand the AS Number space to include the
values 65536 through 4294967295, initially marked as Held by IANA.

Allocations can be made to the RIRs prior to the publication of
this RFC.

Thank You,
The IESG

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce




Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-11-29 Thread Deepak Jain



Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for 128 bit 
AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing about how 
silly 32 bit AS#s seem.


Does anyone have a current projection of when AS# (16 bit) exhaust will 
occur?


Thanks,

Deepak

Marshall Eubanks wrote:


Seems relevant.

Begin forwarded message:


From: IESG Secretary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 29, 2006 10:32:38 AM EST
To: IETF Announcement list ietf-announce@ietf.org
Subject: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

 Original Message 
Subject: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:56:13 -0500
From: IESG Secretary
To: IANA
CC: IESG

Dear IANA,

The IESG has approved the expansion of the size of the AS Number
registry described in draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes-12.txt before the approval
of the document. Please expand the AS Number space to include the
values 65536 through 4294967295, initially marked as Held by IANA.

Allocations can be made to the RIRs prior to the publication of
this RFC.

Thank You,
The IESG

___
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce





Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

2006-11-29 Thread Chris L. Morrow



On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Deepak Jain wrote:



 Afraid so. I'm hoping to be out of the industry before calls for 128 bit
 AS#s come down the pipe and people (at that time) are laughing about how
 silly 32 bit AS#s seem.

 Does anyone have a current projection of when AS# (16 bit) exhaust will
 occur?

anyone have a swag at the number of things that this (32bit asn) touches?

netflow
bgp (duh!)
provisioning databases/systems
web-pages (really the backend parts like routeviews query/search tools)


yeesh :(