ARIN IRR

[Mike Hammett]

I'm not here to debate how awesome or poor ARIN's IRR is. 

I've created my first objects in there, verified they exist via the ARIN RR 
whois and seen them show up in IRR Explorer. How do I verify that I've actually 
done them all correctly? 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

Re: ARIN IRR

[Job Snijders]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 08:32:42AM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I'm not here to debate how awesome or poor ARIN's IRR is. 
> 
> I've created my first objects in there, verified they exist via the
> ARIN RR whois and seen them show up in IRR Explorer. How do I verify
> that I've actually done them all correctly? 

You can input your AS number to look for more hints:

http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/15562

Kind regards,

Job

Software Defined Networking

[Rod Beck]

Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?

This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. If 
you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that 
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments 
thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately telephone 
or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of 
this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements 
referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The contents of an 
attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses that could damage your 
own computer system. While Hibernia Networks has taken every reasonable 
precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage 
that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should carry out your own 
virus checks before opening any attachment.

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Jethro R Binks]

About every edition of Packet Pushers Podcast for the last 18 months would 
be a good start probably.  That'll keep you busy.

Jethro.


On Fri, 4 Sep 2015, Rod Beck wrote:

> Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the 
> addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. 
> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified 
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any 
> attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is 
> strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
> telephone or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and 
> any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts 
> or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. 
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses 
> that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Networks has taken 
> every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability 
> for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should 
> carry out your
  own virus checks before opening any attachment.
> 

.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
Jethro R Binks, Network Manager,
Information Services Directorate, University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

The University of Strathclyde is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, number SC015263.

Re: Software Defined Networking

[John Kristoff]

On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 14:40:31 +
Rod Beck  wrote:

> Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?

A bit more effort will be required on your part to get the most out
it, but one potentially in depth resource would be Nick Feamster's
Software Defined Networking course, currently available through
Coursera:

  

John

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Larry Sheldon]

On 9/4/2015 12:57, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:

I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:

220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal
disclaimers are null and void.
220 You also agree that I am awesome.


I like that.  Unfortunately, I no longer operate a mail host.

I have been trying to figure out how to mechanically route messages 
containing them to the spam sump.


IANAL, but I thing an interesting case would be trying to enforce that 
crap in a situation involving unsolicited email (as in this case).


--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

Weekly Routing Table Report

[Routing Analysis Role Account]

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 05 Sep, 2015

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:   30167
Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS):   12174
Deaggregation factor:  2.48
Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets):   10608
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:  4848
Prefixes per ASN:  6.22
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:3304
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:2007
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:1198
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:707
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.3
Max AS path length visible:  36
Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 55644)  31
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:63
Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:  45
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:  10864
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 346
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 854
Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 0
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:  9
Number of addresses announced to Internet:258338464
Equivalent to 15 /8s, 101 /16s and 238 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:7.0
Percentage of allocated address space announced:7.0
Percentage of available address space allocated:  100.0
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   97.6
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:8184

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 8544
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:1854
APNIC Deaggregation factor:4.61
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:8266
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 3049
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 501
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   16.50
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:125
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:195
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.6
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 36
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 27
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:   45189632
Equivalent to 2 /8s, 177 /16s and 138 /24s
Percentage of available APNIC address space announced:  5.3

APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 63488-64098, 131072-135580
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8,
   163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8,
   203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8,
   222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 12219
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 5908
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.07
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:13925
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks:  3821
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1960
ARIN Prefixes per 

Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

[Larry Sheldon]

Y'all can stop thumping on me about it "because it is required by the 
employer".


After contemplating my navel for a while, it dawned on me that my 
sensitivity is due to an old wound.


Years ago, Faculty, Staff, Students, and myriad others more or less 
loosely connected with my employer complained that they could never make 
contact with me.


As a defensive measure (among others) I crafted a .sig that contained 
all of the telephone numbers and email addresses by which I could be 
reached (included a pager number) 7 x 24 x 52 with (guaranteed) no more 
than 20 minute delay.


It ran to 7 lines, including the dash dash space EOL protocol sentinel.

I was banned from NANOG because of the excessive length.  (And yes, I 
got banned for other things at other times as well, mostly having to to 
do with trying to protect the network I administered from abuse.)

--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Pawel Rybczyk]

Hi Rod,

Ivan's Pepelnjak blog is good source of information about SDN (and what
it is not).

Blog link:
http://blog.ipspace.net/search/label/SDN

Ivan's presentation at last RIPE meeting in Amsterdam:

Software Defined Networks - Four Years Later
https://youtu.be/z-NW3GIFyss


Cheers,
Pawel

On 09/04/2015 04:40 PM, Rod Beck wrote:
> Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by the 
> addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally privileged. 
> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified 
> that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any 
> attachments thereto, without the prior written permission of the sender is 
> strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
> telephone or e-mail the sender and permanently delete the original copy and 
> any copy of this e-mail, and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts 
> or agreements referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. 
> The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses 
> that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Networks has taken 
> every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we cannot accept liability 
> for any damage that you sustain as a result of software viruses. You should 
> carry out your
  
own virus checks before opening any attachment.
> 

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Aaron C. de Bruyn]

I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:

220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal
disclaimers are null and void.
220 You also agree that I am awesome.

-A

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Larry Sheldon  wrote:
> On 9/4/2015 09:40, Rod Beck wrote:
>>
>> Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by
>> the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally
>> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you
>> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
>> of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written
>> permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
>> e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or e-mail the sender
>> and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail,
>> and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements
>> referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The
>> contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
>> that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Networks
>> has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we
>> cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result
>> of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks
>> before opening any attachment.
>>
>
> All of that for 11 1/2 words?
>
> Ineducable.
> --
> sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

Re: Weekly Routing Table Report

[Hugo Slabbert]

BGP routing table entries examined:   30167

...

   Percentage of available address space announced:7.0
   Percentage of allocated address space announced:7.0


erm...y'all missing some prefixes on the collector for the report?

--
Hugo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

[Larry Sheldon]

On 9/4/2015 14:40, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:

There's quite a difference between the 'legal babble' and 'contact
info' at the end of a message.


What part of "required by employer" is different?

I'm not seeing it.


--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Fred Hollis]

Hi,

Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj 
area for cogent/level3/zayo?

Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Fred Hollis]

1.|-- hosted-by-i3d.net 0.0% 10 8.1 17.3 0.3 144.6 45.0
2.|-- 80ge.cr0-br2-br3.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 2.1 0.2 9.4 3.0
3.|-- 40ge.cr1-cr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 7.3 0.3 13.3 5.7
4.|-- ae51.edge4.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 10 10.6 14.2 7.6 30.4 7.5
5.|-- 4.69.156.9 90.0% 10 224.7 224.7 224.7 224.7 0.0
6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|-- cs20.cs90.v.ewr.nyinternet.net 80.0% 10 169.4 168.8 168.1 169.4 0.9
9.|-- 96.47.77.134.static.nyinternet.net 90.0% 10 167.7 167.7 167.7 
167.7 0.0

10.|-- ftw.nj.nyi.net 90.0% 10 169.4 169.4 169.4 169.4 0.0

Having this to almost every network located in NYC/NJ that is going 
through the said three carrier from many locations.


On 04.09.2015 at 23:24 Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:

Hi,

wer're working with Telia and Hurricane in NYC and we only see some latency 
flaps in the HE network  flapping from 0.3 to ~15ms. Nothing really bad. No 
visible packet loss.


Best regards

Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500

E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
Web: http://www.anexia.at

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:18
An: nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

Hi,

Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj
area for cogent/level3/zayo?

Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

[Aaron C. de Bruyn]

There's quite a difference between the 'legal babble' and 'contact
info' at the end of a message.
Regardless, my comment was meant for fun, not to upset you.

-A

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Larry Sheldon  wrote:
> Y'all can stop thumping on me about it "because it is required by the
> employer".
>
> After contemplating my navel for a while, it dawned on me that my
> sensitivity is due to an old wound.
>
> Years ago, Faculty, Staff, Students, and myriad others more or less loosely
> connected with my employer complained that they could never make contact
> with me.
>
> As a defensive measure (among others) I crafted a .sig that contained all of
> the telephone numbers and email addresses by which I could be reached
> (included a pager number) 7 x 24 x 52 with (guaranteed) no more than 20
> minute delay.
>
> It ran to 7 lines, including the dash dash space EOL protocol sentinel.
>
> I was banned from NANOG because of the excessive length.  (And yes, I got
> banned for other things at other times as well, mostly having to to do with
> trying to protect the network I administered from abuse.)
> --
> sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

AW: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Jürgen Jaritsch]

Hi,

wer're working with Telia and Hurricane in NYC and we only see some latency 
flaps in the HE network  flapping from 0.3 to ~15ms. Nothing really bad. No 
visible packet loss.


Best regards

Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500

E-Mail: j...@anexia.at 
Web: http://www.anexia.at

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:18
An: nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

Hi,

Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj 
area for cogent/level3/zayo?

Updating dns glue

[Mike]

Hi,

Due to a recent fiber cut in northern california, I've stepped up 
my plan to have one authoritative dns and backup mail exchanger located 
on another network far, far away. I am sadly having immense trouble with 
dotster understanding that I need to update the ip address of a glue 
record, as I host my own stuff,  for which their gui has no abillity and 
which phone support says open a ticket for which the e-mailed response 
was utter cluelessness, claiming they checked and it's already set... 
yeah, you recursed and hit my existing ns which gave you the answer, but 
it's the roots which need to know 


Honestly the last time I mucked with this low level of a function I 
was actually emailing unenceypted spoofed 'mail from' secured templates 
to internic. I find the modern registrars to be a huge improvement, but 
in this regard I am confounded. I needed this done 24 hours ago. Anyone 
out there can tell me how to get this done?


Mike-

Re: Akamai Geolocation Secret Sauce?

[Gustavo Rodrigues Ramos]

Hello Ray,

I'm not familiar with Akamai's secret sauce. But I suppose geolocation
databases can be outdated very fast over time and things are getting worst
with the ipv4 depletion...

However, if you have a very large number of nodes spread across the globe,
you could use rtt and edns0 client subnet to map users and their locations.

https://blogs.akamai.com/2013/03/intelligent-user-mapping-in-the-cloud.html
https://blogs.akamai.com/2015/08/end-user-mapping-brings-users-closer-to-internet-nirvana.html

Regards,
Gustavo.


On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Ray Van Dolson  wrote:

> Anyone familiar with how Akamai does its geolocation?  Presumably they
> do more than Maxmind/WHOIS, but I suppose one or both of those could
> factor in?
>
> For those of you with ARIN IP space, do you typically SWIP things to
> yourself to help clarify the locations where the IP space physically
> resides to feed into Geolocation databases?
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>

Re: Akamai Geolocation Secret Sauce?

[Patrick W. Gilmore]

Akamai’s DB is frequently updated, not dependent upon SWIP, and has been 
measured as the most accurate of all the providers for something over a decade.

How they do it is proprietary. And sure, it can be wrong. Very wrong. But those 
times are rare, and they are good at updating when you tell them.

If you think about it, Akamai updates its CDN map frequently, and is not 
limited to the prefixes in the DFZ. So keeping a geo-location DB - not giving 
away any secrets here, just hypothesizing - seems like it would almost, but not 
quite, just fall out of all the other work they are doing anyway.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

> On Sep 4, 2015, at 11:37 PM, Gustavo Rodrigues Ramos  
> wrote:
> 
> Hello Ray,
> 
> I'm not familiar with Akamai's secret sauce. But I suppose geolocation
> databases can be outdated very fast over time and things are getting worst
> with the ipv4 depletion...
> 
> However, if you have a very large number of nodes spread across the globe,
> you could use rtt and edns0 client subnet to map users and their locations.
> 
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2013/03/intelligent-user-mapping-in-the-cloud.html
> https://blogs.akamai.com/2015/08/end-user-mapping-brings-users-closer-to-internet-nirvana.html
> 
> Regards,
> Gustavo.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Ray Van Dolson  wrote:
> 
>> Anyone familiar with how Akamai does its geolocation?  Presumably they
>> do more than Maxmind/WHOIS, but I suppose one or both of those could
>> factor in?
>> 
>> For those of you with ARIN IP space, do you typically SWIP things to
>> yourself to help clarify the locations where the IP space physically
>> resides to feed into Geolocation databases?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ray
>> 

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Larry Sheldon]

On 9/4/2015 09:40, Rod Beck wrote:

Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?

This e-mail and any attachments thereto is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may be proprietary and/or legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying
of this email, and any attachments thereto, without the prior written
permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
e-mail in error, please immediately telephone or e-mail the sender
and permanently delete the original copy and any copy of this e-mail,
and any printout thereof. All documents, contracts or agreements
referred or attached to this e-mail are SUBJECT TO CONTRACT. The
contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses
that could damage your own computer system. While Hibernia Networks
has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, we
cannot accept liability for any damage that you sustain as a result
of software viruses. You should carry out your own virus checks
before opening any attachment.



All of that for 11 1/2 words?

Ineducable.
--
sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal)

The Cidr Report

[cidr-report]

This report has been generated at Fri Sep  4 21:14:47 2015 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.

Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report.

Recent Table History
Date  PrefixesCIDR Agg
28-08-15565765  306001
29-08-15565902  305994
30-08-15566011  305946
31-08-15565838  305759
01-09-15565663  305975
02-09-15565830  306333
03-09-15565947  306913
04-09-15566067  307642


AS Summary
 51628  Number of ASes in routing system
 20478  Number of ASes announcing only one prefix
  3352  Largest number of prefixes announced by an AS
AS10620: Telmex Colombia S.A.,CO
  120888576  Largest address span announced by an AS (/32s)
AS4134 : CHINANET-BACKBONE No.31,Jin-rong Street,CN


Aggregation Summary
The algorithm used in this report proposes aggregation only
when there is a precise match using the AS path, so as 
to preserve traffic transit policies. Aggregation is also
proposed across non-advertised address space ('holes').

 --- 04Sep15 ---
ASnumNetsNow NetsAggr  NetGain   % Gain   Description

Table 566191   307544   25864745.7%   All ASes

AS22773 3176  171 300594.6%   ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC -
   Cox Communications Inc.,US
AS17974 2707   80 262797.0%   TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT
   Telekomunikasi Indonesia,ID
AS6389  2695   69 262697.4%   BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
   BellSouth.net Inc.,US
AS39891 2473   30 244398.8%   ALJAWWALSTC-AS Saudi Telecom
   Company JSC,SA
AS7545  2912  647 226577.8%   TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom
   Limited,AU
AS28573 2275  137 213894.0%   NET Serviços de Comunicação
   S.A.,BR
AS9394  2105  201 190490.5%   CTTNET China TieTong
   Telecommunications
   Corporation,CN
AS4766  3000 1272 172857.6%   KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom,KR
AS10620 3352 1630 172251.4%   Telmex Colombia S.A.,CO
AS9808  1585   75 151095.3%   CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile
   Communication Co.Ltd.,CN
AS6983  1739  247 149285.8%   ITCDELTA - Earthlink, Inc.,US
AS4755  2042  561 148172.5%   TATACOMM-AS TATA
   Communications formerly VSNL
   is Leading ISP,IN
AS20115 1881  408 147378.3%   CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter
   Communications,US
AS3356  2541 1220 132152.0%   LEVEL3 - Level 3
   Communications, Inc.,US
AS9498  1386  120 126691.3%   BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd.,IN
AS18566 2147  956 119155.5%   MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath
   Corporation,US
AS4323  1588  405 118374.5%   TWTC - tw telecom holdings,
   inc.,US
AS6849  1210   74 113693.9%   UKRTELNET JSC UKRTELECOM,UA
AS4788  1202   69 113394.3%   TMNET-AS-AP TM Net, Internet
   Service Provider,MY
AS6147  1404  278 112680.2%   Telefonica del Peru S.A.A.,PE
AS7552  1423  382 104173.2%   VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel
   Corporation,VN
AS7303  1556  522 103466.5%   Telecom Argentina S.A.,AR
AS4808  1546  513 103366.8%   CHINA169-BJ CNCGROUP IP
   network China169 Beijing
   Province Network,CN
AS22561 1375  344 103175.0%   CENTURYLINK-LEGACY-LIGHTCORE -
   CenturyTel Internet Holdings,
   Inc.,US
AS26615 1098  153  94586.1%   Tim Celular S.A.,BR
AS8402   965   24  94197.5%   CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom",RU
AS8151  1704  779  92554.3%   Uninet S.A. de C.V.,MX
AS7738   996   77  91992.3%   Telemar Norte Leste S.A.,BR
AS38285  982  133  84986.5%   M2TELECOMMUNICATIONS-AU M2
   Telecommunications Group
   Ltd,AU
AS55430  876 

Akamai Geolocation Secret Sauce?

[Ray Van Dolson]

Anyone familiar with how Akamai does its geolocation?  Presumably they
do more than Maxmind/WHOIS, but I suppose one or both of those could
factor in?

For those of you with ARIN IP space, do you typically SWIP things to
yourself to help clarify the locations where the IP space physically
resides to feed into Geolocation databases?

Thanks,
Ray

Re: Software Defined Networking

[alvin nanog]

hi valdis

On 09/04/15 at 06:59pm, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> 
> Does anybody have a citation that legal disclaimers attached to
> publicly posted mail aren't null and void?  Seems to me that
> what they're trying to say is "Sorry, we're too lame to use
> PGP or similar on actually sensitive e-mail"...

i keep wondering why "they" keep using sniffable clear text 
smtp/imap/pop3 instead of at least encrypted version

the problem also is both ends, the sender and the receiver
and all the laptops/desktops need to be configured

more importantly, why not just use https based webmail
or even smpts encrypted google mail where less setup and
configuring would be needed for sender and receiver

have a nice weekend
alvin
#
# DDoS-Mitigator.com
#

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Niraj Kacha]

> On 4 Sep 2015, at 15:40, Rod Beck  wrote:
> 
> Can anyone provide references on this top so I can educate myself?

This might be of help

http://packetpushers.net/sdn-network-virtualization-hypervisors/

Niraj
--
Niraj Kacha
Network Security
Loughborough University



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: Akamai Geolocation Secret Sauce?

[Nicholas Harland]

The people who could answer that question are quite unlikely to do so on a
public mailing list, but I'm sure that having a huge number of servers
deployed to a huge number of known physical locations on networks across
the globe plays a big part in the ingredients.

If you think Akamai or any other network is geolocating incorrectly,
contact their support. Or if you just want to know how the geo sauce is
made, many companies file the best parts of their recipes online:
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=pts=en=akamai+geolocation

Nick Harland

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ray Van Dolson  wrote:

> Anyone familiar with how Akamai does its geolocation?  Presumably they
> do more than Maxmind/WHOIS, but I suppose one or both of those could
> factor in?
>
> For those of you with ARIN IP space, do you typically SWIP things to
> yourself to help clarify the locations where the IP space physically
> resides to feed into Geolocation databases?
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>

Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Mark Blackman]

> On 4 Sep 2015, at 22:18, Fred Hollis  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj area 
> for cogent/level3/zayo?

From London, yes to a general problem, but not sure if it’s specific to NYC, 
just East Coast in general.

Start: Fri Sep  4 22:31:02 2015 BST
HOST: severnLoss%   Snt   Last   
Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- gw1.thn.exonetric.net  0.0%107.7   
0.9   0.2   7.7   2.4
  2.|-- e1-3-2.a00.londen03.uk.ra.gin.ntt.net  0.0%100.6   
0.8   0.5   1.4   0.0
  3.|-- be3028.ccr21.lon02.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%100.8   
0.9   0.8   1.2   0.0
  4.|-- be2328.ccr21.lon01.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%101.0   
0.9   0.8   1.2   0.0
  5.|-- be2178.ccr42.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%101.0   
1.0   0.9   1.1   0.0
  6.|-- ???   100.0100.0   
0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
  7.|-- be2268.ccr41.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com 80.0%10  147.2 
145.7 144.2 147.2   2.0
  8.|-- be2657.ccr42.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com 90.0%10  145.4 
145.4 145.4 145.4   0.0
  9.|-- be2149.ccr42.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com 90.0%10  145.0 
145.0 145.0 145.0   0.0
 10.|-- be2149.ccr42.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com 80.0%10  154.7 
152.4 150.1 154.7   3.2
 11.|-- be2113.ccr42.atl01.atlas.cogentco.com 80.0%10  163.3 
162.6 161.8 163.3   1.0
 12.|-- ???   100.0100.0   
0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 13.|-- ???   100.0 80.0   
0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 14.|-- te0-0-1-0.agr12.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com  71.4% 7  182.0 
181.9 181.7 182.0   0.0
 15.|-- te0-0-2-3.nr11.b000821-1.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com 71.4% 7  183.3 
182.8 182.2 183.3   0.0
 16.|-- ???   100.0 70.0   
0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0

AW: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Jürgen Jaritsch]

Hi,

I do see one of our offices down ... but ftw.nj.nyi.net is reachable without 
any issue for us (but the path differ from yours):

   Packets   Pings
 HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best 
 Wrst StDev
 1. cr-01.0v-00-05.anx32.nyc.us.anexia-it.com 0.0%470.5   5.4   0.4 
 80.3  17.4
 2. cs70.nyi.net  0.0%470.9   6.7   0.8 
118.0  21.4
 3. cs70.cs80.v.ewr.nyinternet.net0.0%472.6   8.1   2.0 
144.8  27.0
 4. 96.47.77.142.static.nyinternet.net0.0%472.1   2.1   2.0 
  3.1   0.1
 5. ftw.nj.nyi.net0.0%472.0   2.0   1.9 
  2.2   0.1

One other thing we do see: looks like Level3 is broken globally ... we can't 
send traffic from Europe via Level3 to the Asian region:

  Packets   
Pings
 Host   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  
Best  Wrst StDev
 1. er-03.0v-00-03.anx04.vie.at.anexia-it.com0.0%   1010.3   0.4   
0.3   2.2   0.2
 2. cr-04.0v-08-71.anx03.vie.at.anexia-it.com0.0%   1010.8   0.8   
0.4  17.8   2.0
 3. win-b4-link.telia.net0.0%   1010.5   1.6   
0.5  29.1   4.0
 4. level-ic-1573273-wien-b4.c.telia.net 0.0%   1010.5   3.6   
0.4  85.3  12.1
 5. ???
 6. 4.69.152.14499.0%   100  307.4 307.4 
307.4 307.4   0.0
 7. 4.53.208.10289.9%   100  253.8 255.7 
251.3 265.8   3.9
 8. TenGE4-2.br01.tok02.pccwbtn.net 87.9%   100  524.0 406.4 
366.9 536.7  66.9
 9. cr-01.0v-00-08.anx11.tyo.jp.anexia-it.com   91.9%   100  368.1 371.0 
365.4 382.9   5.5
10. anx-lg-jp-tyo01.anexia-it.com   96.0%   100  368.9 368.6 
366.9 369.3   1.1

We'll start a ticket with Level3 support ... hopefully they will share some 
information (in the next days ... ).

Best regards

Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500

E-Mail: j...@anexia.at 
Web: http://www.anexia.at

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:34
An: nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

1.|-- hosted-by-i3d.net 0.0% 10 8.1 17.3 0.3 144.6 45.0
2.|-- 80ge.cr0-br2-br3.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 2.1 0.2 9.4 3.0
3.|-- 40ge.cr1-cr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 7.3 0.3 13.3 5.7
4.|-- ae51.edge4.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 10 10.6 14.2 7.6 30.4 7.5
5.|-- 4.69.156.9 90.0% 10 224.7 224.7 224.7 224.7 0.0
6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|-- cs20.cs90.v.ewr.nyinternet.net 80.0% 10 169.4 168.8 168.1 169.4 0.9
9.|-- 96.47.77.134.static.nyinternet.net 90.0% 10 167.7 167.7 167.7 
167.7 0.0
10.|-- ftw.nj.nyi.net 90.0% 10 169.4 169.4 169.4 169.4 0.0

Having this to almost every network located in NYC/NJ that is going 
through the said three carrier from many locations.

On 04.09.2015 at 23:24 Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wer're working with Telia and Hurricane in NYC and we only see some latency 
> flaps in the HE network  flapping from 0.3 to ~15ms. Nothing really bad. 
> No visible packet loss.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Jürgen Jaritsch
> Head of Network & Infrastructure
>
> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>
> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>
> E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
> Web: http://www.anexia.at
>
> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:18
> An: nanog@nanog.org
> Betreff: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj
> area for cogent/level3/zayo?
>

BGP Update Report

[cidr-report]

BGP Update Report
Interval: 27-Aug-15 -to- 03-Sep-15 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072

TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS22047  236563  5.5% 854.0 -- VTR BANDA ANCHA S.A.,CL
 2 - AS9829   187555  4.4% 182.6 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet 
Backbone,IN
 3 - AS22059  118656  2.8%   59328.0 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 4 - AS38197   86971  2.0%  62.3 -- SUNHK-DATA-AS-AP Sun Network 
(Hong Kong) Limited,HK
 5 - AS53271   76774  1.8%6979.5 -- PHENIXCITYCABLE - Phenix 
Cable,US
 6 - AS370959647  1.4%2209.1 -- NET-CITY-SA - City of San 
Antonio,US
 7 - AS150551748  1.2%6468.5 -- DNIC-AS-01505 - Headquarters, 
USAISC,US
 8 - AS840247582  1.1%  73.8 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom",RU
 9 - AS199367   46790  1.1%   46790.0 -- AS_GBP Globe Business 
Publishing Limited,GB
10 - AS800143042  1.0%   14347.3 -- NET-ACCESS-CORP - Net Access 
Corporation,US
11 - AS837637224  0.9% 152.6 -- Jordan Data Communications 
Company LLC,JO
12 - AS28   31626  0.7%   10542.0 -- PIRUM-AS Pirum Systems 
Limited,GB
13 - AS30295   31122  0.7%3890.2 -- 2ICSYSTEMSINC - 2iC Systems 
Inc.,CA
14 - AS131090   30911  0.7%2207.9 -- CAT-IDC-4BYTENET-AS-AP 
 CAT TELECOM Public Company Ltd,CAT
,TH
15 - AS56636   30098  0.7%   30098.0 -- ASVEDARU VEDA Ltd.,RU
16 - AS25563   26268  0.6%8756.0 -- WEBLAND-AS Webland AG,CH
17 - AS815122990  0.5%  19.6 -- Uninet S.A. de C.V.,MX
18 - AS28573   22465  0.5%  21.1 -- NET Serviços de Comunicação 
S.A.,BR
19 - AS31549   19468  0.5%  91.4 -- RASANA Aria Shatel Company 
Ltd,IR
20 - AS13999   19020  0.5%  44.4 -- Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V.,MX


TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix)
Rank ASNUpds %  Upds/PfxAS-Name
 1 - AS22059  118656  2.8%   59328.0 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 2 - AS199367   46790  1.1%   46790.0 -- AS_GBP Globe Business 
Publishing Limited,GB
 3 - AS56636   30098  0.7%   30098.0 -- ASVEDARU VEDA Ltd.,RU
 4 - AS200671   17285  0.4%   17285.0 -- SKOK-JAWORZNO SKOK Jaworzno,PL
 5 - AS31357   15377  0.4%   15377.0 -- TOMICA-AS Tomsk Information and 
Consulting Agency,RU
 6 - AS800143042  1.0%   14347.3 -- NET-ACCESS-CORP - Net Access 
Corporation,US
 7 - AS28   31626  0.7%   10542.0 -- PIRUM-AS Pirum Systems 
Limited,GB
 8 - AS25563   26268  0.6%8756.0 -- WEBLAND-AS Webland AG,CH
 9 - AS375907760  0.2%7760.0 -- BCA-ASN,AO
10 - AS404937694  0.2%7694.0 -- FACILITYSOURCEINC - 
FacilitySource,US
11 - AS53271   76774  1.8%6979.5 -- PHENIXCITYCABLE - Phenix 
Cable,US
12 - AS150551748  1.2%6468.5 -- DNIC-AS-01505 - Headquarters, 
USAISC,US
13 - AS380004721  0.1%4721.0 -- CRISIL-AS [CRISIL 
Limited.Autonomous System],IN
14 - AS30295   31122  0.7%3890.2 -- 2ICSYSTEMSINC - 2iC Systems 
Inc.,CA
15 - AS557413549  0.1%3549.0 -- WBSDC-NET-IN West Bengal 
Electronics Industry Development,IN
16 - AS254703171  0.1%3171.0 -- SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN-PLC-AS 
Scottish and Southern Energy PLC,GB
17 - AS327786   12457  0.3%3114.2 -- TELECOM-4G,SS
18 - AS159232389  0.1%2389.0 -- ASN-LOGOS Logos S.P.A.,IT
19 - AS370959647  1.4%2209.1 -- NET-CITY-SA - City of San 
Antonio,US
20 - AS131090   30911  0.7%2207.9 -- CAT-IDC-4BYTENET-AS-AP 
 CAT TELECOM Public Company Ltd,CAT
,TH


TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes
Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name
 1 - 64.34.125.0/2459501  1.3%   AS22059 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 2 - 76.191.107.0/24   59155  1.3%   AS22059 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ
 3 - 185.19.144.0/22   46790  1.1%   AS199367 -- AS_GBP Globe Business 
Publishing Limited,GB
 4 - 192.135.223.0/24  43033  1.0%   AS8001  -- NET-ACCESS-CORP - Net Access 
Corporation,US
 5 - 185.38.132.0/24   31605  0.7%   AS28 -- PIRUM-AS Pirum Systems 
Limited,GB
 6 - 61.7.155.0/24 30833  0.7%   AS131090 -- CAT-IDC-4BYTENET-AS-AP 
 CAT TELECOM Public Company Ltd,CAT
,TH
 7 - 195.128.159.0/24  30098  0.7%   AS56636 -- ASVEDARU VEDA Ltd.,RU
 8 - 162.218.162.0/23  21066  0.5%   AS53271 -- PHENIXCITYCABLE - Phenix 
Cable,US
 9 - 162.218.160.0/21  20291  0.5%   AS53271 -- PHENIXCITYCABLE - Phenix 
Cable,US
10 - 24.38.128.0/2218183  0.4%   AS53271 -- PHENIXCITYCABLE - Phenix 
Cable,US
11 - 155.133.79.0/24   17285  0.4%   AS200671 -- SKOK-JAWORZNO SKOK Jaworzno,PL
12 - 24.38.128.0/2017224  0.4%   AS53271 -- PHENIXCITYCABLE - Phenix 
Cable,US
13 - 78.140.0.0/18 15377  0.3%   AS31357 -- TOMICA-AS Tomsk Information and 
Consulting Agency,RU
14 - 187.244.0.0/2213746  0.3%   AS13999 -- Mega Cable, S.A. de C.V.,MX
15 - 199.60.234.0/23   10680  0.2%   

AW: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Jürgen Jaritsch]

Surprise, surprise ... the cleaning staff stopped his worked and connected back 
in the correct cord ...

Looks like everything went back to normal 


Best regards



Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500

E-Mail: j...@anexia.at 
Web: http://www.anexia.at

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Jürgen Jaritsch
Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:45
An: Fred Hollis ; nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: AW: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

Hi,

I do see one of our offices down ... but ftw.nj.nyi.net is reachable without 
any issue for us (but the path differ from yours):

   Packets   Pings
 HostLoss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best 
 Wrst StDev
 1. cr-01.0v-00-05.anx32.nyc.us.anexia-it.com 0.0%470.5   5.4   0.4 
 80.3  17.4
 2. cs70.nyi.net  0.0%470.9   6.7   0.8 
118.0  21.4
 3. cs70.cs80.v.ewr.nyinternet.net0.0%472.6   8.1   2.0 
144.8  27.0
 4. 96.47.77.142.static.nyinternet.net0.0%472.1   2.1   2.0 
  3.1   0.1
 5. ftw.nj.nyi.net0.0%472.0   2.0   1.9 
  2.2   0.1

One other thing we do see: looks like Level3 is broken globally ... we can't 
send traffic from Europe via Level3 to the Asian region:

  Packets   
Pings
 Host   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  
Best  Wrst StDev
 1. er-03.0v-00-03.anx04.vie.at.anexia-it.com0.0%   1010.3   0.4   
0.3   2.2   0.2
 2. cr-04.0v-08-71.anx03.vie.at.anexia-it.com0.0%   1010.8   0.8   
0.4  17.8   2.0
 3. win-b4-link.telia.net0.0%   1010.5   1.6   
0.5  29.1   4.0
 4. level-ic-1573273-wien-b4.c.telia.net 0.0%   1010.5   3.6   
0.4  85.3  12.1
 5. ???
 6. 4.69.152.14499.0%   100  307.4 307.4 
307.4 307.4   0.0
 7. 4.53.208.10289.9%   100  253.8 255.7 
251.3 265.8   3.9
 8. TenGE4-2.br01.tok02.pccwbtn.net 87.9%   100  524.0 406.4 
366.9 536.7  66.9
 9. cr-01.0v-00-08.anx11.tyo.jp.anexia-it.com   91.9%   100  368.1 371.0 
365.4 382.9   5.5
10. anx-lg-jp-tyo01.anexia-it.com   96.0%   100  368.9 368.6 
366.9 369.3   1.1

We'll start a ticket with Level3 support ... hopefully they will share some 
information (in the next days ... ).

Best regards

Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure

ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH

Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500

E-Mail: j...@anexia.at 
Web: http://www.anexia.at

Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:34
An: nanog@nanog.org
Betreff: Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

1.|-- hosted-by-i3d.net 0.0% 10 8.1 17.3 0.3 144.6 45.0
2.|-- 80ge.cr0-br2-br3.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 2.1 0.2 9.4 3.0
3.|-- 40ge.cr1-cr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 7.3 0.3 13.3 5.7
4.|-- ae51.edge4.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 10 10.6 14.2 7.6 30.4 7.5
5.|-- 4.69.156.9 90.0% 10 224.7 224.7 224.7 224.7 0.0
6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|-- cs20.cs90.v.ewr.nyinternet.net 80.0% 10 169.4 168.8 168.1 169.4 0.9
9.|-- 96.47.77.134.static.nyinternet.net 90.0% 10 167.7 167.7 167.7 
167.7 0.0
10.|-- ftw.nj.nyi.net 90.0% 10 169.4 169.4 169.4 169.4 0.0

Having this to almost every network located in NYC/NJ that is going 
through the said three carrier from many locations.

On 04.09.2015 at 23:24 Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wer're working with Telia and Hurricane in NYC and we only see some latency 
> flaps in the HE network  flapping from 0.3 to ~15ms. Nothing really bad. 
> No visible packet loss.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Jürgen Jaritsch
> Head of Network & Infrastructure
>
> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>
> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>
> E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
> Web: http://www.anexia.at
>
> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT U63216601
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: NANOG 

Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

[Stephen Satchell]

On 09/04/2015 12:32 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:

As a defensive measure (among others) I crafted a .sig that contained
all of the telephone numbers and email addresses by which I could be
reached (included a pager number) 7 x 24 x 52 with (guaranteed) no more
than 20 minute delay.

It ran to 7 lines, including the dash dash space EOL protocol sentinel.


I, for one, feel your pain in this matter.  When I was a consultant in 
The Bad Ol' Days, I had so many telephone numbers where I *could* be 
that my .sig would be a run-on one as well.  As a compromise, I had my 
cell number and a hyperlink to a Web site page with the full monte.


That was before I joined NANOG, so I never tested the tolerance of the 
people here with that solution.


When I was employed as a full-timer (including now) my "work" mail has 
the same sort of crap.  One option you might want to consider is to use 
a personal e-mail account for places like NANOG with the single-line 
disclaimer "Views expressed herein may not be my employer's view"

Re: Software Defined Networking

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 10:57:26 -0700, "Aaron C. de Bruyn" said:
> I think it's time to change my SMTP greeting to:
>
> 220-By submitting e-mail to this server, you agree all legal
> disclaimers are null and void.
> 220 You also agree that I am awesome.

Does anybody have a citation that legal disclaimers attached to
publicly posted mail aren't null and void?  Seems to me that
what they're trying to say is "Sorry, we're too lame to use
PGP or similar on actually sensitive e-mail"...


pgprVjAqdcHls.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Oliver Garraux]

We're seeing issues between the US and northwest Europe (UK / Ireland),
that started around 40 minutes ago.  They are fairly unrelated services
(AWS, Linode, L3VPN, commercial IP transit)...so I'm assuming there's some
kind of larger outage going on?

Oliver

-

Oliver Garraux
Check out my blog:  blog.garraux.net
Follow me on Twitter:  twitter.com/olivergarraux

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Fred Hollis  wrote:

> 1.|-- hosted-by-i3d.net 0.0% 10 8.1 17.3 0.3 144.6 45.0
> 2.|-- 80ge.cr0-br2-br3.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 2.1 0.2 9.4 3.0
> 3.|-- 40ge.cr1-cr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 7.3 0.3 13.3 5.7
> 4.|-- ae51.edge4.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 10 10.6 14.2 7.6 30.4 7.5
> 5.|-- 4.69.156.9 90.0% 10 224.7 224.7 224.7 224.7 0.0
> 6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
> 7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
> 8.|-- cs20.cs90.v.ewr.nyinternet.net 80.0% 10 169.4 168.8 168.1 169.4 0.9
> 9.|-- 96.47.77.134.static.nyinternet.net 90.0% 10 167.7 167.7 167.7 167.7
> 0.0
> 10.|-- ftw.nj.nyi.net 90.0% 10 169.4 169.4 169.4 169.4 0.0
>
> Having this to almost every network located in NYC/NJ that is going
> through the said three carrier from many locations.
>
>
> On 04.09.2015 at 23:24 Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> wer're working with Telia and Hurricane in NYC and we only see some
>> latency flaps in the HE network  flapping from 0.3 to ~15ms. Nothing
>> really bad. No visible packet loss.
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Jürgen Jaritsch
>> Head of Network & Infrastructure
>>
>> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>>
>> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
>> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>>
>> E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
>> Web: http://www.anexia.at
>>
>> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
>> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT
>> U63216601
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:18
>> An: nanog@nanog.org
>> Betreff: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj
>> area for cogent/level3/zayo?
>>
>>

Re: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?

[Peter Tavenier]

Hi, 

We see the same hier from server pingdom servers towards Amsterdam, The 
Netherlands. 
Last hops without loss in the traceroutes were fist: 
• 4 xe-8-0-0.bar1.Tampa1.Level3.net (4.53.172.1) 57.509 ms 57.970 ms 58.201 ms
• 4 ae52.edge1.Washington4.Level3.net (4.53.112.25) 2.254 ms 2.453 ms 2.633 ms
and last few I saw 10min ago was:
• 4 xe-11-0-3.bar2.LasVegas1.Level3.net (205.129.18.249) 1.928 ms 2.211 ms 
2.484 ms

-- 
Kind regards, 

Peter Tavenier

> On 04 Sep 2015, at 23:41, Oliver Garraux  wrote:
> 
> We're seeing issues between the US and northwest Europe (UK / Ireland),
> that started around 40 minutes ago.  They are fairly unrelated services
> (AWS, Linode, L3VPN, commercial IP transit)...so I'm assuming there's some
> kind of larger outage going on?
> 
> Oliver
> 
> -
> 
> Oliver Garraux
> Check out my blog:  blog.garraux.net
> Follow me on Twitter:  twitter.com/olivergarraux
> 
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Fred Hollis  wrote:
> 
>> 1.|-- hosted-by-i3d.net 0.0% 10 8.1 17.3 0.3 144.6 45.0
>> 2.|-- 80ge.cr0-br2-br3.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 2.1 0.2 9.4 3.0
>> 3.|-- 40ge.cr1-cr0.smartdc.rtd.i3d.net 0.0% 10 0.3 7.3 0.3 13.3 5.7
>> 4.|-- ae51.edge4.London1.Level3.net 0.0% 10 10.6 14.2 7.6 30.4 7.5
>> 5.|-- 4.69.156.9 90.0% 10 224.7 224.7 224.7 224.7 0.0
>> 6.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>> 7.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>> 8.|-- cs20.cs90.v.ewr.nyinternet.net 80.0% 10 169.4 168.8 168.1 169.4 0.9
>> 9.|-- 96.47.77.134.static.nyinternet.net 90.0% 10 167.7 167.7 167.7 167.7
>> 0.0
>> 10.|-- ftw.nj.nyi.net 90.0% 10 169.4 169.4 169.4 169.4 0.0
>> 
>> Having this to almost every network located in NYC/NJ that is going
>> through the said three carrier from many locations.
>> 
>> 
>> On 04.09.2015 at 23:24 Jürgen Jaritsch wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> wer're working with Telia and Hurricane in NYC and we only see some
>>> latency flaps in the HE network  flapping from 0.3 to ~15ms. Nothing
>>> really bad. No visible packet loss.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> 
>>> Jürgen Jaritsch
>>> Head of Network & Infrastructure
>>> 
>>> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
>>> 
>>> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
>>> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
>>> 
>>> E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
>>> Web: http://www.anexia.at
>>> 
>>> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt
>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler
>>> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT
>>> U63216601
>>> 
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Fred Hollis
>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 04. September 2015 23:18
>>> An: nanog@nanog.org
>>> Betreff: High latency/packetloss in nyc/nj for cogent/level3/zayo?
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Anyone also experiencing really high lancy and packetloss 80%+ in nyc/nj
>>> area for cogent/level3/zayo?
>>> 
>>>