Re: Hurricane Maria: Summary of communication status - and lack of

[Sean Donelan]

The situation reports from Puerto Rico seems to be getting passed 
through public relations, so I'll try to add some context.



Public Safety
   Primary Public Safety Answering Point (9-1-1) center generator 
ran out of diesel fuel.  Switched to alternate PSAP.


  San Juan Police Department has restored its radio repeaters and 
police radio communications metro-wide. (translated from spanish, so I 
think I understood the technical translation).




Landline Central Offices
813,546 subscribers (CIA World Factbook)

390,000 subscribers in 52 municipalities with voice, data and long 
distance (Claro)
 Repaired fiber optic cable conntecting CO's in Fajardo and Rio 
Grande.


 65% of inter-office Central Office connections restored island-wide.
 Remaining CO's have only local voice calling.

 Optico Fiber reports most of its infrastructure is intact, and has 
open WiFi hotspots outside its offices.



Wireless services
3,227,281 subscribers (CIA World Factbook)

29 municipalities have 0% working cell sites.  It appears carriers are 
repairing one tower in each county/municipality to improve island-wide 
coverage.  Several municipalities going from 0 to 1 cell site working.


310,000 subscribers in 28 municipalities with working cell towers (Claro)

34% of San Juan has working cell tower coverage (Claro)

Cell on Wheels in Ponce (4 mile radius) serving 6,000 calls per hour, 
35,000 texts per hour (AT)


Dorado, Tao Baja and Toa Alta have T-Mobile service (T-Mobile)


I don't know what FCC and PRTRB are counting:

286 working cell sites out of 2671 (according to FCC report)
96 working cell sites out of 1600 (according to PR Telecommunications 
Regulatory Board report)


For context, the number of cell sites repaired each day since 
the end of Hurricane Maria is improving slowly - average less than 20 
sites a day, but some days its negative, i.e. more cell towers failing 
than repaired.


On U.S. Virigin Islands, the number of cell sites out of service 
decreased initially, but has slowly increased for the last 5 days.


I created a spreadsheet of the FCC wirelss outage data from hurricane 
Harvey, Irma and Maria.


https://www.donelan.com/FCC-Wireless-Outages.xlsx

There is no consistent pattern between states, territories or hurricanes. 
Florida had the fatest wireless restoration, average 500 cell sites 
restored a day; while U.S. Virgin Islands averaged less than 1 
cell site restored.  But Florida was mostly restoring the electrical grid, 
which restored lots of cell sites.  Harvey was slow to start restoring 
cell sites, the tropical storm lasted for days; but less than 6% of cell 
sites were out of service.



Cable systems

 First official report from Liberty Cable Puerto Rico

 Most cable headends or in good condition, with backup generators. 
Internet connection to international circuits reconnected. Main fiber 
trunk between San Juan and Luquillo completed. Working to repair 
infrastructure and primary services such as physical plant, main 
repeater bases, fiber optic ring and fiber to distribution stations in 
neighborhoods. (LibertyPR)



Satellite Services and Satellite Phones

   As more satellite phones are distributed, social media and news 
reporters are saying satellite capacity is getting worse.  It may be user 
issues and lack of training, or running out of satellite bandwidth in the 
area.


   American Red Cross driving a VSAT station between shelters, and 
setting up temporary hotspots for an hour at each shelter so people can 
contact family members.

Re: CPE that support 1G with BGP multihomed

[Raymond Burkholder]

On 09/26/17 06:29, marcel.duregards--- via NANOG wrote:

Dear Nanoger,

Anyone have an advice on CPE which can support the following features,
please:


I've been building cpe devices using various models from 
http://www.lannerinc.com.


I populate with Debian linux:.  I use pxeboot to autoboot into install 
mode with dnsmasq providing deb-install preseed build files.  On the 
auto reboot after o/s install, I finish up with consistent, documented 
builds with SaltStack.  This provides the necessary customized 
switching, routing, security, and monitoring.


Raymond Burkholder
https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net
441 705 7292



1)
1 Gigabits/s ipv4 or ipv6 forwarding IMIX or Internet traffic, full
duplex (not sure if cisco or miercom are conducting bidirectionals
traffic flows at the same time).


With an FW-7543, I can iperf bidirectional 1gbps with no acl.  I can get 
strongswan ipsec bidirectional at about 50mbps (the cpu has AES-NI).  I 
havn't tried ipsec on devices like the FW-7573.




2)
with ACLs and with uRPF
with prefix filtering
with bgp ext-communities (rfc 8092 would be a ++, but not mandatory)


I can customize configs with various combinations of VRRP, 
FreeRangeRouting BGP/OSPF (full routes are no problem), nftables for 
ACL, lldpd, hostapd for wireless, openvswitch for bridging 
requirements/netflow/sflow ...


The linux kernel supplies uRPF.  FreeRangeRouting (a fork of Quagga) can 
do prefix filtering, ext-communities, etc.  They have even recently 
implemented EVPN using VxLAN for encapsulation.



3)
with BGP full route, 1 eBGP session + 1 iBGP  (--> multihomed, single
attached solution, so there is 2 CPE connected to 2 bgp transit))
I've used the FW-7543 in pairs to a customer for this:  a management 
port,  a port between the two, an upstream port, and a downstream port.

4)
vrf light and
SNMP + telnet/ssh with ACLs
Linux kernel has VRF capabilities, or use namespaces or native 
containers for segregation of functions or for implementing virtual 
functions.



Currently on Cisco side, we see the following candidates:

- ASR 1001-x
- ASR 1002
- ISR 4431, 4451
- ISR G2 2921 + 2951 + 3925(E)  (EoL soon, so we are currently in the
process of evaluating other solution).


But we would like also to include other manufacturer : juniper, mikrotik
, etc





--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

AT LA issue

[Andrew Stern]

Hello.

We are experiencing traffic issues between AT and twtelecom between SF and LA 
(5-7% dropped and out-of-order packets, increased latency RTT).
Issue occurs only during business hours pacific time. We are on the AT 
enterprise side of the equation.

My personal guess is oversubscribed peering, but what do I know?

If anyone from att or twtelecom sees this, help!

Andrew Stern, CBNE | Broadcast Engineer
Cumulus Media San Francisco
KFOG | KNBR | KSAN | KTCT | KGO | KSFO
office: 415-995-5740
andrew.st...@cumulus.com
750 Battery St. | 2nd Floor | San Francisco | CA 94111


Cumulus Media Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual(s) named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

Re: Peering at public exchange authentication

[BRAD RAYMO]

Its up to you and how you want to manage your sessions. Some networks
require it, some prefer it but do not require it, and others do not want to
use it at all.

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington <
craigwashingto...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP
> at public exchange locations.
>
> Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta,
> do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
>
> Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
>
>

Re: [Ext] Re: Hurricane Maria: Summary of communication status - and lack of

[Barbara Roseman]

Sean, thank you for all the excellent updates you have been providing. 
Status.pr is disturbing since there is no context to the stats offered on this 
page. 49% of supermarkets may be open, but with nothing on their shelves. And 
11k refugees? Who are they trying to kid with a number like that. 

-Barb
+1.808.385.1677
mauig...@earthlink.net

Written on the move, apologies for any errors. 

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Sean Donelan  wrote:
> 
> Career federal employees are taught to write situation reports in very boring 
> language with just the facts known. Nevertheless, after reading lots of 
> situation reports, you start to notice when the bubureaucratic language 
> changes. Perhaps the most famous was the commander of Apollo 13's report 
> "Houston, We have a problem."
> 
> Puerto Rico has announced a new web site with current status:
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__status.pr_=DwIBAg=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM=eFHwbDul3gCazAMQCZYPBUi5FR29U9pfCEZA3KSPp1U=8QGAW2zyikBvyqdqem1ufMWHN1wmpYs5CHOkKkgxHuY=zr44KzVhB4CMsDiVsjPo0RNdkIMb14m0WxW3UV60JYY=
>  
> 
> However, in the last 24 hours I've noticed some agency situation reports used 
> different statistics to report "happy, happy, joy, joy" stuff. In the 
> bureaucratic world, this is very concerning, such as when the Veterans 
> Administration was misreporting appointment waiting times to look better.
> 
> You can't fix problems, if the real situation isn't being reported accurately 
> to senior leadership even if its bad news.
> 

zayo / AS 6461 maximum prefix limit

[Job Snijders]

Hi all,

It appears one of our fellow network operators ran into some issues
earlier today, probably due to the turn-up of a some new circuits for
customers. In order to expedite the restoration I'm sharing the below
information.

I recommend any peering partners that saw BGP sessions go down with Zayo
/ AS 6461 due to maximum prefix limits being hit, please increase the
maximum prefix limit to 65,000 for IPv4 and 2,000 for IPv6 and/or clear
BGP sessions.

The information on https://www.peeringdb.com/net/541 is current.

Kind regards,

Job

CenturyLink VDSL2 Support For RFC 4638 or IPoE?

[Brielle Bruns]

Hey everyone,

Don't suppose if anyone on this list knows if RFC 4638 (baby jumbos, aka 
MTU of 1508) or IPoE is supported on CenturyLink VDSL2 connections?


I know IPoE is supported on connections with their TV service option. 
Would be nice to either get PPPoE out of the picture or have a proper 
1500 MTU.


--
Brielle Bruns
The Summit Open Source Development Group
http://www.sosdg.org/ http://www.ahbl.org

Re: Peering at public exchange authentication

[Bob Evans]

Almost all good and popular peering points utilize MAC locks on ports for
all peers. (With few exceptions. )  To hijack a bgp session one would need
not only a port on the peering network but a MAC address registered with
the peering network - or their packets won't transverse the port through
the switches to your port.

So the extra CPU load of MD5, in my opinon, is a waste on an peering edge
router with many peers. With lots of peers on a router - all the timing
and table building after a needed maintenance reboot could lead to table
building slowness and establishment timing sluggishness issues (depending
on the router of course).

If a peering network doesn't lock most all participants (and any router
servers they have) by the MAC of the peering device I won't be a
participant.

All that said - I know of a way a customer of a network can create havoc
by using a device/router that allows the MAC to be modified like a
variable. However, for the most part that havoc would be limited to that
network that hacking customer is located on. This would also be a truly
rare event as there needs to be something the network also allowed for the
customer to get routable layer 2 access to the peering port.

Bob Evans
CTO




> MD5 on BGP Considered Harmful
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
> Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos.
>
>
>> On Sep 29, 2017, at 13:41, craig washington
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via
>> BGP at public exchange locations.
>>
>> Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in
>> Atlanta, do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP
>> session?
>>
>> Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
>

Re: Peering at public exchange authentication

[Job Snijders]

Hi Craig,

It may be simplest to use GTSM https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5082

Kind regards,

Job

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington
 wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at 
> public exchange locations.
>
> Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do 
> you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
>
> Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
>

Weekly Routing Table Report

[Routing Analysis Role Account]

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.

The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.

Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net

For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net.

If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith .

Routing Table Report   04:00 +10GMT Sat 30 Sep, 2017

Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net
Detailed Analysis:  http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/

Analysis Summary


BGP routing table entries examined:  664412
Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS):  258107
Deaggregation factor:  2.57
Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets):  320310
Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 58459
Prefixes per ASN: 11.37
Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   50491
Origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   22271
Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:7968
Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:230
Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table:   4.3
Max AS path length visible:  55
Max AS path prepend of ASN ( 55644)  51
Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table:91
Number of instances of unregistered ASNs:91
Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:  20109
Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   15925
Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:   65301
Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:20
Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table:0
Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space:359
Number of addresses announced to Internet:   2851720800
Equivalent to 169 /8s, 249 /16s and 206 /24s
Percentage of available address space announced:   77.0
Percentage of allocated address space announced:   77.0
Percentage of available address space allocated:  100.0
Percentage of address space in use by end-sites:   98.7
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  219606

APNIC Region Analysis Summary
-

Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes:   183498
Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation:   52398
APNIC Deaggregation factor:3.50
Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks:  182418
Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks:74771
APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:8348
APNIC Prefixes per ASN:   21.85
APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix:   2300
APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:   1198
Average APNIC Region AS path length visible:4.4
Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 55
Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table:   3207
Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet:  765499872
Equivalent to 45 /8s, 160 /16s and 153 /24s
APNIC AS Blocks4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431
(pre-ERX allocations)  23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319,
   58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-137529
APNIC Address Blocks 1/8,  14/8,  27/8,  36/8,  39/8,  42/8,  43/8,
49/8,  58/8,  59/8,  60/8,  61/8, 101/8, 103/8,
   106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8,
   116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8,
   123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8,
   163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8,
   203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8,
   222/8, 223/8,

ARIN Region Analysis Summary


Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes:199474
Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation:95708
ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.08
Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks:   201183
Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 93502
ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table:17897
ARIN Prefixes per ASN:   

Re: Peering at public exchange authentication

[Patrick W. Gilmore]

MD5 on BGP Considered Harmful

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

Composed on a virtual keyboard, please forgive typos. 


> On Sep 29, 2017, at 13:41, craig washington  
> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> 
> Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at 
> public exchange locations.
> 
> Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do 
> you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?
> 
> Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?

Peering at public exchange authentication

[craig washington]

Hello all,


Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at 
public exchange locations.

Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do 
you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session?

Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?

Re: Hurricane Maria: Summary of communication status - and lack of

[Sean Donelan]

Career federal employees are taught to write situation reports in very 
boring language with just the facts known. Nevertheless, after 
reading lots of situation reports, you start to notice when the 
bubureaucratic language changes. Perhaps the most famous was the 
commander of Apollo 13's report "Houston, We have a problem."


Puerto Rico has announced a new web site with current status:

http://status.pr/


However, in the last 24 hours I've noticed some agency situation reports 
used different statistics to report "happy, happy, joy, joy" stuff. In the 
bureaucratic world, this is very concerning, such as when the Veterans 
Administration was misreporting appointment waiting times to look better.


You can't fix problems, if the real situation isn't being reported 
accurately to senior leadership even if its bad news.

Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?

[Larry LaBas]

If one uses Caltrain and has luggage there is a luggage car with racks.  

Also no wifi on Caltrain but wifi is available on Bart and the VTA (light rail 
and express buses).  The car with the assistance ramp has a washroom, the rest 
do not.

As a long time commuter (Gilroy to SF) I do recommend Bart to Caltrain to Light 
Rail as it will be cheaper than Uber.  When I last returned from London we took 
that route.  It's also very reliable and usually on schedule.

Yes, I'm a bit jaded on driving in traffic in the area as I've also been doing 
that for many years.

I've found Citymapper the best app for directions and public transport.  Not 
only was it great here but was fantastic for using the tube in London and 
walking  around.  You can call uber or get driving directions from it also.

TTFN,
Larry

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 07:20, Alastair Johnson  wrote:
> 
> I live in the next block along from the Fairmont. For people who want to use 
> CalTrain then there is the Downtown Area Shuttle (DASH) that runs from 
> Diridon around the downtown area and will pass by the Fairmont on San 
> Fernando St. The shuttle is timed to connect with CalTrain in both directions 
> and is free, so it's probably the most convenient. 
> 
> That said... I would just take Lyft/Uber. SFO to downtown SJC via public 
> transport is annoying. I try to fly in/out of SJC as much as possible.
> 
> AJ  
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Owen DeLong  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 29, 2017, at 1:07 AM, Julien Goodwin  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
 Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
 shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
 your way south.
>>> 
>>> I'm arriving on Sunday morning, so have plenty of time, and will take
>>> Caltrain down (BART to Millbrae, then Caltrain), sure it'll take 2h, but
>>> any van service wouldn't be much faster.
>>> 
>>> During the week, or out of daylight hours it's a much less sensible idea.
>>> 
>> 
>> I disagree… I’ve done it during the week and it’s not that bad.
>> 
>> I find Lyft to be the most desirable option (About $65), with Uber as
>> a second choice.
>> 
>> Third choice would be BaRT/CalTrain (to Diridon) followed by either a very
>> short Lyft ride or VTA bus or light rail.
>> 
>> Another option (if you get on the right CalTrain) is Tamien station and
>> connection to light rail there.
>> 
>> Light rail gets you _VERY_ close to the Fairmont. The Fairmont has entrances
>> on Market St. (Front Door direct to Lobby) and First St. (Back door, hallway
>> to lobby). The VTA light rail northbound is on First St.
>> 
>> I’m not 100% sure of the light rail routing from the Diridon station to 
>> downtown
>> as it’s tied to the Almaden line and I’m usually dealing with the Santa 
>> Teresa
>> line.
>> 
>> I, myself intend to bicycle to the meeting as my home is only about 7 miles 
>> away.
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
> 

Re: isp/cdn caching

[Marco Slater]

Do they publicly have any more info on this?

I thought CloudFlare didn’t consider doing that because of their vast coverage 
and peering arrangements provided by their PoPs.

Regards,
Marco Slater

> On 29 Sep 2017, at 14:38,  
>  wrote:
> 
> I think that Cloudflare has a caching solution, but I think they have strict 
> requirements towards the isp in order to install them on their premises.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Michalis Bersimis
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:25 PM
> To: Nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: isp/cdn caching
> 
> Hi, I've been aware of a few caching providers for a few years now, but I'm 
> learning of others as time goes on. which makes me curious if there are more 
> springing up and gaining popularity.  I'm speaking of ISP-type caching 
> whereas the cache provider sends hardware servers and perhaps a switch to the 
> local ISP to install locally in their network.  Can someone please send a 
> simple list of what they know is the current players in this ISP Caching 
> space?  I'll list the ones I know about and you please let me know of others. 
>  This seems to be an evolving/growing thing and I'm curious of where we are 
> today for significant providers and possibly up-and-coming ones that I should 
> know about.  (amazon prime has my wondering also.)
> 
> 
> 
> Google (GGC)
> 
> Netflix (OCA)
> 
> Akamai (AANP)
> 
> Facebook (FNA)
> 
> Apple (I heard this isn't isp-located like the others, but unsure)
> 
> ? others ?
> 
> ? others ?
> 
> ? others ?
> 
> 
> 
> -Aaron Gould
> 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?

[Alastair Johnson]

I live in the next block along from the Fairmont. For people who want to use 
CalTrain then there is the Downtown Area Shuttle (DASH) that runs from Diridon 
around the downtown area and will pass by the Fairmont on San Fernando St. The 
shuttle is timed to connect with CalTrain in both directions and is free, so 
it's probably the most convenient. 

That said... I would just take Lyft/Uber. SFO to downtown SJC via public 
transport is annoying. I try to fly in/out of SJC as much as possible.

AJ  

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Owen DeLong  wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Sep 29, 2017, at 1:07 AM, Julien Goodwin  wrote:
>> 
>> On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
>>> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
>>> shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
>>> your way south.
>> 
>> I'm arriving on Sunday morning, so have plenty of time, and will take
>> Caltrain down (BART to Millbrae, then Caltrain), sure it'll take 2h, but
>> any van service wouldn't be much faster.
>> 
>> During the week, or out of daylight hours it's a much less sensible idea.
>> 
> 
> I disagree… I’ve done it during the week and it’s not that bad.
> 
> I find Lyft to be the most desirable option (About $65), with Uber as
> a second choice.
> 
> Third choice would be BaRT/CalTrain (to Diridon) followed by either a very
> short Lyft ride or VTA bus or light rail.
> 
> Another option (if you get on the right CalTrain) is Tamien station and
> connection to light rail there.
> 
> Light rail gets you _VERY_ close to the Fairmont. The Fairmont has entrances
> on Market St. (Front Door direct to Lobby) and First St. (Back door, hallway
> to lobby). The VTA light rail northbound is on First St.
> 
> I’m not 100% sure of the light rail routing from the Diridon station to 
> downtown
> as it’s tied to the Almaden line and I’m usually dealing with the Santa Teresa
> line.
> 
> I, myself intend to bicycle to the meeting as my home is only about 7 miles 
> away.
> 
> Owen
> 

Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?

[Owen DeLong]

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 1:07 AM, Julien Goodwin  wrote:
> 
> On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
>> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
>> shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
>> your way south.
> 
> I'm arriving on Sunday morning, so have plenty of time, and will take
> Caltrain down (BART to Millbrae, then Caltrain), sure it'll take 2h, but
> any van service wouldn't be much faster.
> 
> During the week, or out of daylight hours it's a much less sensible idea.
> 

I disagree… I’ve done it during the week and it’s not that bad.

I find Lyft to be the most desirable option (About $65), with Uber as
a second choice.

Third choice would be BaRT/CalTrain (to Diridon) followed by either a very
short Lyft ride or VTA bus or light rail.

Another option (if you get on the right CalTrain) is Tamien station and
connection to light rail there.

Light rail gets you _VERY_ close to the Fairmont. The Fairmont has entrances
on Market St. (Front Door direct to Lobby) and First St. (Back door, hallway
to lobby). The VTA light rail northbound is on First St.

I’m not 100% sure of the light rail routing from the Diridon station to downtown
as it’s tied to the Almaden line and I’m usually dealing with the Santa Teresa
line.

I, myself intend to bicycle to the meeting as my home is only about 7 miles 
away.

Owen

RE: isp/cdn caching

[michalis.bersimis]

I think that Cloudflare has a caching solution, but I think they have strict 
requirements towards the isp in order to install them on their premises.

Best Regards,

Michalis Bersimis

-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:25 PM
To: Nanog@nanog.org
Subject: isp/cdn caching

Hi, I've been aware of a few caching providers for a few years now, but I'm 
learning of others as time goes on. which makes me curious if there are more 
springing up and gaining popularity.  I'm speaking of ISP-type caching whereas 
the cache provider sends hardware servers and perhaps a switch to the local ISP 
to install locally in their network.  Can someone please send a simple list of 
what they know is the current players in this ISP Caching space?  I'll list the 
ones I know about and you please let me know of others.  This seems to be an 
evolving/growing thing and I'm curious of where we are today for significant 
providers and possibly up-and-coming ones that I should know about.  (amazon 
prime has my wondering also.)

 

Google (GGC)

Netflix (OCA)

Akamai (AANP)

Facebook (FNA)

Apple (I heard this isn't isp-located like the others, but unsure)

? others ?

? others ?

? others ?

 

-Aaron Gould

Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?

[i mawsog via NANOG]

Google SFO SJC 

  From: Julien Goodwin 
 To: nanog@nanog.org 
 Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 11:09 PM
 Subject: Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?
   
On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
> shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
> your way south.

I'm arriving on Sunday morning, so have plenty of time, and will take
Caltrain down (BART to Millbrae, then Caltrain), sure it'll take 2h, but
any van service wouldn't be much faster.

During the week, or out of daylight hours it's a much less sensible idea.


   

Re: Best way to San Jose Fairmont from SFO?

[Julien Goodwin]

On 29/09/17 06:47, Bob Evans wrote:
> Train and Bus travel is not worth considering. However, there are airport
> shuttle van services like supershuttle 4-5 passengers being dropped off on
> your way south.

I'm arriving on Sunday morning, so have plenty of time, and will take
Caltrain down (BART to Millbrae, then Caltrain), sure it'll take 2h, but
any van service wouldn't be much faster.

During the week, or out of daylight hours it's a much less sensible idea.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature