Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak

2016-01-24 Thread Josh Reynolds 
If you wanted 1/4 cab out of 1102 Grand in KC we might be able to
accommodate you as well.
On Jan 24, 2016 8:06 PM, "Mike Hammett"  wrote:

> Do any of you have excess space within Equinix at 350 E. Cermak? It needs
> to be both of those due to the number of cross connects to other players
> within Equinix 350 E. Cermak.
>
> Equinix direct is pricing full cabs at a ridiculous price. Given that we
> need 1/4 cab or less, it's hard to justify the full thing at those rates.
>
> Every time we think we've got someone lined up, their space is actually
> Equinix out in Elk Grove or 350 E. Cermak, but in TelX or Steadfast instead.
>
> I see a lot of partially filled cabinets when I walk through to our
> existing space. Come on now ;-)
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>

Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak

2016-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett 
Hah. You know that I know that. :-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

- Original Message -

From: "Josh Reynolds"  
To: "Mike Hammett"  
Cc: "NANOG"  
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2016 8:18:59 PM 
Subject: Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak 


If you wanted 1/4 cab out of 1102 Grand in KC we might be able to accommodate 
you as well. 
On Jan 24, 2016 8:06 PM, "Mike Hammett" < na...@ics-il.net > wrote: 


Do any of you have excess space within Equinix at 350 E. Cermak? It needs to be 
both of those due to the number of cross connects to other players within 
Equinix 350 E. Cermak. 

Equinix direct is pricing full cabs at a ridiculous price. Given that we need 
1/4 cab or less, it's hard to justify the full thing at those rates. 

Every time we think we've got someone lined up, their space is actually Equinix 
out in Elk Grove or 350 E. Cermak, but in TelX or Steadfast instead. 

I see a lot of partially filled cabinets when I walk through to our existing 
space. Come on now ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com

Equinix 350 E. Cermak

2016-01-24 Thread Mike Hammett 
Do any of you have excess space within Equinix at 350 E. Cermak? It needs to be 
both of those due to the number of cross connects to other players within 
Equinix 350 E. Cermak. 

Equinix direct is pricing full cabs at a ridiculous price. Given that we need 
1/4 cab or less, it's hard to justify the full thing at those rates. 

Every time we think we've got someone lined up, their space is actually Equinix 
out in Elk Grove or 350 E. Cermak, but in TelX or Steadfast instead. 

I see a lot of partially filled cabinets when I walk through to our existing 
space. Come on now ;-) 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com

Re: RADb Outage?

2016-01-24 Thread Jared Mauch 

> On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Max Tulyev  wrote:
> 
> People do prefix filtering based on *DB may think twice...

Ideally you would have your own local mirror or similar.

Since there is the near realtime mirroring that occurs, other servers get the 
data within 5-30 minutes.

This means you can point at one of the other IRR servers.

- Jared

Re: IPv6 traffic percentages?

2016-01-24 Thread Bruce Curtis 

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:14 AM, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their 
> percentage of IPv6 traffic?
> 
> Bonus points for sharing top IPv6 sources. Anything else than the usual 
> suspects, Google/YouTube, Netflix and Facebook?
> 
> Some public information I've found so far:
> - Comcast around 25% IPv6 traffic ( 
> http://www.lightreading.com/ethernet-ip/ip-protocols-software/facebook-ipv6-is-a-real-world-big-deal/a/d-id/718395
>  )
> - Comcast has over 1 Tb/s (of mostly YouTube traffic) over IPv6 ( 
> http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-reaches-key-milestone-in-launch-of-ipv6-broadband-network
>  )
> - Swisscom 26% IPv6 traffic, 60% YouTube ( 
> http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog27/p/01_Martin_Gysi.pdf )
> 
> I'd be very much interested in hearing from smaller ISPs, especially those 
> having a very limited number of IPv4 addresses and/or running out. 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jared


This is some more public info.


On this page click to sort on IPv6 deployment.

http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/

About 40% of traffic inbound to our University is IPv6.  I see several 
Universities on the list above at more than 60%.

There are more links to public info sites at the bottom of the page.

You can add Apple and Microsoft to the list of usual suspects, but for state in 
NAT boxes rather than traffic.  With happy eyeballs devices query both IPv4 and 
IPv6 so end up creating state in the NAT box even if the client ultimately 
chooses IPv6 for the connection.  We have lots of devices that like to check 
with Apple whenever they wake up and the staff here use Microsoft Exchange in 
the cloud which is available via IPv6.  I don’t have any verified data but I 
have noticed a relation between 

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will see that my latency to Google 
via IPv6 dropped from 40 ms to 20 ms. 

http://mcnet.cc.ndsu.nodak.edu/smokeping/?target=Internet.Google_IPv6


 If I compare some days before and after the change I see a decrease in my peak 
NAT pool usage.  However on other days I don’t see a difference.   The theory 
is that after my latency dropped to 20 ms that should be less than the magical 
25 ms for Apple devices to receive an answer via IPv6 so they don’t even send 
out an IPv4 query.


https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg22455.html

  This link mentions that Microsoft is already preferring IPv6 over IPv4 95% of 
the time when both are available.

http://labs.apnic.net/?p=657

I’m 30 ms away from Facebook so 95% of Microsoft clients would use IPv6 but for 
Apple devices it’s a gamble.   But it’s not clear if 95% of Microsoft clients 
would only send an IPv6 SYN and not send an IPv4 SYN (saving NAT table size).

The top of our wish list would be for twitter and AWS to support IPv6, I think 
that those would make the biggest reduction in our NAT table size.


If you hover your mouse over the US on this page

http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/

it lists 47% for content.  What that 47% means is explained here.

http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/information.php#content


It is fun to play with the type of regression on this page and project 730 days 
or so in the future.

https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/project.php




---
Bruce Curtis bruce.cur...@ndsu.edu
Certified NetAnalyst II701-231-8527
North Dakota State University

Cisco CMTS SNMP OID's

2016-01-24 Thread Lorell Hathcock 
All:

Does anyone out there have some valuable OID's for a Cisco CMTS?

The ones I am looking for are:
Signal to Noise per upstream channel
Cable Modem counts of all kinds
connected / online
ranging
offline 

I opened a ticket through Cisco's help desk.  I have a SmartNET contract for 
the unit, but they were not very helpful.  The OIDs they suggested did not 
yield any useful data.  ("0" when I know there are CMs connected, etc).

Thanks in advance.

Lorell Hathcock

Re: Cisco CMTS SNMP OID's

2016-01-24 Thread Jason Hellenthal 
Not that you wouldn't have looked already but at the moment too much 
information for me to consume I figured it would be worthwhile mentioning I 
case you didn't know or maybe others as well.

ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/oid/


I've had some custom ones around in the past and if I can figure out where they 
are held I'll shoot them your way.

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 JJH48-ARIN

On Jan 24, 2016, at 13:06, Lorell Hathcock  wrote:

All:

Does anyone out there have some valuable OID's for a Cisco CMTS?

The ones I am looking for are:
   Signal to Noise per upstream channel
   Cable Modem counts of all kinds
   connected / online
   ranging
   offline 

I opened a ticket through Cisco's help desk.  I have a SmartNET contract for 
the unit, but they were not very helpful.  The OIDs they suggested did not 
yield any useful data.  ("0" when I know there are CMs connected, etc).

Thanks in advance.

Lorell Hathcock

Re: Cisco CMTS SNMP OID's

2016-01-24 Thread Stephen Satchell 

On 01/24/2016 11:06 AM, Lorell Hathcock wrote:

All:

Does anyone out there have some valuable OID's for a Cisco CMTS?

The ones I am looking for are:
Signal to Noise per upstream channel
Cable Modem counts of all kinds
connected / online
ranging
offline

I opened a ticket through Cisco's help desk.  I have a SmartNET contract for the unit, 
but they were not very helpful.  The OIDs they suggested did not yield any useful data.  
("0" when I know there are CMs connected, etc).


1.  Did you get the MIB for the CMTS from the Cisco web site?

2.  What did you see when you did a SNMPWALK of the device?

Re: Cisco CMTS SNMP OID's

2016-01-24 Thread Yang Yu 
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Lorell Hathcock  wrote:

> Signal to Noise per upstream channel

CISCO-CABLE-SPECTRUM-MIB::ccsUpSpecMgmtSNR
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en=Translate=ccsUpSpecMgmtSNR

> Cable Modem counts of all kinds
> connected / online
> ranging
> offline

Not there if there are OIDs for `show cable modem docsis version summary`