[OT] Micros~1 Sysinternals
[Off Topic] [Dont annoy the MLC by making this a thread] [MLC: *waves hand, jedi style* This post is okay.] All, I dont know the politics behind it, but whenever things like this come out, it usually means the viability is being questioned. MS has put out a survey w.r.t. Sysinternals, formerly sysinternals.combut now part of the Microsoft collective. If you use, or have used, Sysinternals tools [1] (invaluable to those with clue trying to deal with MS crap), you know its value. As SANS writes, "If you are a Sysinternals user please consider taking five minutes to contribute to their future." It took me about a minute and a half. The link URL is below at #2, or *http://tinyurl.com/mvtd6d* -jamie [1] http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/default.aspx [2] SURVEY LINK : *http://tinyurl.com/mvtd6d* , aka http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB229A879HFVU -- Jamie Rishaw // .com.a...@j <- reverse it. ish. [Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Jorge Amodio wrote: Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU The correct URL is http://youtube.com/watch?v=Qh3i6lDqWBM Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> Wow !!!, Randy with the anti-grumpyness filter sounds and looks quite >> different. > > it was the duct tape He, he, BTW your interview was really good. Hope some folks get the point that besides many of the challenges to transition to v6 the real deal is what you put very clearly in just one word: "experience". Cheers
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
> Wow !!!, Randy with the anti-grumpyness filter sounds and looks quite > different. it was the duct tape
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
> Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU Wow !!!, Randy with the anti-grumpyness filter sounds and looks quite different. Marvelous technologies of these days ... Cheers
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
Am 12.06.2009 um 20:59 schrieb Ken A: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://youtube.com/ "It's not just you! http://youtube.com looks down from here." seems like a hickup :-) Amazing that even such big sites , with a mega infrastructure, tons of servers and people behind it can´t guarantee 100% uptime greetings marc Ken Arno Meulenkamp wrote: As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the second in a series of interviews. Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Cheers, Arno Meulenkamp RIPE NCC -- Ken Anderson Pacific Internet - http://www.pacific.net -- Les enfants teribbles - research / deployment Marc Manthey Vogelsangerstrasse 97 D - 50823 Köln - Germany Vogelsangerstrasse 97 Geo: 50.945554, 6.920293 PGP/GnuPG: 0x1ac02f3296b12b4d Tel.:0049-221-29891489 Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 web : http://www.let.de Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). Please note that according to the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months.
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://youtube.com/ "It's not just you! http://youtube.com looks down from here." Ken Arno Meulenkamp wrote: As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the second in a series of interviews. Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Cheers, Arno Meulenkamp RIPE NCC -- Ken Anderson Pacific Internet - http://www.pacific.net
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:03, Randy Bush wrote: > sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no ... previous ... > notice just as we have for ... ... everything !!! >>> exactly. so was the question a troll, a red herring, or just a rant? >> If you are saying that the policy can be changed > > i am saying all this is specious. > > if you don't like it, don't use it. i have been using vern's stuff for > 15 years or so, and trust him vastly more than i trust 94.3% of all the > other services you trust. > > randy > Probably so and it was not my intention to attack Vern, Berkley, ICIR nor infer that they were not trustworthy. Just pointing out a possible place for improvement from my view. ~Chris
Weekly Routing Table Report
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith . Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 13 Jun, 2009 Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary BGP routing table entries examined: 287824 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 137147 Deaggregation factor: 2.10 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 142799 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 31449 Prefixes per ASN: 9.15 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 27360 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 13306 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4089 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 96 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.6 Max AS path length visible: 29 Max AS path prepend of ASN (12026) 22 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 500 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 147 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:181 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 49 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:829 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2050857808 Equivalent to 122 /8s, 61 /16s and 155 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 55.3 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 64.0 Percentage of available address space allocated: 86.4 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 77.4 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 142267 APNIC Region Analysis Summary - Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:68490 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 24490 APNIC Deaggregation factor:2.80 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 67896 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:30776 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:3665 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 18.53 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:997 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:556 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:3.5 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 18 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 453620336 Equivalent to 27 /8s, 9 /16s and 178 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 84.5 APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079 APNIC Address Blocks58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 180/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:123257 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:65969 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.87 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 124046 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 51834 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:13033 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 9.52 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:4995 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1276 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.3 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 24 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1009227328 Equivalent to 60 /8s, 39 /16s and 150 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 194.0 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-282
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
On 12 Jun 2009, at 19:29 , Marc Manthey wrote: thanks but thats not Randy Bush its Andy Davidson Randy Bushs Video is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh3i6lDqWBM you are right! guess that tells me that cutting and pasting is dangerous.. thanks! :) Arno PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Arno Meulenkamp wrote: As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the second in a series of interviews. Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU He got larger! And developed an accent... oh wait. Randy here, but I enjoyed Andy as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh3i6lDqWBM So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Cheers, Arno Meulenkamp RIPE NCC
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
>> i am saying all this is specious. > What is really suspect is www.netalyzr.com is registered via GoDaddy and > DomainsByProxy. The IP resolves in Berkeley's IP space, but the reverse > DNS name is roland.icir.org. > > Why the hidden registration? if you knew anything about icir, vern, berkeley, ... you would have a clue. as it is, you don't. so anything sounds like black helicopters. i have work to do, so will be dropping out of this ever so exciting and informative conversation. randy
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
i am saying all this is specious. What is really suspect is www.netalyzr.com is registered via GoDaddy and DomainsByProxy. The IP resolves in Berkeley's IP space, but the reverse DNS name is roland.icir.org. Why the hidden registration? I realize Educause won't register a .com for you, but do you really need to be obtuse about who owns the domain? Also .. the Netalyzr project isn't even listed on the "projects" page at www.icir.org. Cheers, Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Re: RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
Am 12.06.2009 um 19:05 schrieb Arno Meulenkamp: As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the second in a series of interviews. Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU thanks but thats not Randy Bush its Andy Davidson Randy Bushs Video is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh3i6lDqWBM greetings Marc So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Cheers, Arno Meulenkamp RIPE NCC -- Les enfants teribbles - research / deployment Marc Manthey Vogelsangerstrasse 97 D - 50823 Köln - Germany Vogelsangerstrasse 97 Geo: 50.945554, 6.920293 PGP/GnuPG: 0x1ac02f3296b12b4d Tel.:0049-221-29891489 Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 web : http://www.let.de Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). Please note that according to the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months.
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
imho, I believe you are being a little bit paranoid with a tool released by folks that have been trusted in the community for ages. As Randy said, if you don't like it or don't feel comfortable with it, don't use it. BTW, have you ever notified or made public what do you do with the response of each single ping you sent ? You ICMP packets are invading my privacy !!! :-) Cheers
RIPE NCC interview about IPv6 deployment with Randy Bush
As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to announce the second in a series of interviews. Randy Bush (IIJ) discusses IPv6 deployment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCcigLJJbvU So far, we have interviewed 22 people from the community about their experiences and are very busy editing all the video material. In the coming months, you will be able to enjoy the rest of the interviews here: http://www.youtube.com/user/RIPENCC These interviews will also be published on our e-learning page and on our IPv6 Act Now website: http://ripe.net/training/e-learning/ http://www.ipv6actnow.org/ Cheers, Arno Meulenkamp RIPE NCC PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no >>> ... previous ... notice just as we have for ... >>> ... everything !!! >> exactly. so was the question a troll, a red herring, or just a rant? > If you are saying that the policy can be changed i am saying all this is specious. if you don't like it, don't use it. i have been using vern's stuff for 15 years or so, and trust him vastly more than i trust 94.3% of all the other services you trust. randy
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:43, Randy Bush wrote: >>> sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no >> ... previous ... >>> notice just as we have for ... >> ... everything !!! > > exactly. so was the question a troll, a red herring, or just a rant? > > randy > > I guess it was just a rant, I like to know more specifically how folks intend to use data before I hand it over - and I like that promise to be at least theoretically enforceable. I am far from a lawyer but it is my understanding that an official pp is much more substantive and binding than a single FAQ answer -- especially in the eyes of the FTC. Yes policies can be changed but I can follow those changes and stop using the service/tool/etc if I don't like the changes. If you are saying that the policy can be changed after the fact to allow uses of the data for purposes or in manners other than those originally stated, I think you are wrong, see the 2004 case between the FTC and Gateway Learning as one example I know of off hand: Howard Beales, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “You can change the rules but not after the game has been played.” (http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/07/gateway.shtm) I will grant you that in this case the data being collected is probably not that sensitive, but the access to my computer is - to me at least. I for one would have used the tool immediately had there been an acceptable PP or other TOS in place but without it I hesitate... So I figured I would bring it up. ~Chris PS - if you are interested in TOS related stuff, might be worthwhile to check out http://www.tosback.org/timeline.php a new project launched by the EFF (no affiliation, just fyi)
Re: Rwhoisd solution?
Do you have a link to the information on how to get that setup? ---Chris On Jun 10, 2009, at 1:05 PM, Chris Stone wrote: Can someone please point me in the direction of an rwhoisd solution to be run on a CentOS Linux platform? ARIN is now punting rwhois queries to us and frankly i've been unable to find an easy to install/use solution to answer these queries. I've seen the rwhoisd at projects.arin.net but the documentation on it is ghastly to say the least. If you use IPPlan to manage your IP allocations, it comes with a whois daemon that'll automagically use the information from your IPPlan sql database. Chris
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
>> sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no > ... previous ... >> notice just as we have for ... > ... everything !!! exactly. so was the question a troll, a red herring, or just a rant? randy
Re: Cogent input
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Justin Shore wrote: > I'm in search of some information about Cogent, it's past, present and > future. I've heard bits and pieces about Cogent's past over the years but > by no means have I actively been keeping up. > I had a very positive interaction with the Cogent folks in Europe FWIW. It was seeded by their US colleagues and everyone worked closely to try and make things work operationally and economically. That signaled to me that they have some cohesiveness internally which I found to be a big plus*. At worst, allowing Cogent to seriously compete for your business can help you reduce your costs elsewhere if you are smart about it. At best, you could cut your costs and maintain the reliability that you are seeking with some strategic mitigation. Others may have different suggestions. YMMV. Best, Marty * Not an endorsement, just an opinion. -- Martin Hannigan mar...@theicelandguy.com p: +16178216079 Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
> sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no ... previous ... > notice just as we have for ... ... everything !!!
Re: Cogent input
In a message written on Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:13:02AM -0500, Justin Shore wrote: > Let me rephrase that. :-) I know of no tier-Ns that offer any native v6 > services here in the Midwest (central Kansas) including L3 which only > has a best effort pilot program using tunnels. There might be more > options in KC or OKC but not here that I'm aware of... www.tunnelbroker.net (which is HE under the hood) is available anywhere, self serve, and works great. I bring this up knowing a tunnel is not as good as native connectivity, yadda yadda yadda. My personal experience with sales folks is telling them you need IPv6 makes them go ask questions internally, while telling them you were forced to get service (a tunnel) from a competitor generally sends the entire sales force into a tizzy internally. It really drives home the point that not only are you asking, but you need it, and will go around them if necessary. This changes the equasion for them from wanting to be second (we will offer it in the market when our competitor does) to wanting to be first (we can't let our competitor pick off customers like this who are desperate for the feature). Of course, you may not want to turn up customers on such a service, but it does provide an excellent opportunity to enable your test lab, employee personal boxes, and the like so you can hit the ground running. Hard to beat for something that's free and takes 15 minutes to set up. -- Leo Bicknell - bickn...@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ pgphwsGecxnLQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Traffic billing - L2 encap to include or not?
Weber, Markus a écrit : We all have our billing systems for traffic (bought, downloaded or home made, volume based or usage). We all got hit by fancy SNMP bugs of various vendors and we all suffer from the fact, that SNMP counters do not carry a time stamp, when they had been taken from the ASICs, causing a slight derivation. [...] [../..] So, is L2 encapsulation (e.g. Ethernet) considered as framing characters or not? [../..] Hello, To my point of view, if you base your billing from L2 encapsulation you gonna bill your customers on local networks problems like, problems on L2 frames, padding (as you explain). These kind of problematic (again to my point of view) is the problem of the provider and not of the customer who buy IP traffic and not L2 traffic. Renaud
Traffic billing - L2 encap to include or not?
We all have our billing systems for traffic (bought, downloaded or home made, volume based or usage). We all got hit by fancy SNMP bugs of various vendors and we all suffer from the fact, that SNMP counters do not carry a time stamp, when they had been taken from the ASICs, causing a slight derivation. [...] Most systems (not the xflow based ones) do use IF-MIB::InOctets and IF-MIB::OutOctets or their HC counter parts to retrieve the number of transmitted bytes and do their calculation based on these numbers. What would you expect these counters to return, esp. on Ethernet? RFC2683 states ifXxxOctets The definitions of ifInOctets and ifOutOctets (and similarly, ifHCInOctets and ifHCOutOctets) specify that their values include framing characters. The media-specific MIB designer MUST specify any special conditions of the media concerning the inclusion of framing characters, especially with respect to frames with errors. The total number of octets transmitted out of/received on the interface, including framing characters." So, is L2 encapsulation (e.g. Ethernet) considered as framing characters or not? Cisco does count them (looks like they also count the FCS), while Juniper does not (at least not on their routers) with above MIBs. So who's right? Which brings me to the question: How do others handle this? Do your customers have to pay for the L2 encapsulation overhead or not? Does your (special) G T&C address this? Does your system adjust the numbers by adding/subtracting L2 enc overhead * number of transmitted packets? Or do you just live with it as it is (and hope, your provider uses J-counters to do their billing). Oh, it's Friday ... Markus PS1: And what about padding? IP packets could be smaller then the min ethernet frame size ... (think of some kind of DOS attacks) ... PS2: Oh, maybe someone could check on J switches - would be nice to know ... -- [E] Markus Weber [IRC] FvD [T] +49 69 96874-298 [F] -289 [KPN Eurorings B.V. Darmstädter Landstraße 184 D-60598 Frankfurt] [HRB56874 Amtsgericht Frankfurt Carolien Nijhuis+Louis Rustenhoven]
Re: Cogent input
Paul Timmins wrote: GlobalCrossing told me today I can order native IPv6 anywhere on their network. Don't know if they count as Tier 1 on your list, though. VZB has given me tunnels for a while, hopefully they'll get their pMTU issue fixed so we can do more interesting things with it. I'd love to have GLBX but I'm positive that they aren't available here. We'd have to pay for transport to a much larger market to go get them. That may be more feasible when the state network gets built but that's a few years off. Until then I'll have to dream about GBLX... Justin
Re: Cogent input
John van Oppen wrote: NTT (2914) and GBLX (3549) both do native v6... most everyone else on the tier1 list does tunnels. :( There are some nice tier2 networks who do native v6, tiscali and he.net come to mind. Let me rephrase that. :-) I know of no tier-Ns that offer any native v6 services here in the Midwest (central Kansas) including L3 which only has a best effort pilot program using tunnels. There might be more options in KC or OKC but not here that I'm aware of... Justin
The Cidr Report
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 12 21:13:51 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date PrefixesCIDR Agg
05-06-09293617 183706
06-06-09294620 183567
07-06-09294066 182882
08-06-09294012 183175
09-06-09294091 183252
10-06-09293965 183136
11-06-09292531 183769
12-06-09294158 183680
AS Summary
31555 Number of ASes in routing system
13395 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
4288 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS6389 : BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc.
89748736 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS27064: DNIC-ASBLK-27032-27159 - DoD Network Information Center
Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').
--- 12Jun09 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
Table 294180 183434 11074637.6% All ASes
AS6389 4288 343 394592.0% BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
BellSouth.net Inc.
AS4323 4273 1780 249358.3% TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
inc.
AS17488 1600 299 130181.3% HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over
Cable Internet
AS4766 1815 520 129571.3% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS4755 1243 144 109988.4% TATACOMM-AS TATA
Communications formerly VSNL
is Leading ISP
AS1785 1685 642 104361.9% AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
Communications, Inc.
AS22773 1062 67 99593.7% ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
Cox Communications Inc.
AS8151 1464 548 91662.6% Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS19262 1014 236 77876.7% VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon
Internet Services Inc.
AS8452 981 278 70371.7% TEDATA TEDATA
AS18566 1062 423 63960.2% COVAD - Covad Communications
Co.
AS18101 753 157 59679.2% RIL-IDC Reliance Infocom Ltd
Internet Data Centre,
AS17908 656 66 59089.9% TCISL Tata Communications
AS6478 1375 790 58542.5% ATT-INTERNET3 - AT&T WorldNet
Services
AS4804 679 107 57284.2% MPX-AS Microplex PTY LTD
AS11492 584 52747.4% CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC.
AS22047 591 88 50385.1% VTR BANDA ANCHA S.A.
AS7029 605 105 50082.6% WINDSTREAM - Windstream
Communications Inc
AS2706 536 44 49291.8% PI-HK Pacnet Internet (Hong
Kong) Limited
AS17676 564 80 48485.8% GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp.
AS24560 714 246 46865.5% AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
Services
AS7018 1507 1042 46530.9% ATT-INTERNET4 - AT&T WorldNet
Services
AS4808 631 166 46573.7% CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
network China169 Beijing
Province Network
AS4134 892 434 45851.3% CHINANET-BACKBONE
No.31,Jin-rong Street
AS7545 810 383 42752.7% TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Internet
Pty Ltd
AS9443 514 90 42482.5% INTERNETPRIMUS-AS-AP Primus
Telecommunications
AS7011 977 564 41342.3% FRONTIER-AND-CITIZENS -
Frontier Communications of
America, Inc.
AS4668 693 284 40959.0% LGNET-AS-KR LG CNS
AS6517 650 246 40462.2% RELIANCEGLOBALCOM - Reliance
Globalcom
BGP Update Report
BGP Update Report Interval: 28-Apr-09 -to- 29-May-09 (32 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS919858785 1.0% 233.3 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 2 - AS638957303 1.0% 13.1 -- BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc. 3 - AS21491 54595 0.9%1819.8 -- UTL-ON-LINE UTL On-line is RF broadband ISP in Uganda - Africa 4 - AS845253246 0.9% 41.6 -- TEDATA TEDATA 5 - AS815148723 0.8% 12.6 -- Uninet S.A. de C.V. 6 - AS313046229 0.8% 179.9 -- RGNET-3130 RGnet/PSGnet 7 - AS35805 45913 0.8% 127.2 -- UTG-AS United Telecom AS 8 - AS17974 36111 0.6% 33.2 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 9 - AS10834 35811 0.6% 14.1 -- Telefonica Data Argentina S.A. 10 - AS20115 35268 0.6% 20.9 -- CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter Communications 11 - AS505634984 0.6% 296.5 -- INS-NET-2 - Iowa Network Services 12 - AS424932651 0.6% 180.4 -- LILLY-AS - Eli Lilly and Company 13 - AS17488 32059 0.5% 19.0 -- HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over Cable Internet 14 - AS33776 31203 0.5% 269.0 -- STARCOMMS-ASN 15 - AS432330360 0.5% 7.0 -- TWTC - tw telecom holdings, inc. 16 - AS30890 26554 0.5% 48.8 -- EVOLVA Evolva Telecom 17 - AS292025925 0.4% 316.2 -- LACOE - Los Angeles County Office of Education 18 - AS29372 25107 0.4% 317.8 -- SFR-NETWORK SFR 19 - AS505025065 0.4%1790.4 -- PSC-EXT - Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center 20 - AS10620 24077 0.4% 24.3 -- TV Cable S.A. TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix) Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS16931 18144 0.3%9072.0 -- GLOBAL-PAYMENTS-1 - Global Payments, Inc. 2 - AS15045 16317 0.3%4079.2 -- KITTELSON - KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 3 - AS23535 0.1% 4.0 -- NAVITAIRE-AS-AU-AP Accenture - Navitaire, 4 - AS32398 20661 0.3%3443.5 -- REALNET-ASN-1 5 - AS131532542 0.0%2542.0 -- ONEWORLD OneWorld S.A. 6 - AS292292444 0.0%2444.0 -- ASDA-AS Assotiation for the Development of West Athens 7 - AS8499 2252 0.0%2252.0 -- Space Hellas Network Operation Center (NOC) 8 - AS13325 16858 0.3%2107.2 -- STOMI - State of Michigan, DMB-CNOC 9 - AS398034171 0.1%2085.5 -- UTI-AS SC UTI COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS SRL 10 - AS396995751 0.1%1917.0 -- SSPOY-AS Salon Seudun Puhelin Oy 11 - AS476405581 0.1%1860.3 -- TRICOMPAS Tricomp Sp. z. o. o. 12 - AS21491 54595 0.9%1819.8 -- UTL-ON-LINE UTL On-line is RF broadband ISP in Uganda - Africa 13 - AS505025065 0.4%1790.4 -- PSC-EXT - Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center 14 - AS172361271 0.0%1271.0 -- TULSAL-74103 - Tulsa City-County Library 15 - AS354007612 0.1%1268.7 -- MFIST Interregoinal Organization Network Technologies 16 - AS282561241 0.0%1241.0 -- 17 - AS289532317 0.0%1158.5 -- PIRAEUSBANK Greek banking institution 18 - AS472991086 0.0%1086.0 -- DRSA-AS Dlugie Rozmowy S.A. 19 - AS414921082 0.0%1082.0 -- EXIMBANK-AS SC Eximbank SA 20 - AS249942136 0.0%1068.0 -- GENESYS-AS GENESYS Informatica AS for announcing own prefixes TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name 1 - 72.23.246.0/2424597 0.4% AS5050 -- PSC-EXT - Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center 2 - 41.204.2.0/24 20567 0.3% AS32398 -- REALNET-ASN-1 3 - 64.69.192.0/2018134 0.3% AS16931 -- GLOBAL-PAYMENTS-1 - Global Payments, Inc. 4 - 192.12.120.0/24 10437 0.2% AS5691 -- MITRE-AS-5 - The MITRE Corporation 5 - 89.218.218.0/237837 0.1% AS9198 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 6 - 89.218.220.0/237833 0.1% AS9198 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 7 - 92.46.244.0/23 7830 0.1% AS9198 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 8 - 95.59.4.0/22 7823 0.1% AS9198 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 9 - 95.59.2.0/23 7818 0.1% AS9198 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 10 - 95.59.8.0/23 7817 0.1% AS9198 -- KAZTELECOM-AS Kazakhtelecom Corporate Sales Administration 11 - 123.49.152.0/247538 0.1% AS18118 -- CITICNET-AP CITIC Networks Management Co.,Ltd. 12 - 90.150.0.0/24 7284 0.1% AS35400 -- MFIST Interregoinal Organization Network Technologies 13 - 63.144.223.0/247006 0.1% AS30221 -- T3COM - T3 Commun
Re: Cogent input
That might be because some bigger providers in the Netherlands are throwing out transits that don't support IPv6. So there's your commercial necessity ;-) Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: Hi! Should have said "And, they have no plans to deploy IPv6 in the immediate future." :) "Cogent's official stance on IPv6 is that we will deploy IPv6 when it becomes a commercial necessity. We have tested IPv6 and we have our plan for rolling it out, but there are no commercial drivers to spend money to upgrade a network to IPv6 for no real return on investment." Thats strange they are running pilots with customers on v6 in Amsterdam. Bye, Raymond. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Jeroen Wunnink, EasyHosting B.V. Systeembeheerder systeembeh...@easyhosting.nl telefoon:+31 (035) 6285455 Postbus 48 fax: +31 (035) 6838242 3755 ZG Eemnes http://www.easyhosting.nl http://www.easycolocate.nl
Re: ICSI Netalyzr launch
> Why no privacy policy? Or am I just partially blind? Is an answer in > a FAQ legally binding? sure, we need a privacy policy that can be arbitrarily changed with no notice just as we have for ... randy
