Re: Looking for VPS providers with BGP session

[Jared Mauch]

You may want to look at this presenation from Nat Morris:

http://www.slideshare.net/natmorris/anycast-on-a-shoe-string

- Jared

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:31:58AM -0500, Dovid Bender wrote:
> I am looking for this as well. I am OK with 1 CPU core since all I need is
> a default route.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Philippe Bonvin via NANOG 
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I'm looking for providers around the world who are able to provide VPS
> > with a BGP session but it seems to be rather difficult to find. I have
> > already found a few with WHT/bgp.he.net/google but a little help would be
> > appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have contact or know people who can offer such services ?
> >
> > If yes, please contact me off list.
> >
> >
> > Our budget is quite low: around 50$/month/node +/- 50$ depending the
> > transit providers for a server with 1-2 CPU cores, 20 Go SSD or SAS and 1-2
> > Go RAM.
> >
> >
> > I'll be happy to share my provider list we use with anyone who needs it.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> >
> > Philippe
> >
> > [EDSI-Tech Sarl]
> > Philippe Bonvin, Directeur
> > EDSI-Tech S?rl
> > EPFL Innovation Park, Batiment C, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse | T?l?phone: +41
> > (0) 21 566 14 15
> > Savoie Technolac, 17 Avenue du Lac L?man, 73375 Le Bourget-du-Lac, France
> > | T?l?phone: +33 (0)4 86 15 44 78
> >

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++;  | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.

Re: Looking for VPS providers with BGP session

[Dovid Bender]

I am looking for this as well. I am OK with 1 CPU core since all I need is
a default route.

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Philippe Bonvin via NANOG 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I'm looking for providers around the world who are able to provide VPS
> with a BGP session but it seems to be rather difficult to find. I have
> already found a few with WHT/bgp.he.net/google but a little help would be
> appreciated.
>
>
> Does anyone have contact or know people who can offer such services ?
>
> If yes, please contact me off list.
>
>
> Our budget is quite low: around 50$/month/node +/- 50$ depending the
> transit providers for a server with 1-2 CPU cores, 20 Go SSD or SAS and 1-2
> Go RAM.
>
>
> I'll be happy to share my provider list we use with anyone who needs it.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Philippe
>
> [EDSI-Tech Sarl]
> Philippe Bonvin, Directeur
> EDSI-Tech S?rl
> EPFL Innovation Park, Batiment C, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse | T?l?phone: +41
> (0) 21 566 14 15
> Savoie Technolac, 17 Avenue du Lac L?man, 73375 Le Bourget-du-Lac, France
> | T?l?phone: +33 (0)4 86 15 44 78
>

Re: Looking for VPS providers with BGP session

[Yucong Sun]

I recommend http://www.quadranet.com/ ! I have been a happy customer
for almost two years,

I have a single dedicated server over there,  running full BGP feed
with them, It's a fairly extensive setup with multiple sessions,
automatic null routing and all the communities tinkering! Their NOC is
very friendly and very easy to work with!

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Philippe Bonvin via NANOG
 wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm looking for providers around the world who are able to provide VPS with a 
> BGP session but it seems to be rather difficult to find. I have already found 
> a few with WHT/bgp.he.net/google but a little help would be appreciated.
>
>
> Does anyone have contact or know people who can offer such services ?
>
> If yes, please contact me off list.
>
>
> Our budget is quite low: around 50$/month/node +/- 50$ depending the transit 
> providers for a server with 1-2 CPU cores, 20 Go SSD or SAS and 1-2 Go RAM.
>
>
> I'll be happy to share my provider list we use with anyone who needs it.
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Philippe
>
> [EDSI-Tech Sarl]
> Philippe Bonvin, Directeur
> EDSI-Tech S?rl
> EPFL Innovation Park, Batiment C, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse | T?l?phone: +41 (0) 
> 21 566 14 15
> Savoie Technolac, 17 Avenue du Lac L?man, 73375 Le Bourget-du-Lac, France | 
> T?l?phone: +33 (0)4 86 15 44 78

Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?

[joel jaeggli]

Hi,

I'm still on the h...@routeviews.org alias.

I haven't seen any mail from Kurt Kraut.

so I would suspect that something is being filtered someplace.

perhaps we can interceed to identify that issue.

thanks
joel


On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
> from them since July.
> 
> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.
> 
> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
> point of view of my routers have of the internet?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Kurt Kraut
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?

[Paul S.]

RIPE stats also takes a feed similarly.

On 12/9/2015 01:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:

Hi,


For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
from them since July.

Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.

Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
point of view of my routers have of the internet?


Best regards,


Kurt Kraut

Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?

[Kurt Kraut via NANOG]

Hi,


For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
from them since July.

Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.

Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
point of view of my routers have of the internet?


Best regards,


Kurt Kraut

Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?

[Christopher Morrow]

routeviews peering tuned up this weekend... in ashburn equinix.

kemp and his folk are normally quite respsnsive, are you sure your
mail got to them?

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Paul S.  wrote:
> RIPE stats also takes a feed similarly.
>
>
> On 12/9/2015 01:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
>> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
>> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
>> from them since July.
>>
>> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
>> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.
>>
>> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
>> point of view of my routers have of the internet?
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>> Kurt Kraut
>
>

Re: Is RouteViews dead? Is there any alternatives?

[John Kemp]

The problem being discussed here relates to:
route-views.saopaulo.routeviews.org

We do have a lot of outstanding requests for that collector.
But there are some issues there that we need to discuss with
the exchange.  We'll work on getting that moving forward.

Apologies for the lack of response.

John Kemp
h...@routeviews.org

On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
> in my area, I wasn't able to find no new BGP operator that got a response
> from them since July.
> 
> Is RouteViews dead? If the answer is yes, it is sad. It is the most used
> resource about the internet routing for multiple perspectives.
> 
> Is there any other similar project that I could colaborate providing the
> point of view of my routers have of the internet?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> 
> Kurt Kraut
> 

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

[Collin Anderson]

This thread seems to have run its course, but it was an interesting
conversation, so I wanted to flag that the Open Technology Institute is
running what seems to be a fairly balanced panel on the issue in D.C. next
week. Might be worth asking if there's remote participation.

https://newamerica.cvent.com/events/zero-rating-and-net-neutrality-is-free-content-naughty-or-nice-/registration-8e22b15178dc4fa88c2ebe19525262eb.aspx?i=d0db0beb-7340-47c8-8bcc-86d9d6cc85b8

New America
Please note our new address!
740 15th Street NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20005
Wednesday, December 16, 2015 | 12:00 pm - 1:45 pm


Even if the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the FCC’s Open Internet
Order, the ability of mobile carriers to exclude certain content from the
data caps or buckets that determine what a user pays each month remains
undecided and controversial. Although mobile carriers maintain that
zero-rating selected content is pro-consumer, some consumer advocates argue
the FCC should find it violates network neutrality rules against favoring
some Internet content or applications over others.

In the U.S., T-Mobile recently launched Binge On, which allows consumers to
opt out of the delivery of 'free' (zero-rated) streaming video content at
lower resolution (CD quality), and instead receive content at
high-definition that counts against their data limit. T-Mobile also hosts
Music Freedom, which zero-rates participating streaming music services.

In the developing world, Facebook’s Free Basics initiative partners with
mobile carriers to provide cell phone customers with low-bandwidth versions
of participating information and social media apps (e.g., Wikipedia and
Facebook itself) at no cost in the hope this exposure will encourage them
to upgrade to full Internet access.

Join us for an explanation and debate about zero-rating on mobile networks,
featuring the two companies most visibly marketing the practice, as well as
a range of perspectives from consumer and public interest advocates.

Lunch will be served.

Follow the discussion online using #ZeroRating
and by following us @OTI.

Participants:
Kevin Martin
Vice President for Mobile & Global Access, Facebook
Former Chairman, FCC
@facebook

Mark Cooper
Research Director, Consumer Federation of America
@ConsumerFed

Steve Sharkey
Chief, Engineering and Technology Policy, T-Mobile
@TMobile

Matt Wood
Policy Director, Free Press
@MattFWood

Sarah Morris
Senior Policy Counsel, Open Technology Institute at New America
@sarmorris

Moderator:
Michael Calabrese
Director, Wireless Future Project, Open Technology Institute at New America
@MCalabreseNAF


On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Tony Hain  wrote:

> Keenan Tims wrote:
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
> >
> > I'm surprised you're supporting T-Mob here Owen. To me it's pretty
> > clear: they are charging more for bits that are not streaming video.
> > That's not neutral treatment from a policy perspective, and has no basis
> in
> > the cost of operating the network.
>
> I have no visibility into what the line
> "T‐Mobile will work with content providers to ensure that our networks
> work together to properly"
> actually means, but they could/should be using this as a tool to drive
> content sources to IPv6.
>
> Trying to explain to consumers why an unlimited data plan only works for a
> tiny subset of content is a waste of energy. Picking a category and
> "encouraging" that content to move, then after the time limit, pick the
> next category, rinse/repeat, is a way to move traffic away from the 6/4 nat
> infrastructure without having to make a big deal about the IP version to
> the consumer, and at the same time remove "it costs too much" complaints
> from the sources. If I were implementing such a plan, I would walk the list
> of traffic sources based on volume to move traffic as quickly as possible,
> so it makes perfect sense to me that they would start with video.
>
> Tony
>
>
> >
> > Granted, the network itself is neutral, but the purported purpose of NN
> in
> > my eyes is twofold: take away the influence of the network on user and
> > operator behaviour, and encourage an open market in network services
> > (both content and access). Allowing zero-rating based on *any* criteria
> > gives them a strong influence over what the end users are going to do
> with
> > their network connection, and distorts the market for network services.
> > What makes streaming video special to merit zero-rating?
> >
> > I like Clay's connection to the boiling frog. Yes, it's "nice" for most
> > consumers now, but it's still distorting the market.
> >
> > I'm also not seeing why they have to make this so complicated. If they
> can
> > afford to zero-rate high-bandwidth services like video and audio
> streaming,
> > clearly there is network capacity to spare. The user behaviour they're
> > encouraging with free video streaming is *precisely* what the incumbents
> 

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

[Jean-Francois Mezei]

Side question:

Since the OP mentioned a "ransom" demand (aka: extortion), should law
enforcement be contacted in such cases ? Is there any experience doing
this ? Are they any help ?

In North america, would that mean FBI in USA and RCMP in Canada, or
local police force which then escalates to proper law enforcement agency ?

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

[Roland Dobbins]

On 9 Dec 2015, at 11:46, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:

Since the OP mentioned a "ransom" demand (aka: extortion), should law 
enforcement be contacted in such cases ?


Yes.


Is there any experience doing this ?


Yes.


Are they any help ?


Operationally, no.  Investigatively, possibly.



In North america, would that mean FBI in USA and RCMP in Canada


Yes.

or local police force which then escalates to proper law enforcement 
agency ?


If you're asking about US and/or Canada, the relevant national LEA 
generally applies.  In other jurisdictions, it's situationally-specific.


---
Roland Dobbins