G root pmtu?

[Randy Bush]

it seems that G root ops are blocking dns ops mail servers.  the more i
think about that the sicker i think some folk out there are.  but
anyway, anyone else seeing this kind of problem with g root?

http://dnsviz.net/d/gn/dnssec/ whines

gn/DS (alg 8, id 38486): No response was received until the UDP
payload size was decreased, indicating that the server might be
attempting to send a payload that exceeds the path maximum
transmission unit (PMTU) size. (2001:500:12::d0d,
UDP_0_EDNS0_32768_4096)

randy

Re: CGNAT

[Tassos Chatzithomaoglou]

With a ~59% dual-stack percentage and a 8% ds-lite percentage (aka 67%
of our subscriber base has IPv6), we get around 40% of IPv6 traffic.

--
Tassos

Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote on 10/4/2017 1:11 μμ:
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 20:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual
>>> load of CGNAT?
>> Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual 
>> stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.
> My data on customers supposed to be 100% dual-stack (unless they
> explicitely disable IPv6 on their side, which some of them do) says 25%
> on best days. It used to be up to 35% in late 2015.
> For reason unknown, it was going slightly down during 2016, with a
> sudden extra decrease in january this year.
>

Re: CGNAT

[Radu-Adrian Feurdean]

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017, at 20:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Max Tulyev wrote:
> 
> > BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual
> > load of CGNAT?
> 
> Reports are that 30-50% of traffic will be IPv6 when you enable dual 
> stack. This would be traffic that will not traverse your CGNAT.

My data on customers supposed to be 100% dual-stack (unless they
explicitely disable IPv6 on their side, which some of them do) says 25%
on best days. It used to be up to 35% in late 2015.
For reason unknown, it was going slightly down during 2016, with a
sudden extra decrease in january this year.

Call for presentations EPF12, 18th - 20th September, Lisbon sent to NANOG

[Arnold Nipper]

Dear all,

AMS-IX, DE-CIX, LINX, Netnod are happy to host the 12th European
Peering Forum (EPF) in Lisbon, Portugal from the 18th - 20st September
2017. The event will welcome up to 300 peering managers and
coordinators from networks connected to the host Internet exchanges.
Besides an interesting topical agenda, the three-day event
accommodates room for attendees to meet on a one-to-one basis to
discuss bilateral peering business opportunities.

The programme committee will be looking for presentations and
lightning talks related to peering and technical topics of
interconnection. Your presentation should address

 * Interconnection Automation
 * Regional Peering
 * Interconnection and Peering Internet Governance and Regulatory TopicS
 * Economic and Product Trends
 * Peering/Interconnection Strategy
 * Interesting findings about peering
 * 100GE and beyond


Submissions
===

Presentations must be of a non-commercial nature. Product or
marketing heavy talks are strongly discouraged.

Submissions of presentations should be made to the programme
committee . Please include:

 * Author's name and e-mail
 * Presentation title
 * Abstract
 * Slides (if available)
 * Time requested


Deadlines
=

Presentation Abstract Deadline  17/07/2017 12:00 UTC
Final Selection of Speakers 28/07/2017
Presentation Slides Submission Deadline 04/09/2017 12:00 UTC


More information about the event and other activities around EPF12
may be found at https://peering-forum.eu/

Best regards,
Arnold

On behalf of the EPF hosts
-- 
Arnold Nipper
email: arn...@nipper.de
mobile: +49 172 2650958













signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature