Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-17 Thread chuck goolsbee


Or say, lots of processing somewhere short term - like video 
editing/rendering/whatever at the Olympic games.


Rendering maybe, but editing needs human space...

http://www.confidencebay.com


--chuck


Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-17 Thread Jim Popovitch

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:20 -0700, chuck goolsbee wrote:
 Or say, lots of processing somewhere short term - like video 
 editing/rendering/whatever at the Olympic games.
 
 Rendering maybe, but editing needs human space...

Not even rendering... streaming it back to your established production
facility is cheaper in the long run then having your camera folks haul a
box of servers around everywhere they go.  ;-)


Die thread Die!

-Jim P.



RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-15 Thread Lorell Hathcock


On 15/10/2007, at 12:05 AM, Simon Lyall wrote:
 As for where the Blackboxes will be used, It'll be where companies  
 want
 servers in place in weeks or months and existing datacenters are  
 full or
 in the wrong place. Think of a building full of people processing
 insurance claims in India or a cluster delivering video on demand  
 in each
 Asian city with more than 500,000 people.

Or say, lots of processing somewhere short term - like video editing/ 
rendering/whatever at the Olympic games.

That kind of work is better suited to a central location where your
editing/rendering/whatever staff is established and non-transient.  In the
film industry, the people on set are largely local to the set and are there
to run the lights, electrical, camera, etc.  The editing goes on back in the
studio.

Still, there are good uses for this kind of platform.  Perhaps in cases
where the amount of data to be captured outstrips the ability/bandwidth
available to transmit that data back in (near) realtime?

The seismic / geophone industry (if that's what it's called) has a box like
this they have used for years.  It has a satellite uplink for data
transmission back to base after gathering large amounts of data from
geophones.  The processing of that data is done back at home base.

Lorell



RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-15 Thread Lorell Hathcock
I think the better approach is to not purchase one but to do a lease so
that the hardware stays refreshed and keeps up with technology.  I'm not
sure if they've got a service model for doing the leases but would be a
great way to go for large organizations where you can pay a fee to have them
on standby but managed by Sun or the provider and brought to disaster sites
on-demand.  

 

That is an interesting approach.  

 

 It would be interesting to talk to someone that has used one during a
major event to get their take on them including spin up time to bring them
online.  

 

I hope to do so through this thread.

 

Lorell

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lorell Hathcock
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 6:07 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

That's the issue with these things.  It seems that everyone likes the idea,
but no one wants to be the early adopters.

 

It was pointed out to me that Google has patented the idea, but yet Sun has
working on Project Blackbox for a couple of years.  I wonder if there will
be a legal battle between the two over this.

 

The concept of a portable data center is seems like it could have some very
specific uses.  Others?

 

-  Military

-  Geo Physical / Seismic

-  Disaster Recovery

-  New Media / Web 2.0

 

The same box could also serve these industries with the same buildings but
in a permanent location.  Others?

 

-  Telecommunications / Fiber

-  Semi-Permanent Data Centers 

 

Lorell

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hex
Star
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 3:49 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

 

 

On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

www.sun.com/blackbox

 

Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?

 

I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston.  I would love to take a
tour.

 

Also, is anyone using anything like this?  It seems like they would make
great fiber huts.

 

 

 


I also find this very interesting but don't really know of anyone who has
deployed this in their business



Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-14 Thread Andy Davidson



On 14 Oct 2007, at 01:26, Jim Popovitch wrote:


-  New Media / Web 2.0

HUH?


I understand what Lorell means - the web 2.0 scaling model is to  
throw resources, rather than intelligence at your bottlenecks.



I met some 'web 2' people at a conference quite recently, and they  
were telling me their platform scales because they can keep throwing  
servers at a cluster and performance increases.  Problem is that it  
needs to scale early, and scale often.  I asked if any of them  
understood the power requirements of a typical server, whether they'd  
heard of the power constraints in the datacentres that they'd all  
heard of, and how this model affected their new company's OSS costs  
long-term, and none of them knew.


Scaling meant something else when I was solving these problems for  
the first time.


Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-14 Thread Simon Lyall

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Andy Davidson wrote:
 I understand what Lorell means - the web 2.0 scaling model is to
 throw resources, rather than intelligence at your bottlenecks.

I think this is a little hard. Just about all the Web 2.0 presentations I
see have a big bit that says that how they had to redesign and rearchitect
each time their customer level increased by a factor or 10 or so. The
newer companies are learning from this and implementing scaling from the
start.

Most of these companies are less than a dozen people and sometimes go from
nothing to Top 1000 site in months or a year or two. The aim these days
is to make sure you can do that.

Take a look at Pages 8-11 of this ( ppt - flash presentation):

http://s3.amazonaws.com/slideshare/ssplayer.swf?id=122183doc=aiderss-aws-the-startup-project708

These people don't care about power, space, aircon and bandwidth problems.
They just buy off others companies (eg Amazon) who specialise in those
problems and charge the Web 2.0 companies what it costs them to solve.

As for where the Blackboxes will be used, It'll be where companies want
servers in place in weeks or months and existing datacenters are full or
in the wrong place. Think of a building full of people processing
insurance claims in India or a cluster delivering video on demand in each
Asian city with more than 500,000 people.


-- 
Simon Lyall  |  Very Busy  |  Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz/
To stay awake all night adds a day to your life - Stilgar | eMT.



Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-14 Thread Nathan Ward


On 15/10/2007, at 12:05 AM, Simon Lyall wrote:
As for where the Blackboxes will be used, It'll be where companies  
want
servers in place in weeks or months and existing datacenters are  
full or

in the wrong place. Think of a building full of people processing
insurance claims in India or a cluster delivering video on demand  
in each

Asian city with more than 500,000 people.


Or say, lots of processing somewhere short term - like video editing/ 
rendering/whatever at the Olympic games.


--
Nathan Ward


Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-13 Thread Hex Star
On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  www.sun.com/blackbox



 Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?



 I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston.  I would love to take a
 tour.



 Also, is anyone using anything like this?  It seems like they would make
 great fiber huts.






I also find this very interesting but don't really know of anyone who has
deployed this in their business


RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-13 Thread Lorell Hathcock
That's the issue with these things.  It seems that everyone likes the idea,
but no one wants to be the early adopters.

 

It was pointed out to me that Google has patented the idea, but yet Sun has
working on Project Blackbox for a couple of years.  I wonder if there will
be a legal battle between the two over this.

 

The concept of a portable data center is seems like it could have some very
specific uses.  Others?

 

-  Military

-  Geo Physical / Seismic

-  Disaster Recovery

-  New Media / Web 2.0

 

The same box could also serve these industries with the same buildings but
in a permanent location.  Others?

 

-  Telecommunications / Fiber

-  Semi-Permanent Data Centers 

 

Lorell

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hex
Star
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 3:49 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

 

 

On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

www.sun.com/blackbox

 

Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?

 

I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston.  I would love to take a
tour.

 

Also, is anyone using anything like this?  It seems like they would make
great fiber huts.

 

 

 


I also find this very interesting but don't really know of anyone who has
deployed this in their business



RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-13 Thread Jim Popovitch

On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 17:07 -0500, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
 -  Disaster Recovery

I can see portable generators being part of DR, but not one or more
portable data centers.  How long would it take you to start up a second
instance of all the hosts and devices you have in a data centers?  Isn't
the purpose of DR to recover quickly?  I've seen a zillion data centers,
and I've never seen two that look alike or carry the same sub systems.
So the value of this idea is the case with the empty rackspace
(IMHO) but then I would have to pre-fill it with all my same-kind
hardware and then store it somewhere safe until I needed it, and I would
want it online so that I could keep it in sync... at that point it's
only benefit is that I could move it from site to site as hookup costs
(data/power) fluctuate.

 -  New Media / Web 2.0

HUH?

Like everyone else I think the idea is cool... just not sure how
valuable it is.   Then again, CALEA brings a different perspective, the
DOJ could have a thousand of these things on standby ready to park
outside your offices when necessary. :rolleyes:

-Jim P.



RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-13 Thread Jerry Dixon
We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great concept.
I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth checking out.  I
believe FEMA was in process of looking into leveraging them for disaster
command centers along with the military.  
 
I think the better approach is to not purchase one but to do a lease so that
the hardware stays refreshed and keeps up with technology.  I'm not sure if
they've got a service model for doing the leases but would be a great way to
go for large organizations where you can pay a fee to have them on standby
but managed by Sun or the provider and brought to disaster sites on-demand.

 
It would be interesting to talk to someone that has used one during a major
event to get their take on them including spin up time to bring them online.

 
Jerry

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lorell Hathcock
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 6:07 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center



That's the issue with these things.  It seems that everyone likes the idea,
but no one wants to be the early adopters.

 

It was pointed out to me that Google has patented the idea, but yet Sun has
working on Project Blackbox for a couple of years.  I wonder if there will
be a legal battle between the two over this.

 

The concept of a portable data center is seems like it could have some very
specific uses.  Others?

 

-  Military

-  Geo Physical / Seismic

-  Disaster Recovery

-  New Media / Web 2.0

 

The same box could also serve these industries with the same buildings but
in a permanent location.  Others?

 

-  Telecommunications / Fiber

-  Semi-Permanent Data Centers 

 

Lorell

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hex
Star
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 3:49 PM
To: Lorell Hathcock; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

 

 

On 10/12/07, Lorell Hathcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

www.sun.com/blackbox

 

Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?

 

I hear that there's been one sighted in Houston.  I would love to take a
tour.

 

Also, is anyone using anything like this?  It seems like they would make
great fiber huts.

 

 

 


I also find this very interesting but don't really know of anyone who has
deployed this in their business



Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-13 Thread Alan Clegg
Jerry Dixon wrote:

 We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great
 concept.  I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth
 checking out.  I believe FEMA was in process of looking into leveraging
 them for disaster command centers along with the military. 

As a long time network professional, volunteer firefighter, CERT[*] team
member/instructor, and Red Cross disaster response volunteer, I'd wonder
why ANYONE would want one of these.

If your command center is close enough to require this specialized
configuration, YOU ARE TOO CLOSE.  Please stay somewhere that you have
functional/reliable power, walls that are not falling down, and hotel
rooms for your staff.

The idea of moving your data center INTO the hot zone would scare the
bejeebers out of me.  I've been to large fires, hurricane aftermath,
floods, tornado paths, and nowhere have I seen a need for these things.

If you have a spare data center somewhere geographically diverse from
your primary, you're golden and you don't need a unit like this.

The concept of moving one of these things into an area that is still
without normal utilities is not only dangerous to the equipment in the
box, but also begins to steal from the limited resources that are being
used to rehabilitate the incident scene.

Why not get a couple of high-powered communication trucks that would
allow network connectivity from the disaster zone instead of endangering
your hardware and putting non-essential personnel into a dangerous
situation?

Who's going to hire the private army that you are going to need to
protect these monsters? (I understand that one is available) And who's
bringing in the food for the poor technicians that are being deployed
with the crate?

If you have the choice of using preciously scarce fuel to power your
data center in a box or to help prepare and transport meals to people in
need, which will you do?

Maybe I'm missing the point.

If you told me you were using one of these to deploy a preliminary data
center while a permanent facility was being built, I'd think you were
much more on track, but for emergencies?

AlanC

[*] Community Emergency Response Team, not computer related:
http://www.wakecountycert.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-13 Thread Jerry Dixon


Poor word choice on my part regarding command center versus data  
service augmentation.


However there are many capabilities that this setup can bring to bear  
no differently than a military TOC is established out in a forward  
operating site.


I do agree that a good DR plan and hot/warm sites are a necessity for  
critical services however there are uses for this capability.  One  
only needs to look at Katrina or 9/11 where a solution like this would  
have shown benefits in augmenting a larger DR plan and quickly  
providing computing or network services depending on how it was built  
out.


Just to add a disclaimer, these are my opinions and not an official  
stance by the government.


Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Jerry Dixon wrote:


We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great
concept.  I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth
checking out.  I believe FEMA was in process of looking into  
leveraging

them for disaster command centers along with the military.


As a long time network professional, volunteer firefighter, CERT[*]  
team
member/instructor, and Red Cross disaster response volunteer, I'd  
wonder

why ANYONE would want one of these.

If your command center is close enough to require this specialized
configuration, YOU ARE TOO CLOSE.  Please stay somewhere that you have
functional/reliable power, walls that are not falling down, and hotel
rooms for your staff.

The idea of moving your data center INTO the hot zone would scare the
bejeebers out of me.  I've been to large fires, hurricane aftermath,
floods, tornado paths, and nowhere have I seen a need for these  
things.


If you have a spare data center somewhere geographically diverse  
from

your primary, you're golden and you don't need a unit like this.

The concept of moving one of these things into an area that is still
without normal utilities is not only dangerous to the equipment in  
the
box, but also begins to steal from the limited resources that are  
being

used to rehabilitate the incident scene.

Why not get a couple of high-powered communication trucks that would
allow network connectivity from the disaster zone instead of  
endangering

your hardware and putting non-essential personnel into a dangerous
situation?

Who's going to hire the private army that you are going to need to
protect these monsters? (I understand that one is available) And who's
bringing in the food for the poor technicians that are being deployed
with the crate?

If you have the choice of using preciously scarce fuel to power your
data center in a box or to help prepare and transport meals to  
people in

need, which will you do?

Maybe I'm missing the point.

If you told me you were using one of these to deploy a preliminary  
data

center while a permanent facility was being built, I'd think you were
much more on track, but for emergencies?

AlanC

[*] Community Emergency Response Team, not computer related:
http://www.wakecountycert.org



RE: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center

2007-10-12 Thread Buhrmaster, Gary

 Subject: Sun Project Blackbox / Portable Data Center
 
 www.sun.com/blackbox
 
  
 
 Has anyone seen one of these things in real life?

SLAC has a blackbox (which is actually white) 
installed, and running it packed with servers
for batch computing for the high energy physics program.

http://today.slac.stanford.edu/feature/2007/blackbox1.asp

Of course, using shipping containers for data centers
(and telco/networking) is not new, but this is a 
commercialized offering, rather than custom built
(although these early ones are still essentially
custom built).  

Note also that Google has (recently) patented
the modular data center

http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/09/1543256from=rss

Gary