LACNOG 2013 - Curaçao - October 28
The Lacnog 2013 and Lacnic 20 meetings will take place in three weeks (October 28) in Curaçao. Please register asap if you're planning to attend. The main hotel is full, but a neighboring hotel, closer to the convention center has available rooms. A peering forum is scheduled for Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30. Please contact infolac...@lacnog.org if you want to take part. Look forward to seeing you there, The Lacnog Program Committee
RE: Phoenix - Single Mode SFP GBIC
Try sfpplus, compufox or fiberstore.com Sam Roche - Supervisor of Network Operations - Lakeland Networks sro...@lakelandnetworks.com| Office: 705-640-0086 | Cell: 705-706-2606| www.lakelandnetworks.com IT SOLUTIONS for BUSINESS Fiber Optics, Wireless, DSL Network Provider; I.T. Support; Telephony Hardware and Cabling; SIP Trunks, VoIP; Server Hosting; Disaster Recovery Systems The information contained in this message is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) named above and may not be otherwise distributed, copied or disclosed. The message may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and/or confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately advising of the error and delete the message without making a copy. -Original Message- From: Chris Cariffe [mailto:ccari...@gmail.com] Sent: October 5, 2013 10:20 PM To: NANOG Subject: Phoenix - Single Mode SFP GBIC Any chance someone can help me out with one in the Phoenix area? Tried Fry's, MMF only... CDW won't get one here till Tuesday. thanks -chris
Re: apt-mirror near ashburn
My suggestion is to use http://http.debian.net/debian as your source.
It uses geo thingie to figure out the closest mirror to you.
Code is on github if you're interested in how it works.
https://github.com/rgeissert/http-redirector
On 10/5/2013 11:11 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
{{{
$apt-get install libsm6
...
After this operation, 717 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
x11-common libice6 libsm6
Install these packages without verification [y/N]?
}}}
hm. ft meade can't even hack the checksums?
possibly the mirror is just misbehaving :( it's been a while since i
ran it, so I'm honestly not sure what's going on with it these days.
-chris
Re: Phoenix - Single Mode SFP GBIC
try calling the local datacenters and see if one of them will loan you one for a day or two. From: Chris Cariffe ccari...@gmail.com To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org Sent: Saturday, October 5, 2013 7:19 PM Subject: Phoenix - Single Mode SFP GBIC Any chance someone can help me out with one in the Phoenix area? Tried Fry's, MMF only... CDW won't get one here till Tuesday. thanks -chris
Re: apt-mirror near ashburn
On 10/07/2013 09:47 AM, Robert Drake wrote: My suggestion is to use http://http.debian.net/debian Ubuntu != Debian -- Kind regards, Michael
Att mobility LTE contact
Anyone from mobility around? You have turned on some new towers around me with the wrong time zone. (Lansing, Chelsea, dexter all in Michigan). Only seems to be wrong on the LTE and not the 3G/4G side. Thanks! Jared Mauch
nanog.org website
We are aware of trouble with the NANOG website. The NANOG geeks have been dispatched to work on the trouble. Please be patient if you are trying to view the site. Andrew Koch on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee
Re: apt-mirror near ashburn
there's also the unfortunate case of: My traffic to the selected mirror is over the 'expensive' transit port, why can't I use my SFP's mirror over there on the left? setting the mirror to a specific one means some fragility, but determinism is nice. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Robert Drake rdr...@direcpath.com wrote: On 10/7/2013 11:16 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: Ubuntu != Debian http://askubuntu.com/questions/157840/why-does-apt-get-fail-to-resolve-the-mirror Apparently mirrors.ubuntu.com picks a mirror based on geographical location using lines like this: |deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise main restricted universe multiverse deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise-security main restricted universe multiverse I'm not sure how good it is at picking a mirror though. ubuntu seems to make a mess of the sources.list file and makes it scary to change. I always leave it with the mirror I chose during install. This: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SourcesList Says you can pick Select Best Server from a menu. That would probably work okay if it's not a headless box. |
Re: apt-mirror near ashburn
mirror.symnds.com has debian/ubuntu and is in Ashburn on Above.net FYI. On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 01:51:31PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote: there's also the unfortunate case of: My traffic to the selected mirror is over the 'expensive' transit port, why can't I use my SFP's mirror over there on the left? setting the mirror to a specific one means some fragility, but determinism is nice. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Robert Drake rdr...@direcpath.com wrote: On 10/7/2013 11:16 AM, Michael Shuler wrote: Ubuntu != Debian http://askubuntu.com/questions/157840/why-does-apt-get-fail-to-resolve-the-mirror Apparently mirrors.ubuntu.com picks a mirror based on geographical location using lines like this: |deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise main restricted universe multiverse deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb mirror://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt precise-security main restricted universe multiverse I'm not sure how good it is at picking a mirror though. ubuntu seems to make a mess of the sources.list file and makes it scary to change. I always leave it with the mirror I chose during install. This: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SourcesList Says you can pick Select Best Server from a menu. That would probably work okay if it's not a headless box. | -- Bryan G. Seitz
Re: nanog.org website
The NANOG web site will be offline starting at 12:15 Pacific time for hardware maintenance. We expect the outage to last at least 10 minutes but no longer than 45 minutes. We apologize for the inconvenience. On Oct 7, 2013, at 9:56, Andrew Koch a...@gawul.net wrote: We are aware of trouble with the NANOG website. The NANOG geeks have been dispatched to work on the trouble. Please be patient if you are trying to view the site. Andrew Koch on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee
Removal of Stale Level 3 IRR Object
Would someone from Level 3 please contact me off-list regarding removal of stale IRR removal? Our ASN was previously used by another organization and they had an IRR listed with Level 3. AS11990 Thank you! -- Jason Canady Unlimited Net, LLC Responsive, Reliable, Secure www.unlimitednet.us ja...@unlimitednet.us twitter: @unlimitednet
Re: apt-mirror near ashburn
i gave up and put up my own freeping ubuntu apt-mirror randy
Re: nanog.org website
A second maintenance will be happening at 15:30 PDT to work on the existing server problems. The website will be restored as quickly as possible. Thanks for your understanding.. On Oct 7, 2013, at 9:56, Andrew Koch a...@gawul.net wrote: We are aware of trouble with the NANOG website. The NANOG geeks have been dispatched to work on the trouble. Please be patient if you are trying to view the site. Andrew Koch on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee
Re: nanog.org website - restored
We believe the server is now at a stable point and all functions of the NANOG website and mailing list are restored. For those interested, we would like to share some details of this event. It was noticed a couple weeks ago that a lack of memory conditon was present on the NANOG servers in Chicago. Temporary measures were taken to clear processes and restart the server, but this only temporarialy restored the server. Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. NANOG is making plans to move the NANOG web and mail services off this platform to an environment that is more capable. We will inform the community of any maintenance plans as we move forward. Thank you for your understanding. Andrew Koch on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee
Re: nanog.org website - restored
On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote: Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
Re: nanog.org website - restored
Perhaps you'd like to donate geebees to a nonprofit? Sent from my (old) iPhone5 On Oct 7, 2013, at 16:54, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote: On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote: Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
Re: nanog.org website - restored
For those interested, we would like to share some details of this event. It was noticed a couple weeks ago that a lack of memory conditon was present on the NANOG servers in Chicago. Temporary measures were taken to clear processes and restart the server, but this only temporarialy restored the server. Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. If the file from the presentation about NSA spying is removed from the server, it's possible it suddenly starts to be stable again. Rubens
RE: nanog.org website - restored
Yeah isn't there some cloud provider like Amazon, Rackspace, or MS willing to donate some BW and CPU cycles? Would be a drop in the bucket. Phil From: Michael Thomas Sent: 10/7/2013 19:57 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: nanog.org website - restored On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote: Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
RE: nanog.org website - restored
Or throw one less gathering a year? Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: Phil Bedard bedard.p...@gmail.com Date: 10/07/2013 5:53 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com,nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: nanog.org website - restored Yeah isn't there some cloud provider like Amazon, Rackspace, or MS willing to donate some BW and CPU cycles? Would be a drop in the bucket. Phil From: Michael Thomas Sent: 10/7/2013 19:57 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: nanog.org website - restored On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote: Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
RE: nanog.org website - restored
I have, and would. -Original Message- From: Phil Bedard [mailto:bedard.p...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 8:50 PM To: Michael Thomas; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: nanog.org website - restored Yeah isn't there some cloud provider like Amazon, Rackspace, or MS willing to donate some BW and CPU cycles? Would be a drop in the bucket. Phil From: Michael Thomas Sent: 10/7/2013 19:57 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: nanog.org website - restored On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote: Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
Re: nanog.org website - restored
Translated: On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Koch a...@gawul.net wrote: We believe the server is now at a stable point and all functions of the We hope that the NANOG website and mailing list are restored. For those interested, we would like to share some details of this event. It was noticed a couple weeks ago that a lack of memory conditon[sic] was present on the NANOG servers in Chicago. Temporary measures were taken to clear processes and restart the server, but this only temporarialy restored the server. Server swapped itself to death. We power cycled that bad boy Working with onsite personel[sic] to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. Added more ramz but only after remote hands wikipedia'd the right ram for our vps At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. Seems to work now we think NANOG is making plans to move the NANOG web and mail services off this platform to an environment that is more capable. We will inform the community of any maintenance plans as we move forward. $1/mo hosting aint cutting it anymore; NANOG fees now +$99/attendee/event Thank you for your understanding. closing ticket Andrew Koch on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee Got the short straw What happened to MERIT, A2 and the big tens rocking the mic fantastic? j -- sharp, dry wit and brash in his dealings with contestants. - Forbes If voting didn't matter, the GOP wouldn't make it more difficult than buying a gun. /* - teh jamie. ; uri - http://about.me/jgr */
RE: nanog.org website - restored
I would be happy to donate a VM or two on my personal stack. Contact me if interested. -Adam Original message From: Phil Bedard bedard.p...@gmail.com Date: 10/07/2013 5:51 PM (GMT-08:00) To: Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com,nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: nanog.org website - restored Yeah isn't there some cloud provider like Amazon, Rackspace, or MS willing to donate some BW and CPU cycles? Would be a drop in the bucket. Phil From: Michael Thomas Sent: 10/7/2013 19:57 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: nanog.org website - restored On 10/7/13 4:24 PM, Andrew Koch wrote: Working with onsite personel to upgrade the server with additional memory failed during the first announced maintenance. Compatible memory was located and tested leading to the second maintenance when it was successfully installed. At this time we have increased the memory on the server and are at a stable point. How primative. When i want more memory I just log into the provider's web console and tell it I want more geebees. Mike
