RE: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)

2006-09-14 Thread Michael . Dillon

  Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki; 

 I might just to watch the hilarity.  Is there any real interest in this?

Do we want another wiki to compete with http://nanog.cluepon.net ?

Mediawiki is a good idea, but proliferation is not so good.
Also, if you want to contribute, why not write up a page
or two for the existing wiki?

--Michael Dillon



Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)

2006-09-13 Thread Frank Coluccio

Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki; and no, while I'd like to, I'm 
not
at this time volunteering to admin ;)

Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile

On Wed Sep 13 15:43 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:


 It's insulting
 when you trim the message to a shorter statement that you are
 responding to.  The other 18 lines may not have been important to this
 particular response but they were not content free.

If your content was in any way, interesting, then people
will have read it in the message that you posted. I see
no need to repeat a bunch of irrelevant text when I am
only replying to one point in your email.

Personally, I wish more people would trim away all the
irrelevant junk when replying.

On the other hand, in the corporate world I find that
the habit of top posting is very useful to me. I often
see things that were never intended to be sent to me
and I often discover that the previous replies in a thread
betray the fact that the writer did not read or did not
understand the original message. 

But on a mailing list, trimmed replies are superior.

--Michael Dillon

P.S. are the standards of this list so unclear that
Darcy and I have to discuss this? Who is right?






Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)

2006-09-13 Thread Joe Abley



Le 2006-09-13 à 15:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :


P.S. are the standards of this list so unclear that
Darcy and I have to discuss this? Who is right?


http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Posting_Style_Conventions


Joe

RE: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)

2006-09-13 Thread Andrew Kirch



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
 Frank Coluccio
 Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:48 PM
 To: nanog@merit.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen)
 
 
 Perhaps the list should be turned into a wiki; and no, while I'd like
to,
 I'm not
 at this time volunteering to admin ;)
 

I might just to watch the hilarity.  Is there any real interest in this?
MediaWiki with restricted editing for people on the NANOG list.

Andrew



Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)

2006-09-13 Thread Joe Abley



Le 2006-09-13 à 15:59, Andrew Kirch a écrit :

I might just to watch the hilarity.  Is there any real interest in  
this?

MediaWiki with restricted editing for people on the NANOG list.


At the risk of repeating myself, http://nanog.cluepon.net/. This is  
a NANOG wiki with somewhat restricted editing (you have to register  
an account) running on MediaWiki.



Joe




Re: Watch your replies (was Kremen....)

2006-09-13 Thread Justin M. Streiner


On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


It's insulting
when you trim the message to a shorter statement that you are
responding to.  The other 18 lines may not have been important to this
particular response but they were not content free.


If your content was in any way, interesting, then people
will have read it in the message that you posted. I see
no need to repeat a bunch of irrelevant text when I am
only replying to one point in your email.

Personally, I wish more people would trim away all the
irrelevant junk when replying.


I'm not singling any one person out, but when a thread that started off 
talking about RIR policy issues and IP address portability debate gets 
this far off track, then it's time for that thread to die or be taken 
out-of-band.


Agreed?

jms