Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread Mel Beckman
Blake,

There's no call to be blatantly offensive like that. 

-mel 

 On Aug 28, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I'll just leave this here
 
 https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/the-true-meaning-behind-most-rfos/
 
 On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jason Canady ja...@unlimitednet.us wrote:
 Mike, I would take it to mean someone screwed something up and they don't
 want to admit to it.  :-)  That's just a guess.
 
 --
 
 Jason Canady
 Unlimited Net, LLC
 Responsive, Reliable, Secure
 
 www.unlimitednet.us
 ja...@unlimitednet.us
 twitter: @unlimitednet
 
 
 On 8/28/15 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 
 08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
 Event Conclusion Summary
 
 Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
 Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT
 
 Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
 Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.
 
 Summary:
 The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical
 Support. It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for
 customers. Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services
 were dispatched to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations.
 Troubleshooting identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering
 worked with Tier III Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links.
 It was confirmed that the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered
 on cards in Chicago to alleviate any further issues. Should any additional
 impact be experienced, please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.
 
 What the hell is a protocol issue?
 
 I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...
 
 
 
 
 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com
 
 - Original Message -
 
 From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
 To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
 Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)
 
 If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
 under Network Events now.
 
 Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets
 
 08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT
 
 Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
 Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
 in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
 time.
 
 08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT
 
 IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
 continue collaboratively working the issue.
 
 
 08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT
 
 Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in
 Chicago,
 IL investigating the issue.
 
 
 08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT
 
 The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
 services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
 dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.
 
 08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT
 
 IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
 currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III
 are
 actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
 have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
 customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
 hourly unless otherwise noted.
 


Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread Jason Canady
Mike, I would take it to mean someone screwed something up and they 
don't want to admit to it.  :-)  That's just a guess.


--

Jason Canady
Unlimited Net, LLC
Responsive, Reliable, Secure

www.unlimitednet.us
ja...@unlimitednet.us
twitter: @unlimitednet

On 8/28/15 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
Event Conclusion Summary

Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT

Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.

Summary:
The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical Support. 
It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for customers. 
Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services were dispatched 
to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations. Troubleshooting 
identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering worked with Tier III 
Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links. It was confirmed that 
the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered on cards in Chicago to 
alleviate any further issues. Should any additional impact be experienced, 
please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.

What the hell is a protocol issue?

I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -

From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
under Network Events now.

Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets

08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT

Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
time.

08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT

IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
continue collaboratively working the issue.


08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT

Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in Chicago,
IL investigating the issue.


08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT

The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.

08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT

IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III are
actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
hourly unless otherwise noted.





Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread Blake Dunlap
I'll just leave this here

https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/the-true-meaning-behind-most-rfos/

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jason Canady ja...@unlimitednet.us wrote:
 Mike, I would take it to mean someone screwed something up and they don't
 want to admit to it.  :-)  That's just a guess.

 --

 Jason Canady
 Unlimited Net, LLC
 Responsive, Reliable, Secure

 www.unlimitednet.us
 ja...@unlimitednet.us
 twitter: @unlimitednet


 On 8/28/15 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

 08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
 Event Conclusion Summary

 Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
 Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT

 Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
 Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.

 Summary:
 The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical
 Support. It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for
 customers. Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services
 were dispatched to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations.
 Troubleshooting identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering
 worked with Tier III Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links.
 It was confirmed that the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered
 on cards in Chicago to alleviate any further issues. Should any additional
 impact be experienced, please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.

 What the hell is a protocol issue?

 I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...




 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 - Original Message -

 From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
 To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
 Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

 If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
 under Network Events now.

 Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets

 08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT

 Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
 Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
 in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
 time.

 08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT

 IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
 continue collaboratively working the issue.


 08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT

 Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in
 Chicago,
 IL investigating the issue.


 08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT

 The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
 services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
 dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.

 08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT

 IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
 currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III
 are
 actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
 have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
 customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
 hourly unless otherwise noted.




Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread James Sink
Seemed reasonably accurate to me.


[image: Phone.com] http://www.phone.com/James SinkSenior Network Engineer
js...@phone.com(800) 997-9179 x506Try Phone.com free!
http://www.phone.com/?_tracking_id=10132CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This
e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of
the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please do not read,
distribute, or take action in reliance upon this message. Instead, please
notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and
its attachments from your computer system.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:

 Blake,

 There's no call to be blatantly offensive like that.

 -mel

  On Aug 28, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  I'll just leave this here
 
 
 https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/the-true-meaning-behind-most-rfos/
 
  On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jason Canady ja...@unlimitednet.us
 wrote:
  Mike, I would take it to mean someone screwed something up and they
 don't
  want to admit to it.  :-)  That's just a guess.
 
  --
 
  Jason Canady
  Unlimited Net, LLC
  Responsive, Reliable, Secure
 
  www.unlimitednet.us
  ja...@unlimitednet.us
  twitter: @unlimitednet
 
 
  On 8/28/15 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 
  08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
  Event Conclusion Summary
 
  Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
  Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT
 
  Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
  Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.
 
  Summary:
  The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical
  Support. It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for
  customers. Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field
 Services
  were dispatched to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations.
  Troubleshooting identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering
  worked with Tier III Technical Support to perform adjustments on the
 links.
  It was confirmed that the errors cleared. The traffic load was also
 lowered
  on cards in Chicago to alleviate any further issues. Should any
 additional
  impact be experienced, please contact the Level 3 Technical Service
 Center.
 
  What the hell is a protocol issue?
 
  I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...
 
 
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
  - Original Message -
 
  From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
  To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
  Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
  Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)
 
  If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
  under Network Events now.
 
  Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets
 
  08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT
 
  Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified
 Internet
  Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts
 are
  in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
  time.
 
  08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT
 
  IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
  continue collaboratively working the issue.
 
 
  08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT
 
  Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in
  Chicago,
  IL investigating the issue.
 
 
  08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT
 
  The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
  services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
  dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.
 
  08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT
 
  IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
  currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III
  are
  actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The
 engineers
  have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
  customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum
 of
  hourly unless otherwise noted.
 



Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread chris
ill just leave this here :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ilMx7k7mso

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:

 I'll just leave this here


 https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/the-true-meaning-behind-most-rfos/

 On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jason Canady ja...@unlimitednet.us
 wrote:
  Mike, I would take it to mean someone screwed something up and they don't
  want to admit to it.  :-)  That's just a guess.
 
  --
 
  Jason Canady
  Unlimited Net, LLC
  Responsive, Reliable, Secure
 
  www.unlimitednet.us
  ja...@unlimitednet.us
  twitter: @unlimitednet
 
 
  On 8/28/15 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
 
  08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
  Event Conclusion Summary
 
  Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
  Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT
 
  Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
  Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.
 
  Summary:
  The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical
  Support. It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for
  customers. Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services
  were dispatched to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations.
  Troubleshooting identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering
  worked with Tier III Technical Support to perform adjustments on the
 links.
  It was confirmed that the errors cleared. The traffic load was also
 lowered
  on cards in Chicago to alleviate any further issues. Should any
 additional
  impact be experienced, please contact the Level 3 Technical Service
 Center.
 
  What the hell is a protocol issue?
 
  I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...
 
 
 
 
  -
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com
 
  - Original Message -
 
  From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
  To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
  Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
  Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
  Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)
 
  If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
  under Network Events now.
 
  Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets
 
  08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT
 
  Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified
 Internet
  Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
  in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
  time.
 
  08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT
 
  IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
  continue collaboratively working the issue.
 
 
  08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT
 
  Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in
  Chicago,
  IL investigating the issue.
 
 
  08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT
 
  The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
  services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
  dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.
 
  08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT
 
  IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
  currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III
  are
  actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
  have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
  customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
  hourly unless otherwise noted.
 
 



Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread chris
This reminded me of this great clip

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckIMuvumYrg

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:

 08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
 Event Conclusion Summary

 Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
 Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT

 Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
 Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.

 Summary:
 The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical
 Support. It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for
 customers. Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services
 were dispatched to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations.
 Troubleshooting identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering
 worked with Tier III Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links.
 It was confirmed that the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered
 on cards in Chicago to alleviate any further issues. Should any additional
 impact be experienced, please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.

 What the hell is a protocol issue?

 I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...




 -
 Mike Hammett
 Intelligent Computing Solutions
 http://www.ics-il.com

 - Original Message -

 From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
 To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
 Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
 Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
 Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

 If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
 under Network Events now.

 Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets

 08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT

 Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
 Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
 in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
 time.

 08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT

 IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
 continue collaboratively working the issue.


 08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT

 Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in Chicago,
 IL investigating the issue.


 08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT

 The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
 services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
 dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.

 08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT

 IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
 currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III are
 actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
 have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
 customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
 hourly unless otherwise noted.




Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

2015-08-28 Thread Richard Hesse
We've tried their products off an on for the past 3-4 years. Here are
my impressions:

* UI stuck in 1999. Can't click zoom, drill down, etc.
* Inflexible UI. Want a bandwidth graph with only egress or ingress? Too bad.
* Inexpensive. I don't like that it's licensed yearly, but it's not
too much money.
* Inaccurate flow processing. Do you have iBGP peering sessions
between border routers? WANGuard will struggle mightily to correctly
classify the traffic as internal or external.
* Yes, it runs out of memory quickly during a spoofed SYN flood with
many sources. This is due to setting the Top generator to Full. If you
just want to mitigate and not have any insight into network data, set
this to Extended and you'll be fine. But if you want to use
WANGuard/WANSight as a network intelligence tool as well, you need to
set the generator to Full and it will fall over.
* Doesn't process IPFIX flow data properly. There's an old thread on
the j-nsp list about this. Basically their support claims Juniper is
broken (which I don't doubt) but then refuses to work around the
issue. None of our other flow processing tools have these problems.
* Support is responsive at times and is always cranky. I brought them
two bonafide bugs in their product that they refused to admit. It got
to the point where I asked for my money back and I think someone in
sales lit up their support team. I get the feeling that the support
team is staffed with employees who really don't like their job or
working with customers. A bad combination.
* The TAP generators with Myricom cards work well. The docs say you
can use SolarFlare for TAPs but they don't work at all. Again, they
blame SolarFlare and say that the cards are too complicatedbut
fail to update their documentation saying this.
* Doesn't support any kind of layer 7 detection or filtering. It's all
very rudimentary layer 3-4 stuff. Considering how easy it is to block
layer 3/4 attacks on your own, their filtering clusters don't offer
much value.
* No real scale out solution on the detection side. It's basically
scale up your server or use clunky tech like NFS to share out
directories across managers.
* Works well enough to get you a rough idea of what's going on. It's
also decently cheap.

We use it as one part of our attack detection toolset. We don't use it
for on-site attack mitigation. I'd recommend it if you don't want to
use flow data and only want to use it for intelligence on TAP ports.

-richard

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Marcel Duregards
marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr wrote:
 Dear Nogers,
 We are currently evaluating some DDOS detection/mitigation solutions.
 Do you have any inputs/experiences on Wanguard from Andrisoft, please 
 ?https://www.andrisoft.com/software/wanguard
 Currently we are just interested on the packets/flows sensors with the 
 console for detection and RTBH trigger. Maybe the packet filtering (for 
 scrubbing) will come later.
 Best Regards,-Marcel Duregards





Weekly Routing Table Report

2015-08-28 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith pfsi...@gmail.com.

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 29 Aug, 2015

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  556877
Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS):  210209
Deaggregation factor:  2.65
Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets):  272891
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 51281
Prefixes per ASN: 10.86
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   36680
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   16140
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:6362
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:169
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.4
Max AS path length visible:  45
Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 55644)  41
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:  1164
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 426
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:  10780
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:8239
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:   30881
Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:18
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:1
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:417
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2792002752
Equivalent to 166 /8s, 106 /16s and 148 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   75.4
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   75.4
Percentage of available address space allocated:  100.0
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   97.6
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  185757

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:   137357
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   39703
APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.46
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:  144673
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:59491
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:5079
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   28.48
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   1207
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:893
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.5
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 45
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   1600
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  751999104
Equivalent to 44 /8s, 210 /16s and 152 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 87.9

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 63488-64098, 131072-135580
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8,
   163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8,
   203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8,
   222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:180309
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:88398
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.04
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   183221
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 86088
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:16593
ARIN Prefixes per 

Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread Randy

On 8/27/2015 11:00 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:

08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
Event Conclusion Summary

Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT

Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.

Summary:
The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical Support. 
It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for customers. 
Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services were dispatched 
to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations. Troubleshooting 
identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering worked with Tier III 
Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links. It was confirmed that 
the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered on cards in Chicago to 
alleviate any further issues. Should any additional impact be experienced, 
please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.

What the hell is a protocol issue?

I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...
I was having major issues yesterday. It wasn't with all traffic, and its 
seemed to have cleared up now.
I did do packet inspections, and I kept getting ethernet frame check 
errors from certain sources.
vast majority of packets did not have this extra data appended to the 
tcp portion of packet, and I think that is likely the reason for the 
issues, since those packets are supposed to be dropped if there is a 
checksum error. I'm by no means an expert, just voicing what I was seeing.






-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -

From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
under Network Events now.

Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets

08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT

Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
time.

08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT

IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
continue collaboratively working the issue.


08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT

Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in Chicago,
IL investigating the issue.


08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT

The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.

08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT

IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III are
actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
hourly unless otherwise noted.





The Cidr Report

2015-08-28 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Aug 28 21:14:41 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
21-08-15565311  307557
22-08-15565397  307372
23-08-15564695  307460
24-08-15564815  308049
25-08-15565247  307192
26-08-15565168  306930
27-08-15565019  306047
28-08-15565765  306135


AS Summary
 51555  Number of ASes in routing system
 20455  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  3344  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS10620: Telmex Colombia S.A.,CO
  120888576  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street,CN


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 28Aug15 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 565908   306049   25985945.9%   All ASes

AS22773 3168  169 299994.7%   ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
   Cox Communications Inc.,US
AS6389  2695   69 262697.4%   BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
   BellSouth.net Inc.,US
AS17974 2703   80 262397.0%   TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT
   Telekomunikasi Indonesia,ID
AS39891 2473   33 244098.7%   ALJAWWALSTC-AS Saudi Telecom
   Company JSC,SA
AS7545  2908  624 228478.5%   TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom
   Limited,AU
AS28573 2297  148 214993.6%   NET Serviços de Comunicação
   S.A.,BR
AS9394  2104  201 190390.4%   CTTNET China TieTong
   Telecommunications
   Corporation,CN
AS4766  3010 1280 173057.5%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom,KR
AS10620 3344 1619 172551.6%   Telmex Colombia S.A.,CO
AS9808  1585   75 151095.3%   CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile
   Communication Co.Ltd.,CN
AS6983  1736  245 149185.9%   ITCDELTA - Earthlink, Inc.,US
AS4755  2038  556 148272.7%   TATACOMM-AS TATA
   Communications formerly VSNL
   is Leading ISP,IN
AS20115 1877  406 147178.4%   CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter
   Communications,US
AS3356  2537 1217 132052.0%   LEVEL3 - Level 3
   Communications, Inc.,US
AS9498  1386  121 126591.3%   BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd.,IN
AS18566 2148  956 119255.5%   MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath
   Corporation,US
AS4323  1594  411 118374.2%   TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
   inc.,US
AS6147  1439  278 116180.7%   Telefonica del Peru S.A.A.,PE
AS6849  1208   74 113493.9%   UKRTELNET JSC UKRTELECOM,UA
AS4788  1191   68 112394.3%   TMNET-AS-AP TM Net, Internet
   Service Provider,MY
AS7303  1556  522 103466.5%   Telecom Argentina S.A.,AR
AS7552  1400  366 103473.9%   VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel
   Corporation,VN
AS22561 1377  343 103475.1%   CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-LIGHTCORE -
   CenturyTel Internet Holdings,
   Inc.,US
AS4808  1545  512 103366.9%   CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
   network China169 Beijing
   Province Network,CN
AS38197 1312  366  94672.1%   SUNHK-DATA-AS-AP Sun Network
   (Hong Kong) Limited,HK
AS26615 1098  153  94586.1%   Tim Celular S.A.,BR
AS8151  1693  763  93054.9%   Uninet S.A. de C.V.,MX
AS7738   996   77  91992.3%   Telemar Norte Leste S.A.,BR
AS8402   885   21  86497.6%   CORBINA-AS OJSC Vimpelcom,RU
AS38285  982  133  84986.5%   M2TELECOMMUNICATIONS-AU M2

BGP Update Report

2015-08-28 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report
Interval: 20-Aug-15 -to- 27-Aug-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072

TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS9829   285802  7.0% 221.9 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet 
Backbone,IN
 2 - AS38197  166147  4.0% 131.5 -- SUNHK-DATA-AS-AP Sun Network 
(Hong Kong) Limited,HK
 3 - AS22059  116439  2.8%   58219.5 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 4 - AS26210   80874  2.0% 569.5 -- AXS Bolivia S. A.,BO
 5 - AS370957253  1.4%2120.5 -- NET-CITY-SA - City of San 
Antonio,US
 6 - AS22773   52705  1.3% 566.7 -- ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox 
Communications Inc.,US
 7 - AS28024   46358  1.1%  29.5 -- Nuevatel PCS de Bolivia S.A.,BO
 8 - AS131090   37063  0.9% 134.3 -- CAT-IDC-4BYTENET-AS-AP 
 CAT TELECOM Public Company Ltd,CAT
,TH
 9 - AS13188   36755  0.9%  47.4 -- BANKINFORM-AS CONTENT DELIVERY 
NETWORK LTD,UA
10 - AS800134076  0.8% 173.9 -- NET-ACCESS-CORP - Net Access 
Corporation,US
11 - AS840231499  0.8% 106.4 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC Vimpelcom,RU
12 - AS56636   29589  0.7%   29589.0 -- ASVEDARU VEDA Ltd.,RU
13 - AS30295   29540  0.7%9846.7 -- 2ICSYSTEMSINC - 2iC Systems 
Inc.,CA
14 - AS25563   29032  0.7%9677.3 -- WEBLAND-AS Webland AG,CH
15 - AS199367   23140  0.6%   23140.0 -- AS_GBP Globe Business 
Publishing Limited,GB
16 - AS13999   22212  0.5%  52.6 -- Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V.,MX
17 - AS150520201  0.5%2525.1 -- DNIC-AS-01505 - Headquarters, 
USAISC,US
18 - AS22047   19138  0.5%  63.0 -- VTR BANDA ANCHA S.A.,CL
19 - AS684919087  0.5%  15.8 -- UKRTELNET JSC UKRTELECOM,UA
20 - AS200671   17998  0.4%   17998.0 -- SKOK-JAWORZNO SKOK Jaworzno,PL


TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS22059  116439  2.8%   58219.5 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 2 - AS56636   29589  0.7%   29589.0 -- ASVEDARU VEDA Ltd.,RU
 3 - AS199367   23140  0.6%   23140.0 -- AS_GBP Globe Business 
Publishing Limited,GB
 4 - AS200671   17998  0.4%   17998.0 -- SKOK-JAWORZNO SKOK Jaworzno,PL
 5 - AS28   14778  0.4%   14778.0 -- PIRUM-AS Pirum Systems 
Limited,GB
 6 - AS30295   29540  0.7%9846.7 -- 2ICSYSTEMSINC - 2iC Systems 
Inc.,CA
 7 - AS25563   29032  0.7%9677.3 -- WEBLAND-AS Webland AG,CH
 8 - AS375909254  0.2%9254.0 -- BCA-ASN,AO
 9 - AS404937840  0.2%7840.0 -- FACILITYSOURCEINC - 
FacilitySource,US
10 - AS3935887061  0.2%7061.0 -- MUBEA-FLO - Mubea,US
11 - AS31357   14599  0.4%4866.3 -- TOMICA-AS Tomsk Information and 
Consulting Agency,RU
12 - AS219734473  0.1%4473.0 -- XPONET - Xponet,US
13 - AS327786   17399  0.4%4349.8 -- TELECOM-4G,SS
14 - AS197068   16094  0.4%4023.5 -- QRATOR HLL LLC,RU
15 - AS557413614  0.1%3614.0 -- WBSDC-NET-IN West Bengal 
Electronics Industry Development,IN
16 - AS287736580  0.2%3290.0 -- MASTER-SERVICE-AS Global 
Technology Ukraine Ltd,UA
17 - AS514287804  0.2%2601.3 -- ASIRONNET IRONNET Ltd.,CZ
18 - AS380005147  0.1%2573.5 -- CRISIL-AS [CRISIL 
Limited.Autonomous System],IN
19 - AS150520201  0.5%2525.1 -- DNIC-AS-01505 - Headquarters, 
USAISC,US
20 - AS45606   12600  0.3%2520.0 -- 


TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
 1 - 64.34.125.0/2458586  1.4%   AS22059 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 2 - 76.191.107.0/24   57853  1.4%   AS22059 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 3 - 192.40.244.0/24   51955  1.2%   AS22773 -- ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox 
Communications Inc.,US
 4 - 61.7.155.0/24 35196  0.8%   AS131090 -- CAT-IDC-4BYTENET-AS-AP 
 CAT TELECOM Public Company Ltd,CAT
,TH
 5 - 192.135.223.0/24  33877  0.8%   AS8001  -- NET-ACCESS-CORP - Net Access 
Corporation,US
 6 - 195.128.159.0/24  29589  0.7%   AS56636 -- ASVEDARU VEDA Ltd.,RU
 7 - 185.19.144.0/22   23140  0.5%   AS199367 -- AS_GBP Globe Business 
Publishing Limited,GB
 8 - 155.133.79.0/24   17998  0.4%   AS200671 -- SKOK-JAWORZNO SKOK Jaworzno,PL
 9 - 185.65.148.0/24   16091  0.4%   AS197068 -- QRATOR HLL LLC,RU
10 - 185.38.132.0/24   14778  0.3%   AS28 -- PIRUM-AS Pirum Systems 
Limited,GB
11 - 78.140.0.0/18 14590  0.3%   AS31357 -- TOMICA-AS Tomsk Information and 
Consulting Agency,RU
12 - 187.244.68.0/22   13302  0.3%   AS13999 -- Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V.,MX
13 - 199.60.234.0/23   10150  0.2%   AS30295 -- 2ICSYSTEMSINC - 2iC Systems 
Inc.,CA
14 - 199.60.236.0/249942  0.2%   AS30295 -- 2ICSYSTEMSINC - 2iC Systems 
Inc.,CA
15 - 92.43.216.0/21 9916  0.2%   AS25563 -- WEBLAND-AS Webland AG,CH
16 - 185.84.192.0/229588  0.2%   AS25563 -- WEBLAND-AS Webland AG,CH
17 - 

Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread Paras

Personally I thought it was funny

I don't think it was meant to come across as offensive

On 8/28/2015 11:45 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:

Blake,

There's no call to be blatantly offensive like that.

-mel


On Aug 28, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:

I'll just leave this here

https://honestnetworker.wordpress.com/2013/11/04/the-true-meaning-behind-most-rfos/


On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Jason Canady ja...@unlimitednet.us wrote:
Mike, I would take it to mean someone screwed something up and they don't
want to admit to it.  :-)  That's just a guess.

--

Jason Canady
Unlimited Net, LLC
Responsive, Reliable, Secure

www.unlimitednet.us
ja...@unlimitednet.us
twitter: @unlimitednet



On 8/28/15 12:00 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:

08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
Event Conclusion Summary

Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT

Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.

Summary:
The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical
Support. It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for
customers. Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services
were dispatched to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations.
Troubleshooting identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering
worked with Tier III Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links.
It was confirmed that the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered
on cards in Chicago to alleviate any further issues. Should any additional
impact be experienced, please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.

What the hell is a protocol issue?

I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -

From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.net
To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
under Network Events now.

Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets

08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT

Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
time.

08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT

IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
continue collaboratively working the issue.


08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT

Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in
Chicago,
IL investigating the issue.


08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT

The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.

08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT

IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III
are
actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
hourly unless otherwise noted.





Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

2015-08-28 Thread Mel Beckman
Randy,

Frame Check Sequence errors are not a problem if you are capturing your packets 
from an endpoint system such as a PC participating in communications. Modern 
network cards do checksum offloading, so the FCS is calculated and applied by 
the NIC instead of by the OS. If you're capturing on one of the endpoints, 
Wireshark will see frames transmitted by that endpoint machine before the NIC 
inserts a correct FCS.

If communication succeeds (e.g., you see replies to pings), then there is not 
really an FCS error. If the FCS really was incorrect, the NIC would have 
discarded them, and you wouldn't see replies.

It's best to capture directly from the wire (for example, from a switch span 
port or a network tap) rather than an endpoint involved in the communication.

-mel

On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Randy na...@afxr.netmailto:na...@afxr.net 
wrote:

On 8/27/2015 11:00 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
08/28/2015 3:08 AM GMT
Event Conclusion Summary

Start: August 27, 2015 13:20 GMT
Stop: August 28, 2015 00:00 GMT

Root Cause: A protocol issue impacted IP services in multiple markets.
Fix Action: Adjustments were made to clear the errors.

Summary:
The IP NOC began investigating the root cause with Tier III Technical Support. 
It was reported that the issue was causing packet loss for customers. 
Operations Engineering teams were engaged, and Field Services were dispatched 
to a site in Chicago, IL to assist with investigations. Troubleshooting 
identified a protocol issue, and Operations Engineering worked with Tier III 
Technical Support to perform adjustments on the links. It was confirmed that 
the errors cleared. The traffic load was also lowered on cards in Chicago to 
alleviate any further issues. Should any additional impact be experienced, 
please contact the Level 3 Technical Service Center.

What the hell is a protocol issue?

I'm not an idiot, you can tell me specifically what happened...
I was having major issues yesterday. It wasn't with all traffic, and its seemed 
to have cleared up now.
I did do packet inspections, and I kept getting ethernet frame check errors 
from certain sources.
vast majority of packets did not have this extra data appended to the tcp 
portion of packet, and I think that is likely the reason for the issues, since 
those packets are supposed to be dropped if there is a checksum error. I'm by 
no means an expert, just voicing what I was seeing.




-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

- Original Message -

From: Ryan Gelobter rya...@atwgpc.netmailto:rya...@atwgpc.net
To: Mel Beckman m...@beckman.orgmailto:m...@beckman.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.orgmailto:nanog@nanog.org 
nanog@nanog.orgmailto:nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:14:59 PM
Subject: Re: Level(3) ex-twtelecom midwest packet loss (4323)

If you have access to the Level3 portal you should see ticket #9639047
under Network Events now.

Event Summary:IP Network Event ~ Multiple Markets

08/27/2015 8:05 PM GMT

Level 3 Tier III and Operations Engineering teams have identified Internet
Protocols dropping, affecting customer services. Restoration efforts are
in progress, but an estimated time of restoral is not available at this
time.

08/27/2015 6:36 PM GMT

IP and Transport Tier III, Operations Engineering and Field Services
continue collaboratively working the issue.


08/27/2015 4:59 PM GMT

Operations Engineering is engaged and Field Services is on site in Chicago,
IL investigating the issue.


08/27/2015 4:38 PM GMT

The engineers are currently migrating traffic in efforts of restoring
services while troubleshooting continues. Field Services is being
dispatched to a Chicago, IL site to assist.

08/27/2015 4:21 PM GMT

IP services are affected across multiple markets and the root cause is
currently under investigation. The IP NOC and IP and Transport Tier III are
actively troubleshooting and working to isolate the cause. The engineers
have detected peering issues which are resulting in packet loss for
customers. Please be advised that updates will be provided at minimum of
hourly unless otherwise noted.