IANA AS Numbers registry update
The IANA AS Numbers registry has been updated to reflect the allocation of 1 block to ARIN in 2013-05-30: 62464-63487 You can find the IANA AS Numbers registry at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers/as-numbers.xml Regards, Selina Harrington *** Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names Numbers 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Phone: +1 310 301 5800 Fax: +1-310-823-8649 ***
Re: A bit of historical news
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's borged into the 701 confed? Yay! Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios connection... ;) jms
Re: A bit of historical news
+1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add make the YouTube work to my wish list for the artist formerly known as 19262. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: http://www.cidr-report.org/**cgi-bin/as-report?as=**AS19262view=2.0http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's borged into the 701 confed? Yay! Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios connection... ;) jms
RE: A bit of historical news
Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in several remote locations and the most he could find for me as of last month was: Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for deployment in Tampa, FL in May of 2012. During this time, Verizon will establish Dual Stack support on two E320 Gateway routers and 200 FiOS customers will be installed with IPv6 enabled BHRs. As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to be a year late. David -Original Message- From: Ryan Shea [mailto:ryans...@google.com] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:55 AM To: Justin M. Streiner Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: A bit of historical news +1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add make the YouTube work to my wish list for the artist formerly known as 19262. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: http://www.cidr-report.org/**cgi-bin/as-report?as=**AS19262vie w=2.0http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's borged into the 701 confed? Yay! Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios connection... ;) jms
Re: A bit of historical news
I believe they plan on spelling IPv6 slightly differently than we do, C-G-N http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/internet/highspeed/networking/troubleshooting/portforwarding/123897.htm On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:01 AM, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote: Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in several remote locations and the most he could find for me as of last month was: Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for deployment in Tampa, FL in May of 2012. During this time, Verizon will establish Dual Stack support on two E320 Gateway routers and 200 FiOS customers will be installed with IPv6 enabled BHRs. As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to be a year late. David -Original Message- From: Ryan Shea [mailto:ryans...@google.com] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:55 AM To: Justin M. Streiner Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: A bit of historical news +1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add make the YouTube work to my wish list for the artist formerly known as 19262. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: http://www.cidr-report.org/**cgi-bin/as-report?as=**AS19262vie w=2.0http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's borged into the 701 confed? Yay! Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios connection... ;) jms
Re: A bit of historical news
On 5/31/2013 9:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote: Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in several remote locations and the most he could find for me as of last month was: Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for deployment in Tampa, FL in May of 2012. During this time, Verizon will establish Dual Stack support on two E320 Gateway routers and 200 FiOS customers will be installed with IPv6 enabled BHRs. As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to be a year late. David Would it be difficult to at least enable v6 for the people that don't use their gateways? Many people use the ethernet ports on their ONT.
Re: ipp.gov and Google DNS (8.8.8.8)
Thus spake Casey Deccio (ca...@deccio.net) on Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:17:03AM -0700: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Yunhong Gu g...@google.com wrote: Google resolvers got no response (i.e. timeout) for ipp.gov/dnskey from its authoritative name servers. If there is anyone on this list who manages ipp.gov DNS servers, please take a look. Our resolver IPs can be found at https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq#locations. I get a response for DNSKEY just fine*. However, the payload of the response is 1279 bytes, and Google's resolvers set the maximum UDP receive payload to 1232, which results in the truncated response. Unfortunately, the ipp.gov servers don't respond over TCP, so the resolvers aren't able to retrieve ipp.gov/DNSKEY. The problem here is that the ipp.gov servers aren't responding on TCP/53. But of curiosity, why a max payload size of 1232 for the Google resolvers? I would guess that it is to fit inside tunnels? You will also see smaller than usual MSS (ex: 1416) from some (all?) google tcp services. Dale
Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
Re: A bit of historical news
Yup. Changes are underway and AS19262 will become a footnote. :) -Alby On 5/30/2013 11:38 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's borged into the 701 confed?
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's. I'm foggy, but I believe the word was Fry's in lieu of Microcenter etc. I think we also heard some people reply back with Graybar. On 5/31/13 4:15 AM, Tuc t...@admarketplace.com wrote: Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
gray bar on cesar chavez about 5-10 min from 200 paul. Not sure if you need to have an account or if you can just walk into the counter. Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com -Original Message- From: Tuc t...@admarketplace.com Date: Friday, May 31, 2013 4:15 AM To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org Subject: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
I could suggest a few places. Might want to call ahead to make sure they'll have what you need: - Central Computer. Has locations in San Francisco and San Mateo. SF maybe closer, but will take longer with traffic and parking. -- http://www.centralcomputers.com/commerce/misc/sanfrancisco.jsp -- http://www.centralcomputers.com/commerce/misc/sanmateo.jsp - Frys. Much further. Closest shop would be Palo Alto -- http://www.frys.com/template/isp/index/Frys/isp/Middle_Topics/H1%20Store%20Maps/palo%20alto/ - Jameco. Has some limited Ethernet cable selection. Has a will-call pick up at their warehouse in Belmont. -- http://www.jameco.com/ Cheers, jof
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
Central computer. It's next to Moscone west. It's great. No need to go to the south bay. -j On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's. I'm foggy, but I believe the word was Fry's in lieu of Microcenter etc. I think we also heard some people reply back with Graybar. On 5/31/13 4:15 AM, Tuc t...@admarketplace.com wrote: Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
We walked up the counter all the time, however that was in Alaska so the rules may be different down here. On 5/31/13 11:20 AM, Carlos Alcantar car...@race.com wrote: gray bar on cesar chavez about 5-10 min from 200 paul. Not sure if you need to have an account or if you can just walk into the counter. Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com -Original Message- From: Tuc t...@admarketplace.com Date: Friday, May 31, 2013 4:15 AM To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org Subject: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's. The nearest Frys to SF is about 30 miles away in Palo Alto. Scott
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
MicroCenter Santa Clara / Silicon Valley is no more, due to the rent extortion in the Bay Area. If you care for my rant on the subject: http://tu.cnst.su/post/39584711234/why-microcenter-silicon-valley-is-no-more C. On 31 May 2013 11:16, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's. I'm foggy, but I believe the word was Fry's in lieu of Microcenter etc. I think we also heard some people reply back with Graybar. On 5/31/13 4:15 AM, Tuc t...@admarketplace.com wrote: Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
RE: A bit of historical news
On Fri, 31 May 2013, David Hubbard wrote: Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in several remote locations and the most he could find for me as of last month was: Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for deployment in Tampa, FL in May of 2012. During this time, Verizon will establish Dual Stack support on two E320 Gateway routers and 200 FiOS customers will be installed with IPv6 enabled BHRs. As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to be a year late. I keep pressing people at VZ on this, in hopes of getting some grease for this squeaky wheel, but so far... no go. I just got fios this past summer, and the router they provided does support v6. I've messed around with a tunnel to Hurricane Electric, but haven't had much time to figure out why it doesn't work. jms
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
Tuc wrote: Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Central Computer (http://www.centralcomputers.com/) is much closer than Fry's. -- andrei
Re: A bit of historical news
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Ryan Shea wrote: I believe they plan on spelling IPv6 slightly differently than we do, C-G-N http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/internet/highspeed/networking/troubleshooting/portforwarding/123897.htm I have fios business service at the house. So far, there's even less information available for any v6 rollout on that. jms On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:01 AM, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote: Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in several remote locations and the most he could find for me as of last month was: Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for deployment in Tampa, FL in May of 2012. During this time, Verizon will establish Dual Stack support on two E320 Gateway routers and 200 FiOS customers will be installed with IPv6 enabled BHRs. As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to be a year late. David -Original Message- From: Ryan Shea [mailto:ryans...@google.com] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:55 AM To: Justin M. Streiner Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: A bit of historical news +1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add make the YouTube work to my wish list for the artist formerly known as 19262. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote: http://www.cidr-report.org/**cgi-bin/as-report?as=**AS19262vie w=2.0http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0 note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's borged into the 701 confed? Yay! Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios connection... ;) jms
Weekly Routing Table Report
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG, TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith pfsi...@gmail.com. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 01 Jun, 2013 Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary BGP routing table entries examined: 455214 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 185422 Deaggregation factor: 2.46 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 224816 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 44200 Prefixes per ASN: 10.30 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 34661 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 16138 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:5862 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:150 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.6 Max AS path length visible: 54 Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 56484) 51 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 315 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 130 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 4781 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:3677 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 10524 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 26 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:235 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2620299948 Equivalent to 156 /8s, 46 /16s and 154 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 70.8 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 70.8 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 94.6 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 160166 APNIC Region Analysis Summary - Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 109303 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 33546 APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.26 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 110744 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:45098 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:4852 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 22.82 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 1221 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:822 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.8 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 30 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:547 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 722414304 Equivalent to 43 /8s, 15 /16s and 42 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 84.4 APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 131072-133119 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:159792 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:80132 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.99 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 160347 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 73391 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:15711 ARIN Prefixes per ASN:10.21 ARIN Region origin ASes
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:25:54PM +, Warren Bailey wrote: We walked up the counter all the time, however that was in Alaska so the rules may be different down here. You can walk up with a credit card, terms just make it easier to place orders in advance for pickup. Anyway, as noted, from 200P, Graybar is your closest and best bet, Central Computer doesn't always have the quantities that people on this list sometimes require. --msa
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
+1 Central computer on Howard. On 5/31/13 11:23 AM, John Adams wrote: Central computer. It's next to Moscone west. It's great. No need to go to the south bay. -j On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's. I'm foggy, but I believe the word was Fry's in lieu of Microcenter etc. I think we also heard some people reply back with Graybar. On 5/31/13 4:15 AM, Tuc t...@admarketplace.com wrote: Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
+1 ; go Graybar. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Majdi S. Abbas m...@latt.net wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:25:54PM +, Warren Bailey wrote: We walked up the counter all the time, however that was in Alaska so the rules may be different down here. You can walk up with a credit card, terms just make it easier to place orders in advance for pickup. Anyway, as noted, from 200P, Graybar is your closest and best bet, Central Computer doesn't always have the quantities that people on this list sometimes require. --msa -- -george william herbert george.herb...@gmail.com
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
Needs to be a Corporate CC though. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Tim M Edwards t...@lifelike.com wrote: Needs to be a Corporate CC though. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Majdi S. Abbas m...@latt.net wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:25:54PM +, Warren Bailey wrote: We walked up the counter all the time, however that was in Alaska so the rules may be different down here. You can walk up with a credit card, terms just make it easier to place orders in advance for pickup. Anyway, as noted, from 200P, Graybar is your closest and best bet, Central Computer doesn't always have the quantities that people on this list sometimes require. --msa
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
On 5/31/13 12:06 PM, Tim M Edwards wrote: Needs to be a Corporate CC though. Graybar? My local counter here has taken my personal card, but you still have to have an account with them. ~Seth
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/31/2013 04:15 AM, Tuc wrote: Hi, Hate to be that guy but really need help. Anyone know a place near 200 Paul in SF with a major quantity of cat-5 cables? Like 30 8ft blue, 20 8ft grey, 30 5ft blue. Need them today due to ex-employee's poor inventory keeping. Thanks, Tuc Depending on how soon your need is, check out http://www.sfcable.com/ They pretty much deliver overnight in the Bay Area. Cheers, Ryan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRqPwLAAoJEMth0VwPagXs6FYP/REN7Q7Gw4ThyXX2ZHqvWfnN v8NQa1KZvvCsvGRoSp1D1ICR5xqo+ArYFd4KlGcXtjJ81JAb8679Xr7oNYogO/bw Zr5rg4ngEinEmNr5uxCYg/ya+Ad1ae9XsOtIQiyhMcxsc79tIN+FEoVrcObGYMRM mprbTJFxt9mXJ7JA1JRbbycT0otILyF+se2DeSKrO4YvwF4VJSiJRZZcG+aavgdP RGttenvJpZfApbd6m9eLpa+6b8w5nfupZkkjYwm5ir3MEADMxy5+Cn+NfOHCEUa3 XN56vSk6mNVQv6G6vZGv17/kSn1WXuRGHeLS6Y+pAyraP8rqeV5Ks/bVGFXROypw ClsUhfNdzaOQTVIlvcv0AU7vK0fBjRdkDcRbgGmHf42bdbbokGJiogVZsvaMCUDP Q2lU3b0Tc4vO0rd4a/U2/+2qaRqvDayPOyqwwT3WPm6wXvZxd3QLo8gQLV5jraAU 3bJjyANkJ+VeDII8Yntc9FW4KcEv6dYjAe6PT1mah4FzdLX67/cXLChPc/HzqepY w2VhScP1D/72ov6Pq2RuUBtFArH5CFIMlidOqF6wBL0NSwI1D6MejqCU6V1cjHa4 2YsMNqUHMKH3sFNnR9+cTnu0rhA5jUl6aThy9+PFsN0bwL6KrbexzCcfpyxgrRdI Ei8xeRRdc84ziEInHCKc =a/fa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
The Cidr Report
This report has been generated at Fri May 31 21:13:21 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date PrefixesCIDR Agg
24-05-13457343 260522
25-05-13457261 261050
26-05-13457360 261034
27-05-13457347 261303
28-05-13457273 261905
29-05-13457301 261868
30-05-13457371 260916
31-05-13456466 261087
AS Summary
44286 Number of ASes in routing system
18335 Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
3017 Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS6389 : BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc.
116960224 Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street
Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').
--- 31May13 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
Table 456592 260924 19566842.9% All ASes
AS6389 3017 81 293697.3% BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
BellSouth.net Inc.
AS28573 2794 547 224780.4% NET Serviços de Comunicação
S.A.
AS4766 2959 942 201768.2% KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom
AS17974 2518 544 197478.4% TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT
Telekomunikasi Indonesia
AS22773 1983 135 184893.2% ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
Cox Communications Inc.
AS10620 2633 831 180268.4% Telmex Colombia S.A.
AS18566 2065 474 159177.0% COVAD - Covad Communications
Co.
AS7303 1723 452 127173.8% Telecom Argentina S.A.
AS4323 1622 411 121174.7% TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
inc.
AS2118 1260 86 117493.2% RELCOM-AS OOO NPO Relcom
AS4755 1733 584 114966.3% TATACOMM-AS TATA
Communications formerly VSNL
is Leading ISP
AS7552 1152 198 95482.8% VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel
Corporation
AS36998 1237 301 93675.7% SDN-MOBITEL
AS18881 958 83 87591.3% Global Village Telecom
AS18101 999 180 81982.0% RELIANCE-COMMUNICATIONS-IN
Reliance Communications
Ltd.DAKC MUMBAI
AS1785 1991 1242 74937.6% AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec
Communications, Inc.
AS4808 1138 389 74965.8% CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
network China169 Beijing
Province Network
AS701 1585 848 73746.5% UUNET - MCI Communications
Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon
Business
AS13977 844 140 70483.4% CTELCO - FAIRPOINT
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
AS855733 55 67892.5% CANET-ASN-4 - Bell Aliant
Regional Communications, Inc.
AS22561 1185 509 67657.0% DIGITAL-TELEPORT - Digital
Teleport Inc.
AS8151 1278 608 67052.4% Uninet S.A. de C.V.
AS7029 2070 1405 66532.1% WINDSTREAM - Windstream
Communications Inc
AS6983 1136 476 66058.1% ITCDELTA - ITC^Deltacom
AS24560 1076 418 65861.2% AIRTELBROADBAND-AS-AP Bharti
Airtel Ltd., Telemedia
Services
AS17676 733 110 62385.0% GIGAINFRA Softbank BB Corp.
AS34744 684 72 61289.5% GVM S.C. GVM SISTEM 2003
S.R.L.
AS3549 1055 444 61157.9% GBLX Global Crossing Ltd.
AS7545 1987 1381 60630.5% TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom
Limited
AS3356 1100 509 591
BGP Update Report
BGP Update Report Interval: 23-May-13 -to- 30-May-13 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS36998 213281 8.8% 301.7 -- SDN-MOBITEL 2 - AS580052809 2.2% 219.1 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD Network Information Center 3 - AS840248260 2.0% 36.5 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC Vimpelcom 4 - AS982939099 1.6% 41.3 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone 5 - AS453835774 1.5% 68.9 -- ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Research Network Center 6 - AS755223880 1.0% 20.8 -- VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel Corporation 7 - AS21299 17430 0.7% 77.5 -- ORBITA-PLUS-AS ORBITA-PLUS Autonomous System 8 - AS17974 17048 0.7% 8.2 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 9 - AS941616296 0.7% 354.3 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 10 - AS390916063 0.7%2677.2 -- QWEST-AS-3908 - Qwest Communications Company, LLC 11 - AS28573 14733 0.6% 6.7 -- NET Serviços de Comunicação S.A. 12 - AS29049 14613 0.6% 43.0 -- DELTA-TELECOM-AS Delta Telecom LTD. 13 - AS33776 13834 0.6% 75.6 -- STARCOMMS-ASN 14 - AS45899 13619 0.6% 36.5 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 15 - AS30693 12382 0.5% 33.6 -- EONIX-CORPORATION-AS-WWW-EONIX-NET - Eonix Corporation 16 - AS27738 12108 0.5% 21.2 -- Ecuadortelecom S.A. 17 - AS31148 11434 0.5% 14.0 -- FREENET-AS Freenet Ltd. 18 - AS754511310 0.5% 7.8 -- TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited 19 - AS270811185 0.5% 145.3 -- Universidad de Guanajuato 20 - AS18207 10917 0.5% 38.6 -- YOU-INDIA-AP YOU Broadband Cable India Ltd. TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix) Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS6629 7406 0.3%7406.0 -- NOAA-AS - NOAA 2 - AS194065390 0.2%5390.0 -- TWRS-MA - Towerstream I, Inc. 3 - AS423345270 0.2%5270.0 -- BBP-AS Broadband Plus s.a.l. 4 - AS449719912 0.4%4956.0 -- GOETEC-AS GOETEC Limited 5 - AS9854 6818 0.3%3409.0 -- KTO-AS-KR KTO 6 - AS6174 6386 0.3%3193.0 -- SPRINTLINK8 - Sprint 7 - AS373672843 0.1%2843.0 -- CALLKEY 8 - AS390916063 0.7%2677.2 -- QWEST-AS-3908 - Qwest Communications Company, LLC 9 - AS146808022 0.3%2674.0 -- REALE-6 - Auction.com 10 - AS277355660 0.2%1886.7 -- Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT LTDA 11 - AS339203361 0.1%1680.5 -- AQL (aq) Networks Limited 12 - AS8137 5028 0.2%1676.0 -- DISNEYONLINE-AS - Disney Online 13 - AS572011236 0.1%1236.0 -- EDF-AS Estonian Defence Forces 14 - AS223565590 0.2%1118.0 -- Durand do Brasil Ltda 15 - AS22688 979 0.0% 979.0 -- DOLGENCORP - Dollar General Corporation 16 - AS23295 793 0.0% 793.0 -- EA-01 - Extend America 17 - AS12396 745 0.0% 745.0 -- INAR-ARKHNAGELSK-AS OJSC MegaFon 18 - AS271642190 0.1% 730.0 -- US-INTERNET - Global Reach Communications LLC 19 - AS486129633 0.4% 688.1 -- RTC-ORENBURG-AS CJSC Comstar-Regions 20 - AS478873831 0.2% 638.5 -- NEU-AS NEU Telecom Technologies TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name 1 - 92.246.207.0/249560 0.4% AS48612 -- RTC-ORENBURG-AS CJSC Comstar-Regions 2 - 5.56.48.0/21 8945 0.3% AS44971 -- GOETEC-AS GOETEC Limited 3 - 202.41.70.0/24 8227 0.3% AS2697 -- ERX-ERNET-AS Education and Research Network 4 - 203.118.224.0/21 8081 0.3% AS9416 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 5 - 203.118.232.0/21 8027 0.3% AS9416 -- MULTIMEDIA-AS-AP Hoshin Multimedia Center Inc. 6 - 192.58.232.0/247406 0.3% AS6629 -- NOAA-AS - NOAA 7 - 211.214.206.0/24 6816 0.3% AS9854 -- KTO-AS-KR KTO 8 - 12.139.133.0/246672 0.3% AS14680 -- REALE-6 - Auction.com 9 - 206.48.139.0/245655 0.2% AS27735 -- Synapsis Soluciones y Servicios IT LTDA 10 - 69.38.178.0/24 5390 0.2% AS19406 -- TWRS-MA - Towerstream I, Inc. 11 - 151.118.255.0/24 5348 0.2% AS3909 -- QWEST-AS-3908 - Qwest Communications Company, LLC 12 - 151.118.254.0/24 5348 0.2% AS3909 -- QWEST-AS-3908 - Qwest Communications Company, LLC 13 - 151.118.18.0/245340 0.2% AS3909 -- QWEST-AS-3908 - Qwest Communications Company, LLC 14 - 62.84.76.0/24 5270 0.2% AS42334 -- BBP-AS Broadband Plus s.a.l. 15 - 173.232.235.0/24 5215 0.2% AS30693 -- EONIX-CORPORATION-AS-WWW-EONIX-NET - Eonix Corporation 16 - 173.232.234.0/24 5214 0.2% AS30693 -- EONIX-CORPORATION-AS-WWW-EONIX-NET - Eonix
Headscratcher of the week
Gang, In the interest of sharing 'the weird stuff' which makes the job of being an operator ... uh, fun? is that the right word?..., I would like to present the following two smokeping latency/packetloss plots, which are by far the weirdest I have ever seen. These plots are from our smokeping host out to a customer location. The customer is connected via DSL and they run PPPoE over it to connect with our access concentrator. There is about 5 physical insfastructure hops between the host and customer; The switch, the BRAS, the Switch again, and then directly to the DSLAM and then customer on the end. The 10 day plot: http://picpaste.com/10_Day_graph-YV3IdvRV.png The 30 hour plot: http://picpaste.com/30_hour_graph-DrwzfhYJ.png How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). Happy friday all! Mike-
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:06:50PM -0700, Tim M Edwards wrote: Needs to be a Corporate CC though. Nahh, they take my personal card in Phoenix and SF all the time. --msa
Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF
I don't think they will care how you pay. It's just the question if you do or don't need an account. Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com -Original Message- From: Majdi S. Abbas m...@latt.net Date: Friday, May 31, 2013 3:26 PM To: Tim M Edwards t...@lifelike.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Cat-5 cables near 200 Paul, SF On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:06:50PM -0700, Tim M Edwards wrote: Needs to be a Corporate CC though. Nahh, they take my personal card in Phoenix and SF all the time. --msa
Re: Headscratcher of the week
Those are some truly perplexing graphs. Quite strange that it appears linear, as if something is slightly changing over time or growing/shrinking at a constant-ish rate. Do you have throughput or PPS graphs for the intermediate links as well? Any similar correlations in the derivative slope? My only hunch would be some intermediate buffer being increasingly full over time, as some other application riding the path linearly grows in packets/second or bits/second. Cheers, jof On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Mike mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com wrote: Gang, In the interest of sharing 'the weird stuff' which makes the job of being an operator ... uh, fun? is that the right word?..., I would like to present the following two smokeping latency/packetloss plots, which are by far the weirdest I have ever seen. These plots are from our smokeping host out to a customer location. The customer is connected via DSL and they run PPPoE over it to connect with our access concentrator. There is about 5 physical insfastructure hops between the host and customer; The switch, the BRAS, the Switch again, and then directly to the DSLAM and then customer on the end. The 10 day plot: http://picpaste.com/10_Day_graph-YV3IdvRV.png The 30 hour plot: http://picpaste.com/30_hour_graph-DrwzfhYJ.png How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). Happy friday all! Mike-
Re: Headscratcher of the week
OK, here's a wild guess from left-field. Well, at least from left-field where I made at least one game-saving catch :) We had a similar case some years back, but it was a ramp-up in overall traffic we were looking at. If you're looking at latency, it could be related to traffic (do you have traffic graphs?). One particular user that was accustomed to Windows and trying to get started with Linux was playing games with our NAT firewall. Rather than file a request with us for a static NAT and firewall openings for their new Linux server, they discovered that as long as they generated some internet traffic periodically, they could defeat the NAT translation timeout, and essentially keep a static outside IP. Problem was, they crontabed a ping of an outside server to run once a minute. Just a ping x.x.x.x. Windows as we know defaults to only ping 4 times then quit. Linux does not :) So you might look for some recurring scheduled event on the customer's end that might be cumulative rather than simply recurring. Jeff On 5/31/2013 6:25 PM, Mike wrote: Gang, In the interest of sharing 'the weird stuff' which makes the job of being an operator ... uh, fun? is that the right word?..., I would like to present the following two smokeping latency/packetloss plots, which are by far the weirdest I have ever seen. These plots are from our smokeping host out to a customer location. The customer is connected via DSL and they run PPPoE over it to connect with our access concentrator. There is about 5 physical insfastructure hops between the host and customer; The switch, the BRAS, the Switch again, and then directly to the DSLAM and then customer on the end. The 10 day plot: http://picpaste.com/10_Day_graph-YV3IdvRV.png The 30 hour plot: http://picpaste.com/30_hour_graph-DrwzfhYJ.png How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). Happy friday all! Mike-
Re: Headscratcher of the week
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 03:25:22PM -0700, Mike wrote: Gang, In the interest of sharing 'the weird stuff' which makes the job of being an operator ... uh, fun? is that the right word?..., I would like to present the following two smokeping latency/packetloss plots, which are by far the weirdest I have ever seen. These plots are from our smokeping host out to a customer location. The customer is connected via DSL and they run PPPoE over it to connect with our access concentrator. There is about 5 physical insfastructure hops between the host and customer; The switch, the BRAS, the Switch again, and then directly to the DSLAM and then customer on the end. The 10 day plot: http://picpaste.com/10_Day_graph-YV3IdvRV.png The 30 hour plot: http://picpaste.com/30_hour_graph-DrwzfhYJ.png How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). Theory: There's a stateful device (firewall, NAT, something else) in the path that is creating state for every ICMP Echo Request it forwards and (possibly) searching that state when forwarding the ICMP Echo Reply responses, and never destroying that state, and either the create operation or the search operation (or both) takes an amount of time that is a linear function of the number of state entries. -- Brett
Re: Headscratcher of the week
On 31/05/13 17:30, Brett Frankenberger wrote: How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). Variation of the buffer filling theory is that there's some QoS/traffic-shaping going on which is causing your ping packets to get classed and policed into an ever depleting buffer pool. I wonder what would happen to the pattern if you reset the interface. |8^) -- /*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+ | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | | | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS | +==*/
Re: Headscratcher of the week
I agree with previous poster, table size progression and corresponding increase in search delay, probably related directly to the monitoring itself, or at least a connection state of some kind. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net wrote: On 31/05/13 17:30, Brett Frankenberger wrote: How can you possibly have consistent increase in latency like that? I'd love to hear theories (or offers of beer, your choice!). Variation of the buffer filling theory is that there's some QoS/traffic-shaping going on which is causing your ping packets to get classed and policed into an ever depleting buffer pool. I wonder what would happen to the pattern if you reset the interface. |8^) -- /*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+ | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | | | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| NETWORKS | +=**==**===*/
