Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy.

2011-12-16 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Dec 15, 2011 10:35 PM, Brielle Bruns br...@2mbit.com wrote:

 On 12/15/11 3:31 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:

 On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:36:32 -0500, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org
 wrote:

 ... I had thought new allocations are based on demonstrated need. The
 fact that addresses are in use would seem to suggest they're needed.


 That depends on how you see their demontrated need. The way I look at
 it, if you build your network squatting on someone elses addresses,
 that's a problem of your own making and does not equate to any
 immediate need on my (channeling ARIN) part. This is a mess they
 created for themselves and should have known was going to bite them in
 the ass sooner than later. Translation: they should have started working
 to resolve this a long time ago. (or never done it in the first place.)

 And if I may say, they've demonstrated no need at all for public address
 space. They simply need to stop using 5/8 as if it were 10/8 -- i.e.
 they need more private address space. They don't need *public* IPv4
 space for that. They will need to re-engineer their network to handle
 the addressing overlaps (ala NAT444.)



 Heh, if this is about TMO, then they're squatting on alot more then just
5/8...  My phone has an IP address in 22/8, and I've seen it get IPs in
25/8, 26/8 as well.

 I've always wondered what the deal was with the obviously squatted
addresses that my device gets.



5/8 is not used for squat space in this case, somebody along this thread
mentioned 5/8 as an example, not a data point.  There's an effort to avoid
squat space that appears in the dfz. Yes, that is a moving target.

Cb

 --
 Brielle Bruns
 The Summit Open Source Development Group
 http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org



Re: BGP and Firewalls...

2011-12-16 Thread Colin Alston
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Gregory Croft gcr...@shoremortgage.com wrote:
 Does anyone have any experience with using firewalls as edge devices
 when BGP is concerned?

Doing so very successfully with Fortigate devices.



Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

2011-12-16 Thread Blake Hudson

Requests to this address appear to go unanswered?

Dave Temkin wrote the following on 12/11/2011 6:29 PM:
Feel free to contact peering@netflixdotcom - we're happy to provide 
you with delivery statistics for traffic terminating on your network.


Regards,
-Dave Temkin
Netflix

On 12/7/11 8:57 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for 
this, but you also need to consider that netflix streaming is just 
port 80 www traffic. Because netflix uses CDNs, its difficult to pin 
down the traffic to specific hosts in the CDN and say that this 
traffic was netflix, while this traffic was the latest windows update 
(remember this is often a shared hosting platform). We've done our 
own testing and have come to a good solution which uses a combination 
of nbar, packet marking, and netflow to come to a conclusion. On a 
~160Mbps link, netflix peaks out between 30-50Mbps around 8-10PM each 
evening. The rest of the traffic is predominantly other forms of HTTP 
traffic (including other video streaming services).



Martin Hepworth wrote the following on 12/3/2011 2:36 AM:
Also checkout Adrian Cockcroft presentations on their architecture 
which

describes how they use aws and CDns etc

Martin










RE: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

2011-12-16 Thread Dennis Burgess
Same here.

---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS


 -Original Message-
 From: Blake Hudson [mailto:bl...@ispn.net]
 Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:11 AM
 To: Dave Temkin
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?
 
 Requests to this address appear to go unanswered?
 
 Dave Temkin wrote the following on 12/11/2011 6:29 PM:
  Feel free to contact peering@netflixdotcom - we're happy to provide
  you with delivery statistics for traffic terminating on your network.
 
  Regards,
  -Dave Temkin
  Netflix
 
  On 12/7/11 8:57 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
  Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for
  this, but you also need to consider that netflix streaming is just
  port 80 www traffic. Because netflix uses CDNs, its difficult to pin
  down the traffic to specific hosts in the CDN and say that this
  traffic was netflix, while this traffic was the latest windows update
  (remember this is often a shared hosting platform). We've done our
  own testing and have come to a good solution which uses a combination
  of nbar, packet marking, and netflow to come to a conclusion. On a
  ~160Mbps link, netflix peaks out between 30-50Mbps around 8-10PM
 each
  evening. The rest of the traffic is predominantly other forms of HTTP
  traffic (including other video streaming services).
 
 
  Martin Hepworth wrote the following on 12/3/2011 2:36 AM:
  Also checkout Adrian Cockcroft presentations on their architecture
  which describes how they use aws and CDns etc
 
  Martin
 
 
 
 



Re: BGP and Firewalls...

2011-12-16 Thread Patrick Sumby
We run redundant solutions for a number of our customers and have always 
decoupled the routing and firewalling.


I can think of one situation where the customer manages the BGP and 
firewall failover on their firewalls, it doesn't work too well.


The issue as I see it is that in the event of a device failure if you 
only have firewalls you need to keep the firewall session states when 
failing over to the second device, the BGP sessions will not if in an 
active passive HA setup whereas user traffic states will. If you run in 
an active active setup, BGP states will remain up however user traffic 
states will not always be transferred.


If you're only using one firewall then this is not going to be an issue 
but it depends if the solution you're deploying has only redundant 
connectivity or redundant equipment as well.


My experience is mainly using Juniper routers and firewalls so not able 
to comment on the Palo Alto platform.


Decoupling the two functions gives a much better model from an NSP sales 
perspective as it means you're able to sell failover with no managed 
equipment / just managed routers / full solution with routers and firewalls.


--
---
Patrick Sumby
Network Architect
Sohonet


On 07/12/2011 17:31, Gregory Croft wrote:

Hi All,



Does anyone have any experience with using firewalls as edge devices
when BGP is concerned?

Specifically the Palo Alto series of devices.



If so please contact me off list.



Thank you.





Thank you,

Gregory S. Croft










Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

2011-12-16 Thread Paul Stewart
I'll take a guess they are back logged - they have been working on our traffic 
stats since a week before that posting made it to nanog list

--- Sent via IPhone

On 2011-12-16, at 9:16 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:

 Same here.
 
 ---
 Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer 
 Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik  WISP Support Services
 Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
 LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Blake Hudson [mailto:bl...@ispn.net]
 Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:11 AM
 To: Dave Temkin
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?
 
 Requests to this address appear to go unanswered?
 
 Dave Temkin wrote the following on 12/11/2011 6:29 PM:
 Feel free to contact peering@netflixdotcom - we're happy to provide
 you with delivery statistics for traffic terminating on your network.
 
 Regards,
 -Dave Temkin
 Netflix
 
 On 12/7/11 8:57 AM, Blake Hudson wrote:
 Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for
 this, but you also need to consider that netflix streaming is just
 port 80 www traffic. Because netflix uses CDNs, its difficult to pin
 down the traffic to specific hosts in the CDN and say that this
 traffic was netflix, while this traffic was the latest windows update
 (remember this is often a shared hosting platform). We've done our
 own testing and have come to a good solution which uses a combination
 of nbar, packet marking, and netflow to come to a conclusion. On a
 ~160Mbps link, netflix peaks out between 30-50Mbps around 8-10PM
 each
 evening. The rest of the traffic is predominantly other forms of HTTP
 traffic (including other video streaming services).
 
 
 Martin Hepworth wrote the following on 12/3/2011 2:36 AM:
 Also checkout Adrian Cockcroft presentations on their architecture
 which describes how they use aws and CDns etc
 
 Martin
 
 
 
 
 



RE: Overall Netflix bandwidth usage numbers on a network?

2011-12-16 Thread Don Bowman
From: Blake Hudson [mailto:bl...@ispn.net]



 Yeah, that's an interesting one. We currently utilize netflow for this,

 but you also need to consider that netflix streaming is just port 80

 www traffic. Because netflix uses CDNs, its difficult to pin down the

 traffic to specific hosts in the CDN and say that this traffic was

 netflix, while this traffic was the latest windows update (remember

 this is often a shared hosting platform). We've done our own testing

 and have come to a good solution which uses a combination of nbar,

 packet marking, and netflow to come to a conclusion. On a ~160Mbps

 link, netflix peaks out between 30-50Mbps around 8-10PM each evening.

 The rest of the traffic is predominantly other forms of HTTP traffic

 (including other video streaming services).



We (Sandvine) also have a product that does this measurement in the

IP network, per CDN, per device type (e.g. how much Netflix on xbox

is on Akamai vs Limelight). In addition it measures the delivered

quality per CDN.



Anyone can feel free to contact me off list for more information.



[cid:image001.jpg@01CCBBE1.BCF573A0]
inline: image001.jpg

IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Shahab Vahabzadeh
Hi everybody,
Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
flexible.
If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
Thanks

-- 
Regards,
Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek


Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Phil Regnauld
Shahab Vahabzadeh (sh.vahabzadeh) writes:
 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.

Hi Shahab,

Look at the archives for NANOG - there are plenty of solutions.

You might want to look at:
- Netdot: https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/projects/netdot
- TIPP: http://tipp.tobez.org/

Cheers,
Phil





Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Payam Poursaied
Try noc project

On Friday, December 16, 2011, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which
I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its



Comcast Mail Admin

2011-12-16 Thread Peter Kristolaitis
Apologies to the list for the noise, but if there's a clueful Comcast 
mail admin on list, can you please get in touch with me off list?  My 
employer's network is having problems sending mail to your domain, and 
several attempts to clear it up using the Blocked Provider Request 
Form have failed (it looks like the comments I provided on the form 
aren't being read, as the link I provided to some of our log snippets 
showing the problem hasn't been hit).


Thanks!
- Peter Kristolaitis
http://www.comcastsupport.com/rbl


Re: Is AS information useful for security?

2011-12-16 Thread Patrick Sumby

On 15/12/2011 16:28, Drew Weaver wrote:



-Original Message-
From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 9:45 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Is AS information useful for security?


origin-AS could be another story.  If you know of an AS that is being used by the 
bad guys for bad purposes, you can write a routing policy to dump all traffic 
to/from that AS into the bit bucket or take some other action that could be 
dictated by your security policy.  In that case, a routing policy could 
beconsidered an extension of a security policy.


I could be wrong here but I believe origin-AS uses a lookup from the routing 
table to figure out what the originAS for the source IP should be (and not what 
it explicitly IS) which means the information is unreliable.

For example if someone is sending spoofed packets towards you the origin AS 
will always show up as the originator of the real route instead of the origin 
AS of the actual traffic.

This is why it would be useful to have the originAS (from the actual origin) in 
the packet header.



How would you determine and enforce this?

Ok so a packet leaves my network that I know originated from my network 
based on some factor (IGP route existing or matched prefix list) and the 
origin AS is put into a new field in the packet header...


Whats to stop the spoofer putting that origin AS into their spoofed 
packet headers?


This means that another level of checking then needs to be put into 
inter AS BGP sessions to make sure that all traffic passing across the 
link would need to be checked to make sure origin ASs are matched.


Couldn't most of the same protection be solved by more people running 
BCP38 and RPKI?




Thanks,
-Drew







Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Rafael Rodriguez
Check out 6connect.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
 Thanks
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek



Wireless/Free Space Enterprise ISP in Palo Alto

2011-12-16 Thread Darren Bolding
Apologies if this is not the most appropriate forum for this, but I am not
aware of a better list to use.

I recently took over responsibility for the network connectivity at an
office in downtown Palo Alto (University and Emerson).  Unfortunately, and
perhaps ironically, the connectivity options here are not as great as I
would like- currently they are using DSL, there is no cable service, and
lead times for T1's and above are higher than I would like.

I have already started the process of getting fiber from the city of Palo
Alto between the office and Equinix/SD/PAIX/529 Bryant, which will resolve
the problem.  However, the city's time estimate is longer than we need, and
experience implies there may be delays.

So- I am investigating wireless/free space ISP's in downtown Palo Alto, and
also possible options for doing a point-to-point wireless connection
between our office and 529 Bryant (I am reaching out to Equinix on this).

Any pointers to known good providers, or other suggestions would be very
welcome- off list is fine.  I am already reaching out to a telecom broker,
but wanted to reach out for suggestions.

To clarify- I am trying to get either a) rapidly turned up IP transit or b)
rapidly turned up point-to-point (presumably wireless) between 529
Bryant/PAIX and the office (University and Emerson).

Thanks very much!

--D

-- 
--  Darren Bolding  --
--  dar...@bolding.org   --


Re: Wireless/Free Space Enterprise ISP in Palo Alto

2011-12-16 Thread Jared Mauch
I can't help with most, but for wireless gear check out the ubiquity nanobridge 
stuff. Cheap fast and good. I've seen these work at 5km range with high speeds 
(eg: 30-60mbps) when using 40mhz channels. 

Works well to bridge the last mile in cases where you have access to mount 
hardware. A pair costs around $180 or so. 

Jared Mauch

On Dec 16, 2011, at 1:24 PM, Darren Bolding dar...@bolding.org wrote:

 Apologies if this is not the most appropriate forum for this, but I am not
 aware of a better list to use.
 
 I recently took over responsibility for the network connectivity at an
 office in downtown Palo Alto (University and Emerson).  Unfortunately, and
 perhaps ironically, the connectivity options here are not as great as I
 would like- currently they are using DSL, there is no cable service, and
 lead times for T1's and above are higher than I would like.
 
 I have already started the process of getting fiber from the city of Palo
 Alto between the office and Equinix/SD/PAIX/529 Bryant, which will resolve
 the problem.  However, the city's time estimate is longer than we need, and
 experience implies there may be delays.
 
 So- I am investigating wireless/free space ISP's in downtown Palo Alto, and
 also possible options for doing a point-to-point wireless connection
 between our office and 529 Bryant (I am reaching out to Equinix on this).
 
 Any pointers to known good providers, or other suggestions would be very
 welcome- off list is fine.  I am already reaching out to a telecom broker,
 but wanted to reach out for suggestions.
 
 To clarify- I am trying to get either a) rapidly turned up IP transit or b)
 rapidly turned up point-to-point (presumably wireless) between 529
 Bryant/PAIX and the office (University and Emerson).
 
 Thanks very much!
 
 --D
 
 -- 
 --  Darren Bolding  --
 --  dar...@bolding.org   --



Weekly Routing Table Report

2011-12-16 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith pfsi...@gmail.com.

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 17 Dec, 2011

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  387142
Prefixes after maximum aggregation:  167902
Deaggregation factor:  2.31
Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 189021
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 39612
Prefixes per ASN:  9.77
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   32512
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   15502
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:5342
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:145
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.3
Max AS path length visible:  33
Max AS path prepend of ASN (48687)   24
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:  1923
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 999
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:   2095
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:1758
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:4191
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:2
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 90
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2502485008
Equivalent to 149 /8s, 40 /16s and 228 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   67.5
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   67.5
Percentage of available address space allocated:  100.0
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   91.7
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  163725

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:95726
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   31275
APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.06
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:   92115
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:38521
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4609
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   19.99
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   1248
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:726
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.3
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 18
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:123
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  631919968
Equivalent to 37 /8s, 170 /16s and 85 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 80.1

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 131072-132095, 132096-133119
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 175/8, 180/8,
   182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8,
   219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:146548
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:74859
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.96
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   118628
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 48721
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:14807
ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 8.01
ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:

playing NICE

2011-12-16 Thread bmanning

http://csrc.nist.gov/nice/framework/

its only a tad over 100 pages. :)  the comment period has been extended to 
january 2012.

something to read by the fire over the holiday.

/bill



I'm looking for routing/switching guys near the SF Bay Area

2011-12-16 Thread Thomas Cannon

Preferably with consulting experience. If that's you, please contact me 
directly.

Thanks.

Thomas Cannon
CCDP, CCNP, BCNE, CISSP
tcan...@c2company.commailto:tcan...@c2company.com





Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread chip
http://getipv6.info/index.php/IPv6_Management_Tools

A good list of stuffs

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Rafael Rodriguez
packetjoc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Check out 6connect.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
 Thanks

 --
 Regards,
 Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek




-- 
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc



RE: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Mike Walter
+1, agree on 6connect.net.  

-Original Message-
From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 12:55 PM
To: Shahab Vahabzadeh
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IP Management Software

Check out 6connect.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
 Thanks
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek




Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread deleskie
Not to be a bandwagon jumper but +1 for 6connect as well.
--Original Message--
From: Mike Walter
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: IP Management Software
Sent: Dec 16, 2011 4:42 PM

+1, agree on 6connect.net.  

-Original Message-
From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 12:55 PM
To: Shahab Vahabzadeh
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IP Management Software

Check out 6connect.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
 Thanks
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek




Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

BGP Update Report

2011-12-16 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Dec-11 -to- 15-Dec-11 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072

TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS42116  163949  8.9%3345.9 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
 2 - AS840244512  2.4%  24.5 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC Vimpelcom
 3 - AS982930388  1.6%  39.4 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet 
Backbone
 4 - AS27738   28941  1.6%  85.1 -- Ecuadortelecom S.A.
 5 - AS44568   25931  1.4%1525.4 -- OPSOURCE-UK OpSource, Inc
 6 - AS816325030  1.4%  80.7 -- METROTEL REDES S.A.
 7 - AS755224318  1.3%  16.0 -- VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel Corporation
 8 - AS32528   24316  1.3%4863.2 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 9 - AS20632   19939  1.1% 586.4 -- PETERSTAR-AS PeterStar
10 - AS55515   18990  1.0% 791.2 -- ONE-NET-HK INTERNET-SOLUTION -HK
11 - AS24560   14095  0.8%  14.2 -- AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti 
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia Services
12 - AS19223   13134  0.7%   13134.0 -- NTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS - Ntegrated 
Solutions
13 - AS580012855  0.7%  46.9 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD 
Network Information Center
14 - AS746512846  0.7% 988.2 -- PROCERGS - Cia. de 
Processamento de Dados do RGS
15 - AS17974   12603  0.7%   8.4 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT 
Telekomunikasi Indonesia
16 - AS607212586  0.7% 899.0 -- UNISYS-6072 For routing issues, 
email hostmas...@unisys.com
17 - AS12479   12581  0.7%  63.2 -- UNI2-AS France Telecom Espana SA
18 - AS540012104  0.7% 117.5 -- BT BT European Backbone
19 - AS39353   11082  0.6%3694.0 -- PRINCAST-AS Gobierno del 
Principado de Asturias
20 - AS17488   10341  0.6%  14.9 -- HATHWAY-NET-AP Hathway IP Over 
Cable Internet


TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS19223   13134  0.7%   13134.0 -- NTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS - Ntegrated 
Solutions
 2 - AS102095013  0.3%5013.0 -- SYNOPSYS-AS-JP-AP Japan HUB and 
Data Center
 3 - AS32528   24316  1.3%4863.2 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 4 - AS373784777  0.3%4777.0 -- NIGERIA-AIRFORCE
 5 - AS39353   11082  0.6%3694.0 -- PRINCAST-AS Gobierno del 
Principado de Asturias
 6 - AS42116  163949  8.9%3345.9 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
 7 - AS44568   25931  1.4%1525.4 -- OPSOURCE-UK OpSource, Inc
 8 - AS746512846  0.7% 988.2 -- PROCERGS - Cia. de 
Processamento de Dados do RGS
 9 - AS607212586  0.7% 899.0 -- UNISYS-6072 For routing issues, 
email hostmas...@unisys.com
10 - AS53362 857  0.1% 857.0 -- MIXIT-AS - Mixit, Inc.
11 - AS55515   18990  1.0% 791.2 -- ONE-NET-HK INTERNET-SOLUTION -HK
12 - AS38528 783  0.0% 783.0 -- LANIC-AS-AP Lao National 
Internet Committee
13 - AS31598 776  0.0% 776.0 -- TELECOMAX-AS TELECOMAX
14 - AS33621  0.2% 237.0 -- BORYSZEW BORYSZEW SPOLKA AKCYJNA
15 - AS6066 1368  0.1% 684.0 -- VERIZON-BUSINESS-MAE-AS6066 - 
Verizon Business Network Services Inc.
16 - AS20632   19939  1.1% 586.4 -- PETERSTAR-AS PeterStar
17 - AS196741646  0.1% 548.7 -- NAVPOINT - Navpoint Internet
18 - AS245621611  0.1% 537.0 -- UNESCAP-AS-AP The United 
Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP)
19 - AS21863 532  0.0% 532.0 -- DMVNOC - Internet Connection
20 - AS25910 526  0.0% 526.0 -- TELTRAX-ARIN - TELTRAX CORP.


TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
 1 - 84.204.132.0/24   19840  1.0%   AS20632 -- PETERSTAR-AS PeterStar
 2 - 67.97.156.0/2413134  0.7%   AS19223 -- NTEGRATED-SOLUTIONS - Ntegrated 
Solutions
 3 - 130.36.34.0/2412152  0.6%   AS32528 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 4 - 130.36.35.0/2412152  0.6%   AS32528 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs
 5 - 88.151.16.0/2211080  0.6%   AS39353 -- PRINCAST-AS Gobierno del 
Principado de Asturias
 6 - 46.147.72.0/22 7023  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
 7 - 46.147.80.0/22 7022  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
 8 - 95.78.20.0/22  7021  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
 9 - 95.78.4.0/22   7019  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
10 - 95.78.16.0/22  7017  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
11 - 46.147.76.0/22 7016  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
12 - 95.78.12.0/22  7013  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
13 - 46.147.84.0/22 7010  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC ER-Telecom 
Holding
14 - 46.147.92.0/22 6989  0.4%   AS42116 -- ERTH-NCHLN-AS CJSC 

The Cidr Report

2011-12-16 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Dec 16 21:12:27 2011 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
09-12-11386491  227371
10-12-11386600  227223
11-12-11386365  227383
12-12-11386687  227266
13-12-11386830  226854
14-12-11387006  227323
15-12-11388632  223854
16-12-11385889  227871


AS Summary
 39706  Number of ASes in routing system
 16714  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  3479  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS6389 : BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc.
  109169664  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 16Dec11 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 389158   227932   16122641.4%   All ASes

AS6389  3479  223 325693.6%   BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
   BellSouth.net Inc.
AS18566 2093  412 168180.3%   COVAD - Covad Communications
   Co.
AS4766  2517  994 152360.5%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS7029  2958 1525 143348.4%   WINDSTREAM - Windstream
   Communications Inc
AS22773 1513  114 139992.5%   ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
   Cox Communications Inc.
AS4755  1515  213 130285.9%   TATACOMM-AS TATA
   Communications formerly VSNL
   is Leading ISP
AS4323  1622  389 123376.0%   TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
   inc.
AS28573 1577  399 117874.7%   NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A.
AS1785  1858  785 107357.8%   AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
   Communications, Inc.
AS7552  1491  438 105370.6%   VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel
   Corporation
AS19262 1388  402  98671.0%   VZGNI-TRANSIT - Verizon Online
   LLC
AS10620 1717  751  96656.3%   Telmex Colombia S.A.
AS2118  1097  144  95386.9%   RELCOM-AS OOO NPO Relcom
AS7303  1247  362  88571.0%   Telecom Argentina S.A.
AS18101  965  158  80783.6%   RELIANCE-COMMUNICATIONS-IN
   Reliance Communications
   Ltd.DAKC MUMBAI
AS8151  1460  656  80455.1%   Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS30036 1460  685  77553.1%   MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS -
   Mediacom Communications Corp
AS4808  1077  335  74268.9%   CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
   network China169 Beijing
   Province Network
AS15557 1035  310  72570.0%   LDCOMNET Societe Francaise du
   Radiotelephone S.A
AS24560  996  279  71772.0%   AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
   Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
   Services
AS7545  1632  947  68542.0%   TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Internet
   Pty Ltd
AS3356  1105  457  64858.6%   LEVEL3 Level 3 Communications
AS17974 1716 1104  61235.7%   TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT
   Telekomunikasi Indonesia
AS17676  675   74  60189.0%   GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp.
AS8402  1446  873  57339.6%   CORBINA-AS OJSC Vimpelcom
AS4804   663   95  56885.7%   MPX-AS Microplex PTY LTD
AS20115 1604 1048  55634.7%   CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter
   Communications
AS22561  929  378  55159.3%   DIGITAL-TELEPORT - Digital
   Teleport Inc.
AS22047  582   33  54994.3%   VTR BANDA ANCHA S.A.
AS9498   854  306  54864.2%   BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd.

Total  44271148892938266.4%   

Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Eric
you didn't specify open source' so I'll throw out IPControl by BT/INS.  I 
used it at my last place to manage about 100k+ DNS entries (3x /16s, misc 
blocks, RFC1918) and our DNS/DHCP servers.  Worked great but not cheap :)

-- Eric :)

On Dec 16, 2011, at 4:46 PM, deles...@gmail.com wrote:

 Not to be a bandwagon jumper but +1 for 6connect as well.
 --Original Message--
 From: Mike Walter
 To: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: RE: IP Management Software
 Sent: Dec 16, 2011 4:42 PM
 
 +1, agree on 6connect.net.  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com] 
 Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 12:55 PM
 To: Shahab Vahabzadeh
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org
 Subject: Re: IP Management Software
 
 Check out 6connect.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
 Thanks
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek
 
 
 
 
 Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network



Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Ravi Pina
++

For many reasons not the least of which is they listen to what
their customers need.  They run on top of OSS which is great and
have the service provider work flow in mind.

The only negative is they (at the time of eval) were lacking for
enterprise customers, but as I said they listen and are inclined
to make improvement to the product.

-r


On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:54:40PM -0500, Rafael Rodriguez wrote:
 Check out 6connect.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:03, Shahab Vahabzadeh sh.vahabza...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi everybody,
  Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
  can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
  IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
  flexible.
  If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.
  Thanks
  
  -- 
  Regards,
  Shahab Vahabzadeh, IP Engineer, *nix Admin and Geek



Re: IP Management Software

2011-12-16 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: IP Management Software Date: Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:33:41PM +0330 
Quoting Shahab Vahabzadeh (sh.vahabza...@gmail.com):
 Hi everybody,
 Can anybody share his/her experience with IP Management software's? Which I
 can use it managing near 100K IP Address?
 IPPlan is not good enough, I think its covering all my need and not fully
 flexible.
 If you have discuss this before here please share me the link.

I've been impressed by InfoBlox. Main factor behind that is the good
integration between DHCP, IP address management and DNS. If you only
need IP address management, there probably are other solutions. Also,
I've seen no integration with RIR registries. Pricey, as well. We moved
from IPPlan, and are a lot happier. In spite of above. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
I was born in a Hostess Cupcake factory before the sexual revolution!


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: playing NICE

2011-12-16 Thread Jorge Amodio
With SOPA/PIPA and so much fuss about IP (not the protocol)
protection, CBS should sue the
government for using an image that looks like a Borg cube from Startrek.

-J

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM,  bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

 http://csrc.nist.gov/nice/framework/

 its only a tad over 100 pages. :)  the comment period has been extended to 
 january 2012.

 something to read by the fire over the holiday.

 /bill