Re: Lille, France

[Jérôme Fleury]

Hi Rod,

SFR (soon to be renamed Altice) and Orange for sure have metropolitan
networks in Lille.

There might be others depending on your needs.

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Rod Beck 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> I am looking for insight into which carriers have metropolitan or last
> mile networks in this city. Preferably connected to Paris.
>
>
> Roderick Beck
>
> Director of Global Sales
>
> United Cable Company
>
> www.unitedcablecompany.com
>
> 85 Király utca, 1077 Budapest
>
> rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com
>
> 36-30-859-5144
>
>
> [1467221477350_image005.png]
>

Re: I'm getting these bounce messages for some bizarre reason.

[Andrew Kirch]

It's probably subspace interference caused by high levels of neutrinos.

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Large Hadron Collider <
large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com> wrote:

> Would you on the fine mailing list be able to find out what's going on
> here?
>
>
>
>  Forwarded Message 
> Subject:Delivery Status Notification(Failure)
> Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 19:01:29 GMT
> From:   postmas...@o2email.co.uk
> To: large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com
>
>
>
> Your message:
> To: piers.stur...@o2email.co.uk
> Subject: Re: Please run windows update now
> Sent Date: Tue May 16 18:04:19 2017 +
> has not been delivered to the recipient's BlackBerry Handheld.
>
>
>
>

I'm getting these bounce messages for some bizarre reason.

[Large Hadron Collider]

Would you on the fine mailing list be able to find out what's going on here?



 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Delivery Status Notification(Failure)
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 19:01:29 GMT
From:   postmas...@o2email.co.uk
To: large.hadron.colli...@gmx.com



Your message:
To: piers.stur...@o2email.co.uk
Subject: Re: Please run windows update now
Sent Date: Tue May 16 18:04:19 2017 +
has not been delivered to the recipient's BlackBerry Handheld.

Final-Recipient: RFC822;piers.sturley@o2email.co.uk
Action: Failed
Status: 5.0.0

Lille, France

[Rod Beck]

Hi,


I am looking for insight into which carriers have metropolitan or last mile 
networks in this city. Preferably connected to Paris.


Roderick Beck

Director of Global Sales

United Cable Company

www.unitedcablecompany.com

85 Király utca, 1077 Budapest

rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com

36-30-859-5144


[1467221477350_image005.png]

Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

[Jörg Kost]

Hello Michael,

we (AS196922) do have 10g transit links in Munich from AS33891  and I 
can recommended it: http://www.core-backbone.de/, 
http://bgp.he.net/AS33891, pricing and quality especially for German and 
European networks are fine.


If you can pm me your exact location, I could also cross check the 
availability.


Jörg

On 24 May 2017, at 19:59, Michael J McCafferty wrote:


Munich.


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Alistair Mackenzie 
Date: 5/24/17  10:53 AM  (GMT-08:00)
To: Michael J McCafferty 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

Which location?

On 24 May 2017 at 09:49, Michael J McCafferty  
wrote:



Operators,
 We are a US hosting company, expanding in to Europe. 
In the US we
use Level 3 and AIS (AS6130) and Cogent. We planned to use Level 3 
and
Cogent in EU as well, but our experience with Level 3 support has 
been less

than stellar. I am looking for an Internet provider with whom we can
receive full tables, announce our AS/IP space, RTBH, and get a 10G 
port.
Prefer someone that will not have peering fights (we already have 
that with
Cogent). I am interested in feedback from anyone with similar service 
with

euNetworks in Europe (especially Germany).
 By extension, we will be moving some data through 
the DE-CIX.


 Any first-hand experience you might have to share is 
greatly

appreciated, in public or private replies.

Thank you very much!
Mike

Michael J. McCafferty
M5 Hosting
http://www.m5hosting.com 

Like us on Facebook for updates and photos:
https://www.facebook.com/m5hosting 

Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

[Michael J McCafferty]

Munich.


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

 Original message 
From: Alistair Mackenzie  
Date: 5/24/17  10:53 AM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: Michael J McCafferty  
Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
Subject: Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX 

Which location?

On 24 May 2017 at 09:49, Michael J McCafferty  wrote:

> Operators,
> We are a US hosting company, expanding in to Europe. In the US we
> use Level 3 and AIS (AS6130) and Cogent. We planned to use Level 3 and
> Cogent in EU as well, but our experience with Level 3 support has been less
> than stellar. I am looking for an Internet provider with whom we can
> receive full tables, announce our AS/IP space, RTBH, and get a 10G port.
> Prefer someone that will not have peering fights (we already have that with
> Cogent). I am interested in feedback from anyone with similar service with
> euNetworks in Europe (especially Germany).
> By extension, we will be moving some data through the DE-CIX.
>
> Any first-hand experience you might have to share is greatly
> appreciated, in public or private replies.
>
> Thank you very much!
> Mike
> 
> Michael J. McCafferty
> M5 Hosting
> http://www.m5hosting.com 
>
> Like us on Facebook for updates and photos:
> https://www.facebook.com/m5hosting 
> 
>
>

Re: euNetworks, DE-CIX

[Alistair Mackenzie]

Which location?

On 24 May 2017 at 09:49, Michael J McCafferty  wrote:

> Operators,
> We are a US hosting company, expanding in to Europe. In the US we
> use Level 3 and AIS (AS6130) and Cogent. We planned to use Level 3 and
> Cogent in EU as well, but our experience with Level 3 support has been less
> than stellar. I am looking for an Internet provider with whom we can
> receive full tables, announce our AS/IP space, RTBH, and get a 10G port.
> Prefer someone that will not have peering fights (we already have that with
> Cogent). I am interested in feedback from anyone with similar service with
> euNetworks in Europe (especially Germany).
> By extension, we will be moving some data through the DE-CIX.
>
> Any first-hand experience you might have to share is greatly
> appreciated, in public or private replies.
>
> Thank you very much!
> Mike
> 
> Michael J. McCafferty
> M5 Hosting
> http://www.m5hosting.com 
>
> Like us on Facebook for updates and photos:
> https://www.facebook.com/m5hosting 
> 
>
>

euNetworks, DE-CIX

[Michael J McCafferty]

Operators,
We are a US hosting company, expanding in to Europe. In the US we use 
Level 3 and AIS (AS6130) and Cogent. We planned to use Level 3 and Cogent in EU 
as well, but our experience with Level 3 support has been less than stellar. I 
am looking for an Internet provider with whom we can receive full tables, 
announce our AS/IP space, RTBH, and get a 10G port. Prefer someone that will 
not have peering fights (we already have that with Cogent). I am interested in 
feedback from anyone with similar service with euNetworks in Europe (especially 
Germany).
By extension, we will be moving some data through the DE-CIX.

Any first-hand experience you might have to share is greatly 
appreciated, in public or private replies.

Thank you very much!
Mike

Michael J. McCafferty
M5 Hosting
http://www.m5hosting.com 

Like us on Facebook for updates and photos:
https://www.facebook.com/m5hosting 

Linux container (Docker) or linux VM RFC2544/EtherSAM appliance

[Robert Peterson]

Group,

We are looking for options or opinions on a cost effective 
RFC2544/EtherSAM appliance we can run on a VM and/or as a Linux 
container on equipment being placed at the premise.  See 
http://www.vg-labs.com/ for an explanation of the device we would like 
to run these appliances on.


Thanks in advance.

RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic

[Aaron Gould]

Sdn/nfv for the physical layer... c'mon man, don't you know we are going to
have virtual-fiber too , LOL , jk of course

-Aaron

-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keith Medcalf
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:52 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Making interconnection agreements between networks more dynamic

> > This sounds something like the MEF Third Network type stuff I 
> > mean the ability to setup connection dynamically across network 
> > boundaries on-the-fly, via an ordering system... that has always 
> > sounded awesome to me... and I've wondered how we could actually get
there one day.
 
> to me, this was the dream of optical switching and gmpls (which is not
> mpls)

And, pray tell, what is the use of me setting up "peering" between myself
and a network on the other side of the world when the data still has to flow
over the same connections, merely encapsulated inside a tunnel?  Reminds me
of the old days when you could directly connect "Chicago" to "Denver" using
a direct connection over a PVC that was routed Chicago -> New York -> Miami
-> Los Angeles -> Denver.  Sure, it looks like a direct connection, but ...

Or will this magical interface also deploy robots to build the physical
layer?